Middeleeuwse afbeeldingen van de zwarte adel

[djimi]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Egmond Codfried

Het feit dat ik de adel onderzoek wil nog niet zeggen dat ik ze op een voetstuk plaats. Integendeel, als u kennis van mijn hele onderzoek zou nemen ziet u dat ik ze karakteriseer als een 'despotische en wreede overheersing.' In een vervolgartikel zal ik bronnen geven dat deze zelfde adel die het gewone volk ''t grauw' noemde, wellicht vanwege hun witte kleur, menselijk leder gebruikten om hun boeken te kaften. Deze boeken treft men nog steeds in vorrname collecties en bij grote universiteiten. Het is dus als met Zuid Afrika. apartheid maakte Zuid Afrika tot het rijkste en welvarendste Afrikaanse land, maar ze waren wreede onderdrukkers. Dus de zwarte adel maakte Europa tot wat het vandaag is, over de ruggen van de witte meerderheid heen. Het is deze dichotomie die ik probeer over te brengen, om te laten zien dat wij allemaal hebben geleden en dat racisme en haat moeten ophouden.

Wel, dan had ik u duidelijk verkeerd begrepen.

Waar ik het in elk geval volmondig mee eens ben is die opmerking betreffende dat leed en het racisme en de haat die moeten ophouden.

Veel succes nog,

djimi

[Egmond Codfried]

Hendrik Gerritz Pot (1630)
'Officieren van de Cluveniersschutterij'

Met Mr. Solomon Colterman (1601-1654) in het midden. Hij heeft een groot afrokapsel en was bierbrouwer. Wellicht betaalde hij voor dit groepje en dit groepsportret.

[Egmond Codfried]

Portretten van Mary J. Blige die aantonen dat zwarten op vele manier kunnen worden afgebeeld.



Oprah Winfrey en Mary J. Blige

[Egmond Codfried]

Henri IV

[djimi]

Dag Egmond,

ik vind het toch leuker als u hedendaagse foto's van mooie meiden post, eigenlijk.

Dank bij voorbaat,

djimi

[Egmond Codfried]

PERSOONSBESCHRIJVINGEN






HAYDN

While finding an appropriate pose for Haydn may not have been difficult, he presented portraitists with something of a challenge in another area: his physiognomy was, much to his own chagrin, rather less than noble. His facial features were described by one of his earliest biographers, Dies, as ‘rather regular’ and possessing a ‘hawk-like nose’ and his face and even nose having scars from the pox. He was, by his own admission, ugly, but, as Dies continues to recount, not ‘in his form but only in his pock-marked skin and the brownish complexion.’ His complexion was in fact so swarthy that he was once dubbed a ‘Blackamoor’ by his prince at Esterháry. (For a fascinating account of Haydn’s concern for his public image at the time, see Thomas Tolley’s Painting the Cannon’s Roar, chapter 5.) The issue of Haydn’s appearance is important as it relates to the challenges and choices that portraitists had to make when painting their subject, especially the degree to which they were compelled to flatter whist still retaining a sense of likeness.

http://www.cph.rcm.ac.uk/Virtual%20E...ydn/Haydn3.htm

De vraag is waarom Haydn, beschreven als 'swarthy' en 'a blackamoor' als een witte werd afgebeeld. En waar de zwarte kleur vandaan komt.

At the age of twenty-eight Haydn composed his first symphony. Soon after this he attracted the attention of the old Prince Esterhazy, all the members of whose family have become known in the history of music as generous Mæcenases of the art.
"What! you don't mean to say that little blackamoor" (alluding to Haydn's brown complexion and small stature) "composed that symphony?"
"Surely, prince," replied the director Friedburg, beckoning to Joseph Haydn, who advanced toward the orchestra.
"Little Moor," says the old gentleman, "you shall enter my service. I am Prince Esterhazy. What's your name?"
"Haydn."

http://www.guitar-moonbeams.com/haydn-biography.html

[Egmond Codfried]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door djimi

Dag Egmond,

ik vind het leuker als u hedendaagse foto's van mooie meiden post, eigenlijk.

Dank bij voorbaat,

djimi

[Whitney Houston, uit commercieel oogpunt gewit]



[Madame de Recamier (gewit)]

Dit is toch een historie forum. Je zal je toch moeten behelpen met schoonheden als Anna Boleyn, Henrietta Maria en Catherine de Medici. Wat vindt je van Madame de Recamier? negentien jaar lang de tedere minnares van Madame de Staël. Wat zou je doen als je geloofde de oorzaak van racisme gevonden te hebben? Ik neem mijn onderzoek dus wel serieus. Het is typerend voor een groot deel van de Europeanen dat ze door alle eeuwen helemaal suf zijn mishandelt door hun leiders dat elke notie van verandering of protest of zelfs verzet eruit is getimmerd. Dat is feitelijk ook de integratie die men aan nieuwkomers opdringt: gewoon je bek houden en doen wat je gezegd wordt. En geen onderlinge solidariteit terwijl iemand voor je ogen in elkaar wordt geramd door de politie. Er is alleen vrijheid van meningsuiting voor mensen die door het bestuur daartoe gerechtigd zijn. Verder is alles ontdekt wat er te ontdekken valt, is de boodschap. Uitgevers zeggen van te voren dat eigen onderzoeken niet welkom zijn. Het is als die Turkse sultan die zijn wetenschappers ooit verbood de geheimen die god had ingesteld te proberen te ontsluieren, waarmee het Ottomaanse Rijk eeuwenlang in diepe duisternis verkeerde. Maar goed, mijn roots liggen elders en ik ben dus hevig benieuwd naar koningen en adel in Europa die als zwart beschreven worden en hun zwart bloed symboliseerden met de afbeelding van een Moor. Om een vergelijking te maken, weinig mannen zullen zich druk maken om vrouwenrechten want zij zijn allang blij uit die hoek geen concurrentie te krijgen. Dat 'laten wij lekker maar niets doen, wat je uitstraalt' bekoort mij niet.

[Another Jack]

Zo'n revolutionair verhaal, en niemand, zelfs geen neger, die er een academisch proefschrift over schrijft...

Hoe komt dat eigenlijk??

[doubled]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Another Jack

Zo'n revolutionair verhaal, en niemand, zelfs geen neger, die er een academisch proefschrift over schrijft...

Hoe komt dat eigenlijk??

Tja... al die negers in het "complot", om die informatie achter te houden.

[Egmond Codfried]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Another Jack

Zo'n revolutionair verhaal, en niemand, zelfs geen neger, die er een academisch proefschrift over schrijft...

Hoe komt dat eigenlijk??

[Toni Morrison]

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...5/ai_14690907/

Een grote computer voor je neus, verschillende zoekmachines...en toch klink je zo achterlijk! Hierbij een begin, een artikel welke verwijst naar Nobelprijswinnaar Toni Morrison.

[Egmond Codfried]

DEFINITIONS

The New Black Caucasians – Changing Meaning of the Caucasian – By Lion!
The New “Black Caucasians” – Changing Meaning of the Caucasian -
New Caucasian Delusions

In 1937, Caucasians were defined as “the white division of human beings so called because the people are from the Caucaus mountains. They were taken from the highest type of the human family, the circassians, Jews, Armenians, Hindus and Persians.” See Webster’s 20th century Dictionary unabridged, 1937.


A more recent revision of the New Websters dictionary, 1981 defined the terms as: “Caucasian- pertaining to the white race as characterized by physical features. A native of the Caucausus, a member of the Caucasian race.”

In 1992, the American Heritage Dictionary, 3rd Ed,1992 moved this re-definition process even further for it boldly declared as follows: “Caucasian- of relating to, or being a major human racial division traditionally distinguished by physical characteristics such as very light to BROWN skin (??) pigmentation and straight to wavy orcurly hair, and includes people indigenous to Europe, northern AFRICA(??),Western Asia, and India, relating to the Caucasian region of its peoples.”

The definition of Caucasian that exists in Webster’s New World College Dictionary of 1996 is a 180 degrees turn around from the term’s usage in the early parts of the 20th century. In the Webster’s dictionary one finds the following so called explanation: “Caucasoid- from the erroneous notion that the original home of the hypothetical indo-europeans was the Caucasus ..one of the major…varieties of human beings…characterized by…straight or wavy hair..loosely called the white race although it embraces many people of DARK (??) skin color.”

Motivation For A Historic Lie

We all thought that Caucasian meant the so-called white race, (actually a pink-pale coloured tribe from Central Asia) who today dominate Europe, America and the rest of the world. This tribe was the last civilized tribe of humanity, yet it claims to be the first world nation.

Until recently, it was quite understood that the essential difference between the pink northern European (Caucasians) and the brown African (Coloureds)was the colour of their skin. It appears that the Euro-controllers of the world, dominators of the world consciousness, have now redefined the meaning of Caucasian to include Africans.

Why would they do this: To keep Moors (so-called Africans) confused about their identity; to keep Europeans deluded about their abilities; to steal the legacy and achievement of worthier civilizations; to perpetuate pink-skin supremacy by erasing the collective memory of humanity and giving an impression of a collective mass that does not exist in fact.

They also lie to the rest of us, so that we do not know where we are coming from or where we are all heading to. And where are we heading to? To a world of sanity, equity, and balance. We are fighting for a world where white (pink-skin) supremacy is utterly destroyed. Our strenght is in numbers, and we cannot be conquered, as long as we are aware of their manipulations and underhand tactis.

Keep watch, Moorish children, the night is almost over and the false one is in a great panic!

Lion!

See : Suzar, “Blacked Out through whitewash” at www.suzar.com

See http://charismaallover.wordpress.com...-dark-skinned/

The First (Black) Europeans: The Original Africans Of Europe – By – Oguejiofo Annu
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGISTS MEETING:

European Skin Turned Pale Only Recently, Gene Suggests
Ann Gibbons


PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA–At the American Association of Physical Anthropologists meeting, held here from 28 to 31 March, a new report on the evolution of a gene for skin color suggested that Europeans acquired pale skin quite recently, perhaps only 6000 to 12,000 years ago.

Science 20 April 2007:
Vol. 316. no. 5823, p. 364
DOI: 10.1126/science.316.5823.364a

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/conten.../316/5823/364a
Comments on the recent genetic studies:

This research conducted by Europeans descendants seeking the roots of their origin supports the view that the first pale-skin European was born 6,000 years ago. In 2005, researchers linked the paleness of the modern European skin to a mutation in gene SLC 24A5. Its implication is immense if fully comprehended. The “whites” or Caucasians are not native to Europe as noted by Sokal. Haak et al (2006)

1.5 million years ago when human beings first began to evolve in Africa, they had Black skin. 100,000 years ago when anatomically modern humans evolved in Africa, they gave rise to the Black man and woman.

They lived in Africa as Black people, some of these people left Africa, 50,000 years ago as Black people, entered Europe as Black people, and they settled and lived in Europe as Black people until 6,000 years ago when the mutation that gave rise to the pale-skin arose.

Rogers posits that all people having descendants today had exactly the receptor protein of today’s Africans; their skin was black, and the intense sun killed off the progeny with any whiter skin that resulted from mutational variation in the receptor protein (Rogers 2004:107).

Nina Jablonski claims that dark skin evolved pari passu with the loss of body hair and was the original state for the genus Homo.

Furthermore, it is generally accepted as argued by Rogers that the descendants of any people who migrate North from Africa will mutate to become white over time because the evolutionary constraint that keeps Africans’ skin black generation after generation decreases generally the further North a people migrates (Rogers 2004).

However the surprise is that this mutation only occurred after more than 45,000 years in which only Black-skinned African people lived in Europe as its original human aboriginals. It cannot be over-emphasized that it was only in the last 6,000 years that the pale-skin (aka whiteman) first appeared.

The mutation gene must have spread gradually (as often occurs with new mutation) from that time but it surely would have taken another two or three thousand years down the line before it would become the dominant European profile. That makes it just three thousand years ago.

It was only three thousand years ago that whiteman became the dominant type in an African-owned Europe! Before that it was Black-skinned African. For more than 48,000 years Black-skinned Africans would have been the only Europeans!!! Europe was discovered and mapped by Black skin Africans. Europe of yesterday, today and tomorrow will ever remain Africa’s heritage.
Osteological Evidence:

In 2006, Brace a leading authority in anthropology conducted osteological analysis on several skeletal remains dating from neolithic Europe.

According to Brace:

“Many human craniofacial dimensions are largely of neutral adaptive significance, and an analysis of their variation can serve as an indication of the extent to which any given population is genetically related to or differs from any other.

When 24 craniofacial measurements of a series of human populations are used to generate neighbor-joining dendrograms, it is no surprise that all modern European groups, ranging all of the way from Scandinavia to eastern Europe and throughout the Mediterranean to the Middle East, show that they are closely related to each other.

The surprise is that the Neolithic peoples of Europe and their Bronze Age successors are not closely related to the modern inhabitants, although the prehistoric/modern ties are somewhat more apparent in southern Europe.

It is a further surprise that the Epipalaeolithic Natufian of Israel from whom the Neolithic realm was assumed to arise has a clear link to Sub-Saharan Africa.

……………………..

The data treated here support the idea that the Neolithic (i.e. Natufians with a clear link to Sub-Saharan Africa) moved out of the Near East into the circum-Mediterranean areas and Europe by a process of demic diffusion but that subsequently the in situ residents of those areas, derived from the Late Pleistocene inhabitants, absorbed both the agricultural life way and the people who had brought it.

C. Loring Brace: The questionable contribution of the Neolithic and the Bronze Age to European craniofacial form; PNAS | January 3, 2006 | vol. 103 | no. 1 | 242-247

There are no ancient skeletons of the Caucasian type. The findings of Brace et al make it clear that there were no whites in ancient Europe. There were only Black Africans living there until the coming of the Europeans as noted by DuBois, Diop and Boule & Vallois.

Again another piece of incontrovertible scientific evidence that the Paleolithic Europeans were Blacks. The skeletal remains of these people as noted by Boule and Vallois recalled the tropical African type.

“So striking” writes Professor Elliot Smith, “is the family likeness between the early Neolithic peoples of the British Isles and the Mediterranean and the bulk of the population, both ancient and modern, of Egypt and East Africa, that the description of the bones of an Early Briton of that remote epoch might apply in all essential details to an inhabitant of Somaliland. (The Ancient Egyptians, p. 58.)

Geneticist Peter Underhill refines the facts:
About 80 percent of Europeans arose from primitive hunters who arrived about 35,000 years ago, endured the long ice age and then expanded rapidly to dominate the continent, a new study shows.

Researchers analyzing the Y chromosome taken from 1,007 men from 25 different locations in Europe found a pattern that suggests four out of five of the men shared a common male ancestor about 40,000 years ago.

The basic pattern had some changes that apparently developed among people who once shared a common ancestor and then were isolated for many generations.

This scenario supports other studies about the Paleolithic European groups.

Those studies suggest that a primitive, stone-age human came to Europe, probably from Central Asia and the Middle East, in two waves of migration beginning about 35,000 years ago.

Their numbers were small and they lived by hunting animals and gathering plant food. They used crudely sharpened stones and fire.

“About 24,000 years ago, the last ice age began, with mountain-sized glaciers moving across most of Europe.

The Paleolithic Europeans retreated before the ice, finding refuge for hundreds of generations in three areas: what is now Spain, the Balkans and the Ukraine.

“When the glaciers melted, about 16,000 years ago, the Paleolithic tribes resettled the rest of Europe. Y chromosome mutations occurred among people in each of the ice age refuges.

About 8,000 years ago a more advanced people, the Neolithic, migrated to Europe from the Middle East, bringing with them a new Y chromosome pattern and a new way of life – agriculture. About 20 percent of Europeans now have the Y chromosome pattern from this migration [African Y chromosome E3b and SouthWest Asian J].

Ogu Eji Ofo Annu
July 11, 2007

[Egmond Codfried]

Opvallend weinig reacties op de portretten van Charles II Stuart, The Black Boy! Waarom?

[Egmond Codfried]

[Elizabeth Barrett Browning and son Pen]



[Robert Browning]

Two of world's greatest lovers - Elizabeth Barrett and Robert Browning - were descendants of blacks
Ebony, May, 1995 by Monique Burns
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
How do I love thee?" Elizabeth Barrett wrote to Robert Browning in her immortal Sonnets From the Portuguese, "Let me count the ways ...."

The ways apparently were not affected by the mixed bloodline of either poet. For, in Dared And Done: The Marriage of Elizabeth Barrett and Robert Browning, an absorbing 382-page saga recently released by Alfred A. Knopf, the venerable New York publishing house, author Julia Markus offers convincing evidence that the two 19th-century English poets were part-Black descendants of wealthy Jamaican plantation owners.

This evidence comes from contemporary witnesses, frank acknowledgments by Barrett, and photographs that depict both as dark-skinned. In a letter to her beloved sister Arabel in 1860, Barrett enclosed a black-and-white photograph taken in Rome of herself and their 11-year-old son "Pen," which shows a clear contrast between the dark-skinned mother and fair-haired, blue-eyed child.

The evidence of mixed race in two of the greatest poets in the English language has been a cultural bombshell, sending shock waves through literary circles on two continents. Vincent Petronella, president of Boston's Browning Society, one of the country's largest, and an English professor at the University of Massachusetts, Boston, says: "From this time onward, no biographer can ever reject this scholarship. Something was coming to light in her [Elizabeth Barrett's] father's mind. The issue of mixed blood is as good an explanation as any. Even if you don't accept it as fact, you have to bear it in mind."

According to Markus, a respected Browning scholar and award-winning novelist, there are strong indications that the adamant opposition of Elizabeth's father, Edward Barrett Moulton Barrett, to the marriage of any of his 11 surviving children -- was not merely the dictum of a domestic tyrant but, rather, a deliberate attempt to extinguish the family's mixed bloodline.

The most common reaction to this cultural whodunit, which starts in Colonial Jamaica and segues to England and Italy, has been a kind of shocked silence. Although the book has been hailed by The New York Times and the Boston Globe, other major newspapers and major electronic media have not reviewed it or even mentioned it.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...0/ai_16878140/

[djimi]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Egmond Codfried

Opvallend weinig reacties op de portretten van Charles II Stuart, The Black Boy! Waarom?

...

Omdat dat geen schoon meiske is, heer Codfried.

Heeft u toevallig niet een reeks foto's van Sister Carol, Sister Nancy, Lady Saw, de meisjes van Chic, ... ?

Ik durf wedden dat er dan wèl veel reacties gaan komen.

Hoopvol wachtend op de komst van al dat moois,

groet ik u,

djimi

[Egmond Codfried]

[Andres Serrano, The Interpretation of Dreams (White Nigger) (2001). Cibachrome print 60 x 50 inches framed.]

Black Is, Black Ain’t
The Renaissance Society, Chicago, USA


Both polarized by race and, at turns, seamlessly integrated, what better place than Chicago to host an exhibition titled ‘Black Is, Black Ain’t’? The Renaissance Society’s thematic group show follows seven years after the similarly themed ‘Freestyle’ at the Studio Museum in Harlem. In a catalogue essay for the latter show, Hamza Walker, the curator of ‘Black Is, Black Ain’t’, argued that the characteristics of blackness depend largely on external representations rather than innate personality traits. (‘A ‘we’ was assumed,’ Walker states, ‘imposing itself on whatever meager sense of self I could muster.’) It is on this point that ‘Black Is, Black Ain’t’ departs from the earlier exhibition’s free-for-all multiculturalism, wherein all art made by black people was deemed ‘black art’. Instead, Walker’s exhibition re-introduces specific landmarks from the history of black society in America, and, with a twist, welcomes non-black artists into the discussion. Their inclusion highlights an attempt to define race as largely a community effort.

http://www.frieze.com/shows/review/black_is_black_aint/

[Egmond Codfried]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door djimi

Omdat dat geen schoon meiske is, heer Codfried.

Heeft u toevallig niet een reeks foto's van Sister Carol, Sister Nancy, Lady Saw, de meisjes van Chic, ... ?

Ik durf wedden dat er dan wèl veel reacties gaan komen.

Hoopvol wachtend op de komst van al dat moois,

groet ik u,

djimi

Beste, dit is absurd, heb je mijn hulp nodig om gyneacologische afbeeldingen te vinden op het web? Iemand vond dat deze thread werkelijk ergens over ging en daaraan hou ik vast. Ik stel voor dat je deze thread niet meer aanklikt en elders vermaak zoekt. Ik ben uitgesproken!

[djimi]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Egmond Codfried

Beste, dit is absurd, heb je mijn hulp nodig om gyneacologische afbeeldingen te vinden op het web? Iemand vond dat deze thread werkelijk ergens over ging en daaraan hou ik vast. Ik stel voor dat je deze thread niet meer aanklikt en elders vermaak zoekt. Ik ben uitgesproken!

Sorry hoor, ik vind deze draad best wel boeiend, en ik wilde u enkel aan meer bezoekers helpen.

Als u er prijs op stelt dat ik hier niet meer kom, zult u de mods moeten vragen dat ze mij bannen of zo.

Vriendelijke groet,

djimi

[Hallebarde]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Egmond Codfried

....... Ik ben uitgesproken!

Oef !

Het heeft (te) lang geduurd, maar ik ben blij dat u uiteindelijk zelf inziet dat deze waanzin eens moet ophouden.

[Another Jack]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Egmond Codfried

[Toni Morrison]

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...5/ai_14690907/

Een grote computer voor je neus, verschillende zoekmachines...en toch klink je zo achterlijk! Hierbij een begin, een artikel welke verwijst naar Nobelprijswinnaar Toni Morrison.

Dus iets is wetenschappelijk wanneer het verwijst naar een Nobelprijswinnaar.

Ga studeren!!!!

Het gordijn sluit langzaam, je mag je rode neus opbergen.

[Egmond Codfried]

Vanwege onderzoek ga ik ervanuit dat in de periode 1933-1945, Frankrijk 35% van zijn Joodse burgers verloor aan racistisch en moordzuchtig nazi geweld, Belgie 45% en Nederland als koploper, maar liefst 75%!!!

Ik vraag mij af of er vandaag jonge, beschaafde Nederlanders en Belgen zijn die kennis van deze zaken hebben, en afstand daarvan nemen. Het algemene beeld is dat de niet-Joodse bevolking deze verschrikking vrij kalm accepteerde en gretig gebruik maakte van het door de staat verstrekte excuus van 'wij hebben het niet geweten.' Hoezo niet geweten? Sinds wanneer worden mensen die naar een 'luxe oord' gebracht worden, vervoerd in dierenwagons? Beeldmateriaal wijst uit dat de Joden al bij het instappen aan fysiek geweld en fysieke vernederingen van de nazi bezetter blootstonden.

Hier sta ik dus met een thread die een antwoord probeert te zoeken voor rassenhaat tegen zwarten en hoop net die personen te treffen die dat begrijpen en daarover willen discussieren. Tot nu kreeg ik veel respons en beledigingen van achterlijke, onbeschaafde apartheids-nazi's, maar de goede mensen schijnen zich weer de rol aan te meten van de passieve toeschouwer.

Overigens waren ook de niet-Joden: zwarten, witten, homo's, communisten, Roma, Jehova's getuigen en Oost Europeanen slachtoffer van nazi geweld en moordzucht. Het is dus een fout om te geloven dat de rassenhaat vandaag tegen zwarten en moslims, alleen hen betreft.