Teheran, NAM summit : De Beweging van Niet-Gebonden Landen vs. VN & VS - Pagina 3

Nr.10 · 9 september 2012, 23:17

²

Citaat:

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Johan Bollen

Volgens wat ik lees is meer dan 90 % van de Egyptenaren tegen de Camp David akoorden. De kans bestaat dus dat Morsi die zal willen herzien.

Jerusalem to Become Egypt's Capital Under Mursi's Rule Says Islamic Cleric

Johan Bollen · 10 september 2012, 19:08

Evaluatie van de NAM conferentie door Petras:

Iran’s Strategic Diplomatic Victory over the Washington-Israeli Axis: Its Larger Political Consequences

Citaat:

Introduction: Iran chaired, hosted and led the recently rejuvenated Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) meeting in Teheran, attended by delegates from 120 countries, including 31 heads of state and 29 foreign secretaries of state. Even the United Nations General Secretary Ban Ki-Moon, notorious mouthpiece of Washington, felt obligated to address, a forum attended by two-thirds of the member countries of the UN, despite State Department and Israeli objections.

Any objective evaluation of the meeting, its venue, the attendance, resolutions and political impact leads to one paramount conclusion: the NAM meeting was a strategic diplomatic victory for Iran and a major defeat for the US, Israel and the European Union. The entire US-Israeli-EU diplomatic and propaganda effort to isolate and stigmatize Iran, especially over the past decade, was shredded.

The Politics of Attendance

Attendance by representatives of 120 countries demonstrates that Iran is not a ‘pariah state’; it is an accepted member of the international community.The presence of 60 heads of state and foreign secretaries demonstrates that Iran is considered a noteworthy and significant political actor, not a “terrorist state” to be isolated and shunned. The proceedings, debates and discussions among and between the delegates and Iranian leaders convinced those attending that Teheran gives primacy to reasonable dialogue in resolving international conflicts.

Both in terms of form and content the NAM meeting highlighted the superiority of Iran’s diplomacy over and against Washington’s bellicose posturing and improvised diversionary tactics. The fact that the meeting took place in Teheran, that Iran was elected chair, that a major part of the NAM agenda and subsequent resolutions coincided with Iran’s democratic foreign policy, highlights Washington’s policy failures and its isolation on issues of major concern to the larger international community. Pandering to the domestic Zionist power configuration has a high cost in the sphere of international politics.

NAM Resolutions: Iran versus Washington - Israel

The centerpiece of US and Israeli strategic policy has been to claim that Iran’s nuclear program including the enrichment of uranium, are a threat to world peace and in particular to Israel and the Gulf states. The NAM meeting repudiated that position, affirming Iran’s right to develop a peaceful nuclear program including the enrichment of uranium. NAM rejected western sanctions against Iran and other countries. In fact many of the leading members, including India, brought delegations of business executives in pursuit of new economic contracts.

NAM declared its support for a nuclear free Middle East and called for an independent Palestinian state based on 1969 borders with Jerusalem as its capital, in total repudiation of Washington’s unconditional support of the nuclear armed Jewish state.

NAM rejected Egyptian Prime Minister Morsi’s proposal to support the Western backed armed mercenaries invading Syria, major blow to Washington’s effort to secure international support for regime change. NAM unanimously approved several resolutions which affirmed its anti-imperialist principles in direct opposition to US imperial positions: it rejected the US blockade of Cuba; it affirmed Argentine sovereignty of the Malvinas Islands (dubbed the ‘Falklands’ by Anglo-American pundits); it opposed the Paraguayan coup; it supported Ecuador in its dispute with Great Britain on asylum for Assange; it selected Venezuela as the site for the next NAM meeting; it rejected terrorism in all of its forms and modalities, including the state sponsored variant.

Western Propaganda Media: Self Serving Diversions

The resounding diplomatic successes of the Iranian hosts of the NAM meeting were countered by a mass media blitz directed at diverting attention to relatively marginal events. The Financial and New York Times, the BBC and the Washington Post featured a speech by Egyptian Prime Minister Morsi calling for NAM support for the Western backed armed mercenaries invading Syria. The media omitted mentioning that no delegation took up his proposal. NAM not only ignored Morsi but unanimously approved a resolution opposing western intervention and affirming the right of self-determination, clearly applicable to the case of Syria.

While NAM defended Iran’s right to develop its peaceful nuclear program, the mass media publicized a dubious “report” authored by US favorite, Yukiya Amano of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) questioning Iran’s compliance with his directives. Not surprisingly the report Amano carried no weight in the deliberations of the 130 delegates, given his notoriety as a front-man for Israeli and US pro-war propaganda.

Overall the mass media deliberately ignored or underplayed the resolutions, dialogue and democratic procedures of the NAM meeting in an effort to cover up the enormous political gulf between the US, Israel, the EU and the vast majority of the international community.

Political Impact of the NAM Conference

NAM seriously undermined the images of the Mid-East conflicts which US policymakers and their acolytes in the EU and Gulf States project: the political reality, which came out of the meetings emphasized that it is the US. Israel and the EU who are outside the mainstream international community. It is the US and EU who lack political allies in the pursuit of colonial wars. It is the Israeli occupation of Palestine and Washington’s policies of ‘regime change’ in Syria and Iran which lack allies. Its Iran’s peaceful nuclear program which has legitimacy not Israel’s nuclear arsenal. The Iranian leadership gained prestige via its openness to international dialogue. In contrast its regional Gulf adversaries, who rely on to multi-billion dollar US arms purchases and military bases were denigrated and discredited.

The Iranian proposals to reform the United Nations to make it more democratic and responsive to emerging countries and less a tool of US-EU policymakers resonated throughout the conference. The emphasis on free trade, was manifest in the large economic delegations who attended eager to sign agreements in defiance of US-Israel-EU sanctions.

Conclusion

Temporarily the NAM conference may have lessened the threat of a military attack against Iran, at least by the US and the EU – by demonstrating the political cost of alienating two thirds of the UN Assembly. Nevertheless by demonstrating Israel’s total isolation, (and truly pariah status in the international community), NAM may have heightened the pathological paranoia of the Israeli leadership and hastened its move toward a catastrophic war.

The follow-up of the NAM resolutions requires a permanent organization, a minimum coordinating secretariat to ensure compliance and rapid responses to crises. Otherwise the good intentions and positive moves toward peace via dialogue will be inconsequential.

The mobilization of the NAM members in the UN General Assembly is crucial to withstand the blackmail, bribes, threats and corruption which are used by the Western powers to secure majorities on crucial votes regarding US sanctions, coups and military intervention. Trade, investment and cultural boycotts of Israel should be promoted and enforced, until the Jewish State ends its occupation of Palestine. Clearly Iran, as the newly elected leader of NAM, has a major role to play in ensuring that the Tehran meeting of 2012 becomes the bases for a revitalization of the Movement. Iran can play a constructive leadership role providing it continues to promote a plural collective format based on common anti-imperialist principles.

Johan Bollen · 10 september 2012, 19:10

Citaat:

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Nr.10

²

Jerusalem to Become Egypt's Capital Under Mursi's Rule Says Islamic Cleric

Dat soort van opjutterij is niet goed te keuren mijns inziens. Israël heeft recht van bestaan.

Nr.10 · 13 september 2012, 22:29

Citaat:

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Johan Bollen

Dat soort van opjutterij is niet goed te keuren mijns inziens. Israël heeft recht van bestaan.

Morsi was aanwezig op die verkiezingsmeeting, tonen de beelden in dat filmpje.

Nr.10 · 16 september 2012, 23:32

Citaat:

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Johan Bollen

Dat soort van opjutterij is niet goed te keuren mijns inziens. Israël heeft recht van bestaan.

President Morsi op bezoek in Brussel:

"We beschouwen al wie onze profeet beledigt als een vijand"

fcal · 17 september 2012, 03:36

Citaat:

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Nr.10

President Morsi op bezoek in Brussel:

"We beschouwen al wie onze profeet beledigt als een vijand"

Op het beledigen van een dode persoon in casu een zekere Mohammed, die volgens de overlevering leefde in de 7de eeuw na Christus staat in de Islam de doodstraf.
Wat een belediging is wordt uitgemaakt door de oelema's, de godsdienstgeleerden. Bijvoorbeeld in deze film wordt getrouw het leven van Mohammed uitgebeeld zoals dit bekend is door de soenna en de hadieth. Qua inhoud valt hier niets op aan te merken wel integendeel. Dit leven van deze profeet is namelijk de levensleiddraad, die door elke 'vrome' moslim zo goed mogelijk in woord en daad gevolgd dient te worden.

Het moorden en verkrachten en de andere gewelddaden vormen in tegenstelling tot wat heel veel politieke correcten denken helemaal geen probleem, deze gebeurden immers uit noodzaak om het geloof te verspreiden.

Het weergeven of naspelen van het leven van deze profeet door een filmacteur is echter wel de steen des aanstoots. Dat is de echte belediging van de godsdienst en haar profeet. En daar staat nu eenmaal de doodstraf op.

Ook Morsi kan hier niets aan veranderen. Hij kan hier zelfs ook oraal geen afbreuk aan doen door het te bij voorbeeld te vergoeilijken. Immers dan wijkt hij in de praktijk af van de ware leer en kan hij als een afvallige of ketter beschouwd worden. En iemand die blijkt geeft van dergelijke foute opvattingen en dus afvalligheid verdient dan weer de doodstraf zoals voorzien in de sjariah.

Mocht de doodstraf niet voltrokken worden door de bevoegde overheid, dan mag iedere 'vrome' moslim de doodstraf zelf uitvoeren. Hij zal dan wel voor het gerecht komen maar gezien de verzachtende omstandigheden is de kans heel groot, dat hij vrijgesproken wordt.

Piero · 17 september 2012, 08:18

Citaat:

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door fcal

Op het beledigen van een dode persoon in casu een zekere Mohammed, die volgens de overlevering leefde in de 7de eeuw na Christus staat in de Islam de doodstraf.
Wat een belediging is wordt uitgemaakt door de oelema's, de godsdienstgeleerden. Bijvoorbeeld in deze film wordt getrouw het leven van Mohammed uitgebeeld zoals dit bekend is door de soenna en de hadieth. Qua inhoud valt hier niets op aan te merken wel integendeel. Dit leven van deze profeet is namelijk de levensleiddraad, die door elke 'vrome' moslim zo goed mogelijk in woord en daad gevolgd dient te worden.

Het moorden en verkrachten en de andere gewelddaden vormen in tegenstelling tot wat heel veel politieke correcten denken helemaal geen probleem, deze gebeurden immers uit noodzaak om het geloof te verspreiden.

Het weergeven of naspelen van het leven van deze profeet door een filmacteur is echter wel de steen des aanstoots. Dat is de echte belediging van de godsdienst en haar profeet. En daar staat nu eenmaal de doodstraf op.

Ook Morsi kan hier niets aan veranderen. Hij kan hier zelfs ook oraal geen afbreuk aan doen door het te bij voorbeeld te vergoeilijken. Immers dan wijkt hij in de praktijk af van de ware leer en kan hij als een afvallige of ketter beschouwd worden. En iemand die blijkt geeft van dergelijke foute opvattingen en dus afvalligheid verdient dan weer de doodstraf zoals voorzien in de sjariah.

Mocht de doodstraf niet voltrokken worden door de bevoegde overheid, dan mag iedere 'vrome' moslim de doodstraf zelf uitvoeren. Hij zal dan wel voor het gerecht komen maar gezien de verzachtende omstandigheden is de kans heel groot, dat hij vrijgesproken wordt.

Heb je een quote voor die wet op het beledigen van de profeet? Waar staat het 'in de sharia'?

zonbron · 11 november 2012, 07:07

Adrian Salbuchi - Washington, London and Tel Aviv don’t tolerate True Democracy

_{Kourosh Ziabari: In one of your articles, you raised an interesting point, that if people in the United States, France or Britain commit the mistake of choosing bad leaders, then they will not be the only ones affected by such a wrong electoral decision, but millions of people in other parts of the world will suffer from the consequences of that bad choice. What’s the reason in your view? What’s the source of such an enormous amount of power that enables the imperial powers to attack, invade, conquer and kill at will, without being held responsible?

Adrian Salbuchi: First and foremost, we need to understand that Real Power today does not just lie with Sovereign Nation-States but that, over and above, it has been usurped by a very small but extremely powerful and dangerous clique of Supra-National Global Private Power Masters that are deeply embedded into the public and private power structures of the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union and just about every other State in the Western World.

These Global Power Masters operate from inside the US, UK and EU but are not of the US, UK and EU. They merely use and abuse these powerful nations to promote their own interests, objectives and agendas, notably their state-of-the-art war technologies, financial clout and military prowess to invade any country anywhere in the world they so desire. They do this not based on the real National Interest of the US, UK and EU, but on their own supranational interests. Within this global power structure Zionism is the key factor that, once understood, helps to explain most if not all of the dreadful things that are taking place in today’s bleak, dark world. Actually, the Global Power Masters love and honor no nation’s flag – whether of the US, UK, or the EU countries – except for one for which they permanently fight: the flag of Israel.

The source of that power is the combined ability of the Global Power Masters to use banking and finance as their key source of leverage; the media as their key instrument of psychological warfare; multinational corporations as their resource, industrial and technological platform; and all governments – notably the US, UK and EU – as their proxies for political, economic, financial, diplomatic and military intervention.

Kourosh Ziabari: You once quoted the book “Report from Iron Mountain on the Possibility and Desirability of Peace” as writing that “world peace is neither desirable nor in the best interests of society, because war not only serves important economic functions but also plays key social and cultural roles.” Who benefits from waging wars, military expedition on the weaker and poorer countries and plundering their resources? Why do some powers see their survival and empowerment in going into war with the other nations?

Adrian Salbuchi: The “Report from Iron Mountain” very candidly explains the motivations behind today’s New World Order even though it was written 45 years ago. Actually, the fact that it was written so long ago serves to prove how consistent their long-term planning really is.

The Global Power Masters have a hierarchical, pyramid-like power structure where things look different depending on the level of your vantage point on it.

Each “soldier” recruited (i.e., paid) to play their role for this New World Order operates on a “need to know basis” – as do intelligence agencies, for example. Since at the pinnacle of the power pyramid lie the Zionist and Jewish interests, they long-ago realized that they needed to implement a very sophisticated model and method of global domination. Otherwise, there would be no way that a tiny community of 16 million people (global Jewish population according to most official Jewish and Zionist sources) would be able to exert control over a planet with 7 billion people. Do the math: Jews barely represent 0.2% of global population; in other words 99.8% of Mankind is NOT Jewish and yet we not only live in countries where Zionist and Jewish influence is overwhelming – the US, UK, EU, Argentina, Brazil, Australia, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Mexico… – but our whole world’s mental outlook, values and beliefs are becoming more Jewish day-by-day, thanks to their full control over three key global Psychological Warfare weapons in their hands:

(a) The global mainstream media,

(b) The education system in most countries (which they control by controlling governments), and

(c) The so-called entertainment industry, beginning with its flagship, Hollywood.

Kourosh Ziabari: The 16th summit of the heads of state of the Non-Aligned Movement was held in Iran almost two months ago. I saw that you wrote an article about it. What do you think about this movement and the role it can play in resisting and countering the threats posed by the global superpowers to the developing nations? Can this movement promote itself as an alternative to the undemocratic structure of the United Nations which is in the hands of a few veto-yielding powers?

Adrian Salbuchi: As an Argentine follower of the very lucid political doctrine and teachings of our former president Juan Domingo Perón, I can only hail all countries that support treading a non-aligned path. When Perón first came to power in 1946, in a world that was just splitting into two major power blocks – the US and its allies, and the former USSR and its allies – Perón was the first Statesman to come out with what he called the “Third Position”, i.e., Argentina would neither align with nor become subservient to the US nor the USSR.

He kept to his guns; Argentina because the key power in the region; in 1951 Perón started a movement towards political (not just economic) union with Brazil and Chile (dubbed the ABC Movement), but the global and local Powers That Be promptly had him ousted by treacherous liberal pro-US military Argentine army and navy officers in September 1955. At the time, Winston Churchill was Prime Minister of Britain and is quoted to have said in Parliament that “the ouster of the Tyrant Perón is the most important event for Britain since we won World War II”.

Ever since then, Argentine has slumped into greater and greater decay and decadence down to our present horrific predicament under the Kirchner Government who call themselves “Peronists” but are, in fact, the complete opposite: they as Social Democrats.

Now the Non-Aligned Movement has had many internal changes and challenges. It has tried to adapt as best it could as the Cold War years went on and as governments in each member country changed. It has been a contradictory movement which was all but scrapped after the demise of the USSR, however now many countries are coming to realize that Non-Alignment’s new definition would be: “Non-Alignment with the Supra-National Power Masters and their Zionist Controllers”. There lies the key foreign policy decision that every country needs to make, and that includes the US and UK.

Thankfully, and for different reasons, two key global powers have chosen to put a brake on the global Western Hegemons: a reborn Russia and a streaming-forwards China.

We see this today in Syria and also in Iran. Thank God Vladimir Putin is still in power in Russia even if only for the purpose of maintaining this geopolitical balance of power.

The Non-Aligned Movement is not, however, the organization our countries really need. It can, however, serve as a transition so that the “flame won’t go out” of the Non-Alignment Movement, but we need to erect this in a much more forceful manner so that a new truly Independent Free Nations of the World Entity gradually sweeps away today’s totally useless United Nations.

Russia, China, Iran, India and Brazil are the key countries for such a new multinational organization, followed and supported by regional confederations of countries in Africa, Latin America, Central Europe and Asia.

Kourosh Ziabari: The Global War on Terror marked the commencement of a new era in the world’s political developments. As a result of this deadly campaign, thousands, if not millions, of people lost their lives, thousands of others were orphaned, displaced and forced to immigrate. Many political commentators see this War on Terror as a war on the developing nations and more particularly, a war on Islam and Muslims. What’s your assessment of the War on Terror, which seems to be underway thus far, its consequences and results?

Adrian Salbuchi: The only War on Terror I can understand is the war that free and peaceful nations today wage as we are all systematically attacked on the political, financial, PsyWar, diplomatic and military fronts by the US, UK, NATO and Israel. Israel is the foremost terrorist entity in the world.

A little bit of history: Israel was born out of terrorist organizations whose leaders then went on to become their political establishment.

Terrorist group “Irgun Zvai Leumi” led by Menahem Beguin bomb-attacked the King David Hotel in Jerusalem in 1947 killing almost a hundred people, marking the first such bomb attack on an occupied public building in modern history, that was later repeated countless times including the Israeli Embassy and AMIA Jewish Mutual bomb attacks in Argentina in 1992 and 1994, and the September 11 attacks in New York.

Terrorist “Stern” Group led by Itzakh Shamir assassinated UN Special Envoy Folke Bernadotte in 1948 because he wanted to ensure the Palestinians had their own Nation-State.

Terror militias “Hagganah” and “Lehi” killed, maimed and forcibly drove millions of Palestinians from their historical lands. These terror organizations merged in 1948 to become Israel’s Armed Forces, hypocritically dubbed “Defense Force”.

The Global Power Masters’ present War on Islam has two key components:

(1) Geopolitically, they need to grab Arab territory in Palestine to safeguard Israel; and in Libya, Iraq, and Afghanistan to safeguard oil and – very importantly – they cannot tolerate a powerful Iran unmasking them permanently.

(2) Philosophically, Islam is a religion that places Divinity – Allah – at the center of man’s existence whilst the Global Power Masters impose Money and Gold at the center of man’s life. They have their own Demiurge which they call YHWH which is what most other people identify with Satan. Materialism in the West reigns supreme which means they cannot tolerate a culture like Islam where men’s consciences cannot be bought and sold for money.

Kourosh Ziabari: In one of your articles, you pointed to examples of different skyscrapers and tall towers in countries such as Russia, Venezuela and Spain taking fire and suffering considerable damages. You, however, mentioned that these towers did not collapse the way the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center broke apart as the hijacked planes of the American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175 crashed into them one after the other on September 11, 2001. Do you want to conclude that the 9/11 events was a premeditated false flag operation? Do you share the viewpoints of people such as David Ray Griffin or Peter Dale Scott that the Israeli regime was also involved in the attacks?

Adrian Salbuchi: Oh, absolutely. The collapse of the World Trade Center – especially of Tower 7 that was not hit by any airplane and yet perfectly and neatly collapsed into its own fingerprint on that dreadful day – defies the laws of physics and basic common sense.

In the US, there are associations of architects, physicists, chemists, engineers, airplane pilots all demanding to know the truth about 9/11 because the “official government story” is totally absurd.

They accuse those of us who unmask the Global Power Masters and Zionism as “conspiracy theorists,” and yet they impose upon the world the “Number One Absurd Conspiracy Theory”: 19 allegedly “Muslim” suicide pilots who could hardly fly single-engine propeller Cessna’s, easily hijack 4 jetliners with plastic knives (!) over the most secure airspace in the world, ram 2 of those jets into the WTC and third one into the most guarded building in the world – the Pentagon – with uncanny precision and at high speed, whilst the fourth one “crashes” into a field but leaves no debris; and all of this masterminded and controlled by some nut hiding in a cave in Afghanistan; who is “captured” ten years later, killed and, ooops!! We dropped his body into the sea…!”

Can you imagine something more stupid than that? And yet that is what mainstream Americans believe – Homer Simpson is a good archetype of their class. This fairy tale allowed Bush and Obama more than a decade of war, destroying Afghanistan, Iraq, which Baby Bush himself admitted had nothing to do with 9/11, Libya and other free countries in the Muslim World. Also, every time an event like 9/11 occurs, there are two key questions we must ask:

(a) Who Benefits from the attack, and

(b) Follow the money trail…

Clearly the Muslim world has been the key victim of 9/11; Israel however got the US and NATO to fight its proxy wars against Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and now they’re aiming at Syria and Iran. No wonder the folks who prepared the “War on Terror” myth are the same ones who in the late nineties prepared strategy documents for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Douglas Feith, David Wurmser, Paul Wolfowitz and others, and, more importantly, prepared PNAC (Project for a New American Century) which is a veritable blueprint for the conquest of the whole Muslim World adopted as official foreign policy Baby Bush as those same planners then became his key Pentagon and State Department officials.

Kourosh Ziabari: What’s your viewpoint regarding the underground detention facilities which the United States set up after the 9/11 attacks in Guantanamo bay in Cuba and Abu Ghraib in Iraq? There have been several reports of inhumane torturing and abusing of the detainees who are being held there without legal proceedings and under false pretexts. What’s your viewpoint?

Adrian Salbuchi: This is typical of the double standards maintained by the US in just about everything they do. They speak about the “rule of law” but then kidnap, arrest and jail people without any legal framework whatsoever. They speak about “human rights” but then torture and water-board people to get them to “confess” just as the Inquisition did centuries ago. They speak about “democracy” but their own government is now clamping down violently on any American citizen that begins to wake and speak up against the fact they are now living in a police state.

Kourosh Ziabari: Countries such as Iran, Cuba, Venezuela and Syria which have come under the fire of the United States’ psychological and economic warfare are paying the price for their independence and disobedience to the policies of the superpowers. Are these countries and other nations targeted by the America’s Total War, as you put it in one of your articles, the victims of their non-alignment with Washington and its allies?

Adrian Salbuchi: Yes. Washington, London and Tel Aviv do not tolerate any country that decides to live under a true Democracy (not the “Made in USA” Bush-Clinton-Obama version), and who want to live their own religious, cultural, moral and political values, which requires they reject all the poison, decay and perversion that Hollywood and the Western Media vomit on the entire world through decadent TV, movies and the press.

Baby Bush was honest about this when he said in October 2001 that every nation had a decision to make, “You’re either with us or you’re with the terrorists.” The point is that US and its allies are the main platform from where the Global Power Masters make Total War on all of Mankind, including their own people.

Kourosh Ziabari: What’s your viewpoint regarding the massive propaganda campaign against Iran over its nuclear program? The Western public sees Iran in the light of stereotypes and clichés which the mainstream media have created of Iran. They are simply unaware of Iran’s rich culture, history, civilization and traditions. What’s your take on that? How is it possible to acquaint the world with the concealed realities of Iran?

Adrian Salbuchi: That is a very tough problem because, as I say above, one of the Global Power Master’s greatest victories consists in the dumping-down of national populations the world over, especially in the US. Ignorance thus reigns supreme today amongst all populations, which means they can be easily duped into supporting wars against foreign countries they know absolutely nothing about. Of course, since they are maintained in a hypnotic state by the media they never actually realize this… Not yet, anyway.

That’s why the main counter-movement that we can all do from each and every country in the world – even from inside the US, Britain and Europe – is to show the other side of the coin, to make people listen to the other bell; to explain, educate, and show them evidence that the Truth lies elsewhere, and that they are being led by nose by these global Pied Pipers into a deep sea where they are being purposely drowned in ignorance.

One last point, if I may: often, very complex problems can be reduced to one simple formula which then helps us to better understand the whole.

I believe that the world’s foremost problem lies in the fact that the United States of America, Britain and Allies have huge, albeit illegitimate power, so that today they rule the world; however Israel and Zionism rule the US, UK and EU.

When people grasp this simple concept – US/UK/Allies run the world, but Israel/Zion run the US/UK/Allies – then the daily news reports become that much easier to understand.

Interview by Kourosh Ziabari

10 October, 2012.}

zonbron · 11 november 2012, 07:51

Wat is het belang van de beweging van niet-gebonden landen ?

De beweging van niet-gebonden landen is geen doelstelling op zich, doch kan deze beweging aangewend worden als een transitie naar een nieuwe wereldwijde entiteit gevormd door de daadwerkelijk onafhankelijke vrije landen, een soort van humanere, rechtvaardigere en eerlijkere Verenigde Naties dus.

Ondertussen zorgt ook het blok der niet-gebonden landen voor een steeds meer multipolaire wereld en vervult het alzo een stabiliserende functie. Tevens vormt het een tegenpool voor de oude dinosaurus, de Westerse wereld, welke nog steeds denkt dat het zijn willetje zomaar aan de rest van de wereld kan blijven opdringen.

De beweging van niet-gebonden landen is niet enkel een 'positieve ontwikkeling', het is veel meer dan dat, deze vereniging zal noodzakelijk blijken voor de mensheid.

Adrian Salbuchi - Washington, London and Tel Aviv don’t tolerate True Democracy

_{Now the Non-Aligned Movement has had many internal changes and challenges. It has tried to adapt as best it could as the Cold War years went on and as governments in each member country changed. It has been a contradictory movement which was all but scrapped after the demise of the USSR, however now many countries are coming to realize that Non-Alignment’s new definition would be: “Non-Alignment with the Supra-National Power Masters and their Zionist Controllers”. There lies the key foreign policy decision that every country needs to make, and that includes the US and UK.

Thankfully, and for different reasons, two key global powers have chosen to put a brake on the global Western Hegemons: a reborn Russia and a streaming-forwards China.

We see this today in Syria and also in Iran. Thank God Vladimir Putin is still in power in Russia even if only for the purpose of maintaining this geopolitical balance of power.

The Non-Aligned Movement is not, however, the organization our countries really need. It can, however, serve as a transition so that the “flame won’t go out” of the Non-Alignment Movement, but we need to erect this in a much more forceful manner so that a new truly Independent Free Nations of the World Entity gradually sweeps away today’s totally useless United Nations.

Russia, China, Iran, India and Brazil are the key countries for such a new multinational organization, followed and supported by regional confederations of countries in Africa, Latin America, Central Europe and Asia.

...

Interview by Kourosh Ziabari

10 October, 2012.}

Lees meer via de doorverwijzing.

zonbron · 27 november 2012, 10:22

Het kon natuurlijk niet langer uitblijven...

De beweging van niet-gebonden landen (NAM) roept op tot herstructuratie van de VN-Veiligheidsraad. Het proces van beslissingsvorming van dit uiterst belangrijke onderdeel van de VN moet grondig aangepast worden zodat het op een 'meer democratische' en transparante wijze effectief kan optreden.

PressTV - NAM calls for reforms in UN Security Council decision-making mechanism

Mohammad Khazaei, Iran’s ambassador to the UN and head of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM)’s Coordinating Bureau

The Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), which has around 120 member states, has called for the reformation of the decision-making mechanism at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC).

In order to increase transparency in the performance of the UNSC and the efficiency of its methods as well as forging a balance in the council’s approach toward non-member countries, the body should eliminate its inefficiencies, Iran’s Ambassador to the UN Mohammad Khazaei, who also heads the NAM's Coordinating Bureau, said.

The Iranian NAM official made the remarks in an address to an open debate on the transparency and efficiency of the UN Security Council.

Khazaei added that the UNSC should also pay attention to the regulations defined in the UN Charter regarding non-member states as well as resolutions that clarify the relations between the United Nations’ General Assembly and its other organizations.

Referring to the NAM’s recent summit in Tehran in August, Khazaei said the movement’s leaders have stressed the necessity for the UN member states to respect the authority of the United Nations’ different organizations and called for the maintenance of balance between these bodies within the framework of the UN Charter regulations.

The 16th NAM Summit was held in the Iranian capital on August 26-31 in which representatives from more than 100 countries participated.

Iran assumed the rotating presidency of the NAM for a three-year term during the summit.

Khazaei also stressed the necessity of paying attention to the views of the countries that are not members of the council but whose interests are directly affected by the UN body’s decisions.

“Transparency, accountability and coherence," he said, "are among the key factors that the UNSC must observe in all of its activities, approaches and methods.”

MYA/HMV/HJL

Khazaei, een man naar mijn hart !

En tevens een mooie tegemoetkoming vanwege de beweging van niet-gebonden landen (NAM) naar de VN toe, ze willen hun namelijk helpen met hun grootste probleem, nl. de niet democratische werking van de falende VN-Veiligheidsraad.