![]() |
Registreren kan je hier. Problemen met registreren of reageren op de berichten? Een verloren wachtwoord? Gelieve een mail te zenden naar [email protected] met vermelding van je gebruikersnaam. |
|
Registreer | FAQ | Forumreglement | Ledenlijst |
soc.culture.belgium Via dit forum kun je alle berichten lezen die worden gepost op de nieuwsgroep soc.culture.belgium. Je kunt hier ook reageren op deze berichten, reacties worden dan ook in deze nieuwsgroep gepost. Vergeet niet om dit te lezen. |
|
Discussietools |
![]() |
#1 |
Berichten: n/a
|
![]() Depuis la disparition du socialisme, la gauche progressiste s'est rabattue sur la culture pour poursuivre le combat "anti-impérialiste". Chaque année, les Nobel confirment la tendance : l'économie aux libéraux, la littérature et la paix aux belles âmes orphelines de la Gauche, quitte �* récompenser des nullités littéraire (Dario Fo...) ou politique (Carter...). Pinter, qui admire les dictateurs Fidel Castro et Slobodan Milosevic, Pinter lui-même n'est pas dupe, et soupçonne que c'est son anti-américanisme ("mass murderers", "new Nazis"...), sa nostalgie du Labour marxiste (Anthony Blair ? "a deluded idiot", "Blair is a war criminal and a murderer. He is living a deluded life. While he's smiling and grinning at everybody, he's responsible at the same time for the murder of thousands of civilians. He has their blood on his hands") et aux libérations de l'Afghanistan (contre les Talibans) et de l'Iraq (contre Saddam Hussein) qui ont motivé la décision du comité Nobel : "I suspected that they must have taken my political activities into consideration. Since my political engagement is very much part of my work. It's interwoven into many of my plays." (The Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/news/...592153,00.html) Faisons mieux connaissance avec ce M. Harold Pinter, le prix Nobel de littérature 2005. Relisons donc Mark Steyn, le célèbre éditoraliste des journaux britanniques The Spectator et The Daily Telegraph. --- (*) Mark Steyn, Pinteresque & Pooteresque, http://www.steynonline.com/pageprint.cfm?edit_id=69 * (Harold Pinter has won the Nobel Prize for Literature, an oddly timed award for someone whose literary endeavors have played a back seat to his political ones for many years. Below I consider various aspects of his theatrical work, from which I believe he's now formally retired. Instead, he writes poetry, after a fashion - mostly war poems. One of them I discussed in this 1999 column from The National Post at the time of the Kosovo war. See how Nobel-like it sounds to your ears:) On the letters page of The Guardian, Britain's most distinguished playwright, Harold Pinter, denounced U.S. foreign policy as "Kiss my arse or I'll kick your head in." After three further references to arse-kicking, he concluded: "The U.S. is now a highly dangerous force, totally out of control". The great American mouth-organist-that's Larry Adler, not Monica-wrote back to protest this slur on his country: U.S. foreign policy is, of course, "Kiss my ass or I'll kick your head in." But that's just the sort of Yankee cultural imperialism Harold's been railing against all his life: an "ass" is some ghastly Disneyfied airbrushed depilated silicone-pumped pert DiCaprionic thing bobbing along the beach on "Baywatch", quite different from the good old sagging, pasty, pimply British arse. Actually, now I think about it, Pinter does not entirely eschew American posterior vernacular. Eight years ago, he wrote a poem to "celebrate" the U.S. victory in the Gulf: Hallelujah! It works. We blew the shit right out of them We blew the shit right back up their own ass And out their fucking ears. It works. You have to sympathize with Harold. In the darkest day of the Thatcher junta, he and his lovely wife, Lady Antonia Fraser, ran the 20th June Group, a dissident salon whose membership included Salman Rushdie and which met at the Pinters' home in Holland Park: Among those who turned up to take tea with the men of letters and the socialist earl's daughter was Nicaraguan pin-up boy Daniel Ortega, in his best-pressed Sandinista fatigues. "We are going to meet again and again," declared Pinter, "until they break the windows and drag us out." But, instead of breaking the windows, those ruthless Tory thugs just fell around giggling. It must have come as a shock, after the '97 liberation, to discover that Mr Blair was even more into Yank arse-kissing than Thatcher. Worse than that, since this war started, the new prime minister keeps calling the Iron Lady for advice on, among other things, how to stop Bill Clinton wimping out. No sooner has poor old Pinter finally got Maggie, Maggie, Maggie out, out, out than Tony, Tony, Tony keeps inviting her back, back, back. (The National Post, April 29th 1999) --- * (I don't think anyone will be paying any attention to Pinter's poetry a century from now. I've written about his stage work several times over the years. This piece is from The New Criterion in 1996:) Harold Pinter likes to tell a story against himself. A year or two back, he was flying to Miami, and, as a ferocious scourge of the United States government, expected trouble at immigration. "But I was ready for them, I was ready for them," he says. He handed over his British passport and the immigration officer examined it intently. "Pinter," he said, slowly, and paused. "Would that be the dramatist Pinter?" "Yes!" snapped Pinter, aggressively, preparing to launch into a diatribe on how outrageous it was that a country that claimed to be a democracy should attempt to impede his passage. "Well, welcome to the United States, Mr. Pinter," said the officer, cheerily. "Enjoy your stay." The most striking thing about the anecdote is how un-"Pinteresque" the exchange is-save, of course, for the pause, and even that, at least as Pinter tells the story, falls somewhat short. Over the years, he must have had many similarly pleasing encoun ters in America-in cabs, in restaurants, at check-in counters-and yet none of them has caused him to revise his opinion of the Great Satan: the best you could get from him during the Cold War was a surly assertion that there was an equivalence of evil between America and the Soviet Union. It's not that you'd expect a genial immigration officer to cause Pinter to alter his view of U.S. foreign policy, but you're surprised that he doesn't take it into account: if America is an Evil Empire, then surely there is drama to be made in the contrast between its outwardly perky, wholesome, have-a-nice-day appearance and its dark soul. Instead, in his new play Ashes to Ashes (a Royal Court production at the Ambassadors' Theatre in London), we are in familiar territory: a land of murky, nameless horrors, whose language is explicitly brutal in character yet determinedly elusive in meaning. It is a duologue: Lindsay Duncan plays Rebecca, a terrorized woman; Stephen Rea is Devlin, the man who does the terrorizing, both of her, sexually, and of her country, politically. "I can sum up none of my plays," Pinter has said. "I can describe none of them, except to say: That is what happened. That is what they said. That is what they did." His recent work has perfected the abstraction of violence. In traditional forms, when someone says, "I was seized by a nameless dread!" it usually transpires there's a vampire outside the window or the wicked Sir Jasper is riding across the heath. But, in Pinter, the dread stays nameless. For Stephen Rea, this presents certain difficulties. He has played explicit terrorizers, most famously in The Crying Game, as the IRA man who throws up on discovering his girlfriend has a penis-a scene subsequently parodied by both Leslie (Naked Gun) Nielsen and Jim (Ace Ventura) Carrey. But, in Pinter's nebula of non-specifics, his charm has nothing to play against, and you feel you're watching a man who doesn't quite believe in his character, or, indeed, isn't too sure whether there's a character at all. The dialogue chugs along like a slow-motion Abbot and Costello cross-talk routine-"Who's on first?" but without the ruthless, propulsive logic: "When?" "Now." "No?" "Really?" "Why not?" "Who by?" "By me." "You?" etc. Pinter suffered from writer's block for much of the Eighties, and he seems to be recovering ten minutes at a time: some plays are short enough to be performed without an intermission; Pinter's comeback piece, Mountain Language, can be played within an intermission-it lasts about 17 minutes. By contrast, Ashes to Ashes is the equivalent of a Robert Wilson: it lasts an hour. I'm glad Pinter's pen is beginning to stretch itself again, but I wonder if there isn't a very basic reason for his difficulties: at heart he knows that people are not like this, and, after forty years, it requires increasing effort to act as if they are. In the wake of Ashes to Ashes , there was a flurry of comment in the British media about the word "Pinteresque": he is the only modem dramatist to have passed adjectivally into general currency. The official line can be summarized by Carole Woddis, former theater editor at the "radical" magazine City Limits, and Trevor R. Griffiths, Chair of the Department of Language and Literature at the Polytechnic of North London, in their Bloomsbury Theatre Guide: "'Pinteresque' has come to mean the dialogue of evasion." Grifliths, as a Chair of Language, must be aware that that definition is itself an evasion. To most people, "Pinteresque" means a pause followed by a non sequitur. Down at the pub, when they're discussing, say, the popular footballer Gazza and there's a slight lull and then someone says absentmindedly, "I've always fancied the Greek Islands meself," they knowingly nudge each other and say, "Oh, very Pinteresque." A couple of commentators have suggested recently that, in fact, "Pinteresque" is virtually indistinguishable from "Pooteresque"- an adjective deriving from the hero of The Diary of a Nobody and its assemblage of random lower-middle-class suburban banalities. But what's interesting is that, out in the real world, "Pinteresque" has nothing to do with evasion or menace, but is strictly a novelty turn, applied only to those weird disjunctions when normal human communication breaks down. Indeed, even theater folk use it in this sense. I once went to a conference of American producers at which, during the introductions, a lady from the San Diego Civic Light Opera stood up and proudly declared that, being a mile from the airport, they were the only theater with a plane spotter on staff. "When one's approaching, the amber light goes on. On the red, the performers freeze until the spotter gives them the green. Each freeze lasts about eight seconds, and on average there's 29 planes during each show." A fellow producer called out, "You should do Pinter plays. Then no one would notice." It is when Pinter applies himself to something specific that you begin to find yourself pining for the dialogue of evasion, the fraudulence of memory, and all the rest. Last October, I discussed the London production of Ronald Harwood's Taking Sides, directed by Pinter, and starring Daniel Massey as Wilhelm Furtwängler, the great conductor who chose to stay in Berlin during the war with his beloved orchestra. Pinter had cast, as the American major called upon to interrogate Furtwängler under the de-Nazification process, the British actor Michael Pennington, and what emerged knocked the play off balance: While Harwood's text declined to take sides, Pinter's staging did: Pennington's character was a coarse philistine cartoon, whose dramatic purpose seemed to be less to nail Furtwängler than to foreshadow the world's descent into the vulgarity of American cultural pre-eminence. The play has now come to Broadway (at the Brooks Atkinson), with Pinter replaced as director by David Jones, and Ed Harris taking the role of the major. Jones's production restores the balance: Harris is slier, warmer, more human: he and his director do not patronize the character. He is still coarse and philistine, a man whose cultural boundaries are defined by Bob Hope and Betty Grable, whose interest in music extends no further than a bandleader he saw in New Jersey called Dix Dixon. But, shorn of Pinter, the play's evenhandedness comes through: yes, he spews obscenities, but you're more aware now that he's the only one who's actually seen the concentration camps; similarly, his young American assistant is the only one who had relatives in the camps. As I walked up the aisle after an early preview, one guy said, "T'hat Furtwängler-he sure comes over as an asshole"; another theatergoer said, "I think the play's rather hard on Furtwängler." There's a lesson in all of this, especially for so-called "political" theater. lago is the greatest villain in all drama, but productions of Othello work better the more charming and beguiling the actor playing him is. If he's transparently evil, where's the drama? Unfortunately, most political theater in New York at the moment takes the same approach as Pinter and Pennington to that American major: they patronize their characters, and thereby their audience. Thus, your average abortion drama promotes the line that a woman has "a right to choose," but a theatergoer does not: a theatergoer cannot be expected to absorb fully delineated characters of opposing views and to thread his way through the ambiguities in between. The result, alas, is that most political theater may be good politics but it's almost always bad theater. (The New Criterion , November 1996) --- * (Finally, a couple of satirical jabs at the great man. This one's from just before the Iraq war when Pinter had written "The Pong Of The Dead" only to find that every other two-bit versifier in town was also chipping in with the anti-Bush jingles. I wondered why they didn't all get together for a big Live Aid poetic supergroup single:) How many poets does it take to stop a war? All of them! In the wake of Harold Pinter's new poem "The Pong Of The Dead", his latest savage indictment of American imperialism, you may be having difficulty keeping up with all the savage indictments of American imperialism that seem to be around these days. Well, now you don't have to. This week, I went down to London's world-renowned Abbey Road studios to sit in on a recording session for the savage indictment of American imperialism to end them all. Yes, Harold, Andrew Motion, Tom Paulin and dozens of other superstar poets have teamed up to record Harold's all-time great savage indictment charity single, "Bomb The World (Let Them Know It's Killing Time)". Stanza To Reason, as the group calls itself, marks the first time Britain's top versifiers have worked together, as I could tell by the lines of stretch limos backed up to Primrose Hill, all filled with A-list poets and their entourages. "Minor poets to the back!" yelled Harold, instantly taking charge of the session. "That doesn't include you, Andrew," he sniggered, as the Poet Laureate crossed the floor. "I was just getting a coffee," muttered Andrew. "But it does include you, Tom, chum," said Harold. A reluctant Tom Paulin squeezed into the back row between a couple of poets-in-residence from Welsh prisons. "Typical," he grumbled. "I'm in Jenin, and Harold's up front playing Ariel Sharon." But I have to say Harold was impressive. He bellowed out the first verse - "It's bombing time/ There's no need to be afraid" - and then went on to reveal a subtle, more reflective Pinter than we're used to: And your head'll soon be smashed in And your eyeballs poked out, chum 'Cuz the Yanks are on their way. ".To kick some, er, bum," said Andrew Motion on cue. "Marvellous grasp of the American vernacular, Harold." "OK, and then we cut to Alfred." He scanned the room. "Alfred? You're still doing the searing couplet about the Iraqi womenfolk struggling home after getting raped by the Yank bastards?" "Sure," said Lord Tennyson. " 'Come into the garden mauled/ For the B15 has flown'." "Lovely," said Harold. "See how it's done, Andrew? Then the girls come in." And, to my amazement, Elizabeth Barrett Browning, Lady Mary Wortley Montagu and Pam Ayres lit up the room with their background vocals on the "Bomb The World" chorus. Afterwards, Harold beckoned yet another top celebrity rhymester forward. "I wandered lonely as a cloud," began William Wordsworth. "A mushroom cloud?" said Harold. "No wonder you're lonely, chum. Bloody Rumsfeld." "No," said William. "Just an ordinary cloud, that floats on high o'er vales and hills." "I don't get you," said Harold. "Well, all at once I see a crowd ." "Of dead human shields from Scandinavia and the Low Countries?" ". A host of golden daffodils." "A host of golden daffodils?" scoffed Harold. "You mean, Alan Titchmarsh with Flowerwatch Update? Bit bloody fey, isn't it?" "Well," said William, shuffling his papers, "it's just that oft, when on my couch I lie in vacant or in pensive mood..." "Ever heard of writing to the brief, chum?" roared Harold, and tore the old boy's manuscript in shreds. He turned a deep red and wandered lonely off to the gents. There was a palpable tension in the room, but fortunately Rudyard stepped forward. "If," he started, "you can keep your head when all about you/ Are losing theirs. . ." "Yes?" said Harold. "Er, it's only because the Americans haven't blown it off yet. Whoops, there it goes! Biff! Off in a jiff!" Harold's good humour seemed to be restored and he and Andrew duetted merrily through the bridge: "There's a world outside your window," rasped Andrew. "And it's a world of dread, old chum," growled Harold. "Where your arse just won't stop leaking..." "From depleted uranium." "Whoa, yeah, tonight thank America's God it's them, not you! Take, it Will!" The gritty voice of the West Midlands working-class Will Shakespeare leapt in with a bitterly mocking sonnet contrasting the shallowness of Texan culture with Iraq's deep roots as the birthplace of civilisation, "Shall I compare thee to old Sumer's day?" By now the poetic groove was really cooking. Harold and Andrew were just riffing on the whole vibe. "Whoa, the oil is very viscous," wailed Andrew. "Yeah, our politics is Robert Fiskous," Harold responded. You could feel the electric buzz. And then the familiar voice of Lewis Carroll came booming in: Beware the Jacchirac, my son! The jaw-jaw with the slithy catch Beware the mimsy Blix and shun The Princely Bandar, natch. There was an embarrassed silence. "Well," said Lewis. "I think I'll just go to the dressing-room and photograph some of the younger groupies before Scott Ritter gets to them." It took Philip Larkin to get us back on track: They f--- you up George Bush and dad. (The Daily Telegraph, January 25th 2003) --- * (At Christmas 2002, an Anglican vicar was reported to have terrified the children in his congregation by revealing that Rudolph and the other reindeer weren't real and, if they were, they'd be dead for various reasons. Around that time, Harold Pinter wrote an hilariously fevered piece for the Telegraph called The American administration is a bloodthirsty wild animal (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m.../11/do1101.xml) and somehow in my mind the poet and the vicar got conflated into the Reverend Harold Pinter:) Youngsters at a Christmas carol service were devastated this week after the vicar told them Santa Claus was dead and his reindeer had been vaporised shortly after take-off. Preaching at the church of St George of the Galloways, the Reverend Harold Pinter informed his young flock that the real Santa had been assassinated on Christmas Eve 1977 by the Shah's secret police, using Washington-supplied cruise missiles and that the present "Santa" was a CIA stooge with an obvious false beard. Children as young as two covered their ears and ran screaming from the church as the vicar explained at length how the "holidays" were now just a front for US foreign policy. "George W Bush says he's dreaming of a white Christmas," sneered Mr Pinter. "But for the rest of us it's a nightmare. I wake up feeling like a man trapped in a snowy knick-knack with his face pressed up against the glass howling, 'Let me out of here', only to be buried under another ton of artificial flakes." While parents glanced nervously at each other, the vicar continued with his homily. " 'If you are not with us, you're against us,' declares Bush. He says he's making a list, checking it twice, gonna find out who's naughty or nice. Quite right. Look in the mirror, chum. Which side of the list do you belong on? It's George Bush in all his festive hysterical ignorance who loads up his weapons of mass distraction and insists on dropping them down every chimney in the world. Come on, it's lovely weather for a slay ride together with you, chum." Although many toddlers had to be escorted from the church, older boys and girls shrugged off the vicar's horrific catalogue of seasonal gore. "He does this sermon every Christmas," said Cameron, the eight-year-old son of television favourite Ulrika Jonsson. "And most months in between, too. The best bit is when he describes how the Easter Bunny had his throat cut on the orders of Don Rumsfeld in 1983 and that he's now just Ferdinand Marcos in a protective rabbit suit." "You know Dasher and Dancer and Prancer and Vixen?" Mr Pinter asked rhetorically. "Forgotten. No longer referred to. Millions of dead reindeer slaughtered, their blood streaking the ice all around Santa's Workshop. Never mentioned. Millions of elves born without genitals. But you never hear about them. "Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer had a very shiny nose," he continued, "and, if you ever saw it, you would even say it glows. You know why that is? Depleted uranium. Oh, yes, don't worry, he can still guide your sleigh tonight. It's not hard to follow a reindeer whose rectum is leaking radioactive blood across the sky, is it?" "I think I'll just pop out for a cup of tea in the church hall," said Ulrika, squeezing along the pew. "See if the trauma counsellors have arrived yet." "But people don't forget," roared Mr Pinter. "The seven Iraqi children not yet killed by America and Britain jumping up and down in the street shouting, 'Death to the Great Santa', they don't forget. They don't forget the torture and mutilation of the Tooth Fairy. When they wake up one morning and find Frosty the Snowman standing in the front garden, they know it's Dick Cheney, watching them. Things like that don't just happen in Holland Park." A faraway look came into Mr Pinter's eyes. "Santa Nista. Now there was a Santa. The people's Santa. He came to tea at the vicarage with Antonia and me. He wore military fatigues, not blood-soaked red so your big saggy American arse looks like the world's most genetically modified tomato." Then, in a passage that stunned even hardened primary schoolchildren, the vicar savaged the man he called "Washington's lickspittle", Bob the Builder. "Can you fix it?" he cried. "Better believe they've fixed it, chum. Everybody's talking about a poison gas attack on the Underground, but nobody mentions Scoop and Bob have been digging up the road in front of Mrs Potts's. If there is a gas attack, millions of you children will die agonising deaths. Ho-ho-bloody-ho. Needless to say, Bob the Builder does not travel on the Underground himself. Oh, no, he's up on top riding around with Wendy in Muck the Bulldozer, like Ariel Sharon about to level Jenin." At that point, Mr Pinter gave his traditional performance of "Silent Night", in which he stands perfectly still with an enigmatic look for three minutes while from the wings come faraway shrieks of political prisoners being tortured. Afterwards, the vicar agreed he'd made a catastrophic error of judgment. "I didn't realise there were so many young children present," he said. "Otherwise I'd have launched a blistering attack on the Teletubbies. The one with the aerial is a Pentagon mole. And why are they wearing decontamination suits?" Just then, his lovely wife, Antonia, arrived to say that The Daily Telegraph had rung and that they'd like to reprint his sermon. "That Right-wing Condi Rice fishwrap?" he scoffed. "If I appear in there, people will just write it off as a pathetic CIA psy-ops dirty trick to discredit the anti-Bush movement by making it look ridiculous. You don't think I'm that gullible, do you?" (The Daily Telegraph, December 14th 2002) (suivi �* : fr.soc.politique) |