GEEN JOOD ? ah dan bent u geen MENS !!

[bruut geweld]

heeft er geen kloten mee te maken waar uw geimporteerde vrouw werkt.geen gevonden bij het eigen volk ? Ocharme...

die extreme visie van de orthodoxe jood zet zich verder in heel het zionisme.

diens brood men eet he...

[camus]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door bruut geweld

heeft er geen kloten mee te maken waar uw geimporteerde vrouw werkt.geen gevonden bij het eigen volk ? Ocharme...

die extreme visie van de orthodoxe jood zet zich verder in heel het zionisme.

diens brood men eet he...

ikzelf ben half Filipino en Spaans, maar wat jij bent kan ik mij al voorstellen,kruip maar algauw terug in uw riool " Bierzuipende Bassklasse Idioot"

[bruut geweld]

een immigrant dus ...

ASSIMILEREN HE jongen
maar in tegenstelling tot de zionisten zien wij u wel als mens, die onze gelijke is mits hij ook zijn plichten nakomt...

[bruut geweld]

even terug on topic komen, zionistjes verdraaien nu eenmaal graag de discussie.

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door bruut geweld

The 1967 War and the
Israeli Occupation of the
West Bank and Gaza


Did the Egyptians actually start the 1967 war, as Israel originally claimed?

"The former Commander of the Air Force, General Ezer Weitzman, regarded as a hawk, stated that there was 'no threat of destruction' but that the attack on Egypt, Jordan and Syria was nevertheless justified so that Israel could 'exist according the scale, spirit, and quality she now embodies.'...Menahem Begin had the following remarks to make: 'In June 1967, we again had a choice. The Egyptian Army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.' "Noam Chomsky, "The Fateful Triangle."

Was the 1967 war defenisve? - continued

"I do not think Nasser wanted war. The two divisions he sent to The Sinai would not have been sufficient to launch an offensive war. He knew it and we knew it." Yitzhak Rabin, Israel's Chief of Staff in 1967, in Le Monde, 2/28/68

Moshe Dayan posthumously speaks out on the Golan Heights

"Moshe Dayan, the celebrated commander who, as Defense Minister in 1967, gave the order to conquer the Golan...[said] many of the firefights with the Syrians were deliberately provoked by Israel, and the kibbutz residents who pressed the Government to take the Golan Heights did so less for security than for the farmland...[Dayan stated] 'They didn't even try to hide their greed for the land...We would send a tractor to plow some area where it wasn't possible to do anything, in the demilitarized area, and knew in advance that the Syrians would start to shoot. If they didn't shoot, we would tell the tractor to advance further, until in the end the Syrians would get annoyed and shoot.

And then we would use artillery and later the air force also, and that's how it was...The Syrians, on the fourth day of the war, were not a threat to us.'" The New York Times, May 11, 1997

The history of Israeli expansionism

"The acceptance of partition does not commit us to renounce Transjordan; one does not demand from anybody to give up his vision. We shall accept a state in the boundaries fixed today. But the boundaries of Zionist aspirations are the concern of the Jewish people and no external factor will be able to limit them." David Ben-Gurion, in 1936, quoted in Noam Chomsky, "The Fateful Triangle."

Expansionism - continued

"The main danger which Israel, as a 'Jewish state', poses to its own people, to other Jews and to its neighbors, is its ideologically motivated pursuit of territorial expansion and the inevitable series of wars resulting from this aim...No zionist politician has ever repudiated Ben-Gurion's idea that Israeli policies must be based (within the limits of practical considerations) on the restoration of Biblical borders as the borders of the Jewish state." Israeli professor, Israel Shahak, "Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of 3000 Years."

Expansionism - continued

In Israeli Prime Minister Moshe Sharatt's personal diaries, there is an excerpt from May of 1955 in which he quotes Moshe Dayan as follows: "[Israel] must see the sword as the main, if not the only, instrument with which to keep its morale high and to retain its moral tension. Toward this end it may, no - it must - invent dangers, and to do this it must adopt the method of provocation-and-revenge...And above all - let us hope for a new war with the Arab countries, so that we may finally get rid of our troubles and acquire our space." Quoted in Livia Rokach, "Israel's Sacred Terrorism."

But wasn't the occupation of Arab lands necessary to protect Israel's security?

"Senator [J.William Fulbright] proposed in 1970 that America should guarantee Israel's security in a formal treaty, protecting her with armed forces if necessary. In return, Israel would retire to the borders of 1967. The UN Security Council would guarantee this arrangement, and thereby bring the Soviet Union - then a supplier of arms and political aid to the Arabs - into compliance. As Israeli troops were withdrawn from the Golan Heights, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank they would be replaced by a UN peacekeeping force. Israel would agree to accept a certain number of Palestinians and the rest would be settled in a Palestinian state outside Israel.

"The plan drew favorable editorial support in the United States. The proposal, however, was flatly rejected by Israel. 'The whole affair disgusted Fulbright,' writes [his biographer Randall] Woods. 'The Israelis were not even willing to act in their own self-interest.'" Allan Brownfield in "Issues of the American Council for Judaism." Fall 1997.[Ed.-This was one of many such proposals]

What happened after the 1967 war ended?

"In violation of international law, Israel has confiscated over 52 percent of the land in the West Bank and 30 percent of the Gaza Strip for military use or for settlement by Jewish civilians...From 1967 to 1982, Israel's military government demolished 1,338 Palestinian homes on the West Bank. Over this period, more than 300,000 Palestinians were detained without trial for various periods by Israeli security forces." Intifada: The Palestinian Uprising Against Israeli Occupation," ed. Lockman and Beinin.

World opinion on the legality of Israeli control of the West Bank and Gaza.

"Under the UN Charter there can lawfully be no territorial gains from war, even by a state acting in self-defense. The response of other states to Israel's occupation shows a virtually unanimous opinion that even if Israel's action was defensive, its retention of the West Bank and Gaza Strip was not...The [UN] General Assembly characterized Israel's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza as a denial of self determination and hence a 'serious and increasing threat to international peace and security.' " John Quigley, "Palestine and Israel: A Challenge to Justice."

Examples of the effects of Israeli occupation

"A study of students at Bethlehem University reported by the Coordinating Committee of International NGOs in Jerusalem showed that many families frequently go five days a week without running water...The study goes further to report that, 'water quotas restrict usage by Palestinians living in the West Bank and Gaza, while Israeli settlers have almost unlimited amounts.'

"A summer trip to a Jewish settlement on the edge of the Judean desert less than five miles from Bethlehem confirmed this water inequity for us. While Bethlehemites were buying water from tank trucks at highly inflated rates, the lawns were green in the settlement. Sprinklers were going at mid day in the hot August sunshine. Sounds of children swimming in the outdoor pool added to the unreality." Betty Jane Bailey, in "The Link", December 1996.

Israeli occupation - continued

"You have to remember that 90 percent of children two years old or more have experienced - some many, many times - the [Israeli] army breaking into the home, beating relatives, destroying things. Many were beaten themselves, had bones broken, were shot, tear gassed, or had these things happen to siblings and neighbors...The emotional aspect of the child is affected by the [lack of] security. He needs to feel safe. We see the consequences later if he does not. In our research, we have found that children who are exposed to trauma tend to be more extreme in their behaviors and, later, in their political beliefs." Dr Samir Quota, director of research for the Gaza Community Mental Health Programme, quoted in "The Journal of Palestine Studies," Summer 1996, p.84

Israeli occupation - continued

"There is nothing quite like the misery one feels listening to a 35-year-old [Palestinian] man who worked fifteen years as an illegal day laborer in Israel in order to save up money to build a house for his family only to be shocked one day upon returning from work to find that the house and all that was in it had been flattened by an Israeli bulldozer. When I asked why this was done - the land, after all, was his - I was told that a paper given to him the next day by an Israeli soldier stated that he had built the structure without a license. Where else in the world are people required to have a license (always denied them) to build on their own property? Jews can build, but never Palestinians. This is apartheid." Edward Said, in "The Nation", May 4, 1998.

All Jewish settlements in territories occupied in the 1967 war are a direct violation of the Geneva Conventions, which Israel has signed.

"The Geneva Convention requires an occupying power to change the existing order as little as possible during its tenure. One aspect of this obligation is that it must leave the territory to the people it finds there. It may not bring its own people to populate the territory. This prohibition is found in the convention's Article 49, which states, 'The occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.'" John Quigley, "Palestine and Israel: A Challenge to Justice."

Excerpts from the U.S. State Department's reports during the Intifada

"Following are some excerpts from the U.S. State Department's Country Reports on Human Rights Practices from 1988 to 1991:

1988: 'Many avoidable deaths and injuries' were caused because Israeli soldiers frequently used gunfire in situations that did not present mortal danger to troops...IDF troops used clubs to break limbs and beat Palestinians who were not directly involved in disturbances or resisting arrest..At least thirteen Palestinians have been reported to have died from beatings...'

1989: Human rights groups charged that the plainclothes security personnel acted as death squads who killed Palestinian activists without warning, after they had surrendered, or after they had been subdued...

1991: [The report] added that the human rights groups had published 'detailed credible reports of torture, abuse and mistreatment of Palestinian detainees in prisons and detention centers." Former Congressman Paul Findley, "Deliberate Deceptions."

Jerusalem - Eternal, Indivisible Capital of Israel?

"Writing in The Jerusalem Report (Feb. 28, 2000), Leslie Susser points out that the current boundaries were drawn after the Six-Day War. Responsibility for drawing those lines fell to Central Command Chief Rehavan Ze'evi. The line he drew 'took in not only the five square kilometers of Arab East Jerusalem - but also 65 square kilometers of surrounding open country and villages, most of which never had any municipal link to Jerusalem. Overnight they became part of Israel's eternal and indivisible capital.'" Allan Brownfield in The Washington Report On Middle East Affairs, May 2000.

[camus]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door bruut geweld

een immigrant dus ...

ASSIMILEREN HE jongen
maar in tegenstelling tot de zionisten zien wij u wel als mens, die onze gelijke is mits hij ook zijn plichten nakomt...

Met creaturen als jij valt niet te klappen, jij hebt het zelfde idee als 90% van de islamieten, elke dooie jood is een goeie jood 'sieg heil'

[bruut geweld]

kinderlijke veronderstelling die je met je 14 postjes natuurlijk kunt staven...

typisch excuus van zionistjes :
1; u bent een antisemiet/nazi/negationist
2; over andere zaken beginnen leuteren
3; wij ? en die dan ..

[Pascal L.]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door bruut geweld

kinderlijke veronderstelling die je met je 14 postjes natuurlijk kunt staven...

typisch excuus van zionistjes :
1; u bent een antisemiet/nazi/negationist

Bruut Geweld,
Ik ben nog eens over de posts gegaan die u in de voorbije weken hebt geschreven en het blijkt echt wel dat u een antisemiet in hart en nieren bent. Pas op! Ik zeg niet dat alles wat u zegt verkeerd is, bvb. in sommige delen van uw kritiek op Israel. Niet alles wat de antisemiet zegt is per definitie verkeerd natuurlijk .. maar het verandert niets aan het feit dat u heel duidelijk een obsessie hebt met de joden en alles in het werk stelt om ze zwart te maken ... U schrijft zelden over een ander onderwerp en spuwt non-stop haat, vaak per insinuatie want u bent slim genoeg om te begrijpen dat de Belgische wetgeving uw haat niet tolereert. Maar voor die jodenhaat zijn natuurlijk redenen , en ik ben zeker dat een van die redenen niks met politiek te maken heeft, noch internationaal noch nationaal, maar een heel persoonlijke reden is. Waarschijnlijk heeft 1 of meer van de volgende redenen een jammere impact of uw leven heeft gehad: (1) U werkte voor een joodse werkgever die u ofwel ontslagen heeft, ofwel u misbruikte door bvb. u te onderbetalen of (2) u had ofwel een joods vriendinnetje of was verliefd op een joods meisje die u heeft laten zitten, al dan niet omdat u niet joods bent. Ik weet natuurlijk niet zeker welke de juiste reden is, dat weet enkel u, en ik verwacht zeker ook niet dat u in het openbaar daarover gaat spreken. Maar er is wel een persoonlijke reden, dat weet ik wel, wie weet, misschien is een van uw ouders joods en de relatie is rot.
In elk geval hoop ik dat de haat u ooit zal verlaten.

[bruut geweld]

wel pascal, dit is je grappigste post ooit !

nee hoor, niets persoonlijks tegen de joden .Gewoon de rechten van het palestijns volk.
Je fantasie en veronderstellingen zijn die dit keer wel echt grappig ! en dat meen ik...

en dit is dus wat ik bedoel met over andere zaken beginnen te leuteren he...

[Pascal L.]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door bruut geweld

wel pascal, dit is je grappigste post ooit !

nee hoor, niets persoonlijks tegen de joden Gewoon de rechten van een volk.
Je fantasie en veronderstellingen zijn die dit keer wel echt grappig ! en dat meen ik...

en dit is dus wat ik bedoel met over andere zaken beginnen te leuteren he...

Vrij veel ervaring met deze zaken ... het zou natuurlijk kunnen dat het in uw geval anders is, maar ik kan wel met vertrouwen zeggen dat bij het overgrote deel van hardcore antisemieten er een persoonlijke reden is voor hun haat.

[Pascal L.]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door bruut geweld

nee hoor, niets persoonlijks tegen de joden .Gewoon de rechten van het palestijns volk.

Nee dat geloof ik niet ... Als je mening enkel te maken had met de rechten van het Palestijnse volk, dan zou je enkel problemen hebben met het Israelische beleid ... er is wel meer hoor, misschien moet je je eigen emails maar eens eerlijk herlezen ....

[bruut geweld]

eeuh je hebt zoveel ervaring dat je
1. blij bent dat je niet meer in vlaanderen/belgie woont
2. oproept aan alle joden om het hier af te trappen
3. en europese producten te boycotten
4. europa verantwoordelijk houdt voor de 2000 !! jaar onderdrukking en antisemitisme die jullie hier klaarblijkelijk hebben moeten ondergaan
5. daarvoor excuses verwacht van de europese staten

als ik deze beweringen van jou lees, lijkt het persoonlijke gedeelte zich eerder bij jou te situeren he.

[bruut geweld]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pascal L.

Nee dat geloof ik niet ... Als je mening enkel te maken had met de rechten van het Palestijnse volk, dan zou je enkel problemen hebben met het Israelische beleid ... er is wel meer hoor, misschien moet je je eigen emails maar eens eerlijk herlezen ....

het is een zionistische, racistische VISIE die zijn bron heeft in de meest fundamentalistische strekking van het joods geloof/nationalisme; daarmee dat je de discussie dus verder moet opentrekken
je hebt blijkbaar de eerste paragraaf van de eerste post van deze topic gemist.

[Pascal L.]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door bruut geweld

eeuh je hebt zoveel ervaring dat je
1. blij bent dat je niet meer in vlaanderen/belgie woont
2. oproept aan alle joden om het hier af te trappen
3. en europese producten te boycotten
4. europa verantwoordelijk houdt voor de 2000 !! jaar onderdrukking en antisemitisme die jullie hier klaarblijkelijk hebben moeten ondergaan
5. daarvoor excuses verwacht van de europese staten

als ik deze beweringen van jou lees, lijkt het persoonlijke gedeelte zich eerder bij jou te situeren he.

Absoluut !! Doesn't get more personal than this ...

[bruut geweld]

en zoals ik reeds stelde..

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door bruut geweld

het is een zionistische, racistische VISIE die zijn bron heeft in de meest fundamentalistische strekking van het joods geloof/nationalisme; daarmee dat je de discussie dus verder moet opentrekken
je hebt blijkbaar de eerste paragraaf van de eerste post van deze topic gemist.

[Sinistra]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door bruut geweld

heeft er geen kloten mee te maken waar uw geimporteerde vrouw werkt.geen gevonden bij het eigen volk ? Ocharme...

die extreme visie van de orthodoxe jood zet zich verder in heel het zionisme.

diens brood men eet he...

Bruut Gespuis is wéér duidelijk over ze"n theewater Een ander beschuldigen van persoonlijke aanvallen maar zelf �* volonté mensen schofferen en beledigen die het niet eens zijn met ze'n Pro-Arabische visie. Erg vind ik het dan nog iemand ze'n vrouw beledigen, tja de argumenten van de Pro-Palestijnen lobby...wat zielig

[PollyCorrect]

Ik snap één ding niet: dat de admin een topic met deze titel laat staan. Bruut geweld maakt waarschijnlijk deel uit van één of andere louche lobby met privileges. Ik weiger trouwens nog steeds om te lezen wat ie allemaal uitbraakt. Alleen al de hoeveelheid postings onder topics waar een antisemitisch sfeertje hangt maakt me al duidelijk genoeg.

PUKE!!

[bruut geweld]

zionistjes zijn weer eens zeer selectief verontwaardigd he..

en de persoonlijke aanvallen gaan maar door en owee als ik ze van hetzelfde laken een broek geef ...bij de topic blijven is natuurlijk wel erg moeilijk .

[bruut geweld]

dus TERUG on topic....

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door bruut geweld

The 1967 War and the
Israeli Occupation of the
West Bank and Gaza


Did the Egyptians actually start the 1967 war, as Israel originally claimed?

"The former Commander of the Air Force, General Ezer Weitzman, regarded as a hawk, stated that there was 'no threat of destruction' but that the attack on Egypt, Jordan and Syria was nevertheless justified so that Israel could 'exist according the scale, spirit, and quality she now embodies.'...Menahem Begin had the following remarks to make: 'In June 1967, we again had a choice. The Egyptian Army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.' "Noam Chomsky, "The Fateful Triangle."

Was the 1967 war defenisve? - continued

"I do not think Nasser wanted war. The two divisions he sent to The Sinai would not have been sufficient to launch an offensive war. He knew it and we knew it." Yitzhak Rabin, Israel's Chief of Staff in 1967, in Le Monde, 2/28/68

Moshe Dayan posthumously speaks out on the Golan Heights

"Moshe Dayan, the celebrated commander who, as Defense Minister in 1967, gave the order to conquer the Golan...[said] many of the firefights with the Syrians were deliberately provoked by Israel, and the kibbutz residents who pressed the Government to take the Golan Heights did so less for security than for the farmland...[Dayan stated] 'They didn't even try to hide their greed for the land...We would send a tractor to plow some area where it wasn't possible to do anything, in the demilitarized area, and knew in advance that the Syrians would start to shoot. If they didn't shoot, we would tell the tractor to advance further, until in the end the Syrians would get annoyed and shoot.

And then we would use artillery and later the air force also, and that's how it was...The Syrians, on the fourth day of the war, were not a threat to us.'" The New York Times, May 11, 1997

The history of Israeli expansionism

"The acceptance of partition does not commit us to renounce Transjordan; one does not demand from anybody to give up his vision. We shall accept a state in the boundaries fixed today. But the boundaries of Zionist aspirations are the concern of the Jewish people and no external factor will be able to limit them." David Ben-Gurion, in 1936, quoted in Noam Chomsky, "The Fateful Triangle."

Expansionism - continued

"The main danger which Israel, as a 'Jewish state', poses to its own people, to other Jews and to its neighbors, is its ideologically motivated pursuit of territorial expansion and the inevitable series of wars resulting from this aim...No zionist politician has ever repudiated Ben-Gurion's idea that Israeli policies must be based (within the limits of practical considerations) on the restoration of Biblical borders as the borders of the Jewish state." Israeli professor, Israel Shahak, "Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of 3000 Years."

Expansionism - continued

In Israeli Prime Minister Moshe Sharatt's personal diaries, there is an excerpt from May of 1955 in which he quotes Moshe Dayan as follows: "[Israel] must see the sword as the main, if not the only, instrument with which to keep its morale high and to retain its moral tension. Toward this end it may, no - it must - invent dangers, and to do this it must adopt the method of provocation-and-revenge...And above all - let us hope for a new war with the Arab countries, so that we may finally get rid of our troubles and acquire our space." Quoted in Livia Rokach, "Israel's Sacred Terrorism."

But wasn't the occupation of Arab lands necessary to protect Israel's security?

"Senator [J.William Fulbright] proposed in 1970 that America should guarantee Israel's security in a formal treaty, protecting her with armed forces if necessary. In return, Israel would retire to the borders of 1967. The UN Security Council would guarantee this arrangement, and thereby bring the Soviet Union - then a supplier of arms and political aid to the Arabs - into compliance. As Israeli troops were withdrawn from the Golan Heights, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank they would be replaced by a UN peacekeeping force. Israel would agree to accept a certain number of Palestinians and the rest would be settled in a Palestinian state outside Israel.

"The plan drew favorable editorial support in the United States. The proposal, however, was flatly rejected by Israel. 'The whole affair disgusted Fulbright,' writes [his biographer Randall] Woods. 'The Israelis were not even willing to act in their own self-interest.'" Allan Brownfield in "Issues of the American Council for Judaism." Fall 1997.[Ed.-This was one of many such proposals]

What happened after the 1967 war ended?

"In violation of international law, Israel has confiscated over 52 percent of the land in the West Bank and 30 percent of the Gaza Strip for military use or for settlement by Jewish civilians...From 1967 to 1982, Israel's military government demolished 1,338 Palestinian homes on the West Bank. Over this period, more than 300,000 Palestinians were detained without trial for various periods by Israeli security forces." Intifada: The Palestinian Uprising Against Israeli Occupation," ed. Lockman and Beinin.

World opinion on the legality of Israeli control of the West Bank and Gaza.

"Under the UN Charter there can lawfully be no territorial gains from war, even by a state acting in self-defense. The response of other states to Israel's occupation shows a virtually unanimous opinion that even if Israel's action was defensive, its retention of the West Bank and Gaza Strip was not...The [UN] General Assembly characterized Israel's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza as a denial of self determination and hence a 'serious and increasing threat to international peace and security.' " John Quigley, "Palestine and Israel: A Challenge to Justice."

Examples of the effects of Israeli occupation

"A study of students at Bethlehem University reported by the Coordinating Committee of International NGOs in Jerusalem showed that many families frequently go five days a week without running water...The study goes further to report that, 'water quotas restrict usage by Palestinians living in the West Bank and Gaza, while Israeli settlers have almost unlimited amounts.'

"A summer trip to a Jewish settlement on the edge of the Judean desert less than five miles from Bethlehem confirmed this water inequity for us. While Bethlehemites were buying water from tank trucks at highly inflated rates, the lawns were green in the settlement. Sprinklers were going at mid day in the hot August sunshine. Sounds of children swimming in the outdoor pool added to the unreality." Betty Jane Bailey, in "The Link", December 1996.

Israeli occupation - continued

"You have to remember that 90 percent of children two years old or more have experienced - some many, many times - the [Israeli] army breaking into the home, beating relatives, destroying things. Many were beaten themselves, had bones broken, were shot, tear gassed, or had these things happen to siblings and neighbors...The emotional aspect of the child is affected by the [lack of] security. He needs to feel safe. We see the consequences later if he does not. In our research, we have found that children who are exposed to trauma tend to be more extreme in their behaviors and, later, in their political beliefs." Dr Samir Quota, director of research for the Gaza Community Mental Health Programme, quoted in "The Journal of Palestine Studies," Summer 1996, p.84

Israeli occupation - continued

"There is nothing quite like the misery one feels listening to a 35-year-old [Palestinian] man who worked fifteen years as an illegal day laborer in Israel in order to save up money to build a house for his family only to be shocked one day upon returning from work to find that the house and all that was in it had been flattened by an Israeli bulldozer. When I asked why this was done - the land, after all, was his - I was told that a paper given to him the next day by an Israeli soldier stated that he had built the structure without a license. Where else in the world are people required to have a license (always denied them) to build on their own property? Jews can build, but never Palestinians. This is apartheid." Edward Said, in "The Nation", May 4, 1998.

All Jewish settlements in territories occupied in the 1967 war are a direct violation of the Geneva Conventions, which Israel has signed.

"The Geneva Convention requires an occupying power to change the existing order as little as possible during its tenure. One aspect of this obligation is that it must leave the territory to the people it finds there. It may not bring its own people to populate the territory. This prohibition is found in the convention's Article 49, which states, 'The occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.'" John Quigley, "Palestine and Israel: A Challenge to Justice."

Excerpts from the U.S. State Department's reports during the Intifada

"Following are some excerpts from the U.S. State Department's Country Reports on Human Rights Practices from 1988 to 1991:

1988: 'Many avoidable deaths and injuries' were caused because Israeli soldiers frequently used gunfire in situations that did not present mortal danger to troops...IDF troops used clubs to break limbs and beat Palestinians who were not directly involved in disturbances or resisting arrest..At least thirteen Palestinians have been reported to have died from beatings...'

1989: Human rights groups charged that the plainclothes security personnel acted as death squads who killed Palestinian activists without warning, after they had surrendered, or after they had been subdued...

1991: [The report] added that the human rights groups had published 'detailed credible reports of torture, abuse and mistreatment of Palestinian detainees in prisons and detention centers." Former Congressman Paul Findley, "Deliberate Deceptions."

Jerusalem - Eternal, Indivisible Capital of Israel?

"Writing in The Jerusalem Report (Feb. 28, 2000), Leslie Susser points out that the current boundaries were drawn after the Six-Day War. Responsibility for drawing those lines fell to Central Command Chief Rehavan Ze'evi. The line he drew 'took in not only the five square kilometers of Arab East Jerusalem - but also 65 square kilometers of surrounding open country and villages, most of which never had any municipal link to Jerusalem. Overnight they became part of Israel's eternal and indivisible capital.'" Allan Brownfield in The Washington Report On Middle East Affairs, May 2000.

[PollyCorrect]

HAHA! en hij antwoordt twéé maal! Goed voor je statistieken, bruut. Uw quota aan antisemitische vomits moet op peil gehouden worden zeker?

[Sinistra]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door bruut geweld

zionistjes zijn weer eens zeer selectief verontwaardigd he..

en de persoonlijke aanvallen gaan maar door en owee als ik ze van hetzelfde laken een broek geef ...bij de topic blijven is natuurlijk wel erg moeilijk .

Dat u blijkbaar zelf moet vervallen in wat u andere mensen verwijt dat zegt mij en véle forumgebruikers genoeg over uw geloofwaardigheid. Israël zal blijven en zal zich steeds het recht toe eigenen zich te verdedigen tegen terroristen en daar zullen géén 1,5 miljard moslims of bruut gespuizen iets aan kunnen veranderen, dus léér ermee leven.