Politics.be Registreren kan je hier.
Problemen met registreren of reageren op de berichten?
Een verloren wachtwoord?
Gelieve een mail te zenden naar [email protected] met vermelding van je gebruikersnaam.

Ga terug   Politics.be > Diverse > Archief > Usenet > soc.culture.belgium
Registreer FAQForumreglement Ledenlijst

soc.culture.belgium Via dit forum kun je alle berichten lezen die worden gepost op de nieuwsgroep soc.culture.belgium. Je kunt hier ook reageren op deze berichten, reacties worden dan ook in deze nieuwsgroep gepost. Vergeet niet om dit te lezen.

 
 
Discussietools
Oud 30 september 2006, 10:35   #1
Erickassonfire
 
Berichten: n/a
Standaard NORWEGIAN PAEDOPHILE BAUER STOP TERRORISING

Colombo, 08 September, (Asiantribune.com): Two leading Sri Lankan
lawyers - S. L. Gunasekera and Gomin Dayasri - have ripped into Jon
Hanssen Bauer, the Norwegian Special Envoy who replaced the failed Erik
Solheim, for refusing to categorize the Tamil Tigers as terrorists when
the overwhelming evidence has led to a global banning.Jon Hanssen Bauer
shredded to pieces
"Is Bauer a facilitator from a civilized nation or an agent for
international terrorism?" they ask.

Jon Hanssen Bauer told the "World Today" on NRK P2 Radio on 30th
August:

"That does not agree with the politics the government is conducting,
they wish to brand the LTTE as terrorists and isolate them
internationally and this is where we differ from the pattern they wish
to create".

Challenging this statement the two lawyers argue:

"The question whether the LTTE is a terrorist organization or not is
neither a question of "politics" nor of subjective preference but
rather an objective question of fact to be determined on the evidence.
So many countries, after much deliberation and careful consideration,
belatedly recognized the LTTE as a terrorist organization. If so, why
are the Norwegians reluctant to recognize the fact and call a spade a
spade?

"This is the weakness of the Norwegian facilitator- intentionally and
deliberately failing to evaluate the correct status of the LTTE and the
existing situation in Sri Lanka. If they, like the rest of the world,
had opened their eyes to the facts rather than following the ridiculous
practice for which the ostrich is famed, and recognized the LTTE for
what it indisputably is, namely, a terrorist outfit, they may have made
more progress as a facilitator. They would be functioning from a
realistic platform. Instead their desire to be a launderer to cleanse
the LTTE, makes the Norwegians a failed and a biased facilitator. Not
only are they being deliberately blind and deaf, but figuratively
`dumb' at best or perverse and dishonest at worst.

"By these naïve and irresponsible or perverse and dishonest
utterances, the Norwegians have publicly exposed themselves as
propagandists of, or apologists for the LTTE and left no room for doubt
that they are not, and never have been a balanced, genuine or honest
facilitator.

Were the Norwegians wearing blinkers while the LTTE committed
atrocities in Sri Lanka and indulged collecting funds internationally
to purchase arms?

What steps did the Norwegians take to prevent these heinous crimes
against humanity?

These events took place during the period they were a facilitator. From
the above pronouncement of the Special Envoy Bauer, it appears that
these citizens from the land of the Nobel Prize have kept themselves
occupied campaigning on behalf of the LTTE to prevent them from being
branded as terrorists and from being internationally isolated.

It is common knowledge that the Norwegians strained every nerve, muscle
and fibre in their efforts as emissaries for the LTTE before the EU
countries to save them from being branded as terrorists. It is thus no
wonder that the Norwegians are sulking because they failed miserably in
that foul endeavor.

Is this the role the Norwegians are expected to play as an honest
facilitator? Do the Norwegians fail to see that action is being taken
around the world to prevent and save humanity from the type of horrific
terrorist activity which has become the hallmark of the LTTE ? It is
apparent that in Norway, where the LTTE freely roams and receives
invitations to visit as honored guests, no such illegal action has been
detected. Is it a safe haven for terrorists?

"Terrorist are internationally isolated. No borders are open to them to
further their illegal operations. This is Special Envoy Bauer's
complaint. It is his wistful thinking that the LTTE a determined
terrorist organization, should be internationally accepted to enable
them to roam freely and collect funds for terrorist operations. Is
Bauer a facilitator from a civilized nation or an agent for
international terrorism? Naturally and understandably Bauer, possessed
as he is of a positively perverse and malefic mindset wishes Sri Lanka
to follow suit .The refusal to do so has incurred his wrath. Is it a
reading of the Norwegian policy on terrorism?

 
 



Regels voor berichten
Je mag niet nieuwe discussies starten
Je mag niet reageren op berichten
Je mag niet bijlagen versturen
Je mag niet jouw berichten bewerken

vB-code is Aan
Smileys zijn Uit
[IMG]-code is Uit
HTML-code is Uit
Forumnavigatie


Alle tijden zijn GMT +1. Het is nu 00:17.


Forumsoftware: vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content copyright ©2002 - 2020, Politics.be