De nieuwe wereld orde

[Pindar]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pieke

lamelaire ichtyose, veroorzaakt door een mutatie in 1 gen, ABCA12, een transporter van vetten in de huid. Voor het eerst beschreven in de jaren 1700, en toen ook afgedaan als duivelskind. Je zou je er thuis voelen.

Jaja, ik weet het, dat is de cover-up story. Whatever

wat wil je hier nu eigenlijk zeggen?

Iik blijf er bij dat het reptielen thema heel belangrijk is,
dat jij het afwijst, ja dat kan.

De toekomst zal het leren.


Pin d"Ar

[Pieke]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pindar

wat wil je hier nu eigenlijk zeggen?

Iik blijf er bij dat het reptielen thema heel belangrijk is,
dat jij het afwijst, ja dat kan.

De toekomst zal het leren.


Pin d"Ar

ik geef je de wetenschappelijke verklaring (een genetische mutatie in 1 gen, dat ieder van ons zijn kinderen kan overkomen). Niet meer, niet minder

[Pindar]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pieke

ik geef je de wetenschappelijke verklaring (een genetische mutatie in 1 gen, dat ieder van ons zijn kinderen kan overkomen). Niet meer, niet minder

ja leuk!

En ik zeg je dat er meer aan de hand is

Niet meer, niet minder


Pin d"Ar

[exodus]

Artikel van David Icke over de Belgische pedofiliezaken. Hij wordt vandaag geïnterviewed door een ploeg van de RTBF in verband hiermee.

SATANIC RITUAL ABUSE:


Where Have All the Children Gone?
by David Icke, Dec 16, 2007


Hello all ...

I have a crew from Belgian national television coming to see me on Monday to talk about the global trafficking of children. This is especially significant in Belgium after the child kidnappings and murders in the mid-1990s that threatened to implicate the country's political establishment and other famous names.

How they got away with it and pinned it all on a sick and pathetic paedophile and child-supplier called Marc Dutroux was the classic establishment response to danger that is repeated constantly across the world.

Often I hear people say that if child abuse, kidnap and murder was happening on the scale I suggest then 'they' would not be able to keep it under wraps. What happened in Belgium shows that they can.

Missing Children



As I have said so many times, people generally don't get their views and opinions from researched information, but from an 'image', an 'impression', of how things are. With regard to missing children, this 'impression' is heavily influenced by the number of lost children stories they see in the media.

If we are talking the national media there are very few. The enormous coverage of the missing British girl, Madeleine McCann, who was abducted while on holiday in Portugal, is a rare example compared with the number of children who disappear every year.

While people get their impression of scale from the lost children featured in the media, staggering numbers of children go missing never to be seen again. I remember calling many American states a few years ago to ask for their missing children figures and it was truly extraordinary. On average, around 3,000 children a day are reported missing in the United States, never mind those the authorities never hear about. Add them together and you are talking hundreds of thousands of children.

Belgium is a small country of some ten million people and yet in the Brussels region alone it was revealed that 1,300 minors disappeared between 1991 and 1996. Around the world you find the same repeating story and multi-millions of children go missing every year never to be found.

Where do they go?

Missing Children
More Missing Children

After researching this subject in multiple countries for the best part of 20 years, I can tell you what happens to many of them. They become sex objects for the rich and famous; they are trafficked around the world by rings connected to the rich and famous; and they are sacrificed in the satanic rituals of the rich and famous. Others are enslaved into government and military mind-control programmes which abduct children to genetic order.

This is covered up by controlling the system at all levels: government; law 'enforcement'; social services; the courts; and the media.

The Pedophile Network
The Pedophile Network


This is the pyramid system which the perpetrators employ to both abduct children and cover up their monstrous crimes against humanity. The point is that you don't have to control everyone in these organisations and institutions - only those few with the power to stop the truth being investigated and established.

This structure operates in every country and the Belgian case is a textbook example of how it works. Belgium is particularly important to the child trafficking, sex and murder rings because of the sheer demand in that country for the 'services' they provide.

Belgium only became an 'independent'entity in 1830. It was conquered and re-conquered many times after Julius Caesar arrived to impose the Roman province of Belgica, named after the Belgae, a people of ancient Gaul. Major Illuminati bloodlines like Charlemagne and the Habsburg dynasty have ruled this land and today it has a royal family from the German house of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha - the same as the 'British' House of Windsor.

Belgium
Belgium



Belgium is a major global centre for the Illuminati and that's why they have established the headquarters there of both NATO and the European Union (EU).

The country may be only about the size of the State of Maryland, but its influence on world affairs through NATO and the EU is massive.

Now, here's the nub with regard to children. The number of paedophiles among people in power is absolutely extraordinary for the many reasons I outline in my books. The incest that goes on in the 'elite' families is part of the story, but there are other reasons that include genetics.

So here we have this small piece of land that is home not only to the Belgian bloodline establishment, but also to the vast military and political elite attending and administering NATO and the European Union. And where the bloodlines go, so do the child trafficking rings - supply and demand.

This is the background to what happened in Belgium and why it was so blatantly covered up. The names involved would have threatened not only the Belgian power structure, but that of NATO and the EU.

The story began publicly in 1995 when two eight-year-old girls, Julie Lejeune and Mélissa Russo, were kidnapped and they were later found dead in a dungeon under the house of Marc Dutroux, the country's most notorious paedophile, who, with his wife, Michelle Martin, had already served a jail sentence for child abduction and rape.

But this prime suspect wasn't arrested for 14 months, by which time the girls had died of starvation and been buried. Sabine Dardenne, aged 12, and Laetitia Delhez, aged 14, were also kidnapped by Dutroux and an accomplice in 1996. Months later they were found alive in the dungeon. Two other girls, 17-year-old An Marchal and 19-year-old Eefje Lambrecks, were murdered after being kidnapped by Dutroux in 1995 while on a camping trip.

Marc Dutroux
Marc Dutroux

Whenever the establishment want to cover up a crime, or hide the real power behind it, watch for police 'incompetence'. You see it over and over - not least in the case of Britain's Madeleine McCann, which has the hallmarks of a professional kidnap to order.

Long before his arrest, police went to Dutroux's house and heard the sound of children 'whimpering', but took no action. They said the voices sounded like they were outside. They also found videos at the house - which they didn't watch - and failed to develop film they discovered. Had they done so, they would have seen Dutroux building the dungeon in which the girls were kept.

Dutroux and his accomplice, Michel Lelievre, were kidnapping children to order for the Belgian establishment in its many forms. After several of the disappearances Dutroux paid large sums of money into several bank accounts and even when his only income was supposed to be a welfare cheque he was worth an estimated six million francs. It was money for supplying children.

Michel Lelievre told police that Dutroux answered to a Brussels 'businessman' called Jean Michel Nihoul, but as the network began to be revealed Lelievre said he had been threatened and refused to cooperate further.

Nihoul became known as the 'Monster of Belgium', but he told a BBC reporter that he would never appear in court because 'the information he has about important people in Belgium would bring the government down'. In fact, he was brought to trial, but convicted on far lesser charges.

Now the race was on to ensure that Dutroux and his fellow gofers took the blame for everything to protect the big names that were really running the network or being supplied with its kidnapped children.

A major block to this cover up was the original investigating judge, Jean-Marc Connerotte, who appeared to be determined to find the truth whatever it was and whoever it exposed. He became a national hero when his actions led to Sabine Dardenne and Laetitia Delhez being found alive in Dutroux's dungeon.

The establishment required no laxatives at this point, but they seized on the fact that Connerotte attended a fundraising dinner organised by the parents of the victims and this was used to claim that he had compromised his impartiality. It was a lie and a sham, of course, but the elite-controlled Supreme Court ordered him off the case. Phew!

From that moment, no new information about the child kidnap and murder ring has been discovered because it was simply not meant to be. Three hundred thousand people protested on the streets of Brussels and workers went on strike at the dismissal of Connerotte. They knew why it had been done, so blatant had the cover up become.

Strike
Strike

Eight years later at Dutroux's constantly-delayed trial, Connerotte broke down in tears as he described the bullet-proof vehicles and armed guards needed to protect him against 'shadowy figures' determined to stop the full truth coming out.

'Never before in Belgium has an investigating judge at the service of the king been subjected to such pressure. We were told by police that [murder] contracts had been taken out against the magistrates. As the danger mounted, emergency measures were taken.'

The delay in arresting Dutroux, and those eight years before he was brought to trial in 2004, also gave the cover up time to ensure that 20 potential witnesses died in mysterious circumstances that have never been credibly explained.

Then there were the 'X-witnesses', especially Regina Louf. Before his dismissal, Judge Connerotte appealed for victims of paedophiles to tell the police in confidence what they knew. Regina Louf was the first of ten to come forward and they were known as the 'X-witnesses'.

Regina Louf
Regina Louf



Their evidence was so devastating that they had to be discredited - especially Louf. The despicable controlled media leaked her name and began the systematic destruction of her character and perceived credibility, not least via the government-owned TV station RTBF, which has asked to interview me on Monday. That should be interesting. The vicious attacks on Regina Louf were not only to stop her evidence being believed, but to warn anyone else of the consequences of speaking out.

She told police how she had been 'given' by her parents at the age of 12 to a family friend called Tony Van den Bogaert. He would collect her from school and take her to weekend sex parties where she was forced to have sex and make child porn movies. The parties involved sadism, torture and even murder and they were attended by judges, politicians, bankers and the 'elite' - the dregs - of Belgian 'society'.

Louf gave police the names by which she knew these men and described in detail the houses, apartments and districts where it all happened. One of the main organisers, she said, was Jean Michel Nihoul - known to her as 'Mitch' - who was 'a very cruel man'. She said he abused children in 'a very sadistic way'. Also with him was ... Dutroux:

'Dutroux was a boy who brought drugs, cocaine to these parties - he brought some girls, watched girls. At these events Nihoul was a sort of party beast while Dutroux was more on the side.'

This was ten years before the Dutroux murders of the mid-1990s.

Jean Michel Nihoul
Jean Michel Nihoul


Guess what happened next? The police team that interviewed Regina Louf and found her to be credible were dismissed from the case. They also interviewed the other 'X-witnesses' and had already verified parts of Louf's story, including details of a murder she had witnessed that was still in the unsolved file. Nihoul, she said, took part in the murder while Dutroux watched.

The victim was a 16-year-old called Christine Van Hees but her murder had not been investigated for 12 years on the orders of a Judge Van Espen. It turns out that Van Espen had a close relationship with Nihoul and his then wife. The corruption and deceit is fantastic and yet the judge was not sacked when this connection came to light. It's much worse to attend a dinner with the parents of missing children, of course.

This police team working with Regina Louf and the 'X-witnesses' were getting too close for comfort and so they had to go. In the spring of 1997, they were sent home without explanation and a new team assigned. Surprise, surprise, they said that Louf and the rest were making it up. As a result, they were not called to give evidence at Dutroux's trial.

The police 'investigation' has been simply an exercise in elite protection. Little Mellissa Russo was raped repeatedly over a long period according the autopsy report, but no DNA evidence or forensics have been produced to confirm who did it. Anne Thily, the Prosecutor General of Liege, even lied to a BBC documentary reporter when she said there had been DNA tests, but they were inconclusive because the bodies were too decomposed. The autopsy clearly states that this was not the case.

Anne Thily, the Prosecutor General of Liege. No words necessary.
Anne Thily, the Prosecutor General of Liege. No words necessary.


Some 5,000 hairs that were found in the Dutroux dungeon were never sent for DNA analysis and this was Thily's extraordinary explanation: 'There was no need to get the hairs analysed as no one else entered the cage. There was no network so there was no need to look for evidence of one'. She then contradicted herself and said all the hairs had been analysed and nothing of significance found, but this was another lie because BBC sources 'at the centre' of the investigation said the hair had not been tested. Carine Russo, mother of the murdered Melissa, was not even allowed to see her daughter's body. She recalls:

'I begged and pleaded. I went with my lawyer but they refused. They told me the law did not permit it. "But who will identify my daughter?" I asked them. "Who will confirm that it's her?" "Dutroux has identified her," they told me.'

Callousness comes so easy to these people.

Three crime reporters published a book about the affair called the The X-Files: What Belgium Was Not Supposed to Know About the Dutroux Affair, which claimed that the truth was covered up to protect the Belgian establishment. One former prosecutor, Judge Guy Poncelet, called the book 'brilliant and convincing'. He said that 'certain political and judicial authorities', with the help of the state radio and television and much of the press, had deliberately played down disturbing evidence uncovered in the Dutroux investigation.

What he said was correct, but so monumentally understated.

In 2004, Dutroux was jailed for life for the kidnap, rape and murder of young girls; his former wife, Michelle Martin, was given 30 years for kidnapping and rape; and Michel Lelievre got 25 years for kidnapping and drug-dealing. Businessman Michel Nihoul was outrageously acquitted of kidnapping, but jailed for five years for drug-dealing and counts of fraud.

The Belgian establishment, along with those at NATO and the European Union, had been spared exposure and now it was business as usual - child abuse on a massive scale.

Techniques of suppression
Techniques of suppression

The techniques of suppression deployed in Belgium have saved people like serial paedophile and child torturer, Father George Bush, from exposure decade after decade. The infamous Franklin Cover-Up case in Omaha, Nebraska, which involved paedophile parties attended by Bush, was a mirror of what happened in Belgium.

The ring involved the chief of police, leading politicians and the owner of the local media and when the victims spoke out they got the same treatment as Regina Louf. It's the same the whole world over when the establishment is facing the threat of exposure: Police 'incompetence'; the removal and discrediting of honest police officers; killing and discrediting key witnesses; rigging the courts; using the media as a propaganda machine to mislead the public.

How sad it is that the people of Belgium, after all the promise of that mass demonstration, have gone back to their slumber and pretty much forgotten all about it. What's most sad, is that what they were so outraged about more than a decade ago is still going on ... every day.

CLIPS FROM THE BBC DOCUMENTARY ABOUT REGINA LOUF AND THE DUTROUX AFFAIR

Part One http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hg61N86dUIE

Part Two http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6Bhq...eature=related

Part Three http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGwJ4...eature=related

Part Four http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OX2CV...eature=related

Part Five http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t70js...eature=related

Part Six http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLHGC...eature=related

Part Seven http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DN2Ti...eature=related

[Firestone]

[Akufen]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Firestone

<snip>

Best wel grappig

Mogen we daaruit ook afleiden dat je het officiële JFK verhaal als waarheid ziet?

[parcifal]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pindar

ja leuk!

En ik zeg je dat er meer aan de hand is

Niet meer, niet minder


Pin d"Ar

Je zegt wel meer.
Het volstaat je dagelijkse portie posts te bekijken die jij hier dagelijks copy/paste van websites van conspiracy nuts.
En waar je nooit vragen wil over beantwoorden.

[Uh-Huh]

Firestone, kan jij bewijzen dat GOD niet wist dat 'het serpent' Adam en Eva zou verleiden?

[Geert C]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door exodus

Artikel van David Icke over de Belgische pedofiliezaken. Hij wordt vandaag geïnterviewed door een ploeg van de RTBF in verband hiermee.

Dat er mensen zijn die die onzin geloven... Eigenlijk is dat niet om te lachen, het is eerder om te huilen.

Er waren op een gegeven moment ook mensen die beweerden dat Martens in de Waals-Brabantse bossen op blonde, naakte maagden schoot met een kruisboog, er is iemand die dat beweerde dus het MOET gewoon waar zijn... (Trouwens, als dat waar zou geweest zijn, hij zou wel geschoten hebben, maar niet met een kruisboog. ) Leer toch eens kritisch te denken in plaats van al die onzin te slikken.

[Burkide]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door exodus

Artikel van David Icke over de Belgische pedofiliezaken. Hij wordt vandaag geïnterviewed door een ploeg van de RTBF in verband hiermee.

Joepie! Wij zijn belangrijk!

[Pindar]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Burkide

Joepie! Wij zijn belangrijk!

ja maar ik zou niet op die manier belangrijk willen zijn

Belgium is a major global centre for the Illuminati and that's why they have established the headquarters there of both NATO and the European Union (EU).

The country may be only about the size of the State of Maryland, but its influence on world affairs through NATO and the EU is massive.

Pin d"Ar

[Geert C]

Je ben de SHAPE vergeten, de organisatie die (zoals we allemaal weten) de activiteiten van de reptielen in Europa coördineert.

[Pindar]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Geert C

Dat er mensen zijn die die onzin geloven... Eigenlijk is dat niet om te lachen, het is eerder om te huilen.

Er waren op een gegeven moment ook mensen die beweerden dat Martens in de Waals-Brabantse bossen op blonde, naakte maagden schoot met een kruisboog, er is iemand die dat beweerde dus het MOET gewoon waar zijn... (Trouwens, als dat waar zou geweest zijn, hij zou wel geschoten hebben, maar niet met een kruisboog. ) Leer toch eens kritisch te denken in plaats van al die onzin te slikken.

kritisch denken HEEFT me juist daar gebracht.
Je zou kunnen zeggen dat deze planeet min of meer gekaapt is.
Als je dat eenmaal goed ziet en doorhebt ga je nog meer zien
Maar niet iedereen durft die weg in te gaan.

En wat je schrijft is natuurlijk onzin. Je geeft als voorbeeld van naakte maagden etc en daarmee schiet je een ander verhaal af,
Dus omdat iemand ooit onzin heeft gebracht, moet dit dus ook onzin zijn!
Over goed en kritisch denken gesproken zeg!

En verder zijn er veel verhalen van getuigen in omloop en mensen
die er uit de 'illuminati' gestapt zijn en hun verhaal deden.
Al deze verhalen, over de hele wereld zijn vrij consistent.
Icke kwam het tegen, en wilde het eigenlijk niet vertellen, maar hij kwam
er zoveel over de hele wereld tegen dat hij vond dat hij dat toch eigenlijk maar wel moest doen. Met natuurlijk een berg ridiculisaties van kleine geesten! Petje af voor zijn doorzettingsvermogen.
verder liet Credo Mutwa, een Afrikaanse shamaan, weten dat als Icke
de illuminatiu verder wilde begrijpen hij de reptielen moest besturen.
Echt, dit is natuurljk niet alles, maar als je er in gaat duiken zijn er zo veel aanwijzingen. Maar ja, sommigen hebben nog niks onderzocht en hebben de grootste mond!



we'll see


Pin d"Ar

[Burkide]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Geert C

Je ben de SHAPE vergeten, de organisatie die (zoals we allemaal weten) de activiteiten van de reptielen in Europa coördineert.

[fluistertoon tegen iemand naast hem]Hehe, en ondertussen blijven de activiteiten van ons amfibiënleger lekker onopgemerkt. Iedereen kijkt naar de reptielen![/fluistertoon]

[Akufen]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Geert C

Dat er mensen zijn die die onzin geloven... Eigenlijk is dat niet om te lachen, het is eerder om te huilen.

first they ridicule you ...

Ik dacht er vroeger ook zo over maar blijkbaar waren er toch wel dingen die oa Regina Louf niet zomaar uit naar nek lulde. Zembla of netwerk heeft hier ook een dubbele uitzending over gemaakt waarin ze hetzelfde lieten uitschijnen.

[Geert C]

Uiteraard lieten ze dat uitschijnen. Ze kunnen toch moeilijk een dubbele uitzending maken en al op voorhand verkondigen dat het over onzin gaat.

[Pindar]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Geert C

Uiteraard lieten ze dat uitschijnen. Ze kunnen toch moeilijk een dubbele uitzending maken en al op voorhand verkondigen dat het over onzin gaat.

tsjonge jonge zeg.
Heb je zelf door dat het voor oordelen zijn die je ten toon spreidt?



Pin d"Ar

[Burkide]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pindar

tsjonge jonge zeg.
Heb je zelf door dat het voor oordelen zijn die je ten toon spreidt?

Er is niets mis met vooroordelen. Vraag maar aan Gadamer

(EDIT: Of laat maar. Veel saaiere mensen hebben er niet op onze wereldbol rondgelopen.)

[Geert C]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pindar

tsjonge jonge zeg.
Heb je zelf door dat het voor oordelen zijn die je ten toon spreidt?



Pin d"Ar

Is beweren dat televisie vooral om kijkcijfers draait dan een vooroordeel?

Een ernstige uitzending waarin X1 en haar fantasietjes onderuit werden gehaald zou allicht lang niet zoveel kijkers hebben gelokt.

[Pindar]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Geert C

Is beweren dat televisie vooral om kijkcijfers draait dan een vooroordeel?

Een ernstige uitzending waarin X1 en haar fantasietjes onderuit werden gehaald zou allicht lang niet zoveel kijkers hebben gelokt.

daar gaat het nu juist om! het zijn geen fantasietjes!

Maar zeg eens eerlijk, heb je je er een jota in verdiept?


Pin d"Ar