(rev 2.0) Christ 'not allowed' by film maker Paul Verhoeven, to do miracles, "because these are 'scientifically' not possible" - {HRI note 20070226-V2.0}

Christ 'not allowed' by film maker Paul Verhoeven, to do miracles -
(Pre-Introduction to Fine Particle Physics)

26 February 2007
{HRI note 20070226-V2.0}

'

"Because these are 'scientifically' not possible," Jesus Christ is
'not allowed,' by film maker Paul Verhoeven, to perform miracles...
*(1)

'

Which "science" is lying "scientifically" nested in his
brain?

Nested - according to a common, colloquial Dutch
expression *(a) - just behind the hairs in his neck,
from which he, Paul Verhoeven is talking? *(1)

'

Obviously (he has) NOT (studied) Fine Particle Physics, *(2) by which
"miracles," and any other "anomalies,"

that are well published nowadays in television documentaries,
*(3)

"miracles and anomalies," that are demonstrated and reported with
undeniable evidence,

BUT THAT ARE distinctly LOATHED BY, that definitely constitute a
hated truth for some, an undeniable truth regarded secretly or
openly with disgust and contempt,

by any - actually, by ALL - "science" magazine editors
or owners, and - actually, ALL - "science" reporters or
"science" journalists or (associated) press "science"
writers,

notorious as these are for keeping others as stupid
as they (the reporters and the "scientists" that
these report from) can get away with unopposed,

simply by their keeping any Rationality and Logic
and Sanity

- and thus any useful, vital data, to OPPOSE
THEIR "scientific" LIES with -

AWAY from their public, a massive "science"
'in-breeding,' you might say, accomplished

by REVERSING the very definition of 'science'
itself,

in order to please and submit to and
elevate and adore Criminal Minds,

keeping any Rationality and Logic and Sanity
away from the public,

because,

(any "miracles") are perfectly understandable, predictable, and very
simply and easily explained (with Fine Particle Physics). *(1)

'

'

'

The actual question is, of course

- for any person of just a minor amount of intellect,

which is nevertheless very far ABOVE the basic instincts
of film maker Paul Verhoeven's "logic" and "rationality,"

as all Criminal Minds like to consider themselves
very "logical" and "rational," above all others
even

- which is of course easy for them, because
they discard, or else, reverse any actual
facts which are "not fitting their 'logic'
and their 'rationality,' their 'science',"

not fitting their PURPOSE, actually -

the question of course, that any RATIONAL and LOGICAL,
and SANE person wants to know the answer to: -

'Why did he - Christ, that is - NOT perform ENOUGH miracles?' Not two
thousand years ago, and also not at other times?

'

'

If you can - which is of greatest relevance, to anyone of good
intent - consider THAT question,

and that means NOT "answering" with 'justifications'
for a lack of miracles performed,

to make something right that obviously is not
right,

NOR does it mean the "explanations" of the Hindu and
Buddhist and New Age philosophies, of immorality and
spiritual death,

of their PRETENDED "morality" and of
their PRETENDED "understanding of life,"
of their PRETENSES about "eternal life,"
*(3)

by which they "explain" (but can NOT REMEDY
and have NEVER remedied, let alone even
understood, not at all to mention DISCOVERED)
the most horrific crimes committed on people,

because, instead of looking and understanding,
they are *(3)

"explaining" the most repulsive and the
most unimaginable crimes,

"explaining" these IN ORDER NOT TO HAVE
TO FACE the nature of actual, existing
Criminal Minds past and present - yes,

being Criminal Minds themselves, they have
the utmost drive and motivation, to deny
the existence of such (Crimes, and of Criminal
Minds) altogether, *(3) but

the question of course, that any RATIONAL and LOGICAL,
SANE *(4) person wants to know the answer to, is 'Why did
he, Christ, NOT perform ENOUGH miracles?' and

if you can consider THAT question, which I am sure you have not
even dared to consider - if you thought of it at all -

THEN you might begin to apply some logic and rationality to the
matter.

'

'

Which (logic and rationality) you can not at all expect from
film maker Paul Verhoeven, or from film maker Steven Spielberg
for that matter, as mentioned elsewhere, because they are
mainly - if not wholly - interested in using the emotions of
life in order to DENY the nature, to deny the physics of life
itself,

to indeed "rivet" (fixate) attention, so you won't look
further or deeper, let alone in the direction where you
SHOULD look and SHOULD feel and SHOULD sense, *(b)

if you would want to get an understanding of life
and of people.

So if they suddenly feel compelled to claim "they know about
life," then it would do well, to be able to understand also
them.

'

'

'

The physics of life, which physics, logically of course, is called

(should you be even vaguely educated about the nature of life
itself, then you will see, that its physics is logically called)

Fine Particle Physics, *(2)

and is providing (giving you and others) Logic and Rationality

- which (Logic and Rationality) is only possible with, and is
therefore -

based on the Trinity of Science, *(5)

consisting of Love, Beauty, Truth.

'

Koos Nolst Trenite 'Cause Trinity'
human rights philosopher and poet

'Solomon's wisdom was greater
than the wisdom of
all the men of the East,
and greater
than all the wisdom of Egypt.'

1 Kings 4:30

________
Textnote:

(a) A common, Dutch colloquial expression suggests, that,

in particular, when they ("scientists" in other words) do
think, that their soul has taken the form of a human body
part called the brain, then (the colloquial expression
indeed says, that)

their source of reasoning lies just behind the hairs of the neck

- from which, by consequence, they talk (and do) all kind
of nonsense, due to their

(in many cases intentional, often even maliciously
enforced)

LACK of connection to generally accessible data and
experience and feeling and memory,

a CONNECTION to life, by which some people even
concluded, that the earth is not flat, actually,
but a ball hanging freely in space

- which of course you would not believe,
would you, as "you have never actually
seen it."

'

Another common, Dutch colloquial expression, now that we are at
it, does assign the lack of Logic and the absence of Rationality
*(4)

- in film maker Paul Verhoeven, in this case, but
equally in his mentioned colleague -

to be (similar to) what a rational and logical, sane person *(4)
would expect to be emanating from that end of a pig, to which
its curly tail is attached.
'

(b) THEIR underlying motive being always, to PRETEND to inform and
appeal to life, PRETENDING to expose or show crimes or hidden
data, or appeal to "relevant" emotions,

because "these having been addressed now" (ONLY THEN) people
will think and believe, that "they have been understood, and
are well-informed or 'enlightened,' and have their emotions
appealed to," and by consequence,

"they 'do not have to' look further, nor to feel deeper," not
beyond what is offered and beyond the emotions shown and being
exited (kindled, stimulated),

a mechanism of "successful" deceit, elaborately described
elsewhere by me, in various contexts and to various depths

- as the attentive and faithful reader is well aware.
'

_________
Footnotes:

(1) Newspaper interview quote:

"Summarizing the contents of his monograph, Mr. Verhoeven said:

'Thesis No. 1 is, that Jesus was a man. That's already a big
thing, as opposed to what Christianity says, that he was the
son of God.'

The book will be based on a close reading of ancient texts,
he said, 'eliminating everything that's not possible, in my
opinion.'

He added: 'It's impossible that Jesus would have multiplied
all this bread, isn't it? And the resurrection.
All these things, that are not possible, are not possible'."

From the interview by Dennis Lim

- published 7 January 2007, in the New York Times

(I won't now quote the lies, the pretense, that Paul Verhoeven
later gave to the journalist, to pacify his audience, into
thinking he, Paul Verhoeven, "is a big fan of Jesus Christ and
of Mozart."
We do believe everything Paul Verhoeven says, of course, even
if he passionately acts (does) the very opposite.)
'

(2) Introduction to Fine Particle Physics, for instance at
http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld
http://www.geocities.com/plato_world

or as listed in various Human Rights Issues.
'

(3) 'Facing Having Been Made Spiritually Blind'
{HRI 20070105-V3.3}
(5 January 2007 - Version 3.3 on 4 Feb 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...749a082023282d
'

(4) 'Definition Of Insane - Relation To Humor'
{HRI 20030205-V2.2.1}
(5 Feb 2003 - Version 2.2.1 on 9 Aug 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.m...3578e53ce9ea97

'Definition Of Sanity'
{HRI 20040410-V1.2}
(10 April 2004 - Version 1.2 on 16 Apr 2004)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.c...a9a92d555dfaa0

'Explaining The Scale Of Sanity'
{HRI 20040619-V3.4}
(19 June 2004 - Version 3.4 on 2 Sept 2004)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.e...e775b1a7d5b10f

' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds As 'Ability To Perceive
Them' '
{HRI 20040422-V2.7}
(22 April 2004 - Version 2.7 on 22 July 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.c...99af659dba8392
'

(5) 'The Trinity Of Science - Truth, Love and Beauty'
{HRI 20030307-pi-1-V2.1}
(7 Mar 2003 - Version 2.1 on 17 Oct 2003)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.c...29fa4f1a67840e
'

____________
Verification:

http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld

Copyright 2007 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher
and poet
This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
anyone who learns from it and (even if he can not learn from it)
who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included,
to others who might be able to learn from it.
None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
or religious or scientific agenda, but only to educate, and to
encourage people to judge un-dominated and for themselves,
about any organizations or individuals.
Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
PlatoWorld at Lycos.com
(address unreadable for Internet robots
- replace ' at ' with the '@' symbol)