Politics.be Registreren kan je hier.
Problemen met registreren of reageren op de berichten?
Een verloren wachtwoord?
Gelieve een mail te zenden naar [email protected] met vermelding van je gebruikersnaam.

Ga terug   Politics.be > Diverse > Over koetjes en kalfjes...
Registreer FAQForumreglement Ledenlijst

Over koetjes en kalfjes... Op verzoek van de gebruikers van dit forum: een hoekje waarin je over vanalles en nog wat kan praten... De boog moet namelijk niet altijd gespannen staan hé.

Antwoord
 
Discussietools
Oud 30 november 2007, 16:16   #21
Daimanta
Parlementsvoorzitter
 
Daimanta's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 25 oktober 2007
Berichten: 2.063
Standaard

Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Montalcino Bekijk bericht
VHS was een formaat waar wel porno op werd uitgebracht en daarom versloeg het technisch betere concurrenten. Sommigen verwachten dat de geschiedenis zich zal herhalen.

http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/05...rnhd/index.php

Vooruit dan maar:

"
Many theories regarding why Sony's Betamax failed have arisen over the years. One of the more amusing (and false) is that Sony refused to allow pornographic material on their system. A quick perusal of the Betamax library reveals that adult entertainment was readily available. For example, Playboy Industries released their videos in a dual format, both Betamax and VHS, for most of the 1970s and 80s (and can be confirmed with a quick search through Ebay's adult section, or other used video markets). Second, the adult industry is too small to have any lasting impact on standards selection. According to Forbes.com, adult video income is approximately $1 billion. "The industry is tiny next to broadcast television ($32.3 billion in 1999), cable television ($45.5 billion), the newspaper business ($27.5 billion), Hollywood ($31 billion), even to professional and educational publishing ($14.8 billion). When one really examines the numbers, the porn industry — while a subject of fascination — is every bit as marginal as it seems at first glance." [2]
The outcome was decided by other more-important factors such as longer home-recording time (up to 10.6 hours on a T-210). From the consumer perspective, buying a single 8-hour VHS tape for $5 is cheaper than buying two 4-hour Betamax tapes for $10. Although Betamax initially owned 100% of the market in 1975, the perceived value of longer recording times eventually tipped the balance in favor of VHS. By 1981, U.S. Betamax's sales had sunk to only 25% of all sales. As movie and video studios turned away from Betamax, the combination of lower market share and a lack of available titles strengthened VHS's hand. [3] In the UK, Betamax held a 25% market share, but by 1986 it was down to 7.5% and continued to decline further. In Japan, Betamax had more success and eventually evolved into Enhanced Definition Betamax with 500+ lines resolution (DVD quality), but eventually both Betamax and VHS were supplanted by laser-based technology. The last Sony Betamax was produced in 2002."



Bron: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Videotape_format_war
__________________
Steun Groot Nederland!
Daimanta is offline   Met citaat antwoorden
Antwoord



Regels voor berichten
Je mag niet nieuwe discussies starten
Je mag niet reageren op berichten
Je mag niet bijlagen versturen
Je mag niet jouw berichten bewerken

vB-code is Aan
Smileys zijn Aan
[IMG]-code is Aan
HTML-code is Uit
Forumnavigatie


Alle tijden zijn GMT +1. Het is nu 08:30.


Forumsoftware: vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content copyright ©2002 - 2020, Politics.be