De nieuwe wereld orde

[brontosaurus]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door DaS

Het is met grote interesse dat ik deze draad volg.
Toch zou ik graag opheldering hebben over enkele zaken.
Hopelijk kunnen jullie mij helpen?

De NWO streeft naar totale wereldheerschappij door de éénwereldregering.
De Rothschilds beheersen de geldstromen van de wereld, dus zij zitten achter die NWO, veronderstel ik.
De Bilderbergers beslissen mee wat er gebeurd in onze maatschappij.
Uiteindelijk zijn de reptielachtigen (buitenaardsen?) degenen die overal boven staan.

Nu, wat is de verhouding tussen de Bilderbergers en de Rothschilds?
Is het een soort van pro-Rothschild lobbygroep?? Een semi-politiek orgaan?
De Rothschilds (~Gun's draad over hen) zijn pas in de 18e eeuw op het toneel verschenen. Dus daarvoor was er geen sprake van een NWO-achtige streving??? De reptielen echter spelen een rol in de ganse geschiedenis van de mens, niet? (of ik moest slecht geïnformeerd zijn hierover op de webstekken die ik gelezen heb). Waarom laten die reptielen zich dan in met een groep die amper 200 jaar bestaat? En als de reptielen die éénwereldregering toch zo'n goed idee vinden, waarom zijn ze hier dan niet vroeger mee begonnen?? De Romeinen beheersten een gigantisch deel van de toenmalige wereldbevolking. Waarom zijn ze toen niet begonnen met de catalogisering van de mensheid??? Of is de NWO een speelbal in de handen van de reptielen??? Dit punt blijft enorm onduidelijk vind ik.

Bovendien lees ik hier en daar over The Fourth Reich dat zou strijden tegen de NWO om zijn eigen Wereldorde te laten neerdalen over de mensheid. Van hun lees ik hier echter amper iets (al heb ik niet alle pagina's gelezen van deze monsterdraad).

Empire of the city
kijk maar eens naar deze docu op www.becoolbewise.nl.tt
Hier geeft men een duidelijk beeld over de geschiedenis van de heerschappij.
De aarde wordt al jaren door dezelfde bloedlijnen geregeert.

[KrisKras]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door parcifal

Mooi gefotoshopped!

Is dat zo? Is het noorderlicht niet te zien in Alaska?

[Pindar]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door KrisKras

Is dat zo? Is het noorderlicht niet te zien in Alaska?

Ja, en nog wat, daar zullen de wetenschappertjes wel weer over vallen,
maar er zijn wat zeg maar, wetenschappelijke problemen, met het noorderlicht.
En waarom? simpel. In werkelijkheid wordt het noorderlicht veroorzaakt door de "innerlijke zon" in het midden van de ja ja, verder holle aarde.

Nuff Said

Pin d"Ar

[exodus]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pindar

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUWFEjExSr8


Pin d'Ar

Interessant om te zien hoe het dikwijls in de mainstream entertainment media naar boven komt. De scenarioscherijvers hebben duidelijk geïnformeerd bij Icke, en er een verhaal rond gebouwd.

Anyway, truth is stranger than fiction, zoals men zegt.

[parcifal]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pindar

Ja, en nog wat, daar zullen de wetenschappertjes wel weer over vallen,
maar er zijn wat zeg maar, wetenschappelijke problemen, met het noorderlicht.
En waarom? simpel. In werkelijkheid wordt het noorderlicht veroorzaakt door de "innerlijke zon" in het midden van de ja ja, verder holle aarde.

Nuff Said

Pin d"Ar

I say no more.

[Pieke]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door parcifal

I say no more.

hij zegt het dan ook zelf, nuff said

[Pindar]

Gov tries to restrict Freedom of Information requests

One of the political mysteries of 2007 is why ministers hastily withdrew their threat to curb requests under the Act. Robert Verkaik, Law Editor, thinks he knows why



It is customary at this time of year to look back over the past 12 months to re-evaluate key moments that have shaped the political landscape. In the field of information rights it is the battle to force the Government to withdraw plans to restrict its own legislation that stands out.

At the turn of the year, Government forces, led by Lord Falconer of Thoroton, then Lord Chancellor, appeared determined to press ahead with new rules that would stop the media and campaign groups from making costly and embarrassing requests for information. By mid-spring there was strong cross-party opposition to the plans but Falconer and his ministerial colleagues showed no appetite for compromise. But then Jack Straw, the new Justice Secretary, seemed to lose his will for the fight. By October the whole debate had been turned on its head, with Gordon Brown suggesting that Freedom of Information laws could be extended to cover some private firms.

New documents released under the Freedom of Information Act now provide a clearer understanding of why the Government got cold feet.

Responses to its own consultation paper published last year include submissions from FOI officers who show themselves to be less than enthusiastic about the idea of “blanket aggregation”, whereby a financial cap would be put on the amount of money that could be spent on complying with FOI requests made by individuals from within the same organisation.

For example, the Department of Health wrote: “We consider that it may not be reasonable to aggregate where the applicant is clearly acting as a conduit to a large organisation and refusal would lead to multiple non-related requests following from a myriad of requestors.” The department was also lukewarm on the question of introducing a “ready reckoner” to help calculate the amount of time taken by officials to consider a freedom of information request. It added:

DH considers that the Regulations are prescriptive enough but would welcome indicators or examples rather than a “ready reckoner” as part of the guidance. A “ready reckoner” could be overly rigid and not take account of the complexity of some documentation that may have to be examined carefully.

The Serious Fraud Office also had concerns: “The aggregation provision is potentially problematic,” its response stated.

It is proposed to aggregate requests made by a person or persons, who may be acting in concert for the purpose of calculating the appropriate limit. This will be difficult to implement. Anyone can submit a request via e-mail and it would be very difficult to assess whether different identities are being used or whether individuals are collaborating to acquire information.

Government agencies were even less enthusiastic. In its detailed response, Transport for London noted that the consultation paper did not present any evidence that “burdensome FOI requests are a significant or extensive problem outside of central government”.

It added:

TfL does not consider that it incurs unacceptable costs in responding to over 1,000 FOI requests a year, including a significant proportion that are complex. An alternative . . . might have been to develop proposals that would have implemented a revised fees regime for central government only.

And on the issue of aggregation it said: “We consider that the existing Fees Regulations are adequate in this regard and in general multiple unrelated requests from individual applicants, or different applicants in a single organisation, have not imposed an unacceptable burden on TfL.” Such unexpected opposition to its plans must have given the Government plenty of reason to beat a hasty retreat.

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/leg...cle3249843.ece

Pin d"Ar

[Pindar]

Bush Admin Does Not Want CIA Tape Inquiry

Bush administration urges judge not to inquire about destruction of CIA tapes

The Bush administration has told a federal judge it was not obligated to preserve videotapes of CIA interrogations of suspected terrorists and urged the court not to look into the tapes’ destruction.

In court documents filed Friday night, government lawyers told U.S. District Judge Henry H. Kennedy that demanding information about the tapes would interfere with current investigations by Congress and the Justice Department.

It is the first time the government has addressed the issue of the videotapes in court.

Kennedy ordered the Bush administration in June 2005 to safeguard “all evidence and information regarding the torture, mistreatment, and abuse of detainees now at the United States Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay.”

Five months later, the CIA destroyed the interrogation videos.

Government lawyers told Kennedy the tapes were not covered by his court order because Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri — the suspected terrorists whose interrogations were videotaped and then destroyed — were not at the Guantanamo military prison in Cuba.

The men were being held overseas in a network of secret CIA prisons. By the time President Bush acknowledged the existence of those prisons and the prisoners were transferred to Guantanamo, the tapes had been destroyed.

Attorney General Michael Mukasey on Friday refused to give Congress details of the government’s investigation into the matter, saying that doing so could raise questions about whether the inquiry was vulnerable to political pressure.

http://rinf.com/alt-news/breaking-ne...-inquiry/2020/

Pin d"Ar

[Pindar]

To be paranoid means to believe in delusions of danger and persecution. If the danger is real, and the evidence credible, then it cannot be delusional. To ignore the evidence, and hope that it CANNOT be true, is more an evidence of mental illness.

Pin d"Ar

[Pindar]

Is het hier ook iemand opgevallen dat de advertentie tegen terroristische daden nu een advertentie is tegen terroristische gedachten???????


ben er verder naar aan het spitten, maar als iemand meer weet?


Pin d"Ar

[Pindar]

hier al meer info:

http://www.nederlandtegenterrorisme....s210x297fc.pdf


het wordt eng nu, heel eng!



Pin d"Ar

[Pindar]

well well well...

S 1959: Thought Crime Prevention Act of 2007

The Thought Crime1 Prevention Act of 2007 is how the Bush Administration government is laying the groundwork to make it a crime to be openly opposed to their agenda.

http://www.bloggernews.net/112102

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill...bill=s110-1959

brrrrr krijg het opeens heel koud


Pin d"Ar

[Pindar]

and then there is this!

Thought Police


There is a complete media blackout on Crime Prevention Bill S1959 which is being prepared to become law. It regulates "thought".

This heinous legislation which is secretly being pushed through government allows authorities to imprison a person if they even "think" thoughts that are against

the government or about committing a crime. There is technology

that can pick up brain waves and translate them into words and images. In this scenario, you could be arrested for what you are thinking!

CNN and other major media are totally ignoring this law and not posting any info on it. This tells a lot about our so-called "free press", which is obviously completely regulated by the Illuminati.

Email, call and write your Congressperson or House Representative to demand this Bill be rejected outright!

December 14, 2007

http://www.expansions.com/News.cfm

Pin d"Ar

[Pindar]

bovenstaande onzin?

hmmm

Intrusive Brain Reading Surveillance Technology: Hacking the Mind

"Using the scanner, we could look around the brain for this information and read out something that from the outside there's no way you could possibly tell is in there. It's like shining a torch around, looking for writing on a wall", the scientists were reported as saying.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...articleId=7606

Pin d"Ar

[Geert C]

Hier is een link naar de volledige tekst van het wetsvoorstel waar hierboven naar verwezen wordt.

Ja hoor, dat is écht een wetsvoorstel dat gaat over "thought-crime".

Wat is het volgende? FEMA regeert de wereld?

[Pindar]

[Akufen]

Dr. Lawrence Britt, a political scientist, published research on fascism in which he examined the fascist regimes of Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, Suharto and several Latin American regimes. Britt found 14 defining characteristics common to each fascist State:

1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism - Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.

2. Disdain for the recognition of Human Rights - Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of “need.” The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarceration of prisoners, etc.

3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause - The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial, ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists; terrorists, etc.

4. Supremacy of the Military - Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military are glamorized.

5. Rampant sexism - The government of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Divorce, abortion and homosexuality are suppressed and the state is represented as the ultimate guardian of the family institution.

6. Controlled Mass Media - Sometimes the media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.

7. Obsession with National security - Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.

8. Religion and Government are intertwined - Government in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government’s policies or actions.

9. Corporate Power is Protected - The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation are often the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.

10. Labor Power is suppressed - Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated, or are severely restricted.

11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts - Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts and letters is openly attacked.

12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment - Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.

13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption - Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.

14. Fraudulent Elections - Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassinations of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections.

Benito Mussolini - who knew something about fascism - had a more straightforward definition: “Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.”

Abraham Lincoln stated, “I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me, and causes me to tremble for the safety of our country. Corporations have been enthroned, an era of corruption will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people, until wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the republic is destroyed.”

[Pindar]

well well well


Mischien is het toch niet zo vreemd wat ik hier al een poos beweer!

Reptilian Hybrid Baby

http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fu...deoid=20640753


Pin d"Ar

[Pieke]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pindar

well well well


Mischien is het toch niet zo vreemd wat ik hier al een poos beweer!




http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fu...deoid=20640753


Pin d"Ar

lamelaire ichtyose, veroorzaakt door een mutatie in 1 gen, ABCA12, een transporter van vetten in de huid. Voor het eerst beschreven in de jaren 1700, en toen ook afgedaan als duivelskind. Je zou je er thuis voelen.

Jaja, ik weet het, dat is de cover-up story. Whatever

[parcifal]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pindar

well well well
Mischien is het toch niet zo vreemd wat ik hier al een poos beweer!

http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fu...deoid=20640753


Pin d"Ar

Een baby met harlequin Ichtyosis, net zoals deze hier : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLmhGb4ZdZo

Waarom verspreid jij constant desinformatie om je eigen vooroordelen te bevestigen?
Jij doet zelf wat je de media en de NWO verwijt.

Betreffende de perfide handelingen van de NWO/Illuminati kan je discussieren, ik geloof er persoonlijk geen fluit van, maar van jouw
perfide handelingen ben ik zeker.

Ben jij een NWO-agent, pindar?