De nieuwe wereld orde

[Firestone]

En daar hebben we de oude anti-semitische vervalsingen weer!

En nu gaan de believers weer en-bloc steigeren en zeggen dat ik dat verzin.

En ik ben volgens exodus "te gesloten", maar hij is niet in staat ook maar één degelijk antwoord te geven op eenderwelke opmerking van de "te gesloten" mensen.

Doe zo voort jongens.

Oude racistische en anti-semitische zever, pseudo-wetenschappelijke rommel, leugens tot in de sterren, en maar de anderen voor dom verklaren.

Wat een bende toch.

[Salmon L.A.]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door exodus

Jamaar dan nog, het grootste deel van de geschiedenis bestaat volgens de officiele uitleg uit eencelligen. Het is pas op het allerlaatste moment dat de mens, een zeer complexe soort, tot uiting komt. Men heeft nog altijd de "missing" link. (volgens de evolutietheorie).

Men gaat er dus in feite van uit dat de mens zoiezo van mensachtigen afkomt, maar men zit nog altijd met de "missing link". En als men dan eens één sleket vindt, maar dan ook maar slecht één. Dan zit men al direct te roepen dat men een stapje dichter is bij de missing link.

Als men alles op een rijtje zet dan zou men moeten toegeven dat het bewijs voor de evolutheorie van de mens maar zeer pover is.

Er zijn miljoenen missing links in de evolutie van uitsluitend eencellig leven tot de huidige complexe flora en fauna.
Dat ondermijnt de theorie niet, maar bewijst alleen dat organisch materiaal zeer vergankelijk is - alsof dat nog moest bewezen worden.

[Pindar]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pieke

de protocollen van de wijzen van Sion zijn allang bewezen als vervalst verslag. En dat wordt dan gebruikt als bewijs dat evolutie ook opgezet spel is...

Dit vermoede ik al. Je hebt het naar mijn mening verkeerd
Echter er zijn ook andere bronnen zoals de genoemde boeken
bv Darwin and the New World Order. Al gelezen? Ach zo!





my two cents

Pin d'Ar

[Pindar]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Salmon L.A.

Er zijn miljoenen missing links in de evolutie van uitsluitend eencellig leven tot de huidige complexe flora en fauna.
Dat ondermijnt de theorie niet, maar bewijst alleen dat organisch materiaal zeer vergankelijk is - alsof dat nog moest bewezen worden.

Er is nog iets, de "verschrikkelijke sneeuwmannen" homonoiden, bestaan wel degelijk, maar worden net als UFO's belachelijk gemaakt omdat dan de evolutie theorie in duigen valt!

Maar goed wat is dan een betere of alternatieve theorie?

WHAT IS INTERVENTION THEORY?
Intervention Theory is a science-based alternative to human origins. It combines information from ancient historical records with what modern science shows us in our own DNA--Humans are the product of off-world Intervention. Sound crazy? See the PROOF of it in 15 short, compelling, fact-based slide shows

klik hier: http://www.lloydpye.com/

my two cents


Pin d'Ar

[Pindar]

Voor onze dichtgespijkerde wetenschappertjes

Equinox - It Runs on Water (Free Energy - 1995)

On Sunday, 17 December 1995, viewers in U.K. saw an hour-long T V. program which, at long last, puts across the clear message that "free energy" is on the way.

In the opening stages Arthur C. Clarke explained how there were four stages in the way scientists react to the development of anything of a revolutionary nature. "Free energy" was now working its way through these four stages of reaction, which were:

a: "It's nonsense," b: "It is not important," c: "I always said it was a good idea," and d: "I thought of it first."



The scene moved to Rome, Georgia where Jim Griggs of Hydrodynamics, Inc. demonstrated the assembly and operation of a "hydrosonic water pump" which operated over-unity by producing hot water or steam with energy in excess of the electrical energy input to the pump motor. "Over-unity" was confirmed by satisfied customers, including the Albany Fire Station, where engineers from the "local university" and the "local power company" had been called in to verify the over-100% efficiency

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2464139837181538044



hmmmmmmm






Pin d'Ar

[Salmon L.A.]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pindar

Jouw reactie is een reflex reactie!
heb je het al een jota onderzocht? Da zul je namelijk ontdekken dat het klopt wat hij zegt! Zie bv ook de protcols hierboven! Daar staat het nb. Of heb je die niet gelezen?



Nuff said


Pin d'Ar

De protocols van de wijzen van Zion?

The Protocols of the (Learned) Elders of Zion, also The Protocols of the Sages of Zion or The Protocols of Zion (Russian: "Протоколы Сионских мудрецов" or "Сионские Протоколы"), is a text purporting to describe a plan to achieve global domination by Jews. Numerous independent investigations have repeatedly proven it to be a hoax; most notably, a series of articles printed in The Times of London in 1921 revealed that much of the material in the Protocols was plagiarized from earlier political satire that did not have an anti-Semitic theme.

Since the Protocols appeared at the beginning of the 20th century, its earliest publishers have offered vague and often contradictory testimony detailing how they obtained their copy of the rumored original manuscript. Nevertheless, some people continue to view the Protocols as evidence of a conspiracy, especially in parts of the world where anti-Semitism is widespread. It is also frequently quoted and reprinted by anti-Semites, and is sometimes used as evidence of a Jewish conspiracy, especially in the Middle East.
(Wikipedia)

Nuff said?

[Pindar]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Salmon L.A.

De protocols van de wijzen van Zion?


Nuff said?

Kerel. voor mij is allang aangetoond dat die Wikipedia helemaal niks is!
Ik bedoelde onderzoek eens de argumenten tegen de evolutie theorie!
Andere bronnen ook al bekeken zoals de dia's van Lloyd Pye?
Bekijk zen bestudeer zijn argumenten en bekijk zijn lezingen etc etc
en kom dan eens terug.


Nuff said

Pin d'Ar

[Salmon L.A.]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pindar

Er is nog iets, de "verschrikkelijke sneeuwmannen" homonoiden, bestaan wel degelijk, maar worden net als UFO's belachelijk gemaakt omdat dan de evolutie theorie in duigen valt!

Maar goed wat is dan een betere of alternatieve theorie?




klik hier: http://www.lloydpye.com/

my two cents


Pin d'Ar

Waarom zouden reusachtige "verschrikkelijke sneeuwmannen" in strijd zijn met de evolutietheorie?

Er zijn miljoenen verschillende biologische soorten voortgekomen uit de oerversies van leven (zoals er ook miljoenen weer verdwenen zijn, door wat voor omstandigheden ook).

[Pindar]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Salmon L.A.

Waarom zouden reusachtige "verschrikkelijke sneeuwmannen" in strijd zijn met de evolutietheorie?

Er zijn miljoenen verschillende biologische soorten voortgekomen uit de oerversies van leven (zoals er ook miljoenen weer verdwenen zijn, door wat voor omstandigheden ook).

Man bekijk die slides dan op de genoemde site! DAAR krijg je hele goede antwoorden!!!!! Succes! maar je gaat het denk ik toch niet doen
Sommige kernovertuigingen zitten TE vast. so be it

Nuff said

Pin d'Ar

[Salmon L.A.]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pindar

Kerel. voor mij is allang aangetoond dat die Wikipedia helemaal niks is!
Ik bedoelde onderzoek eens de argumenten tegen de evolutie theorie!
Andere bronnen ook al bekeken zoals de dia's van Lloyd Pye?
Bekijk zen bestudeer zijn argumenten en bekijk zijn lezingen etc etc
en kom dan eens terug.


Nuff said

Pin d'Ar

Ik heb ook mijn bedenkingen bij Wikipedia.
Maar kon niet zo direct een beknoptere tekst vinden die aangeeft hoe verwerpelijk èn achterhaald het is om enig geloof te hechten aan de samenzweringstheorie die in deze protocols zogenaamd "onthuld" wordt.

[Pindar]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Salmon L.A.

Ik heb ook mijn bedenkingen bij Wikipedia.
Maar kon niet zo direct een beknoptere tekst vinden die aangeeft hoe verwerpelijk èn achterhaald het is om enig geloof te hechten aan de samenzweringstheorie die in deze protocols zogenaamd "onthuld" wordt.

ok nou dat vind ik fair genoeg!
Maar...zoals hierboven gezegd, er zijn genoeg andere bronnen


Pin d'Ar

[Pindar]

Kan het natuurlijk ook zo doen

"Engineering Evolution: The Alchemy of Eugenics"

In the dark past of human civilization, the ruling class controlled humanity largely through religious institutions and mysticism. However, the turn of the century witnessed the epistemic transformation of the elite's religious power structure into a "scientific dictatorship." The history and background of this "scientific dictatorship" is a conspiracy, created and micro-managed through the historical tide of Darwinism, which has its foundations in Freemasonry. In this article, we shall examine the evolutionary alchemy of eugenics, from Margaret Sanger's Planned Parenthood to William Sims Bainbridge's Transhumanism.

The Alchemical Transformation of Man

A common misnomer that has been circulated by academia's anointed historians is that the alchemists of antiquity were attempting to transform lead into gold. In truth, this was a fiction promulgated by the alchemists themselves to conceal their ultimate objectives . . .the transformation of man into a god. Among one of the various occult organizations that aspired to complete this alchemical mission was Freemasonry. Providing a summation of Masonry's supreme goal, Masonic scholar W.L. Wilmshurst writes:

This - the evolution of man into superman [emphasis - ADDED] - was always the purpose of the ancient Mysteries, and the real purpose of modern Masonry is, not the social and charitable purposes to which so much attention is paid, but the expediting of the spiritual evolution of those who aspire to perfect their own nature and transform it into a more god-like quality. And this is a definite science, a royal art, which it is possible for each of us to put into practice; whilst to join the Craft for any other purpose than to study and pursue this science is to misunderstand its meaning (Wilmshurst, p. 47, 1980).

According to this alchemical mandate, humanity is a gradually developing deity requiring scientific assistance in its evolution. In Mystic Masonry, 32nd degree Mason J.D. Buck reiterates this theme of man as a progressively apotheosizing organism: "Humanity, 'in-toto', then, is the only Personal God" (Buck, p. 136, 1990). Of course, the concept of evolution would later be disseminated on the popular level as Darwinism and become the veritable cornerstone of contemporary science.

Before its popularization, evolutionary theory was the intellectual property of Masonry. Freemason Erasmus Darwin, Charles' grandfather, "originated almost every important idea that has since appeared in evolutionary theory" (Darlington, p. 62, 1959). It is hardly a coincidence that many of Charles Darwin's chief promoters were Freemasons, not the least of which being T.H. Huxley. It is even less of a coincidence that Charles Darwin's cousin, Sir Francis Galton, would become one of the early expediters of Masonry's alchemical agenda.

Eugenics: Alchemically Engineered Apotheosis

Sir Francis Galton could be considered an early evolutionary alchemist. His own cousin's theory of evolution was one of his chief inspirations. In Memories of My Life, Galton wrote:

The publication in 1859 of the Origin of Species by Charles Darwin made a marked epoch in my own mental development, as it did in that of human thought generally. Its effect was to demolish a multitude of dogmatic barriers by a single stroke, and to arouse a spirit of rebellion against all ancient authorities whose positive and unauthenticated statements were contradicted by modern science (Galton, Memories of My Life, p. 287).

Viewing evolutionary theory in conjunction with the alchemical mandate for man's consciously engineered apotheosis, one inevitably recognizes a belief system that exhibits all of the characteristics of a religion. This revelation is most clearly illustrated by Galton's statements in Inquiries into Human Faculty and its Development:

The chief result of these Inquiries has been to elicit the religious significance of the doctrine of evolution. It suggests an alteration in our mental attitude, and imposes a new moral duty. The new mental attitude is one of a greater sense of moral freedom, responsibility, and opportunity; the new duty which is supposed to be exercised concurrently with, and not in opposition to the old ones upon which the social fabric depends, is an endeavor to further evolution, especially that of the human race (Galton, Inquiries into Human Faculty and its Development, p. 337, 1883).

That Galton recognized the "religious significance of evolution" is no accident. Throughout the years, this Masonically inspired religion of emergent deities has resurfaced under various appellations. Wagar enumerates its numerous manifestations:

Nineteenth- and early twentieth-century thought teems with time-bound emergent deities. Scores of thinkers preached some sort of faith in what is potential in time, in place of the traditional Christian and mystical faith in a power outside of time. Hegel's Weltgeist, Comte's Humanite, Spencer's organismic humanity inevitably improving itself by the laws of evolution, Nietzsche's doctrine of superhumanity, the conception of a finite God given currency by J.S. Mill, Hastings Rashdall, and William James, the vitalism of Bergson and Shaw, the emergent evolutionism of Samuel Alexander and Lloyd Morgan, the theories of divine immanence in the liberal movement in Protestant theology, and du Nouy's telefinalism - all are exhibits in evidence of the influence chiefly of evolutionary thinking, both before and after Darwin, in Western intellectual history. The faith of progress itself - especially the idea of progress as built into the evolutionary scheme of things - is in every way the psychological equivalent of religion (Wagar, pp. 106 - 7, 1961).

This emergent deity, Man (spelled with a capitalized M to denote his purported divinity), would be fully enthroned through the efforts of alchemists themselves. Galton would reintroduce the concept of alchemy under the appellation of eugenics, a term derived from Greek for "well born." The basic precepts of eugenics were delineated in Galton's Hereditary Genius, a racist polemic advocating a system of selective breeding for the purposes of providing "more suitable races or strains of blood a better chance of prevailing over the less suitable" (Galton, Hereditary Genius, p. 24, 1869). According to Galton, society should be eugenically regimented. The framework of such a society would be a caste system where status was assigned according to genetic superiority. In an article in the January 1873 edition of Fraser's Magazine, Galton stated:

I do not see why any insolence of caste should prevent the gifted class, when they had the power, from treating their [lower caste] compatriots with all kindness, as long as they maintained celibacy. But if these continued to procreate children, inferior in moral, intellectual, and physical qualities, it is easy to believe that the time may come when such persons would be considered as enemies to the State, and to have forfeited all claims to kindness (qutd. in Chase, pp. 100, 1977).

Galton hoped that such societal regimentation would promote "eugenically sound" breeding amongst the citizenry. Summarizing Galton's objectives, Allan Chase explains: "What Galton was talking about here was the power to breed people as we breed pigs" (Chase, p. 101, 1977). Of course, as George Orwell opined in Animal Farm, some pigs are more equal than others. According to Galton's cousin and racialist progenitor, Charles Darwin, the pigs of higher stock were the Anglo-Saxons. This becomes evident in Darwinian Josiah Strong's manifesto, America's Destiny. Quoting Darwin, Strong wrote:

"At the present day," says Mr. Darwin, "civilized nations are everywhere supplanting barbarous nations, excepting, where the climate opposes a deadly barrier; and they succeed mainly, though exclusively, through their arts, which are the products of the intellect." He continues: "Whether the extinction of inferior races before the advancing Anglo-Saxon seems to the reader sad or otherwise, it certainly appears probable...Is there room for reasonable doubt that this race, unless devitalized by alcohol and tobacco, is destined to dispossess many weaker races, assimilate others, and mold the remainder, until, in a very true and important sense, it has Anglo-Saxonized mankind?" (Strong, pp. 165 - 80, 1885).

Of course, it comes as no real surprise that such thinking underpinned the racialist policies of Nazi Germany, which was a scientific dictatorship edified by Darwinian evolution. It comes as even less a surprise that Leonard Darwin, son of Charles, was vice-president of both the 1912 and 1921 International Eugenics Congresses. The first of these two meetings was the outgrowth of a 1911 gathering of the International Society for Racial Hygiene, a predominantly German organization. That Germany would see the full enactment of eugenical policies is hardly a coincidence.

Planned Parenthood: The Racist Legacy of Margaret Sanger

Although the Nazis' eugenical Holocaust of WWII constituted an enormous public relations disaster for proponents of eugenics, the movement would later resurface under the banner of population control and radical environmentalism. Researchers Tarpley and Chaitkin document this transmogrification:

The population control or zero population growth movement, which grew rapidly in the late 1960s thanks to free media exposure and foundation grants for a stream of pseudoscientific propaganda about the alleged "population bomb" and the limits to growth," was a continuation of the old prewar, protofascist eugenics movement, which had been forced to go into temporary eclipse when the world recoiled in horror at the atrocities committed by the Nazis in the name of eugenics. By mid-1960s, the same old crackpot eugenicists had resurrected themselves as the population-control and environmentalist movement. Planned Parenthood was a perfect example of the transmogrification. Now, instead of demanding the sterilization of the inferior races, the newly packaged eugenicists talked about the population bomb, giving the poor "equal access" to birth control, and "freedom of choice" (Tarpley & Chaitkin, p. 203, 1992).

Indeed, Planned Parenthood successfully carried the banner of eugenics into the post-WWII era. Planned Parenthood was founded by Margaret Sanger, a virulently racist woman who touted the slogan: "Birth Control: to create a race of thoroughbreds." Her manifesto, entitled The Pivot of Civilization, thoroughly delineates the mission of Planned Parenthood and its allied organizations in the eugenics movement. In this treatise, which featured an introduction written by Freemason and Fabian socialist H.G. Wells, Sanger reveals the true motives underpinning the promotion of birth control:

Birth Control, which has been criticized as negative and destructive, is really the greatest and most truly eugenic method, and its adoption as part of the program of Eugenics would immediately give a concrete and realistic power to that science… as the most constructive and necessary of the means to racial health (Sanger, The Pivot of Civilization, p. 189, 1922).

Sanger believed that society's tolerance of "morons," "human weeds," and the "feeble-minded' was encouraging dysgenics. To remedy this purported genetic threat, Sanger unabashedly promoted the implementation of authoritarian measures:

The emergency problem of segregation and sterilization must be faced immediately. Every feeble-minded girl or woman of the hereditary type, especially of the moron class, should be segregated during the reproductive period.... we prefer the policy of immediate sterilization, of making sure that parenthood is absolutely prohibited to the feeble-minded (Sanger, The Pivot of Civilization, pp. 101 - 102, 1922).

Understand, these are the words of a so-called "proponent of reproductive rights." Moreover, Sanger desired to see the establishment of a gulag system within America for the internment of the "feeble-minded." In an issue of Birth Control Review, she wrote:

To apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is already tainted... to apportion farm lands and homesteads for these segregated persons where they would be taught to work under competent instructors for the period of their entire lives… (Sanger, "Plan of Peace," Birth Control Review, pp. 107-8, 1932).

Although Sanger's gulag system was not formally enacted in the United States, her vision saw horrible fulfillment in Nazi Germany. It comes as little surprise that Planned Parenthood's board of directors included Nazi supporters such as Dr. Lothrop Stoddard, author of a racist tract entitled The Rising Tide of Color Against White Supremacy. In fact, Birth Control Review acted as a conduit for the dissemination of Nazi propaganda in America. In April of 1933, Dr. Ernst Rudin, Hitler's director of genetic sterilization and a founder of the Nazi Society for Racial Hygiene, published an article in Birth Control Review. Entitled "Eugenic Sterilization: An Urgent Need," the article presented the following appeal:

The danger to the community of the unsegregated feeble-minded woman is more evident. Most dangerous are the middle and high grades living at large who, despite the fact that their defect is not easily recognizable, should nevertheless be prevented from procreation.... In my view we should act without delay (Rudin, "Eugenic Sterilization: An Urgent Need," Birth Control Review, pp. 102-4, 1933).

Of course, in Rudin's native country, the "feeble-minded" did not remain "unsegregrated" for very long. The same year that Sanger's publication printed Rudin's article, Ernst collaborated with Heinrich Himmler on Germany's 1933 sterilization law. This genocidal edict stipulated the sterilization of all Jews and "colored" German children. Eventually, the "undesirables" were collected, segregated, and systematically murdered. The final result of the Nazi eugenics program was the Holocaust, which claimed six million lives.

Yet, how many people would have been segregated for orderly disposal according to Sanger's vision? Upon examination of army statistics, Sanger concluded that:

...nearly half - 47.3 per cent - of the population had the mentality of twelve-year-old children or less - in other words that they are morons" (Sanger, The Pivot of Civilization, p. 263, 1922).

Sanger expressed dismal hopes for a vast segment of the population, declaring that: "only 13,500,000 will ever show superior intelligence" (Sanger, The Pivot of Civilization, p. 264, 1922). Thus, only a meager 13.5% of the population would be permitted to procreate. The rest would be segregated for orderly disposal. Evidently, Sanger's holocaust would have even dwarfed Hitler's Final Solution.

In typical Darwinian fashion, Sanger showed little mercy towards the weak. In fact, Margaret expressed a distinct aversion towards the poor. Chapter Five of her book is entitled "The Cruelty of Charity." Reiterating Malthus' proposal to "disclaim the right of the poor to support," she wrote:

Organized charity itself is....the surest sign that our civilization has bred, is breeding and is perpetuating constantly increasing numbers of defectives, delinquents and dependents (Sanger, The Pivot of Civilization, p. 108, 1922).

Sanger particularly loathed:

…a special type of philanthropy or benevolence,....which strikes me as being more insidiously injurious than any other.... to supply gratis medical and nursing facilities to slum mothers (Sanger, The Pivot of Civilization, p. 114, 1922).

According to Margaret, such an investment of time, effort, resources, and love represented the height of futility:

.... we are paying for and even submitting to the dictates of an ever increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.... (Sanger, The Pivot of Civilization, p. 187, 1922).

Planned Parenthood retains an active role in the scientific dictatorship's project of eugenical regimentation today. Despite revelations of Nazi atrocities constituted a public relations disaster for the organization, Planned Parenthood survived and continues to tangibly enact Sanger's vision. In fact, so-called "conservative, pro-life, pro-family, Christian" President George Bush Sr. pledged his whole-hearted support to the group. Researchers Tarpley and Chaitkin explain:

Although Planned Parenthood was forced, during the fascist era and immediately thereafter, to tone down Sanger's racist rhetoric from "race betterment" to "family planning" for the benefit of the poor and racial minorities, the organization's basic goal of curbing the population growth rate among "undesirables" never really changed. Bush publicly asserted that he agreed "1,000 percent" with Planned Parenthood (Tarpley & Chaitkin, p. 195, 1992).

Transhumanism: Techno-Eugenics and the End of Humanity

Today, Galton's agenda of biological totalitarianism has resurfaced as the World Transhumanist Association. However, equipped with nanotechnology and genetic engineering, this movement presents a technologically augmented form of eugenics. Richard Hayes, executive director of the Center for Genetics and Society, elaborates:

Last June at Yale University, the World Transhumanist Association held its first national conference. The Transhumanists have chapters in more than 20 countries and advocate the breeding of "genetically enriched" forms of "post-human" beings. Other advocates of the new techno-eugenics, such as Princeton University professor Lee Silver, predict that by the end of this century, "All aspects of the economy, the media, the entertainment industry, and the knowledge industry [will be] controlled by members of the GenRich class... Naturals [will] work as low-paid service providers or as laborers..." (Hayes, 2004).

Here is the vision of the Transhumanist movement… Huxley's Brave New World where the new class distinction is genetic. Yet, just how long shall the GenRich class tolerate the existence of its biological subordinates? Hayes continues:

What happens then? Here's Dr. Richard Lynn, emeritus professor at the University of Ulster, who, like Silver, supports human genetic modification: "What is called for here is not genocide, the killing off of the population of incompetent cultures. But we do need to think realistically in terms of the 'phasing out' of such peoples....Evolutionary progress means the extinction of the less competent" (Hayes, 2004).

This is a frightening proposition indeed. C. Christopher Hook delineates the philosophy underpinning Transhumanism:

That we are biological creatures is simply our current status, transhumanists believe, but it is not necessary for defining who we are or who we should be. Bart Kosko, a professor of electrical engineering at the University of Southern California, puts it more bluntly in his book Heaven in a Chip (2002): "Biology is not destiny. It was never more than tendency. It was just nature's first quick and dirty way to compute with meat. Chips are destiny."

British roboticist Kevin Warwick put it this way: "I was born human. But this was an accident of fate-a condition merely of time and place." This sounds startingly reminiscent of what nihilist Frederick Nietzsche wrote in Thus Spake Zarathustra: "I teach you the overman. Man is something to be overcome" (Hook, 2004).

Like Nietzsche's overman, the roboman of Warwick and Kosko represents yet another incarnation of Adam Weishaupt's "inner Areopagites: man made perfect as a god-without-God" (Billington, p. 97, 1980).

A central feature of Darwinism has been the belief in great extinctions. That belief remains firmly embedded within the crusade of the Transhumanist movement. Hook elaborates:

Katherine Hayles, a professor of English at the University of California, Los Angeles, says in How We Became Posthuman (1999) that "in the posthuman, there are no essential differences, or absolute demarcations, between bodily existence and computer simulation, cybernetic mechanism and biological organism, robot technology and human goals." She concludes her book with a warning: "Humans can either go gently into that good night, joining the dinosaurs as a species that once ruled the earth but is now obsolete, or hang on for a while longer by becoming machines themselves. In either case … the age of the human is drawing to a close" (Hook, 2004).

According to the Darwinian doctrine of the Transhumanist movement, mankind is the next species slated for extinction. How does the GenRich class intend to regulate the rest of the "dysgenics" until their ultimate extinction? Transhumanist ideologue and Deputy Director of the National Science Foundation's Division of Information and Intelligent Systems William Sims Bainbridge provides the answer:

Techniques such as genetic engineering, psychoactive drugs and electronic control of the brain make possible a transformation of the species into docile, fully-obedient, "safe" organisms (Bainbridge, 1982).

In other words, the pharmacological totalitarianism of Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. Chemically numbed and anesthetized, the "dysgenics" will resign themselves to extinction in the posthuman era. Meanwhile, the eugenical alchemists of the elite continue to write the final chapter of the evolutionary script and they have left no room for humanity in the last pages.

BTW nu weten we ook waarom films als superman etc gemaakt worden!!

http://www.hospicepatients.org/alchemy-eugenics.html


Nuff said


Pin d'Ar

[parcifal]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Salmon L.A.

Ik heb ook mijn bedenkingen bij Wikipedia.

Welke bedenkingen dan wel?
Het staat je altijd vrij om aanpassingen aan te vragen of toe te voegen van bepaalde artikels die je incorrect vindt.

Je moet dan wel kunnen aantonen dat jouw versie correcter is, uiteraard
(@pinda & Exodus : bespaar jullie de moeite.)

[Pindar]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door parcifal

Welke bedenkingen dan wel?
Het staat je altijd vrij om aanpassingen aan te vragen of toe te voegen van bepaalde artikels die je incorrect vindt.

Je moet dan wel kunnen aantonen dat jouw versie correcter is, uiteraard
(@pinda & Exodus : bespaar jullie de moeite.)

LOL dit zegt toch wel meer dan genoeg

Maar goed: Omdat ze rotzooi en leugens neerkwakken!
groentjes die net van school komen vullen de database met:
wat ze op school geleerd hebben!!!


LOL




laat maar verder



Pin d'Ar

[TheBlackadder]

Die intervention theory is waardeloos om de oorsprong van "leven" te verklaren, omdat het geen oplossing biedt maar slechts een verschuiving. Gesteld dat er ergens een interventie was, en alles op aarde via die weg komt, dan verplaats ge gewoon uw evolutie naar de bron van de interventie, want hoe zouden die dan "ontstaan" zijn?
Geen oorsprong, geen verklaring, geen waarde als alternatief voor evolutie

[Pindar]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door TheBlackadder

Die intervention theory is waardeloos om de oorsprong van "leven" te verklaren, omdat het geen oplossing biedt maar slechts een verschuiving. Gesteld dat er ergens een interventie was, en alles op aarde via die weg komt, dan verplaats ge gewoon uw evolutie naar de bron van de interventie, want hoe zouden die dan "ontstaan" zijn?
Geen oorsprong, geen verklaring, geen waarde als alternatief voor evolutie

wel, heb je de theorie wel goed bestudeerd?
Het gaat er toch om waar de meeste 'bewijzen' voor zijn. Welnu dan
kom je eerder op de interventie theorie uit dan de evolutie theorie!


Nuff said

Pin d'Ar

[exodus]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door TheBlackadder

Die intervention theory is waardeloos om de oorsprong van "leven" te verklaren, omdat het geen oplossing biedt maar slechts een verschuiving. Gesteld dat er ergens een interventie was, en alles op aarde via die weg komt, dan verplaats ge gewoon uw evolutie naar de bron van de interventie, want hoe zouden die dan "ontstaan" zijn?
Geen oorsprong, geen verklaring, geen waarde als alternatief voor evolutie

Dan kom je bij intelligent design. ( is niet hetzelfde als creationisme). ID'ers laten open wie het leven gecreerd heeft.

Sommigen beweren dat een soort oer-bewustzijn het leven creert (is niet hetzelfde als god).

[exodus]

Informatie over de zin van het leven in het licht van een oer-bewustzijn die het leven creeert.

The Earth finds herself at the threshold of a transformation. The vibrations of humanity are part of the third density, whereas the surrounding sector of spacetime is moving into the fourth density.

In the cosmic scheme of things, the third density is a stage of development of consciousness where entities incarnate as individuals. These individuals must make a choice which determines the nature of their further evolution. According to the Law of One, the Ra material, all which exists originates in and serves the one infinite creator. This can take place in two fundamentally different modes: To serve the self through serving others (Service To Others or STO) or through serving others via serving the self (Service To Self or STS). This is the fundamental duality which makes difference between things and thus experience possible. In human ethical terms, STS is the forces of darkness and STO is the forces of light. However, these do not manifest in their pure unambiguous forms in our direct experience, hence our challenge of discernment.

In order for a 3rd density entity to transit to the 4th density experience, it must choose between STS and STO. According to Ra, either one shall be over 50% service to others or 95% of service to self, both goals being equally difficult to reach. The third density Earth environment is throughout its history oriented towards service to self. This comes as a result of the decision of souls to incarnate on this planet in order to experience life under the control of forces of STS for accelerated learning.

When one incarnates into the Earth third density, one accepts the veil, which separates the conscious and subconscious and one forgets the spiritual goals of the incarnation.

The deeper nature of things is not directly visible for the third density incarnate entity. The spiritual function of the third density is to distinguish between concepts and actions of STO and STS and to systematically bring the choice to application. The uncertainty of discernment inherent in this mode of being makes this a challenging task. According to Ra, the fourth density state of being is radically different from the third density. The medium is more transparent and the spiritual energies of beings are directly perceptible, physicality exists but is in greater degree under conscious control. Beings naturally form so-called social memory complexes, which are groups of individuals with a telepathically shared pool of knowledge accessible to all.

[TheBlackadder]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pindar

wel, heb je de theorie wel goed bestudeerd?
Het gaat er toch om waar de meeste 'bewijzen' voor zijn. Welnu dan
kom je eerder op de interventie theorie uit dan de evolutie theorie!


Nuff said

Pin d'Ar

Van wat ik daar zie zijn er amper bewijzen, terwijl er bergen zijn voor evolutie. En zelfs mocht dat theorietje kloppen voor deze planeet, dan blijft hij waardeloos voor het ontstaan van leven omdat hij niet toepasbaar is op de eerste vormen waar geen interventie mogelijk is, simpelweg omdat ze de eerste zijn. Wat passen we daar dan toe? Toch maar evolutie?

Eerst uw dingen doordenken, dan iets claimen

@Exodus: hetzelfde voor intelligent design en aanverwanten: zelfs als dit klopt voor alle leven op deze planeet, dan kan je nog steeds de oorsprong van uw designer (god, aliens, een of andere kracht, whatever...) niet verklaren, en dus geen antwoord geven voor het ontstaan van het eerste leven (want dit kan niet gedesignd zijn). Dit valt niet in te passen in die theorieën, waar er in evolutietheorie wel mogelijkheden zijn

[exodus]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door TheBlackadder

@Exodus: hetzelfde voor intelligent design en aanverwanten: zelfs als dit klopt voor alle leven op deze planeet, dan kan je nog steeds de oorsprong van uw designer (god, aliens, een of andere kracht, whatever...) niet verklaren, en dus geen antwoord geven voor het ontstaan van het eerste leven (want dit kan niet gedesignd zijn). Dit valt niet in te passen in die theorieën, waar er in evolutietheorie wel mogelijkheden zijn

Dat komt omdat je rekening houdt met causaliteit. Buiten onze ruimte-tijd is er geen tijd. Dus we kunnen dan ook niet van een begin spreken maar van iets dat geen tijd kent. We kunnen zelfs niet zeggen eeuwig want dat impliceert ook tijd. Het is gewoon iets dat IS. Dit is wat de mystici doorheen duizenden jaren zeggen, dat een oer-bewustzijn dat IS deze realiteit creeërt, en vele andere, geschapen heeft om zichzelf uit te drukken doorheen diversiteit.