![]() |
Registreren kan je hier. Problemen met registreren of reageren op de berichten? Een verloren wachtwoord? Gelieve een mail te zenden naar [email protected] met vermelding van je gebruikersnaam. |
|
Registreer | FAQ | Forumreglement | Ledenlijst |
soc.culture.belgium Via dit forum kun je alle berichten lezen die worden gepost op de nieuwsgroep soc.culture.belgium. Je kunt hier ook reageren op deze berichten, reacties worden dan ook in deze nieuwsgroep gepost. Vergeet niet om dit te lezen. |
|
Discussietools |
![]() |
#1 |
Berichten: n/a
|
![]() Judge deals blow to key parts of Bush anti-terrorist order
By DAN EGGEN Washington Post A Los Angeles federal judge ruled that key portions of a presidential order blocking financial assistance to terrorist groups are unconstitutional, further complicating the Bush administration's attempts to defend its aggressive anti-terrorism tactics in federal courts. U.S. District Judge Audrey Collins, in a ruling released late Monday, found that two provisions of an executive order signed Sept. 23, 2001, are impermissibly vague because they allow the president to unilaterally designate organizations as terrorist groups and broadly prohibit association with them. The ruling marks a victory for the Humanitarian Law Project and other plaintiffs who seek to provide support for the "lawful, nonviolent activities" of two groups designated terrorist organizations by the U.S. government: the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) in Turkey and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), also known as the Tamil Tigers, in Sri Lanka. They argue that federal anti-terrorism laws put charities and individual donors at risk of prosecution for providing benign assistance to foreign groups put on the government's terrorism list. David Cole, a Georgetown University law professor helping represent the plaintiffs, said the executive order and a related federal statute improperly allow Bush to create "blacklists" and engage in "guilt by association." The ruling is the latest legal setback for the administration's terrorism and detention policies, in lower courts and at the Supreme Court. In August, a federal judge in Detroit ruled a warrantless wiretap program run by the National Security Agency was unconstitutional. The government appealed the ruling. Justice officials said it was too early to say if the government will appeal. http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/...s/4365941.html |