COP16 AR5 Aerosols, geo-engineering, wolken-behandeling.Mr.Pachauri IPPC !

[zonbron]

Het eerste Australische geo-engineering symposium...

Several leading climate change experts have highlighted the need for further research and understanding into the effects, risks and cost-effectiveness of implementing geo-engineering procedures to counter-act the effects of climate change.
Geo-engineering goes under the microscope in Canberra

[zonbron]

Bij deze is de militaire betrokkenheid bij het klimaathysteriespectakel bevestigd...

Climate change poses "an immediate, growing and grave threat" to health and security around the world, according to an expert conference in London.

Officers in the UK military warned that the price of goods such as fuel is likely to rise as conflict provoked by climate change increases.

A statement from the meeting adds that humanitarian disasters will put more and more strain on military resources.

It asks governments to adopt ambitious targets for curbing greenhouse gases.

The annual UN climate conference opens in about six weeks' time, and the doctors, academics and military experts represented at the meeting (held in the British Medical Association's (BMA) headquarters) argue that developed and developing countries alike need to raise their game.

Scientific studies suggest that the most severe climate impacts will fall on the relatively poor countries of the tropics.

UK military experts pointed out that much of the world's trade moves through such regions, with North America, Western Europe and China among the societies heavily dependent on oil and other imports.

Rear Admiral Neil Morisetti, climate and energy security envoy for the UK Ministry of Defence (MoD), said that conflict in such areas could make it more difficult and expensive to obtain goods on which countries such as Britain rely.

"If there are risks to the trade routes and other areas, then it's food, it's energy," he told BBC News.

"The price of energy will go up - for us, it's [the price of] petrol at the pumps - and goods made in southeast Asia, a lot of which we import."

Coffee climate
A number of recent studies have suggested that climate impacts will make conflict more likely, by increasing competition for scarce but essential resources such as water and food.

The International Institute for Strategic Studies, for example, recently warned that climate change "will increase the risks of resource shortages, mass migration and civil conflict", while the MoD's view is that it will shift "the tipping point at which conflict occurs".


Armed forces are "the gas-guzzlers of the world"
Alejandro Litovsky, founder of the Earth Security Initiative, said that even without the increasing effect of conflict, prices of essential goods were bound to rise.

"From the year 2000 onwards, we have been seeing commodity prices climb, and this is not likely to stop," he said.

"It is primarily driven by resource scarcity, and the trends suggest that depletion of these natural resources is unlikely to be reversed in the near future without drastic interventions."

He also said that degradation of natural resources such as forests and freshwater was removing much of the resilience that societies formerly enjoyed.

Last week, multinational coffee house Starbucks warned that climate change threatened the world's coffee supplies in 20-30 years' time.

Compromised by carbon
The military officers at the meeting also emphasised the interest that armed forces have in reducing their own carbon footprint. (Sorry, maar)

In Afghanistan, for example, fuel has to be delivered by road from Pakistan.

By the time it reaches its destination, it can cost 10 times the pump price. And the convoys are regularly targeted by opposing forces.

Several officers admitted that armed forces were "the gas-guzzlers of the world" - and while that was sometimes necessary in operations, reducing fossil fuel use and adopting renewables wherever possible made sense from economic and tactical points of view.

Rear Admiral Morisetti recalled that when commanding an aircraft carrier, it took a gallon of oil to move just 12 inches (30cm), while as many as 20 tonnes per hour were burned during a period of intensive take-off and landing.

"You can do that [with oil prices at] $30 a barrel, but not at $100 or $200," he said.

Health gains
On the health side, doctors warned of a raft of impacts, particularly in developing countries.

Hunger and malnutrition were likely to increase, and some infectious diseases were likely to spread, they said.

Poorer societies could expect to see an unholy symbiosis between the two, with under-nourished people more prone to succumb to infections.

Tackling carbon emissions, by contrast, would bring a range of health benefits, they argue in their statement.

"Changes in power generation improve air quality.

"Modest life style changes - such as increasing physical activity through walking and cycling - will cut rates of heart disease and stroke, obesity, diabetes, breast cancer, dementia and depressive illness.

"Climate change mitigation policies would thus significantly cut rates of preventable death and disability for hundreds of millions of people around the world."

No cause for optimism
As the UN summit in South Africa approaches, the statement here calls on the EU to increase its ambition and pledge to reduce emissions by 30% from 1990 levels by 2020, rather than the current target of 20%.

Currently, there does not appear to be political consensus for such a move within EU governments, however.

Additional recommendations are that developing country governments should analyse climate threats to their health and security, and that all governments should stop construction of new coal-fired power stations without carbon capture and storage (CCS) - which, as commercial CCS systems do not exist, would as things stand amount to a complete ban.

Without urgent action, carbon emissions could rise to levels that should cause major alarm, said Chris Rapley, professor of climate science at University College London.

Already, he noted, the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide has risen to about 380 parts per million [ppm] - whereas in the millions of years before the pre-industrial era, it fluctuated between about 180ppm during Ice Ages and about 280ppm in the warm interglacial periods.

"If we don't do something, then at the rate we're going, carbon emissions will continue to accelerate, and the atmospheric concentration is not going to be 450ppm or 650ppm by the end of the century, but 1,000ppm," he said.

"That is 10 times the difference between an Ice Age and an interglacial; and you have to be a pretty huge optimist to think that won't bring major changes."

BBC

Spoedig... zullen de militairen ons redden van het CO2-monster. Eat no more beans!

[D'ARTOIS]

Climate change is geen utopie maar realiteit. Het is vermoedelijk het enige effectieve wapen wat de natuur in kan zetten tegen de onvoorstebare snelheid waarmee de mens zich vermeerdert.

De verwachting is dat vvor het einde van deze eeuw de zeewaterspiegel ongeveer een een a anderhalve meter hoger zal liggen.
In de Indische oceaan en Pacific beginnen de koraaleilanden en atollen al onder te lopen. Dat is een goed meetpunt en is opwarming wat dat betreft geen onzin.

Het resultaat zal zijn dat er steeds meer overstromingen komen en steeds grotere delen van het vaste land onder water zal komen te staan.

De consequenties zijn dat de mensheid zal moeten inkrimpen, hoe dan ook.

[zonbron]

Documentaire aangaande climate change, global warming, de grote zwendel met vele bekende wetenschappers. Uitgezonden op Channel 4 (VK). Een aanrader.

The Great Global Warming Swindle

Officiele site : www.greatglobalwarmingswindle.com

A DVD of the film, The Great Global Warming Swindle, will be available from mid July (despite the strenuous efforts of those who support the theory of global warming to prevent its release). The DVD is an expanded and improved version of the film broadcast in the UK on Channel Four. More interview material has been added, covering a broader range of subjects than was possible in the broadcast film.


However, we urge those interested in hearing the case against the theory of man made global warming to dig deeper. The main purpose of this site is to point people towards key scientific papers, books and other relevant material.


We have received literally thousands of emails from scientists and others expressing their support and encouragement. These emails are also often very useful, steering us towards new studies in different areas. Please keep sending them.

The email address is: [email protected]

The general reaction to the film has been overwhelming and enormously encouraging. As Channel Four reported in Broadcast magazine, they received a record number of phone calls following the first transmission. They calculated that the calls were 6 to 1 in support of the film.

It would be nice to claim that the explosion of interest was due to the film itself, but the fuss started even before the film was broadcast. The reason, we suspect, is that the coverage of ‘global warming’, on TV, radio and in the press, has been so one-sided and uncritical. In Britain, hours and hours of programmes have been broadcast by the BBC on the subject, much of it scientifically absurd. The very fact that a science documentary dared to challenge the orthodoxy was itself news.


Why? Why have journalists been so craven or biased? How has a theory which demonstrably lacks really solid supporting evidence become an indisputable fact? What of the impressive, much talked about scientific ‘consensus’ which is used to forestall any awkward questions about the evidence?

The film made a humble stab at suggesting some possible answers, but there was limited space for these bigger questions. The whole global warming alarm, we believe, raises serious issues about the way science functions in the real world, about the political bias of scientists, about censorship within the scientific community itself, about the routine practice of scientists drawing false or inflated conclusions from ambiguous or uncertain data, about the manifest failure of the peer review process, about the extraordinary unwillingness of scientists who have invested time and reputation in a particular theory to consider evidence which directly contradicts it, about the elevation of speculation (models) to the level of solid data, and much else besides.

Science and scientists cannot always rise above the prejudices of their class and of their age. The selection and handling of evidence often reflects these prejudices. The most highly qualified and respected scientists can be blind to obvious deficiencies in a theory, and will be dismissive of evidence when it undermines what they want to believe.

But the scare over man made global warming may prove to be the first great example in the modern Western world, when science was betrayed by scientists themselves

This web-site is still young, and the people running it are doing so in their spare time (when they really should be making television programmes). So apologies for its shortcomings.

The makers of the documentary The Great Global Warming Swindle have made many science documentaries before. The thing they found most shocking when they started to make this one, was the weakness of the case for man made global warming, and the quantity and quality of the evidence which flatly contradicts it.


The Great Global Warming Swindle [Full Film]

[zonbron]

Herinnert U zich nog Nikola Aleksic uit post http://forum.politics.be/showpost.ph...4&postcount=98 ?

Hij werd onlangs opgepakt en men zou ook getracht hebben hem het eeuwige zwijgen op te leggen dit mbv een aanslag.

Serbian ecology leader arrested for openly defying GMOs and chemtrails

Monday, October 24, 2011 by: PF Louis

(NaturalNews) In October 2011, Nikola Aleksi, leader of Ecological Movement of Novi Sad in Serbia, was arrested and fined. Earlier on his way to a conference in Belgrade, an attempt was reportedly made on his life. And Monsanto has sued him with the threat of removing him and his family from their rented flat as "collateral."

Why all the fuss? Nikola made a spirited speech, recorded on video, challenging the Serbian president for allowing GMOs to come into Serbia. He also challenged the Serbian government for allowing planes to spray chemtrails in the Serbian skies.

A brave outspoken challenge
He forcefully spoke of all this as genocide. That the future of Serbians will fade away from the poisons of chemtrails and the toxicity and sterility generated by GMOs.

Mara Kern, wrote the original article, posted by "Food Freedom" and others, on Nikola Aleksi. She was posting a plea for help with Nikola's case in Serbia. Her command of English is very good, but there are passages that indicate English is her second language.

In addition to her plea, there is a video of Nikola's brave challenge with English subtitles as well as an English text of most of his speech. He even called on the Serbian Army to do their duty and protect Serbian skies. He demanded the Serbian prosecutor declare Serbia a non-GMO zone.
...

There have been two or three Natural News articles referring to Monsanto's use of Xe, a private security group formerly known as Blackwater. Yes, the mercenary group changed their names to shine up their tarnished image (http://www.naturalnews.com/030896_M...).

As a corporate intelligence agency for Monsanto, Xe is assigned with locating and isolating international GMO dissenters so they can be marginalized, bought, or removed.

Monsanto marches on through government leaders
Monsanto has succeeded with taking over the US Government and its regulatory agencies. They are meeting with resistance elsewhere, but they are persistent and ruthless. It appears Monsanto has what it takes to corrupt leaders of other foreign nations, any which way that allows them entry.

...

naturalnews

[zonbron]

Marc Morano van Climate Depot praat over de laatste ontwikkelingen in de climate hoax op infowars nightly news.

Een aanrader: VIDEO

[zonbron]

De invloed van CO2 op het klimaat werd overschat

25 November 2011 Last updated at 15:48 GMT

CO2 climate sensitivity 'overestimated'
By Jennifer Carpenter Science reporter, BBC News
Computer climate simulation Models are used to project future climatic scenarios

Global temperatures could be less sensitive to changing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) levels than previously thought, a study suggests.

...

Lees meer: BBC

[zonbron]

Het is geweten dat HAARP een cyclotron in de ionosfeer kan opwekken.
Men zou zich deze cyclotron kunnen inbeelden als een deeltjesversneller op grote hoogte, een beetje zoals CERN, maar dan in de lucht, zonder mechanische of metalen onderdelen (opmerking: soms wordt wel Barium in de lucht gebracht). Deze technologie heeft verschillende toepassingen.

In deze draad werd tot nu toe niet al teveel aandacht gegeven aan dit onderwerp.

A.d.h.v. volgend interview met Dr. Nick Begich wens ik daar verandering in te brengen.

(Een productie van Prisonplanet.tv, zogewenst kan U de intro skippen en het interview bekijken vanaf minuut 2:36)

Dr. Nick Begich: HAARP, Secret Sciences

Dr. Nick Begich has been pursuing independent research in science and politics for most of his adult life. Dr Begich received a doctorate in traditional medicine from the Open International University for Complimentary Medicines in November 2004. Dr. Begich the eldest son of US Congressman Nick Begich Sr. and political activist Pegge Begich.

During this interview conducted by prisonplanet.tv, Dr. Begich talks about many controversial science experiments, including HAARP, Mind Control technology, compartmentalization within the science community, and how these technologies, which might be used for the progress of all mankind, is currently controlled by secret military industrial complex interests putting all of humanity at risk.

Dr. Begich talks about Alaska as a strategic location that can be utilized by the United States as way to stimulate the economy and put America back on the map as the world's economic leader.

Finally, Dr. Begich spends some time telling us his perspective of the plane crash that killed his father, Congressman Nick Begich sr. and US House Majority leader, Hale Boggs. Dr. Begich recalls out the historical election that faced the U.S. immediately after this tragic plane crash. An almost forgotten event in American history, one that not only changed the course of U.S. history, but the history of the world as well.

Deel 1
Deel 2
Deel 3
Deel 4
Deel 5

of

Bekijk het in HD in 1 Deel
(zonder intro)
HIER

[zonbron]

Nieuws uit Durban...

Klimaattop geschorst en baas Greenpeace buitengezet

[zonbron]

Een nieuwe studie toont aan dat de zon het klimaat controleert

Chinese 2,485 year tree ring study shows natural cycles control climate, temps may cool til 2068


A blockbuster Chinese study of Tibetan tree rings by Liu et al 2011 shows, with detail, that the modern era is a dog-standard normal climate when compared to the last 2,500 years. The temperature, the rate of change — it’s all been seen before. Nothing about the current period is “abnormal”, indeed the current warming period in Tibet can be produced through calculation of cycles. Liu et al do a Fourier analysis on the underlying cycles and do brave predictions as well.

[Pastafarian]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

Het is geweten dat HAARP een cyclotron in de ionosfeer kan opwekken.
Men zou zich deze cyclotron kunnen inbeelden als een deeltjesversneller op grote hoogte, een beetje zoals CERN, maar dan in de lucht, zonder mechanische of metalen onderdelen (opmerking: soms wordt wel Barium in de lucht gebracht). Deze technologie heeft verschillende toepassingen.

In deze draad werd tot nu toe niet al teveel aandacht gegeven aan dit onderwerp.

A.d.h.v. volgend interview met Dr. Nick Begich wens ik daar verandering in te brengen.

(Een productie van Prisonplanet.tv, zogewenst kan U de intro skippen en het interview bekijken vanaf minuut 2:36)

Prisonplanet.tv, een heel betrouwbare bron... Ik wacht vol ongeduld op verdere zever over HAARP, kan ik ze nog eens door de gehaktmolen halen

[the_dude]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

Nieuws uit Durban...

Klimaattop geschorst en baas Greenpeace buitengezet

't ziet er niet goed uit.

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pastafarian

Prisonplanet.tv, een heel betrouwbare bron... Ik wacht vol ongeduld op verdere zever over HAARP, kan ik ze nog eens door de gehaktmolen halen

DE Info is juist @Pastafarian, HAARP kan een cyclotron in de atmosfeer aanmaken. Ik wacht op Uw gehakt en bedank hierbij Prisonplanet/Infowars voor het beschikbaar maken van het interview.

BTW, meestal is de door Prisonplanet aangeboden info voldoende juist, enige kritiek kan de onvolledigheid (wat inderdaad een vorm van desinformatie is) en het sensionalisme zijn. Vele Amerikanen hebben dat laatste nodig vanwege hun ADHD, als gevolg van het Hollywood sensionalisme.

Beste @Patafarian, ik wacht vol ongeduld en aanvaard bij deze Uw uitdaging.




PS U schrijft, "kan ik ze nog eens door de gehaktmolen halen".
Graag enige referentie of link, dank bij voorbaat.


ZB

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door the_dude

't ziet er niet goed uit.

Tja, hangt ervan af wat je als goed ervaart.

Deze morgen stond op de site van BBC dat er blijkbaar toch een soort van akkoord tegen 2015 haalbaar zou zijn.

Echter weinig concreet. Wat ook niet meer dan normaal is gezien de VS, India en China oa. niet mee willen.

[zonbron]

VN DURBAN-top

Men zou een internationale klimaatrechtbank willen oprichten die Westerse landen verplicht om de 'klimaatschuld' aan 3de wereldlanden te betalen.
3de wereldlanden zelf zouden buiten schot blijven.

Interview met Lord Christopher Monckton en Mark Morano van Climate Depot.

(Moeder Aarde en GAIA-geloof...)

Tonight's Friday, December 9, 2011 edition of the Infowars Nightly News brings an exclusive and damning look at the United Nation's climate talks in Durbin, which aims to put nations under carbon-based debt and commit genocidal policies against the poor. Alex is joined by Lord Christopher Monckton and Climate Depot's Mark Morano to discuss the latest attempt to build world government on a foundation of eco-fascism.

Specifically, Monckton writes that the summit aims include: "A new International Climate Court will have the power to compel Western nations to pay ever-larger sums to third-world countries in the name of making reparation for supposed "climate debt". The Court will have no power over third-world countries. Here and throughout the draft, the West is the sole target. "The process" is now irredeemably anti-Western


Lord Christopher Monckton: The Coming New International Climate Court 1/2

Lord Christopher Monckton: The Coming New International Climate Court 2/2

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

VN DURBAN-top

Men zou een internationale klimaatrechtbank willen oprichten die Westerse landen verplicht om de 'klimaatschuld' aan 3de wereldlanden te betalen.
3de wereldlanden zelf zouden buiten schot blijven.

Interview met Lord Christopher Monckton en Mark Morano van Climate Depot.

(Moeder Aarde en GAIA-geloof...)

Deel II

Marc Morano: World Government Built on Eco-Fascism to Control All

[Pastafarian]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

DE Info is juist @Pastafarian, HAARP kan een cyclotron in de atmosfeer aanmaken. Ik wacht op Uw gehakt en bedank hierbij Prisonplanet/Infowars voor het beschikbaar maken van het interview.

BTW, meestal is de door Prisonplanet aangeboden info voldoende juist, enige kritiek kan de onvolledigheid (wat inderdaad een vorm van desinformatie is) en het sensionalisme zijn. Vele Amerikanen hebben dat laatste nodig vanwege hun ADHD, als gevolg van het Hollywood sensionalisme.

Beste @Patafarian, ik wacht vol ongeduld en aanvaard bij deze Uw uitdaging.




PS U schrijft, "kan ik ze nog eens door de gehaktmolen halen".
Graag enige referentie of link, dank bij voorbaat.


ZB

Haarp zou ik niet bepaald een cyclotron noemen. Een cyclotron versnelt protonen, Haarp werkt in op ionen, dat is lang niet hetzelfde. Ik zou het qua principe eerder vergelijken met een microgolfoven. Er is helemaal niets sinisters aan Haarp, en het is wat het zegt dat het is: een onderzoeksproject. Er is niets geheimzinnigs aan, de installatie kan zelfs bezocht worden!
Dat Haarp het weer zou kunnen beïnvloeden is onzin. De installatie werkt in op de ionosfeer, die zich hoog boven alle atmosferische weersystemen bevindt. Het weer wordt gevormd in de troposfeer en stratosfeer, die tot maximum 50 kilometer hoogte reiken. Deze lagen worden niet beïnvloed door de golven die door Haarp uitgezonden worden. Bovendien, de energie die door Haarp in de ionosfeer gezonden kan worden is maar een fractie van hetgeen er vanuit de ruimte in terect komt (vooral in de vorm van UV-straling). Daarom kunnen de experimenten van Haarp ook alleen 's nachts uitgevoerd worden, wanneer de ionosfeer niet blootgesteld wordt aan UV-straling.

En wat alle andere wilde verhalen betreft (aardbevingen, mind control, superwapens en wie weet wat nog allemaal, ...), ik wil die wel eens door hard bewijs onderbouwd zien, en liefst niet van sensatiesites als Prison Planet of Niburu!

En nog een laatste opmerking over de heer Nick Begich, die kerel heeft zijn zogezegd doctoraatsdiploma gehaald (of gekocht?) bij een niet-erkende instelling (ik ga niet zeggen universiteit), dat is bijgevolg waardeloos en zijn geloofwaardigheid is dan ook nul komma nul als het over Haarp gaat. Was hij nu nog doctor in de fysica of meteoroloog geweest, dan had hij recht van spreken, maar niet als new-age kwak!

[zonbron]

De VN wil een wereldregering op kosten van het Westen

UN draft text - Verslag

Exclusive: UN Climate Draft Text Demands 'New International Climate Court' to compel reparations for 'climate debt' -- Also seeks 'rights of Mother Earth' & 2C° drop in global temps Vist site

UN Draft Text Demands: The West will pay 'climate debt' because of its 'historical responsibility' for causing 'global warming' -- UN seeks end to wars to 'protect the climate system'

Special to Climate Depot - Lord Christopher Monckton reports from UN Climate Summit

Durban: what the media are not telling you

By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley in Durban, South Africa

DURBAN, South Africa -- “No high hopes for Durban.” “Binding treaty unlikely.” “No deal this year.” Thus ran the headlines. The profiteering UN bureaucrats here think otherwise. Their plans to establish a world government paid for by the West on the pretext of dealing with the non-problem of “global warming” are now well in hand. As usual, the mainstream media have simply not reported what is in the draft text which the 194 states parties to the UN framework convention on climate change are being asked to approve.

Behind the scenes, throughout the year since Cancun, the now-permanent bureaucrats who have made highly-profitable careers out of what they lovingly call “the process” have been beavering away at what is now a 138-page document. Its catchy title is "Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-Term Cooperative Action Under the Convention -- Update of the amalgamation of draft texts in preparation of [one imagines they mean 'for'] a comprehensive and balanced outcome to be presented to the Conference of the Parties for adoption at its seventeenth session: note by the Chair.” In plain English, these are the conclusions the bureaucracy wants.

The contents of this document, turgidly drafted with all the UN's skill at what the former head of its documentation center used to call “transparent impenetrability”, are not just off the wall – they are lunatic.

Main points:

Ø A new International Climate Court will have the power to compel Western nations to pay ever-larger sums to third-world countries in the name of making reparation for supposed “climate debt”. The Court will have no power over third-world countries. Here and throughout the draft, the West is the sole target. “The process” is now irredeemably anti-Western.

Ø “Rights of Mother Earth”: The draft, which seems to have been written by feeble-minded green activists and environmental extremists, talks of “The recognition and defence of the rights of Mother Earth to ensure harmony between humanity and nature”. Also, “there will be no commodification [whatever that may be: it is not in the dictionary and does not deserve to be] of the functions of nature, therefore no carbon market will be developed with that purpose”.

Ø “Right to survive”: The draft childishly asserts that “The rights of some Parties to survive are threatened by the adverse impacts of climate change, including sea level rise.” At 2 inches per century, according to eight years' data from the Envisat satellite? Oh, come off it! The Jason 2 satellite, the new kid on the block, shows that sea-level has actually dropped over the past three years.

Ø War and the maintenance of defence forces and equipment are to cease – just like that – because they contribute to climate change. There are other reasons why war ought to cease, but the draft does not mention them.

Ø A new global temperature target will aim, Canute-like, to limit “global warming” to as little as 1 C° above pre-industrial levels. Since temperature is already 3 C° above those levels, what is in effect being proposed is a 2 C° cut in today's temperatures. This would take us halfway back towards the last Ice Age, and would kill hundreds of millions. Colder is far more dangerous than warmer.

Ø The new CO2 emissions target, for Western countries only, will be a reduction of up to 50% in emissions over the next eight years and of “more than 100%” [these words actually appear in the text] by 2050. So, no motor cars, no coal-fired or gas-fired power stations, no aircraft, no trains. Back to the Stone Age, but without even the right to light a carbon-emitting fire in your caves. Windmills, solar panels and other “renewables” are the only alternatives suggested in the draft. There is no mention of the immediate and rapid expansion of nuclear power worldwide to prevent near-total economic destruction.

Ø The new CO2 concentration target could be as low as 300 ppmv CO2 equivalent (i.e., including all other greenhouse gases as well as CO2 itself). That is a cut of almost half compared with the 560 ppmv CO2 equivalent today. It implies just 210 ppmv of CO2 itself, with 90 ppmv CO2 equivalent from other greenhouse gases. But at 210 ppmv, plants and trees begin to die. CO2 is plant food. They need a lot more of it than 210 ppmv.

Ø The peak-greenhouse-gas target year – for the West only – will be this year. We will be obliged to cut our emissions from now on, regardless of the effect on our economies (and the lack of effect on the climate).

Ø The West will pay for everything, because of its “historical responsibility” for causing “global warming”. Third-world countries will not be obliged to pay anything. But it is the UN, not the third-world countries, that will get the money from the West, taking nearly all of it for itself as usual. There is no provision anywhere in the draft for the UN to publish accounts of how it has spent the $100 billion a year the draft demands that the West should stump up from now on.

The real lunacy comes in the small print – all of it in 8-point type, near-illegibly printed on grubby, recycled paper. Every fashionable leftist idiocy is catered for.

Talking of which, note in passing that Rajendra Pachauri, the railroad engineer who, in the topsy-turvy looking-glass world of international climate insanity is the “science” chairman of the UN's climate panel, has admitted that no one has been talking about climate science at the climate conference here in Durban. Not really surprising, given no real warming for getting on for two decades, no recent sea-level rise, no new record Arctic ice-melt, fewer hurricanes than at almost any time in 30 years, no Pacific atolls disappearing beneath the waves.

Here – and, as always, you heard it here first, for the mainstream media have conspired to keep secret the Madness of King Rajendra and his entire coterie of governmental and bureaucratic lunatics worldwide – is what the dribbling, twitching thrones and dominions, principalities and powers of the world will be asked to agree to.

“International Climate Court of Justice”: This kangaroo court is to be established by next year “to guarantee the compliance of Annex I Parties with all the provisions of this decision, which are essential elements in the obtaining of the global goal”. Note that, here as elsewhere, the bias is only against the nations of the West. However badly the third-world countries behave, they cannot be brought before the new court. Though none of what the draft calls the “modalities” of the proposed marsupial dicastery are set out in detail, one can imagine that the intention is to oblige Western nations to pay up however much the world government run by the Convention secretariat feels like demanding, just as the unelected tyrants of the EU demand – and get – ever-larger cash payments from the ever-shrinking economies and ever-poorer tribute-payers of their dismal empire.

The temperature target: At Copenhagen and Cancun, the states parties to the Convention arrogated to themselves the power – previously safe in the hands of Divine Providence – to alter the weather in such a way as to prevent global mean surface temperature from rising by more than 2 C° above the “pre-industrial” level. They did not even say what they meant by “pre-industrial”. From 1695-1745 temperatures in central England, quite a good proxy for global temperatures, rose by 2.2 C°, with about another 0.8 C° since then, making 3 C° in all. The previous temperature target, therefore, was already absurd. Yet the new, improved, madder target is to keep global temperatures either “1 C°” or “well below 1.5 C°” above “pre-industrial levels” – i.e., well below half of the temperature increase that has already occurred since the pre-industrial era. The twittering states parties are committing themselves, in effect, to reducing today's global temperatures by getting on for 2 C°. This is madness. Throughout pre-history, the governing class – Druids or Pharaohs or Mayans or Incas – thought they could replace their Creator and command the weather. They couldn't. No more can we. But try telling that to the strait-jacketed ninnies of today's governing “elite”. Speech after speech at the plenary sessions of the Durban conference has drivelled on about how We Are The People Who At This Historic Juncture Are Willing And Able To Undertake The Noble Purpose Of Saving The Planet From Thermageddon and Saving You From Yourselves [entirely at your prodigious expense, natch].

The emissions-reduction targets: The new target proposed by the staring-eyed global-village idiots will be a reduction of 50-85% of global greenhouse-gas emissions from 1990 levels (i.e. by 65-100% of today's levels) by 2050, with emissions falling still further thereafter. The West should cut its emissions by 30-50% from 1990 levels (i.e. by 40-65% of today's levels) in just eight years, and by more than 95% (i.e. more than 100%) by 2050. Alternatively (for there are many alternatives in the text, indicating that agreement among the inmates in the Durban asylum is a long way off), the West must cut its emissions “more than 50%” in just five years, and “more than 100%” by 2050. The words “more than 100%” actually appear in the draft. The Third World, however, need cut its emissions only by 15-30% over the next eight years, provided – of course – that the West fully reimburses it for the cost.

The greenhouse-gas reduction target: Greenhouse-gas concentrations in the atmosphere “should stabilize well below 300-450 ppm CO2 equivalent”. This target, like the temperature target, is plain daft. CO2 concentration is currently at 392 ppmv, and the IPCC increases this by 43% to allow for other greenhouse gases. Accordingly, today's CO2-equivalent concentration of greenhouse gases is 560 ppmv, and the current lunacy is to cut this perhaps by very nearly half, reducing the CO2 component to just 210 ppmv, at which point trees and plants become starved of CO2, which is their food, and start to die.

The greenhouse-gas peak targets: Global greenhouse gas emissions, say the mentally-challenged Durban droolers, should peak in not more than eight years' time, and perhaps as soon as two years' time. Western greenhouse-gas emissions should peak immediately (or perhaps by next year, or maybe the year after that) and must decline thereafter. The greenhouse-gas emissions peak in third-world countries will be later than that of the West, and – no surprises here – will depend on the West to pay the cost of it.

“Historical responsibility”: The nations of the West (for which the UN's code is “Annex I parties”) are from now on required to beat their breasts (or at least their strait-jackets) and acknowledge their “historical responsibility” for increasing CO2 emissions and giving us warmer weather. The draft says: “Acknowledging that the largest share of the historical global emissions of greenhouse gases originated in Annex I Parties and that, owing to this historical responsibility in terms of their contribution to the average global temperature increase, Annex I Parties must take the lead in combating climate change and the adverse effects thereof.” This new concept of “historical responsibility” – suspiciously akin to the “war-guilt” of post-1918 Germany, declared by the imprudent governments of the world at the Versailles conference, which was no small cause of World War II – further underscores the rapidly-growing anti-Western bias in the UN and in the Convention's secretariat.

Who pays? Oh, you guessed it before I told you. The West pays. The third world (UN code: “non-Annex-I parties”) thinks it will collect, so it will always vote for the UN's insane proposals. But the UN's bureaucrats will actually get all or nearly all the money, and will decide how to allocate what minuscule fraction they have not already spent on themselves. As a senior UN diplomat told me last year, “The UN exists for only one purpose: to get more money. That, and that alone, is the reason why it takes such an interest in climate change.” The draft says: “Developed-country Parties shall provide developing-country Parties with new and additional finance, inter alia through a percentage of the gross domestic product of developed-country Parties.” And, of course, “The extent of participation by non-Annex-I parties in the global effort to deal with climate change is directly dependent on the level of support provided by developed-country Parties.”

The get-out clause: One or two Western countries – Canada and Japan, for instance – have begun to come off the Kool-Aid. They have worked out what scientifically-baseless nonsense the climate scam is and have said they are not really playing any more. To try to keep these and the growing number of nations who want out of “the process” bankrolling the ever-more-lavish UN, an ingenious escape clause has been crafted: “The scale of financial flows to non-Annex-I parties shall be based on the assessments of their needs to deal with climate change.” Since climate is not going to change measurably as a result of Man's emissions, any honest assessment of the needs of third-world countries “to deal with climate change” is that they don't need any money at all for this purpose and shouldn't get a single red cent. The UN is now the biggest obstacle to the eradication of poverty worldwide, because its pampered functionaries divert so much cash to themselves, to an ever-expanding alphabet-soup of bureaucracies, and then to heroically lunatic projects like “global warming” control. Time to abolish it.

World government: The Copenhagen Treaty draft establishing a world “government” with unlimited powers of taxation and intervention in the affairs of states parties to the UN Framework Convention fortunately failed. Yet at the Cancun climate conference the following year 1000 new bureaucracies were established to form the nucleus of a world government, with central control in the hands of the Convention's secretariat and tentacles in every region and nation. The draft “agrees that common principles, modalities and procedures as well as the coordinating and oversight functions of the UNFCCC are needed” – in short, global centralization of political, economic and environmental power in the manicured hands of the Convention's near-invisible but all-powerful secretariat. No provision is made for the democratic election of key members of the all-powerful secretariat – in effect, a world government – by the peoples of our planet.

Reporting to the world government: From 2013/14, the world government will oblige Western nations to prepare reports and submit them to it every two years. The format of these reports is specified in obsessive detail over several pages of the draft. The reports will describe the extent of their compliance with the mitigation targets imposed by the various treaties and agreements. The West will be obliged to to continue reporting “greenhouse-gas emission inventories”, for which “common reporting formats and methodologies for the calculation of emission, established at the international level, are essential”. Separately, Western nations will now be required to provide information on the financial support they have pledged to assist third-world countries in mitigating greenhouse-gas emissions and adapting to “the adverse effects of climate change”. The world government also expects to receive reports from Western nations on their financial contributions to the Global Environment Facility, the Least Developed Countries' Trust Fund, the Special Climate Change Fund, the Adaptation Fund, the Green Climate Fund and the Trust Fund for Supplementary Activities”. Western nations must also provide information on the steps taken to promote technology development and transfer to third-world countries, and on how they have provided “capacity-building support” to third-world countries, and on numerous other matters. The inexorable increase in compulsory reporting was one of the mechanisms by which the unelected Kommissars of the anti-democratic European Union acquired absolute power over the member states. EU advisors have been helping the UN to learn how to use similar techniques to centralize global power just as anti-democratically in its own hands.

Review of Western nations' conduct: Once the multitude of mechanisms for Western nations' compulsory reporting to the world government are in place, the information gathered by it will be used as the basis of a continuous review of every aspect of their compliance with the various agreements and concords, whether legally-binding or not. Teams of five to eight members of the Convention's secretariat will scrutinize each Western nation's conduct, and will have the power to ask questions and to require additional information, as well as to make recommendations that will gradually become binding. The world government will then prepare a record of the review for each Western nation, including reports of various aspects of the review, an assessment of that nation's compliance, questions and answers, conclusions and recommendations (eventually instructions) to that nation, and a “facilitative process” (UN code for a mechanism to compel the nation to do as it is told by people whom no one has elected).

Finance: One of the 1000 bureaucracies established at Cancun is the Standing Committee on Finance, which the draft says will have the power of “mobilizing financial resources” through flows of public and private finance, “mobilizing additional funding”, and requiring and verifying the reporting of finance provided to third-world Parties by the Western nations through a new Financial Support Registry. Finance for third-world countries is to be scaled up “significantly”, and Western countries will be obliged to provide “a clear work-plan on their pledged assessed contributions” from 2012-2020 “for approval by the Conference of the Parties”. Taxpayers will be compelled to provide the major source of funding through public expenditure.

Green Climate Fund: Western nations are urged to “commit to the initial capitalization of the Green Climate Fund without delay”, to include “the full running costs” and “the funding required for the formation and operating costs of the board and secretariat of the Green Climate Fund”. Here, as always, the UN bureaucrats want their own pay, perks, pensions and organizational structure guaranteed before any money goes to third-world countries.

Worldwide cap-and-trade: The draft establishes a “new market-based approach/mechanism ... to promote the reduction or avoidance of greenhouse-gas emissions” – once again for Western countries only. Also, “Ambitious, legally-binding emission reduction targets for developed-country Parties ... are essential to drive a global carbon market”. What this means, in the plain English that is almost entirely absent from the 138-page draft, is worldwide compulsory cap-and-trade, centrally imposed and regulated, imposed on Western countries only.

Patent rights: Under the guise of action to prevent “global warming” that is not happening at anything like the predicted rate, coded references to the extinction of patent rights in third-world countries are creeping into the text. For instance, “identification and removal of all barriers that prevent effective technology development and transfer to developing-country Parties”; and “the removal of all obstacles, including intellectual property rights and patents on climate-related technologies to ensure the transfer of technology to developing countries”. As an inventor with patents to my name, I can predict what effect any such provision will have. It will prevent the establishment and development of patent offices in continents such as Africa, which – thus far – has contributed remarkably little to the world's inventions, not least because the structure for protecting and encouraging inventors is rickety or non-existent.

Shipping and aviation fuels were previously excluded from the scope of the Convention and are now to be included. International shipping and aviation are described as “a source of financial resources for climate change actions”. More money for UN bureaucrats.

The new bureaucracies: As though the 1000 bureaucracies created at Cancun were not enough, another bureaucracy is to be created “to oversee, monitor and ensure overall implementation of capacity-building activities consistent with the provisions of the Convention”. There will also be a new “International Climate Court of Justice” (see above). A “Financial Support Registry” is also to be set up.

The new special-interest group: Meet the “Parties that are alternative-energy-disadvantaged”. No wind, no sun, no renewables – so, handouts from the West, please.

The new buzzwords: Welcome to the notion of “equitable access to global atmospheric space”; “Mother Earth” [I kid you not: it's in the draft]; “climate-resilient infrastructure” and “paradigm shift towards building a low-carbon society”. These buzzwords are in addition to pre-existing buzzwords such as “climate justice” and “climate debt” – the latter being the notion that because the West has emitted more carbon dioxide than the rest it owes the Third World lots of money.

“Rights of Mother Earth”: The draft burbles insanely about “The recognition and defence of the rights of Mother Earth to ensure harmony between humanity and nature, and that there will be no commodification [whatever that may be] of the functions of nature, therefore no carbon market will be developed with that purpose”.

“Right to survive”: “The rights of some Parties to survive are threatened by the adverse impacts of climate change, including sea level rise.” At 2 inches per century? Oh, come off it! The Jason 2 satellite shows that sea-level has dropped over the past three years.

The science is at last to be reviewed in a manner that appears independent of the discredited IPCC. However, no details of the method of review are provided, and other parts of the schizophrenic draft say we must defer to the science put forward not by the peer-reviewed learned journals but by a political body whose reports are not peer-reviewed in the usual sense.

Legally-binding treaty: According to the draft, the aim is to create a “legally-binding instrument/outcome”. This is UN code for an international Treaty. The US will sign no such treaty. Nor will Canada, Japan, France, India and many other countries. On the basis of drafts as in-your-face idiotic as this, no legally-binding climate treaty will ever be signed: which is just as well, because no such treaty is necessary.

War and the maintenance of defence forces and equipment are to cease because they contribute to climate change. Just like that. The UN draft text asserts: "Stopping wars, defending lives and ceasing destructive activities will protect the climate system; conflict-related activities emit significant greenhouse gas emissions to the atmosphere." A wave of the UN's magic wand and peace will reign throughout the Earth, the sun will shine (but not too much) the rain will fall (just where and when needed), and non-gender-specific motherhood and non-commodificated apple pie will be available to all. Ouroborindra, ba-ba hee! It does not seem to have occurred to the Druids of the UN that they have near-totally failed to prevent wars on Earth – the original purpose for which it was founded. Yet now, in their gibbering, spastic arrogance, they think to command the weather. Canute, thou shouldst be living at this hour!

[zonbron]

Sommigen waren niet welkom op de COP17-top, ze hebben dan maar besloten om met valschermen binnen te vallen. (Lord Christopher Monckton AIRBORN !!!)

CFACT parachutes into Durban Climate Conference

Skydivers jump to draw attention to Climategate 2.0 scandal.

[zonbron]

Jesus, ik begrijp absoluut niet hoe U deze onzin heeft durven posten en zal mijn gehaktmolen eens aanzwengelen *zucht*

Wat U hiermee wil bereiken is me dan ook volledig onduidelijk.

Even snel een paar correcties.

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pastafarian

Haarp zou ik niet bepaald een cyclotron noemen. Een cyclotron versnelt protonen, Haarp werkt in op ionen, dat is lang niet hetzelfde. Ik zou het qua principe eerder vergelijken met een microgolfoven.

- Ik heb HAARP nooit een cyclotron genoemd, enkel dat het systeem een soort van cyclotron kan opwekken in de atmosfeer(ionosfeer)
-Een cyclotron is een deeltjesversneller, de protonen ontgaan me
-Een cyclotron versnelt geladen deeltjes, dus ionen
-Een microgolfoven werkt op Ghz frequenties (typisch 2.45 Ghz), HAARP gebruikt het spectrum van 2.8 - 10 Mhz en tevens ULF,ELF (dus HF en niet UHF, SHF EHF zoals Uw microgolfoven)
- Bekijk even volgend patent

Method and apparatus for creating an artificial electron cyclotron heating region of plasma - United States Patent 4712155
Inventor
Eastlund Bernard J
Ramo Simon

Assignee
APTI

Attorney
Faulconer Drude

IPC
H05H 01/02
H05H 01/18
H05B 06/64
H05C 03/00
H05H 01/46

4712155 is referenced by 3 patents and cites 7 patents.

A method and apparatus altering a region of plasma that lies above the earth's surface at altitudes (e.g. below 50 kilometer) where the collison rate of the electrons in the plasma is originally greater than the cyclotron frequency of the electrons. First, artificial magnetic lines of force are established from the earth's surface by positioning a loop of cable at the earth's surface. An electrical current of sufficient amperage is passed through the cable which inherently generates the artificial magnetic field from the center of the loop. The field strength B on the artificial lines in the region of plasma to be altered is sufficient to increase the cyclotron frequency of the electrons in the plasma so that it will exceed the rate of collosion of the electrons. The plasma is then excited by electron cyclotron resonance heating to thereby further alter the plasma by transmitting circularly polarized electromagnetic radiation upward in a direction substantially parallel to and along the artificial field lines.
...

Patent hier

Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth's atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere


Abstract

A method and apparatus for altering at least one selected region which normally exists above the earth's surface. The region is excited by electron cyclotron resonance heating to thereby increase its charged particle density. In one embodiment, circularly polarized electromagnetic radiation is transmitted upward in a direction substantially parallel to and along a field line which extends through the region of plasma to be altered. The radiation is transmitted at a frequency which excites electron cyclotron resonance to heat and accelerate the charged particles. This increase in energy can cause ionization of neutral particles which are then absorbed as part of the region thereby increasing the charged particle density of the region.

Inventors: Eastlund; Bernard J. (Spring, TX)
Assignee: APTI, Inc. (Los Angeles, CA)

Appl. No.: 06/690,333
Filed: January 10, 1985


Current U.S. Class: 361/231 ; 244/158.1; 380/59; 89/1.11
Current International Class: H05H 1/02 (20060101); H05H 1/18 (20060101); F41G 7/20 (20060101); F41G 7/22 (20060101); F41H 13/00 (20060101); H01Q 1/36 (20060101); H05B 006/64 (); H05C 003/00 (); H05H 001/46 ()
Field of Search: 361/230,231 244/158R 376/100 89/1.11 380/59

1. A method for altering at least one region normally existing above the earth's surface with electromagnetic radiation using naturally-occurring and diverging magnetic field lines of the earth comprising transmitting first electromagnetic radiation at a frequency between 20 and 7200 kHz from the earth's surface, said transmitting being conducted essentially at the outset of transmission substantially parallel to and along at least one of said field lines, adjusting the frequency of said first radiation to a value which will excite electron cyclotron resonance at an initial elevation at least 50 km above the earth's surface, whereby in the region in which said electron cyclotron resonance takes place heating, further ionization, and movement of both charged and neutral particles is effected, said cyclotron resonance excitation of said region is continued until the electron concentration of said region reaches a value of at least 10.sup.6 per cubic centimeter and has an ion energy of at least 2 ev.

2. The method of claim 1 including the step of providing artificial particles in said at least one region which are excited by said electron cyclotron resonance.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein said artificial particles are provided by injecting same into said at least one region from an orbiting satellite.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein said threshold excitation of electron cyclotron resonance is about 1 watt per cubic centimeter and is sufficient to cause movement of a plasma region along said diverging magnetic field lines to an altitude higher than the altitude at which said excitation was initiated.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein said rising plasma region pulls with it a substantial portion of neutral particles of the atmosphere which exist in or near said plasma region.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein there is provided at least one separate source of second electromagnetic radiation, said second radiation having at least one frequency different from said first radiation, impinging said at least one second radiation on said region while said region is undergoing electron cyclotron resonance excitation caused by said first radiation.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein said second radiation has a frequency which is absorbed by said region.

8. The method of claim 6 wherein said region is plasma in the ionosphere and said second radiation excites plasma waves within said ionosphere.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein said electron concentration reaches a value of at least 10.sup.12 per cubic centimeter.

10. The method of claim 8 wherein said excitation of electron cyclotron resonance is initially carried out within the ionosphere and is continued for a time sufficient to allow said region to rise above said ionosphere.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein said excitation of electron cyclotron resonance is carried out above about 500 kilometers and for a time of from 0.1 to 1200 seconds such that multiple heating of said plasma region is achieved by means of stochastic heating in the magnetosphere.

12. The method of claim 1 wherein said first electromagnetic radiation is right hand circularly polarized in the northern hemisphere and left hand circularly polarized in the southern hemisphere.

13. The method of claim 1 wherein said electromagnetic radiation is generated at the site of a naturally-occurring hydrocarbon fuel source, said fuel source being located in at least one of northerly or southerly magnetic latitudes.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein said fuel source is natural gas and electricity for generating said electromagnetic radiation is obtained by burning said natural gas in at least one of magnetohydrodynamic, gas turbine, fuel cell, and EGD electric generators located at the site where said natural gas naturally occurs in the earth.

15. The method of claim 14 wherein said site of natural gas is within the magnetic latitudes that encompass Alaska.
...
Lees verder HIER

en

HAARP PATENTS (Assigned to APTI, Inc.)

U.S. Patent 4686605:
Method And Apparatus For Altering A Region In The Earth's Atmosphere,
Ionosphere, And/Or Magnetosphere
Inventors: Eastlund; Bernard J., Spring, TX
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Los Angeles, CA
Issued: Aug. 11, 1987
Filed: Jan. 10, 1985

U.S. Patent 5038664:
Method For Producing A Shell Of Relativistic Particles At An Altitude
Above The Earth's Surface
Inventors: Eastlund; Bernard J., Spring, TX
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: Aug. 13, 1991
Filed: Jan. 10, 1985

U.S. Patent 4712155:
Method And Apparatus For Creating An Artificial Electron Cyclotron
Heating Region Of Plasma
Inventors: Eastlund; Bernard J., Spring, TX
Ramo; Simon, Beverly Hills, CA
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Los Angeles, CA
Issued: Dec. 8, 1987
Filed: Jan. 28, 1985

U.S. Patent 5068669:
Power Beaming System
Inventors: Koert; Peter, Washington, DC
Cha; James T., Fairfax, VA
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: Nov. 26, 1991
Filed: Sep. 1, 1988

U.S. Patent 5218374:
Power Beaming System With Printer Circuit Radiating Elements
Having Resonating Cavities
Inventors: Koert; Peter, Washington, DC
Cha; James T., Fairfax, VA
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: June 8, 1993
Filed: Oct. 10, 1989

U.S. Patent 5293176:
Folded Cross Grid Dipole Antenna Element
Inventors: Elliot; Paul G., Vienna, VA
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: Mar. 8, 1994
Filed: Nov. 18, 1991

U.S. Patent 5202689:
Lightweight Focusing Reflector For Space
Inventors: Bussard; Robert W., Manassas, VA
Wallace; Thomas H., Gainesville, FL
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: Apr. 13, 1993
Filed: Aug. 23, 1991

U.S. Patent 5041834:
Artificial Ionospheric Mirror Composed Of A Plasma Layer
Which Can Be Tilted
Inventors: Koert; Peter, Washington, DC
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: Aug. 20, 1991
Filed: May. 17, 1990

U.S. Patent 4999637:
Creation Of Artificial Ionization Clouds Above The Earth
Inventors: Bass; Ronald M., Houston, TX
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: Mar. 12, 1991
Filed: May. 14, 1987

U.S. Patent 4954709:
High Resolution Directional Gamma Ray Detector
Inventors: Zigler; Arie, Rishon Le Zion, Israel
Eisen; Yosset, Rishon Le Zion, Israel
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: Sep. 4, 1990
Filed: Aug. 16, 1989

U.S. Patent 4817495:
Defense System For Discriminating Between Objects In Space
Inventors: Drobot; Adam T., Annandale, VA
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Los Angeles, CA
Issued: Apr. 4, 1989
Filed: Jul. 7, 1986

U.S. Patent 4873928:
Nuclear-Sized Explosions Without Radiation
Inventors: Lowther; Frank E., Plano, TX
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Los Angeles, CA
Issued: Oct. 17, 1989
Filed: June 15, 1987

Er is helemaal niets sinisters aan Haarp, en het is wat het zegt dat het is: een onderzoeksproject. Er is niets geheimzinnigs aan, de installatie kan zelfs bezocht worden!

- DARPA en de Airforce van de VS zijn klant nummer 1 bij HAARP, het zijn de militairen die er het meest gebruik van maken. Sommige universiteiten maken er af en toe ook gebruik van. Natuurlijk is er helemaal niets sinisters aan het militaire apparaat.
- Ja, het kan 1 maal per jaar bezocht worden, tijdens de jaarlijkse opendeurdag. Verder is het een gesloten instelling met prima beveiligde omheining, wat logisch is gezien het aangewende vermogen en het sterke RF-veld

Dat Haarp het weer zou kunnen beïnvloeden is onzin. De installatie werkt in op de ionosfeer, die zich hoog boven alle atmosferische weersystemen bevindt. Het weer wordt gevormd in de troposfeer en stratosfeer, die tot maximum 50 kilometer hoogte reiken. Deze lagen worden niet beïnvloed door de golven die door Haarp uitgezonden worden.

... A method and apparatus altering a region of plasma that lies above the earth's surface at altitudes (e.g. below 50 kilometer) where the collison rate of the electrons in the plasma is originally greater than the cyclotron frequency of the electrons.

-Dus 'below 50 kilometer'
-Dat HAARP het weer kan beinvloeden staat in de patenten zelf
-De opwarming van de inonosfeer doet deze stijgen en kan dus onderliggende lagen ook naar boven trekken, dus de jetstream beinvloeden

Reputable scientists claim that HAARP is heating the ionosphere and pushing it up into space, indirectly affecting the Earth's jet stream.

"If you push the ionosphere out into space, then the stratosphere, just below the ionosphere, has to move to fill in that gap," stated Dr. Brooks Agnew.

"When it moves, it could pull the jetstream with it, thus re-routing it for hundreds of miles, changing the way water moves through our atmosphere."

HAARP is jointly funded by the US Air Force, the US Navy, the University of Alaska and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). The major Arctic facility known as the "HAARP Research Station" on an Air Force owned site near Gakona, Alaska. ((Video) What is H.A.A.R.P.? Human Rights info 101,Dupré, D. National Human Rights | Examiner.com)
examiner

Bovendien, de energie die door Haarp in de ionosfeer gezonden kan worden is maar een fractie van hetgeen er vanuit de ruimte in terect komt (vooral in de vorm van UV-straling). Daarom kunnen de experimenten van Haarp ook alleen 's nachts uitgevoerd worden, wanneer de ionosfeer niet blootgesteld wordt aan UV-straling.

Weerom een niet correcte stelling. De energie van Haarp (en zeker in de cyclotron mode) is groter dan deze die uit de ruimte komt per cm3. Verder is deze energie geconcentreerd op een klein volume, dus meer energie per cm3 (grotere dichtheid energie/ionen). Ook is deze accumulatief en kan het energie die zich reeds in de ionosfeer bevindt vrijmaken. Tevens kan er resonantie optreden waarbij de energie opgeslingerd wordt (oscillatie met een steeds groter amplitude). Al eens nagedacht hoe het komt dat men aurora borealis kan zien daar waar HAARP inwerkt en op andere plaatsen niet ? Verder vergelijkt U UV-straling met EM RF-straling

Experimenten kunnen 24h/dag uitgevoerd worden ! De reinste onzin Uw bewering dat dit enkel 's nacht zou kunnen. U bent blijkbaar verward, sommige testen ter verificatie worden inderdaad 's nacht uitgevoerd omdat men dan de opgewekte aurora kan observeren en alzo kan besluiten of het bekomen effect het gewenste is. HAARP kan zonder problemen 24h/dag operatief zijn en de testen die het stralingspatroon en ionisatie visueel bevestigen worden enkel 's nacht gedaan. Met andere methodes kan men dit ook bij daglicht doen.

En wat alle andere wilde verhalen betreft (aardbevingen, mind control, superwapens en wie weet wat nog allemaal, ...), ik wil die wel eens door hard bewijs onderbouwd zien, en liefst niet van sensatiesites als Prison Planet of Niburu!

En nog een laatste opmerking over de heer Nick Begich, die kerel heeft zijn zogezegd doctoraatsdiploma gehaald (of gekocht?) bij een niet-erkende instelling (ik ga niet zeggen universiteit), dat is bijgevolg waardeloos en zijn geloofwaardigheid is dan ook nul komma nul als het over Haarp gaat. Was hij nu nog doctor in de fysica of meteoroloog geweest, dan had hij recht van spreken, maar niet als new-age kwak!

Blijkbaar zijn Uw wilde beweringen niet door de door Uzelf gewenste harde bewijzen onderbouwd. Ik heb menige conspiracy theorietjes en sensatiesites gezien die overtuigender zijn dan de niet wetenschappelijke kwak die U wenst te verkopen. Nick Begich doet het mijn inziens veel beter.

Verder merk ik op dat U met de kennis die U hier op overtuigde wijze hebt ten toon gesteld, weinig aangaande deze problematiek zal kunnen bereiken.

onmogelijk iets zinvol...

Back to 101 ?