![]() |
Registreren kan je hier. Problemen met registreren of reageren op de berichten? Een verloren wachtwoord? Gelieve een mail te zenden naar [email protected] met vermelding van je gebruikersnaam. |
|
Registreer | FAQ | Forumreglement | Ledenlijst |
soc.culture.belgium Via dit forum kun je alle berichten lezen die worden gepost op de nieuwsgroep soc.culture.belgium. Je kunt hier ook reageren op deze berichten, reacties worden dan ook in deze nieuwsgroep gepost. Vergeet niet om dit te lezen. |
|
Discussietools |
![]() |
#21 |
Berichten: n/a
|
![]() On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 02:36:20 GMT, "TR" <[email protected]> wrote:
>"Ordog" <[email protected]> wrote in message >news:[email protected] roups.com... >Nusrat wrote: >>"Ordog" wrote: > >> Hating child molesting pervert is paranoia? > >Hating people might not be a very useful thing to do, but that is your >private business. Seeing child molesters everywhere, specially where >there aren't any is the symptome of a potentially dangerous mental >disease. You dshould get urgent treatment for it! > > >What's the matter Ordog, too ignorant to know that Mohammed married a six >year old girl and banged her at 9? Do you know of any pervert who would wait 3 years to fulfil his demented desires? |
![]() |
#22 |
Berichten: n/a
|
![]() "TR" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected] nk.net... > "Ordog" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected] oups.com... > Nusrat wrote: > >"Ordog" wrote: > > > Hating child molesting pervert is paranoia? > > Hating people might not be a very useful thing to do, but that is your > private business. Seeing child molesters everywhere, specially where > there aren't any is the symptome of a potentially dangerous mental > disease. You dshould get urgent treatment for it! > > > What's the matter Ordog, too ignorant to know that Mohammed married a six > year old girl and banged her at 9? So what? Abraham fucked his daughters. Nothing that happened thousands of years ago has any bearing on modern sexual practices, unless you're a racist scumbag trying to denigrate a group of people....You seem like you're endorsing child-molestation! |
![]() |
#23 |
Berichten: n/a
|
![]() "Nusrat" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 12:10:26 +1100, [email protected] (Rifty) wrote: > > >Nusrat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> If Muslims were to embark on a scorched earth policy with the West, I > >> don't believe it would be too much trouble to eliminate all of them > >> from our midst. > > > >Like it is to eliminate 'insurgents' in Iraq, do you mean? > >Rifty > > In Iraq the animals have home turf advantage, here in States we can > get rid of them all in a few days. Go for it....you stupid arseholes couldn't even take out the Vietnamese! A THIRD world nation kicked your arrogant arse! Fucking with mad Muslims will be a lot harder.....and you're bound to lose that war too....then you'll fuck with the crazy commie Koreans, then bye bye. Dumb fucking American. |
![]() |
#24 |
Berichten: n/a
|
![]() TR wrote:
<> "Ordog" wrote: <> But it was. Only true morons do not understand this. Or do not want to. <> The only one benefitting from the disintegration of that country is <> that single remaining superpower. >Ask the people of Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, > Ukrain, Belarus, Kazakhastan, etc. etc. if they are happy to be rid of > Russian domination? I have no real desire to argue with an idiotic rightard troll. My answer is for other members of this NG, It is amazing how little people really know about Russia and its history. That the baltic nations do not like Russia is quite clear for a variety of reasons. But I challenge anyone to tell me at what time in the past milleneum has a state called Ukrain ever existed before the disintegration of the Russian federation. Those morons who believe that smallish nations with small economical resources can do better that a federation with huge resources are either stupid nationalists or political nutjobs. Why not let the USA disintegrate to its member states and than we will see how little Connecticut or New York could survive on its own. > Ask anyone in Eastern Europe if they are happy that the > Soviet Union disintegrated. Stupid proposition. The occupied countries are happy that they are free again. Is that a surprise? Yet they were never part of Russia even during the military occupation. They have nothing to gain from a weak Russia and the resulting politically and economically unstable remnant states. It won't take long before all of them will distrust the USA domination more than the now defuct Russian expansionary politic. > How about those people celebrating as they took > apart the Berlin wall. Can there be no Troll posts without used up clichés? Ördög Either the neocons go or civilisation does! |
![]() |
#25 |
Berichten: n/a
|
![]() Nusrat <[email protected]> wrote:
> In Iraq the animals have home turf advantage, here in States we can > get rid of them all in a few days. Dream on. One letter with white powder in it stuffs up the entire postal system. A million little pinpricks can make you bleed to death. You have not learnt this lesson yet. I hope you don't have to do it the hard way, for all our sakes. Rifty -- Academic and Computing Help http://rifty.net |
![]() |
#26 |
Berichten: n/a
|
![]() TR <[email protected]> wrote:
> Eliminating insugents in Iraq would be a piece of cake if we weren't so > polite about how we do it. That's the really big illusion so many of you are operating under. Exactly what you said in Vietnam. Turns out that even little Vietnam is quite a big country when you only have a few hundred thousand troops to achieve your political as well as military objectives. So is Iraq. You imagine they don't understand what tough means? Hell, you don't know what they put up with under Saddam and his predecessors then. They are at least as tough as any of you, and a lot less afraid of dying. Rifty -- Academic and Computing Help http://rifty.net |
![]() |
#27 |
Berichten: n/a
|
![]() On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 05:56:34 GMT, "Dean T" <[email protected]>
wrote: >"TR" <[email protected]> wrote in message >news:[email protected] ink.net... >> "Ordog" <[email protected]> wrote in message >> news:[email protected] oups.com... >> Nusrat wrote: >> >"Ordog" wrote: >> >> > Hating child molesting pervert is paranoia? >> >> Hating people might not be a very useful thing to do, but that is your >> private business. Seeing child molesters everywhere, specially where >> there aren't any is the symptome of a potentially dangerous mental >> disease. You dshould get urgent treatment for it! >> >> >> What's the matter Ordog, too ignorant to know that Mohammed married a six >> year old girl and banged her at 9? > > >So what? Abraham fucked his daughters. Nothing that happened thousands of >years ago has any bearing on modern sexual practices, unless you're a racist >scumbag trying to denigrate a group of people....You seem like you're >endorsing child-molestation! Muslim Allah had to have been hard pressed to chose a pervert like Mohammed to represent here on Earth. This bastard also made his adopted son divorce his wife so he can have his fun with her. What a religion, what a prophet. |
![]() |
#28 |
Berichten: n/a
|
![]() On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:12:35 +1100, [email protected] (Rifty) wrote:
>Nusrat <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In Iraq the animals have home turf advantage, here in States we can >> get rid of them all in a few days. > >Dream on. One letter with white powder in it stuffs up the entire postal >system. A million little pinpricks can make you bleed to death. > >You have not learnt this lesson yet. I hope you don't have to do it the >hard way, for all our sakes. >.Rifty So far the Arabs have been clever enough to invest in an individual like Bush who does your bidding. But after 2009 a new man and hopefully a patriot will reside in the White House who will put our interest first,that's when attack on US soil will invite retribution against Mecca. If I were you I would get ready to picture Islam without Mecca. |
![]() |
#29 |
Berichten: n/a
|
![]() Nusrat <[email protected]> wrote:
> If I were you I would get ready to picture Islam without Mecca. I already have, actually. I did quite a bit of thinking about that when someone else tried to put it up as a strategy to hold Islam to ransom. I know what the importance of Mecca is to all Muslims, but if it were obliterated and the Kaaba gone forever, I don't think it would cause any collapse at all in Islam as a religon. If anything, it would create an even stronger focus for the 99.99% of Muslims who would not have been within cooee of Mecca; a determination to avenge the attack both openly and covertly, and to rebuild it when the opportunity came. Islam's iconoclasm would allow it to adjust at least as quickly as Americans adjusted to not have two great twin towers on the New York skyline. Mecca's centrality is as psychological as it is spiritual for Islam; and its destruction in its present form would accomplish very little by way of destruction of morale. On the contrary, it would create a billion people happy to avenge the insult. When you're sitting in a cage, you don't stir up the bees nest just outside your reach. Rifty -- Academic and Computing Help http://rifty.net |
![]() |
#30 |
Berichten: n/a
|
![]() On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 23:50:49 +1100, [email protected] (Rifty) wrote:
>Mecca's centrality is as psychological as it is spiritual for Islam; and >its destruction in its present form would accomplish very little by way >of destruction of morale. On the contrary, it would create a billion >people happy to avenge the insult. > They would be too stupid to realise that their non-existant allah had allowed it to happen. |