De nieuwe wereld orde

[Pindar]

Unseen Photos of Bohemian Grove Found




http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/..._bohemian.html



Nuff Seen!

Pin d'Ar

[Pindar]

Gaan we, nog dieper in de shit!

Move To Label All Civil Disobedience 'Terrorism'



'An endemic crackdown on peaceful protest and dissent has continued with President Bush signing the 'Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act,'. Under the guise of protecting researchers, scientists and their staff who conduct experiments and tests on animals, the latest terror bill seeks to class as "terrorists" those who seek to protest against such activities.'

http://www.infowars.net/articles/dec...egislation.htm


Pin d'Ar

[Pindar]

HENRY KISSINGER ...



... CHILD OF BABYLON

'It is through Kissinger Associates and other sources, like the Bilderberg Group, that he has continued to manipulate events while apparently no longer in government. I say 'apparently' because he has been at the heart of government through the administrations of Bush-Reagan (the right way round), Boy Bush-Cheney and even Bill Clinton, who answers to the same web as the Bush family.


A CIA scientist who was ordered to report to the Oval Office during the father Bush presidency told me of his shock to find Henry Kissinger sitting in the president's chair and conducting the whole meeting while Bush just nodded. This was at a time when Kissinger was supposed to be nothing to do with government.'



Kissinger, Rumsfeld and Nixon: 'Shall I stab him in the back, Don, or would you like the honour?'

Pin d'Ar

[AEvanLoon]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door parcifal

Waarom zou het nodig geweest zijn (vanuit een conspiracist's point of view) om de torens volledig te laten instorten?

Welk motief kan zoiets verklaren?

Verschillende believers hebben hier al op geantwoord, en zullen dat opnieuw doen, dat Bush (of de "NWO "- maar in sommige geesten is dat in bepaalde omstandigheden identiek) een Pearl Harborachtige aanleiding nodig had om Afghanistan en Irak aan te vallen. Als de NWO met dat doel zo'n gigantische en spectaculaire "inside-job" heeft in elkaar gestoken, die duizenden Amerikaans levens heeft gekost in New York èn in de oorlogsgebieden, waarom is het doel van die offers dan compleet mislukt: of geloven de believers nog dat de operaties Irak en Afghanistan als succesverhalen beschouwd kunnen worden?

[Pindar]

Federal government launches marketing campaign for psychiatric industry

Hierboven: Bewijs dat psychiatrische drugs NIET werken!

'Under the guise of combating the stigma of mental illness, the U.S. government will soon begin a massive campaign of psychiatric indoctrination, designed to increase the acceptance of psychiatric chemical imbalance theories and labeling, and to pave the way for national psychiatric screening, driving more Americans into seeking psychiatric drug treatment.'

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publ...cle_1480.shtml


And so on and so forth

Pin d'Ar

[Pindar]

lekker he? die FDA! #$%^%*&^()*)_

FDA approves fluoride in bottled water 'to fight tooth decay' when the connection has long been discredited
'The American Dental Association immediately praised the agency's decision. "Whether you drink fluoridated water from the tap or buy it in a bottle, you're doing the right thing for your oral health," said ADA executive director James Bramson. "Thanks to the FDA's decision, bottlers can now claim what dentists have long known--that optimally fluoridated water helps prevent tooth decay."'

http://www.bevnet.com/news/2006/11-2...ttledwater.asp


Pin d'Ar

[Pindar]

Threats To Internet Freedom All Too Real



'The Internet is the last true unregulated outpost of freedom of speech but moves are afoot to stifle, suffocate and control the world wide web. These threats are not hidden nor are they hard to deduce and yet a significant minority of truth seekers and activists remain naive as to their scope.'

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/nov...netfreedom.htm


Pin d'Ar

[Pindar]

Government And Industry To Use Computer Microphones To Spy On 150 Million Americans

' Private industry and eventually government is planning to use microphones in the computers of an estimated 150 million-plus Internet active Americans to spy on their lifestyle choices and build psychological profiles which will be used for surveillance and minority report style invasive advertising and data mining.

Digital cable TV boxes, such as Scientific Atlanta, have had secret in-built microphones inside them since their inception in the late 1990's and these originally dormant devices were planned to be activated when the invasive advertising revolution arrived - 2006 marks that date.'

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/nov...netfreedom.htm

Pin d'Ar

[Hertog van Gelre]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pindar

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/nov...netfreedom.htm

Pin d'Ar

Komt er ergens in de toekomst nog eens een eigen mening of blijf je deze draad volspammen met prisonplanet-artikelen?

[Pindar]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Hertog van Gelre

Komt er ergens in de toekomst nog eens een eigen mening of blijf je deze draad volspammen met prisonplanet-artikelen?

Ik ga door zoals ik denk dat goed is. jij noemt het spam ik niet.
Welk recht heb jij om het spam te noemen? Omdat het je niet bevalt?
Nou, ik kan je zeggen dat wat er aan komt (de NWO) je nog minder zal bevallen!
Verder is het me al lang duidelijk dat er geen redelijke discussies gehouden kunnen worden hier . Ik zet hier informatie waarvan ik vind dat het het idee van de NWO steunt. Mensen bekijken zelf maar wat ze met de info doen. Take it or leave it!

Jij hebt het recht mijn postings daarover over te slaan!

Pin d'Ar

[AEvanLoon]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door exodus

De gebouwen waren berekend op de inslagvan een type vliegtuig dat niet heel veel kleiner was dan een 747. Bovendien heeft de architect gezegd dat het gebouw verschillende impacten aankon

Alsof een architect zich nooit kan vergissen...
Ik zou van architect veranderen, als ik een nieuwe WTC-toren zou bouwen.

[Akufen]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door AEvanLoon

Vermits elk van beide vliegtuigen 3 ?* 4 verdiepingen verwoest heeft (proven pacts) was de draagkracht van het stalen gebinte op die plaats stevig geschonden. Dat even later de bovenliggende verdiepingen naar beneden donderen, waarop ook de rest van het gebouw onder de instorting bezwijkt lijkt mij een logische opeenvolging van natuurkundige verschijnselen die alles met de zwaartekracht te maken hebben.

Proven facts? Alez jom. Dan hebben wij twee toch een verschillende definitie in gedachten. Het NIST rapport toonde namelijk aan - met harde cijfers, geen beweringen zoals jij - dat de schade door de impact vrij miniem was ( in het slechtste geval 10 van de bijna 50 kolommen beschadigd). Ik heb de cijfers eerder gepost, samen met de temperatuur van het staal. Beide harde bewijzen. Wat jij post zijn dus verzinsels.

[Pindar]

The Discovery of DNA Variability, Holographic Blueprints and the Symphony of Life



Announced with great fanfare in late November, 2006, scientists have discovered that human DNA is far more variable than previously thought. Contrary to previous beliefs, as much as 10 percent of human genes vary wildly from one person to the next. The mainstream press is hailing the discovery and some sort of breakthrough that will shed light on so-called "incurable" diseases and give researchers the ability to create more targeted medicines. (There's always a pro-Pharma slant in the mainstream media isn't there?) In reality, this new DNA discovery explains why most pharmaceuticals don't work for most people.

More importantly, this discovery humbles us, and shows us that even our top scientists know less about human DNA than they once thought. Researching DNA is a lot like researching astronomy: the more we learn, the less we realize we know. It's as if every newly discovered fact unveils the existence of ten new questions we never knew existed.

The mainstream media, in its usual limited view, is reporting this discovery as a breakthrough that will help scientists develop new drugs to treat disease. Every "Eureka!" moment having anything to do with the genetic code seems to lead the mainstream media to the same advertiser-pleasing conclusion, but they haven't even begun to realize the big story here. The real news in this discovery, you see, has nothing to do with pharmaceuticals or even medical science. It is larger and more profound than any of us could have possibly imagined.

Allow me to explain...



Where are all the missing blueprints?
Until today, it was widely believed that individual genes directly controlled physical traits in the human body (and even mental and behavioral traits, according to some), but now it turns out that a surprisingly large number of individuals have wild variations in their genetic code, such as multiple copies of the same gene or even entire genes that are missing from their DNA. And yet they're not walking around without a kidney, for example, or missing their left eyeball.


DNA


It's all quite shocking and rather difficult to explain from a Western point of view where scientists believe that DNA is like a computer program containing sequential instructions for building a physical organism. Truth is, there aren't enough genes in the human genome to even build a human being in the first place. A human has about 30,000 genes, yet an adult human has trillions of specialized cells governed by millions of different chemical reactions. How do 30,000 genes control all this?

Only a few years ago (2001), humans were believed to have 100,000 genes while all simple life forms contained far fewer. But this assumption of humans being some "advanced" life form turned out to be utterly false. It turns out that the mustard weed contains the same number of genes as humans, and even the common mouse has nearly as many. From certain types of worms to common trees, there are many organisms on the planet that have very nearly the same number of genes as human beings (and some have more).

Even more surprising to most, human beings appear to actually be human-bacteria hybrids. We are not all human, in other words. At least 200 genes in our genetic code were mysteriously borrowed from bacteria, we now know. Nobody is sure how they got there (did early humans mate with bacteria? Odd...), but we are sure that they exist.

Furthermore, if you look at the composition of cells in the typical human body, and you start counting them all, you realize that most of the cells in the typical human body are not human. Read that again, if you need to. It's a shocking statement, but it's entirely true. The vast majority of cells contained in the human body are bacteria cells -- about 100 trillion of them for a typical human being.

In other words, when you walk around, most of the cells you're carrying with you are not even you. The importance of this is in understanding that the human organism does not exist in isolation to the world around it. Regardless of what we believe, we are all closer to nature than we think. In fact, we are literally living with nature inside us, permeating our cells and accounting for more of us than us ourselves.[1]



Epigenetic factors
There's also no mention of epigenetics in all this news about the human genome. As recently understood -- to the great surprise of the hard science community, no doubt -- epigenetic factors control the expression of genes, activating or deactivating them based on environmental factors such as nutrition or exposure to synthetic chemicals.

Epigenetic factors are inherited, too, and passed from one generation to the next, meaning that if one woman suffers from chronic nutritional deficiencies when she conceives a child, the detrimental side effects of that nutritional deficiency will be passed down through multiple generations (at least four generations, according to Pottenger, but perhaps as many as seven according to others).

So DNA is not the only archive of information that's passed from mother to child. Even if we understood everything about DNA, we would still lack the big picture unless we also understood epigenetic factors -- and most old-school researchers and Western scientists don't even believe in epigenetic factors, adhering to the outdated point of view that genes alone control everything, and that all disease is predetermined, with environmental factors having little or no effect.



The human genome reflects the patterns of nature
Most Western scientists currently believe the human genome is sort of like a biological computer program; a series of instructions that tells the cells how to construct a complete organism containing trillions of new cells. Of course, there's no real explanation as to how a mere 30,000 genes could oversee the construction, maintenance and operation of such a highly complex organism. As Francis Collins, director of the National Human Genome Research Institute, said, "It's astounding that we get by with so few protein-coding genes, but that seems to be sufficient because here we all are." It's hard to argue with logic like that.

Indeed, it does work. But not in the way Western scientists believe. My own personal theory of the human genome takes special note of the multiple copies of many genes that have now been observed across a wide spectrum of the human population. Some people carry one, two, three or even four copies of the same gene.

If you look around in nature, where else do you notice copies of the same information? In harmonics, of course. A complex sound such as a single note on a violin is not made up of a simple square wave tone, it's made up of highly complex harmonics which give the violin its own tone and timbre, a sort of auditory personality. On an oscilloscope, these often appear as copies of the same underlying waveforms.

They're also called "overtones," and they're present throughout the human experience. Simple saying the word, "we," for example, involves shaping the mouth and tongue into an arrangement that creates complex, high-frequency overtones. The "ee" sound is the highest multi-frequency overtone sound created in human speech, but every vowel sound has its own unique pattern of repeating information. From low to high, it's "uuu" "ooo" "aaah" "eh" "eee."

Physically, a human being is more like musical expression than a set of construction blueprints. The human body has near-perfect symmetry and economies of expression through fractal geometry that are quite evident in the structure of the circulatory system, for example, or the nervous system. Just look at a drawing of veins and arteries and you'll notice the fractal patterns of geometry -- the same patterns you'll see drawn in the underside of a leaf, by the way.

The same is also true with human hair and skin cells. Every police detective knows that the human fingerprint is made up of readily identifiable patterns that are connected through a sort of biological artistry. In any human fingerprint, you'll notice the loops, swishes and curves that give strong clues to the underlying fractal geometry. Fingerprints aren't built with cellular bricks, they're built with repeating patterns that give us strong clues about the true structure of our DNA.

(Fractal geometry is also the dominant form of physical structure in nature, by the way. In fact, it was the study of plant leaves and mollusk shells that led to the discovery of fractal geometry.)

Throughout the human body, from the lining of the cells of the stomach to the structure of the eye, you find patterns that go way beyond mere construction blueprints. The human body is a symphony, a grand musical masterpiece played out in billions of variations across the planet.

And the DNA, in my view, is a holographic reflection of the whole being. The repeating patterns of genes and the symmetry of the double helix are all expressions of music. The human genome is a symphony, and it is through this symphony that we play the music of life. Combined with environmental factors and energetic factors (such as parental love), the symphony of human DNA creates a physical being. But it doesn't stop there. It also helps create the framework for an emotional being, an energetic being and a spiritual being.

Some scientists see nothing but cold, hard construction blueprints in that DNA. Others see God in the symphony, or Mother Nature directing the orchestra. What I see is a miracle of life, created with such masterful poetry and music that it is something to behold, to honor and to be humbled by. It is the ultimate statement of our connection to nature, for everywhere you look in nature, you see the same patterns we express, carried out in a range of melodies through the plants, animals and even the waters and skies. Looking closely at ourselves, we cannot help but notice nature. If we are keen observers, that is.



Western scientists refuse to hear the music
For Western scientists to think they've figured out the Human Genome, and that they can now use it to design new synthetic drugs that hijack the biochemical orchestra of the human body, is the epitome of medical arrogance. They refuse to recognize the miracle of human life, believing instead in the superiority of Man over nature. They would destroy a thousand symphonies to sell another million dollars worth of pharmaceuticals. Every day, they pad their fragile egos with "heroic" surgical procedures and organ transplants that grind the orchestra to a halt.

They are the music stoppers, the nature deniers... the rationalists. They believe all things are compartmentalized and separated. There is no connection between living things, according to the rationalists, and living creatures are nothing more than players in some cruel game called survival of the fittest.

But I say we are all unique, creative expressions of the same universal tune. Even our very blueprint -- our DNA -- is a symphony of expression that will never be understood until researchers start to think holographically rather than sequentially. DNA is a wonderful mystery, as is any good symphony, or novel, or collection of poetry. And just as a novel is more than the sum of its words, a human being is more than the accounting of her DNA. Let me give you a simple example to make this all more apparent.

In the paragraph below, each word represents a gene. What is this paragraph trying to say?

a, a, a, above, air, all, almost, alone, and, and, and, anywhere, as, breadth, brought, by, cluster, color, combining, crate, crooked, dropped, evening, fine, first-water, follow, freedom, from, glossy, greater, hair, hazy, i, i, image, in, in, in, in, it, it, it, it, it, i've, i've, i've, jewel, later, little, luster, might, moon, moon, new, of, of, of, of, on, one, one, or, ornament, over, please, pulled, put, run, seen, shining, shining, slowly, some, sorts, start, the, the, the, the, the, the, tilted, tree-and-farmhouse, trees, tried, tried, try, walking, wallow, water, with, with, wonder, you, your.

Presented as such, it seems to be nonsense, right? This is the Western view of the human genome, where each "word" (or gene) stands on its own, existing in some isolated way for the purpose of governing the construction of some correlated physical structure. Western scientists even use the term, "words" to describe genes, and they describe the variation in the protein sequences as different "spellings" of those words. Yet they completely miss the grammar of those words: the music, the poetry, the linguistics.

So let's take those same words (genes) and rearrange them to create music. Or poetry, as it were, thanks to Robert Frost:


The Freedom of the Moon

I've tried the new moon tilted in the air
Above a hazy tree-and-farmhouse cluster
As you might try a jewel in your hair.
I've tried it fine with little breadth of luster,
Alone, or in one ornament combining
With one first-water start almost shining.

I put it shining anywhere I please.
By walking slowly on some evening later,
I've pulled it from a crate of crooked trees,
And brought it over glossy water, greater,
And dropped it in, and seen the image wallow,
The color run, all sorts of wonder follow.


Do you see the difference? They are the same words as the nonsense paragraph shown earlier, but now suddenly the words create something far more complex and intelligent than the sum of their parts. Through the arrangement of the words, or the symphony of words, Robert Frost takes us on a journey that touches on the human experience, our relationship with nature and the meaning of life itself. All this has been brought forth by a set of words that seemed meaningless when read in isolated, absent the context of their interrelationships (or holographic relationships).

DNA is poetry, you see. And as long as Western scientists continue to look at genes in isolation, they will only see a scramble of isolated words whose meaning remains forever elusive. But genuine, curious scientists who are true enough to their own hearts to take a leap of faith at believing in the symphony of nature will find something far different in human DNA. They will find poetry, symmetry, harmonics... and a song of life that, if truly understood, would humble even the most brilliant among us.

You see, this year's discovery of widespread variability in the genetic code -- and gene copies, and missing genes -- is not something to be viewed as a way to sell more drugs. That view is childish. It is insulting to nature herself. This discovery is far more profound. It gives us an important clue that can help humankind remember where it came from. It reminds us that we are part of nature, not its conquerors or masters. We are, in fact, an expression of the very phenomena we are attempting to understand, and if we read the poetry of DNA correctly, we will realize that life itself is not about the accumulation of wealth, or stuff, or power over others, but rather the discovery of self.

And "self" does not exist in isolation. We are, in every way imaginable, intertwined. We are all made of the same stuff, wrought from the same patterns of nature, and in fact, formulated from the same musical notes played out in five billion unique but compatible tunes. With this discovery, Western science has concluded we are all more different from each other than previously thought, but I believe it is evidence that we are all just unique verses of the same universal poem.

http://www.newstarget.com/021175.html

Pin d'Ar

[exodus]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pindar

Ik heb al eens eerder hier een discussie willen starten over wat dan in godsnaam een PROVEN FACT is! Als dat niet gedefinieerd wordt, kan je dus
ALLES weerleggen als je dat zou willen. Je past gewoon je definitie van je bewijs aan NADAT men bewijs geleverd heeft.

Inderdaad, heel juist!

Verder is het raar dat er voor de "mainstream-theorien" bijna geen enkel
PROVEN FACT wordt gevraagd, en voor alternatieve theorien worden er
bovenmenselijke bewijzen gevraagd.
Het gekke is echter dat de meeste mainstream ideen verre van kloppen en blijken als je gaat spitten en veel alternatieve theorien veel meer hout te snijden. Maar bijna niemand van de 'non-believers' hier is kritisch op
mainstream theorien. Vreemd eigenlijk he?

Ja, dit klopt volledig. De mainstream theorien gaan erin als zoete koek, nochtans is het duidelijk wie er mee belang heeft bij de goedgelovigheid van het volk. Men zou beter een beetje kritisch staan tegenover de officiele versies, anders is men een geconditioneerde puppet.

De wetenschappers mogen dan zeggen dat ze kritisch zijn en de wetenschappelijke methodes willen gebruiken, dit zijn holle woorden. Echte kritische mensen durven gevestigde waarden in vraag stellen, en laten zich niets zomaar iets aanpraten door een gevestigde autoriteit!

[Firestone]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Akufen

Proven facts? Alez jom. Dan hebben wij twee toch een verschillende definitie in gedachten. Het NIST rapport toonde namelijk aan - met harde cijfers, geen beweringen zoals jij - dat de schade door de impact vrij miniem was ( in het slechtste geval 10 van de bijna 50 kolommen beschadigd). Ik heb de cijfers eerder gepost, samen met de temperatuur van het staal. Beide harde bewijzen. Wat jij post zijn dus verzinsels.

De zelfde NIST-studie toonde echter ook aan - met harde cijfers, geen beweringen zoals de believers - volgens welk mechanisme de combinatie van de initiële schade en de branden uiteindelijk tot de instorting heeft geleid.

[exodus]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Firestone

De zelfde NIST-studie toonde echter ook aan - met harde cijfers, geen beweringen zoals de believers - volgens welk mechanisme de combinatie van de initiële schade en de branden uiteindelijk tot de instorting heeft geleid.

Tot instorting, daar zeg je het. Ze zeggen niets over de manier van instorten.

Trouwens die "harde bewijzen" van NIST vind ik zo hard niet hoor. Het blijft uiteindelijk maar een simulatie.

[Firestone]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door exodus

Tot instorting, daar zeg je het. Ze zeggen niets over de manier van instorten.

Eens de instorting ingezet neemt de zwaartekracht over. Standaard fysica, elke wetenschapper/ingenieur/architect/CD-expert weet dat en begrijpt het mechanisme
Conspirationisten begrijpen het echter niet. Hun probleem.

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door exodus

Trouwens die "harde bewijzen" van NIST vind ik zo hard niet hoor. Het blijft uiteindelijk maar een simulatie.

Tiens, daarnet ging het bij Akufen nog om "harde cijfers". Weer blijkt hoe selectief believers met informatie omgaan.

Niemand verbiedt jou of Alex Jones of Hoffman of Steven Jones of 2004gun of democratsteve of wie dan ook een betere simulatie uit te voeren (eerst misschien de fouten in de NIST-studie aanwijzen).

[exodus]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Firestone

Tiens, daarnet ging het bij Akufen nog om "harde cijfers". Weer blijkt hoe selectief believers met informatie omgaan

Tja, ik ben Akufen niet hé. Het is zijn recht om het NIST rapport aan te halen maar ik doen het niet.

Ik vind dat je een simulatie geen hard bewijs kunt noemen. Ze negeren de collapse zelf. "De zwaartekracht doet de rest" ... dit is pas pseudo wetenschap.

Je kan een simulatie zodanig tweaken dat het aan je verwachtingen begint te voldoen.

[eti1777]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Firestone

Eens de instorting ingezet neemt de zwaartekracht over. Standaard fysica, elke wetenschapper/ingenieur/architect/CD-expert weet dat en begrijpt het mechanisme
Conspirationisten begrijpen het echter niet. Hun probleem.

Zoals Exo al eens zei;
Waarom zouden de CD bedrijven zoveel tijd en geld steken in "prepositioned explosives" wanneer blijkt dat een brandje aan +- driekwart de hoogte genoeg blijkt voor het instorten van een building?(standaard fysica).

[Firestone]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door eti1777

Zoals Exo al eens zei;
Waarom zouden de CD bedrijven zoveel tijd en geld steken in "prepositioned explosives" wanneer blijkt dat een brandje aan +- driekwart de hoogte genoeg blijkt voor het instorten van een building?(standaard fysica).

Een brandje + een vliegtuigje + de schade aan de aanliggende gebouwen.

(Dat jullie deze zever nooit beu worden. )