Wokeness

[cookie monster]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Vlad

Een Nederlander die een Aboe Jahjahtje doet, omdat je beter kan leren schrijven dan dansen:



Want ook daar heb je dus zieke types als Kristien Emmelinks.

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door bron: volkskrant.nl

De universiteit meent dat de vereiste om foutloos te kunnen schrijven etnische minderheden en studenten die afkomstig zijn van minder goede scholen discrimineert.
https://www.volkskrant.nl/columns-op...lijk~bc561bf4f

Als iedereen zomaar de taal kan aanpassen naar zijn/haar goesting ,
da' belooft bv bij medische behandelingen , of gerechtszaken , ....
Wa'k nu schreiv iz duz perfeckt neederlaands !!
Ik nu wa' schreiv duz perfeckt is neederlaands !!
Ik iz neederlaands perfeckt duz wa'k nu schreiv !!

Medisse uitslach:
hardslagkloppinge , hardklep boegeert nie' goe' , ....

Je hebt ook echte analfabeten , dat is natuurlijk andere koek !!

[cookie monster]

Lollig & triestig tegelijkertijd:
‘Everything is now racist including barbecues’: Outsiders
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23R_kBMVOAE

Die vraag werd al eerder gesteld , 5 jul. 2015
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/...d-like-to-know

Nou moe

[Vlad]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door cookie monster

Lollig & triestig tegelijkertijd:
‘Everything is now racist including barbecues’: Outsiders
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23R_kBMVOAE

Die vraag werd al eerder gesteld , 5 jul. 2015
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/...d-like-to-know

Nou moe

Dat de jeugd de toekomst is jaagt me vandaag soms wat schrik aan. Ik weet dat ze niet allemaal zo zijn maar de neoracitische psychotische wokes hebben het establishment mee. Diegenen die het voor het zeggen hebben in de media, het onderwijs, de multinationals, de ngo's, de wereldwijde politieke organisaties en bijna overal in de politiek, staan achter hen. Daardoor wordt wat eigenlijk zeer grappig is verontrustend.

[cookie monster]

Sebiet gaan wokiepokies nog beslissen wat anderen moeten dragen ,
en waar & wanneer we naar buiten mogen , wat te eten , welke muziek ,
hoe & wat we moeten schrijven , welk lief we moeten hebben , enz ....
Ik heb echt vliegend diarree aan de hokuspokuswokiementaliteit !!!!!!!!

[Elio di Supo]

https://www.tmz.com/2021/05/01/colle...ument-student/

Debat tss universiteitsprof en student over status politie als helden gaat nu viraal. De prof leek een vrij persoonlijke stellingname te hebben en scheerde de politie graag over 1 kam. Ze stelde ook dat ze nooit beroep zou doen op de politie als ze zelf in nood zou zijn.

Oftewel hoe erbarmelijk het tegenwoordig is gesteld met academisch Amerika. Kleuterniveau voorwaar.

Nu ja, het was ook in Californie. Sneeuwvlokjesland bij uitstek.

[1207]

de prins die sneeuwwitje redt meot er dus ook aan geloven als
verkrachter en nul respect voor vrouwen en ...

https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2021/05...oversiele-kus/

[CUFI]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door 1207

de prins die sneeuwwitje redt meot er dus ook aan geloven als
verkrachter en nul respect voor vrouwen en ...

https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2021/05...oversiele-kus/

Disney is al in correctie met zichzelf voor Sneeuwwitje hoor.
Daar zijn veel verborgen scenes verwijdert. Dat komt van vieze perverse blanke mannen die seksualiteit rond kinderen hun oren willen slaan. Serieuze westerse kwaal waar mensen die de moed vinden dat te zeggen een alu hoedje krijgen.

Ook Sneeuwwitje is een subliminale mindfuck, we don’t need white princes.

[1207]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door CUFI

Disney is al in correctie met zichzelf voor Sneeuwwitje hoor.
Daar zijn veel verborgen scenes verwijdert. Dat komt van vieze perverse blanke mannen

gelukkig hebben we duitsers nog
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StZcUAPRRac

[vanderzapig]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Elio di Supo

Ze stelde ook dat ze nooit beroep zou doen op de politie als ze zelf in nood zou zijn.

Gelukkig is consistentie niet het sterkste punt van de wokies:

Seattle politician who defunded the police called 911 to protect her from a crime she wants to legalize

As first reported by police sources to the neighborhood safety group Safe Seattle, Council Member Lisa Herbold called 911 and requested the police for criminal damage done to her home, a crime that the council member is pushing to legalize.

In October, Herbold, chair of the Seattle City Council's Public Safety Committee, introduced legislation to "…excuse and dismiss" almost all misdemeanor crimes committed in Seattle by "…persons with symptoms of addiction or mental disorder." At the time, Herbold was criticized for trying to sneak the legislation in as part of the budget cycle rather than through the normal legislative process and with no public discussion about the proposal.

[vanderzapig]

Ook elitescholen blijven niet gevrijwaard van wokeness. Prachtig geschreven protestbrief van een vader die zijn dochter weghaalt uit Brearley, Upper East Side:

_________________________


April 13, 2021

Dear Fellow Brearley Parents,

Our family recently made the decision not to reenroll our daughter at Brearley for the 2021-22 school year. She has been at Brearley for seven years, beginning in kindergarten. In short, we no longer believe that Brearley’s administration and Board of Trustees have any of our children’s best interests at heart. Moreover, we no longer have confidence that our daughter will receive the quality of education necessary to further her development into a critically thinking, responsible, enlightened, and civic minded adult. I write to you, as a fellow parent, to share our reasons for leaving the Brearley community but also to urge you to act before the damage to the school, to its community, and to your own child's education is irreparable.

It cannot be stated strongly enough that Brearley’s obsession with race must stop. It should be abundantly clear to any thinking parent that Brearley has completely lost its way. The administration and the Board of Trustees have displayed a cowardly and appalling lack of leadership by appeasing an anti-intellectual, illiberal mob, and then allowing the school to be captured by that same mob. What follows are my own personal views on Brearley's antiracism initiatives, but these are just a handful of the criticisms that I know other parents have expressed.

I object to the view that I should be judged by the color of my skin. I cannot tolerate a school that not only judges my daughter by the color of her skin, but encourages and instructs her to prejudge others by theirs. By viewing every element of education, every aspect of history, and every facet of society through the lens of skin color and race, we are desecrating the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., and utterly violating the movement for which such civil rights leaders believed, fought, and died.

I object to the charge of systemic racism in this country, and at our school. Systemic racism, properly understood, is segregated schools and separate lunch counters. It is the interning of Japanese and the exterminating of Jews. Systemic racism is unequivocally not a small number of isolated incidences over a period of decades. Ask any girl, of any race, if they have ever experienced insults from friends, have ever felt slighted by teachers or have ever suffered the occasional injustice from a school at which they have spent up to 13 years of their life, and you are bound to hear grievances, some petty, some not. We have not had systemic racism against Blacks in this country since the civil rights reforms of the 1960s, a period of more than 50 years. To state otherwise is a flat-out misrepresentation of our country's history and adds no understanding to any of today's societal issues. If anything, longstanding and widespread policies such as affirmative action, point in precisely the opposite direction.

I object to a definition of systemic racism, apparently supported by Brearley, that any educational, professional, or societal outcome where Blacks are underrepresented is prima facie evidence of the aforementioned systemic racism, or of white supremacy and oppression. Facile and unsupported beliefs such as these are the polar opposite to the intellectual and scientific truth for which Brearley claims to stand. Furthermore, I call bullshit on Brearley's oft-stated assertion that the school welcomes and encourages the truly difficult and uncomfortable conversations regarding race and the roots of racial discrepancies.

I object to the idea that Blacks are unable to succeed in this country without aid from government or from whites. Brearley, by adopting critical race theory, is advocating the abhorrent viewpoint that Blacks should forever be regarded as helpless victims, and are incapable of success regardless of their skills, talents, or hard work. What Brearley is teaching our children is precisely the true and correct definition of racism.

I object to mandatory anti-racism training for parents, especially when presented by the rent-seeking charlatans of Pollyanna. These sessions, in both their content and delivery, are so sophomoric and simplistic, so unsophisticated and inane, that I would be embarrassed if they were taught to Brearley kindergarteners. They are an insult to parents and unbecoming of any educational institution, let alone one of Brearley's caliber.

I object to Brearley’s vacuous, inappropriate, and fanatical use of words such as “equity,” “diversity” and “inclusiveness.” If Brearley’s administration was truly concerned about so-called “equity,” it would be discussing the cessation of admissions preferences for legacies, siblings, and those families with especially deep pockets. If the administration was genuinely serious about “diversity,” it would not insist on the indoctrination of its students, and their families, to a single mindset, most reminiscent of the Chinese Cultural Revolution. Instead, the school would foster an environment of intellectual openness and freedom of thought. And if Brearley really cared about “inclusiveness,” the school would return to the concepts encapsulated in the motto “One Brearley,” instead of teaching the extraordinarily divisive idea that there are only, and always, two groups in this country: victims and oppressors.

l object to Brearley’s advocacy for groups and movements such as Black Lives Matter, a Marxist, anti family, heterophobic, anti-Asian and anti-Semitic organization that neither speaks for the majority of the Black community in this country, nor in any way, shape or form, represents their best interests.

I object to, as we have been told time and time again over the past year, that the school’s first priority is the safety of our children. For goodness sake, Brearley is a school, not a hospital! The number one priority of a school has always been, and always will be, education. Brearley’s misguided priorities exemplify both the safety culture and “cover-your-ass” culture that together have proved so toxic to our society and have so damaged the mental health and resiliency of two generations of children, and counting.

I object to the gutting of the history, civics, and classical literature curriculums. I object to the censorship of books that have been taught for generations because they contain dated language potentially offensive to the thin-skinned and hypersensitive (something that has already happened in my daughter's 4th grade class). I object to the lowering of standards for the admission of students and for the hiring of teachers. I object to the erosion of rigor in classwork and the escalation of grade inflation. Any parent with eyes open can foresee these inevitabilities should antiracism initiatives be allowed to persist.

We have today in our country, from both political parties, and at all levels of government, the most unwise and unvirtuous leaders in our nation’s history. Schools like Brearley are supposed to be the training grounds for those leaders. Our nation will not survive a generation of leadership even more poorly educated than we have now, nor will we survive a generation of students taught to hate its own country and despise its history.

Lastly, I object, with as strong a sentiment as possible, that Brearley has begun to teach what to think, instead of how to think. I object that the school is now fostering an environment where our daughters, and our daughters’ teachers, are afraid to speak their minds in class for fear of “consequences.” I object that Brearley is trying to usurp the role of parents in teaching morality, and bullying parents to adopt that false morality at home. I object that Brearley is fostering a divisive community where families of different races, which until recently were part of the same community, are now segregated into two. These are the reasons why we can no longer send our daughter to Brearley.

Over the past several months, I have personally spoken to many Brearley parents as well as parents of children at peer institutions. It is abundantly clear that the majority of parents believe that Brearley’s antiracism policies are misguided, divisive, counterproductive and cancerous. Many believe, as I do, that these policies will ultimately destroy what was until recently, a wonderful educational institution. But as I am sure will come as no surprise to you, given the insidious cancel culture that has of late permeated our society, most parents are too fearful to speak up.

But speak up you must. There is strength in numbers and I assure you, the numbers are there. Contact the administration and the Board of Trustees and demand an end to the destructive and anti-intellectual claptrap known as antiracism. And if changes are not forthcoming then demand new leadership. For the sake of our community, our city, our country and most of all, our children, silence is no longer an option.

Respectfully,

Andrew Gutmann

[Elio di Supo]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door vanderzapig

Ook elitescholen blijven niet gevrijwaard van wokeness. Prachtig geschreven protestbrief van een vader die zijn dochter weghaalt uit Brearley, Upper East Side:

_________________________


April 13, 2021

Dear Fellow Brearley Parents,

Our family recently made the decision not to reenroll our daughter at Brearley for the 2021-22 school year. She has been at Brearley for seven years, beginning in kindergarten. In short, we no longer believe that Brearley’s administration and Board of Trustees have any of our children’s best interests at heart. Moreover, we no longer have confidence that our daughter will receive the quality of education necessary to further her development into a critically thinking, responsible, enlightened, and civic minded adult. I write to you, as a fellow parent, to share our reasons for leaving the Brearley community but also to urge you to act before the damage to the school, to its community, and to your own child's education is irreparable.

It cannot be stated strongly enough that Brearley’s obsession with race must stop. It should be abundantly clear to any thinking parent that Brearley has completely lost its way. The administration and the Board of Trustees have displayed a cowardly and appalling lack of leadership by appeasing an anti-intellectual, illiberal mob, and then allowing the school to be captured by that same mob. What follows are my own personal views on Brearley's antiracism initiatives, but these are just a handful of the criticisms that I know other parents have expressed.

I object to the view that I should be judged by the color of my skin. I cannot tolerate a school that not only judges my daughter by the color of her skin, but encourages and instructs her to prejudge others by theirs. By viewing every element of education, every aspect of history, and every facet of society through the lens of skin color and race, we are desecrating the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., and utterly violating the movement for which such civil rights leaders believed, fought, and died.

I object to the charge of systemic racism in this country, and at our school. Systemic racism, properly understood, is segregated schools and separate lunch counters. It is the interning of Japanese and the exterminating of Jews. Systemic racism is unequivocally not a small number of isolated incidences over a period of decades. Ask any girl, of any race, if they have ever experienced insults from friends, have ever felt slighted by teachers or have ever suffered the occasional injustice from a school at which they have spent up to 13 years of their life, and you are bound to hear grievances, some petty, some not. We have not had systemic racism against Blacks in this country since the civil rights reforms of the 1960s, a period of more than 50 years. To state otherwise is a flat-out misrepresentation of our country's history and adds no understanding to any of today's societal issues. If anything, longstanding and widespread policies such as affirmative action, point in precisely the opposite direction.

I object to a definition of systemic racism, apparently supported by Brearley, that any educational, professional, or societal outcome where Blacks are underrepresented is prima facie evidence of the aforementioned systemic racism, or of white supremacy and oppression. Facile and unsupported beliefs such as these are the polar opposite to the intellectual and scientific truth for which Brearley claims to stand. Furthermore, I call bullshit on Brearley's oft-stated assertion that the school welcomes and encourages the truly difficult and uncomfortable conversations regarding race and the roots of racial discrepancies.

I object to the idea that Blacks are unable to succeed in this country without aid from government or from whites. Brearley, by adopting critical race theory, is advocating the abhorrent viewpoint that Blacks should forever be regarded as helpless victims, and are incapable of success regardless of their skills, talents, or hard work. What Brearley is teaching our children is precisely the true and correct definition of racism.

I object to mandatory anti-racism training for parents, especially when presented by the rent-seeking charlatans of Pollyanna. These sessions, in both their content and delivery, are so sophomoric and simplistic, so unsophisticated and inane, that I would be embarrassed if they were taught to Brearley kindergarteners. They are an insult to parents and unbecoming of any educational institution, let alone one of Brearley's caliber.

I object to Brearley’s vacuous, inappropriate, and fanatical use of words such as “equity,” “diversity” and “inclusiveness.” If Brearley’s administration was truly concerned about so-called “equity,” it would be discussing the cessation of admissions preferences for legacies, siblings, and those families with especially deep pockets. If the administration was genuinely serious about “diversity,” it would not insist on the indoctrination of its students, and their families, to a single mindset, most reminiscent of the Chinese Cultural Revolution. Instead, the school would foster an environment of intellectual openness and freedom of thought. And if Brearley really cared about “inclusiveness,” the school would return to the concepts encapsulated in the motto “One Brearley,” instead of teaching the extraordinarily divisive idea that there are only, and always, two groups in this country: victims and oppressors.

l object to Brearley’s advocacy for groups and movements such as Black Lives Matter, a Marxist, anti family, heterophobic, anti-Asian and anti-Semitic organization that neither speaks for the majority of the Black community in this country, nor in any way, shape or form, represents their best interests.

I object to, as we have been told time and time again over the past year, that the school’s first priority is the safety of our children. For goodness sake, Brearley is a school, not a hospital! The number one priority of a school has always been, and always will be, education. Brearley’s misguided priorities exemplify both the safety culture and “cover-your-ass” culture that together have proved so toxic to our society and have so damaged the mental health and resiliency of two generations of children, and counting.

I object to the gutting of the history, civics, and classical literature curriculums. I object to the censorship of books that have been taught for generations because they contain dated language potentially offensive to the thin-skinned and hypersensitive (something that has already happened in my daughter's 4th grade class). I object to the lowering of standards for the admission of students and for the hiring of teachers. I object to the erosion of rigor in classwork and the escalation of grade inflation. Any parent with eyes open can foresee these inevitabilities should antiracism initiatives be allowed to persist.

We have today in our country, from both political parties, and at all levels of government, the most unwise and unvirtuous leaders in our nation’s history. Schools like Brearley are supposed to be the training grounds for those leaders. Our nation will not survive a generation of leadership even more poorly educated than we have now, nor will we survive a generation of students taught to hate its own country and despise its history.

Lastly, I object, with as strong a sentiment as possible, that Brearley has begun to teach what to think, instead of how to think. I object that the school is now fostering an environment where our daughters, and our daughters’ teachers, are afraid to speak their minds in class for fear of “consequences.” I object that Brearley is trying to usurp the role of parents in teaching morality, and bullying parents to adopt that false morality at home. I object that Brearley is fostering a divisive community where families of different races, which until recently were part of the same community, are now segregated into two. These are the reasons why we can no longer send our daughter to Brearley.

Over the past several months, I have personally spoken to many Brearley parents as well as parents of children at peer institutions. It is abundantly clear that the majority of parents believe that Brearley’s antiracism policies are misguided, divisive, counterproductive and cancerous. Many believe, as I do, that these policies will ultimately destroy what was until recently, a wonderful educational institution. But as I am sure will come as no surprise to you, given the insidious cancel culture that has of late permeated our society, most parents are too fearful to speak up.

But speak up you must. There is strength in numbers and I assure you, the numbers are there. Contact the administration and the Board of Trustees and demand an end to the destructive and anti-intellectual claptrap known as antiracism. And if changes are not forthcoming then demand new leadership. For the sake of our community, our city, our country and most of all, our children, silence is no longer an option.

Respectfully,

Andrew Gutmann

We have today in our country, from both political parties, and at all levels of government, the most unwise and unvirtuous leaders in our nation’s history. Schools like Brearley are supposed to be the training grounds for those leaders. Our nation will not survive a generation of leadership even more poorly educated than we have now, nor will we survive a generation of students taught to hate its own country and despise its history.

Dit dus.


Laat het duidelijk wezen dat heel dit opzet georchestreerd is. De bedoelingen die hierachter steken zijn ook malafide van aard. Het blijft evenwel nog steeds gissen naar de voornaamste aanstokers en de ware beweegredenen. Maar dat Amerika bezig is aan een educatieve ramp is duidelijk.

[Elio di Supo]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Elio di Supo

https://www.tmz.com/2021/05/01/colle...ument-student/

Debat tss universiteitsprof en student over status politie als helden gaat nu viraal. De prof leek een vrij persoonlijke stellingname te hebben en scheerde de politie graag over 1 kam. Ze stelde ook dat ze nooit beroep zou doen op de politie als ze zelf in nood zou zijn.

Oftewel hoe erbarmelijk het tegenwoordig is gesteld met academisch Amerika. Kleuterniveau voorwaar.

Nu ja, het was ook in Californie. Sneeuwvlokjesland bij uitstek.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...er/4971840001/

De zaak begint kwalijker vormen aan te nemen. De faculteitsbond neemt het op voor de gewraakte professor en vind dat het college niet genoeg deed om haar in bescherming te nemen.

En hoe zit het dan met die student zijn 1st amendment rechten? Wat een godverdomde bananenrepubliek is dit land aan het worden.

[vanderzapig]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Elio di Supo

We have today in our country, from both political parties, and at all levels of government, the most unwise and unvirtuous leaders in our nation’s history. Schools like Brearley are supposed to be the training grounds for those leaders. Our nation will not survive a generation of leadership even more poorly educated than we have now, nor will we survive a generation of students taught to hate its own country and despise its history.

Dit dus.

Goed geschreven hé?

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Elio di Supo

Laat het duidelijk wezen dat heel dit opzet georchestreerd is. De bedoelingen die hierachter steken zijn ook malafide van aard. Het blijft evenwel nog steeds gissen naar de voornaamste aanstokers en de ware beweegredenen.

Ik denk niet dat hier een plan achter steekt. Eerder een vicieuze cirkel die al decennialang aan de gang was op de universiteiten. En pas recent uitbreidde naar de media, de overheid en de HR afdelingen van privébedrijven. De opkomst van sociale media echokamers heeft hier een belangrijke invloed gehad denk ik.

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Elio di Supo

Maar dat Amerika bezig is aan een educatieve ramp is duidelijk.

Hopelijk steken de ouders van leerlingen op elitescholen de koppen bij elkaar. Zij hebben de middelen en de daadkracht om nieuwe, niet-woke scholen uit de grond te stampen. Eenmaal ouders de keuze hebben tussen woke en niet-woke scholen zal de markt wel zijn werk doen.

[Elio di Supo]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door vanderzapig

Hopelijk steken de ouders van leerlingen op elitescholen de koppen bij elkaar. Zij hebben de middelen en de daadkracht om nieuwe, niet-woke scholen uit de grond te stampen. Eenmaal ouders de keuze hebben tussen woke en niet-woke scholen zal de markt wel zijn werk doen.

Hopelijk zitten er onder het lerarenkorps nog voldoende elementen die niet aangetast zijn door dit toch wel besmettelijk virus.

[Elio di Supo]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door vanderzapig

Ik denk niet dat hier een plan achter steekt. Eerder een vicieuze cirkel die al decennialang aan de gang was op de universiteiten. En pas recent uitbreidde naar de media, de overheid en de HR afdelingen van privébedrijven. De opkomst van sociale media echokamers heeft hier een belangrijke invloed gehad denk ik.

De invloed van sociale media is onmiskenbaar. Politieke correctheid was al een tijdje aan de gang maat Twitter & consoorten hebben alles in een stroomversnelling gebracht. Maar het blijft me soms verbazen wat een invloed die stomme tweets blijven uitoefenen. Het lijkt soms alsof men wil dat die invloed er is.

[Dadeemelee]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Elio di Supo

We have today in our country, from both political parties, and at all levels of government, the most unwise and unvirtuous leaders in our nation’s history. Schools like Brearley are supposed to be the training grounds for those leaders. Our nation will not survive a generation of leadership even more poorly educated than we have now, nor will we survive a generation of students taught to hate its own country and despise its history.

Dit dus.


Laat het duidelijk wezen dat heel dit opzet georchestreerd is. De bedoelingen die hierachter steken zijn ook malafide van aard. Het blijft evenwel nog steeds gissen naar de voornaamste aanstokers en de ware beweegredenen. Maar dat Amerika bezig is aan een educatieve ramp is duidelijk.

Nogal bombastisch niet: our future leaders? Elite...
Doet mij denken aan... Maar ik zeg het niet.

Voelde jij je een toekomstige leider, deel van de elite op d’univ Elio?

[Elio di Supo]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Dadeemelee

Nogal bombastisch niet: our future leaders? Elite...
Doet mij denken aan... Maar ik zeg het niet.

Voelde jij je een toekomstige leider, deel van de elite op d’univ Elio?

Opmerkelijk hoe je toch steeds de essentie uit een betoog weet op te pikken. En in feite een beetje griezelig hoe je dit bedenkelijk gedachtengoed dat zulke indoctrinatie in scholen aanmoedigt blijkbaar uit de wind wilt zetten. Dus nu ga je die ouder pogen in diskrediet te brengen. Opdat het marxistisch gedachtengoed zou kunnen zegevieren?

Hasta la victoria siempre, Dadee?

[Het Verzet]

Ik vind het er los over.
Vooral omdat het over onderwijs gaat.
Als het first amendment ergens geldig moet zijn, is het zeker wel op een school me dunkt.

[Dadeemelee]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Elio di Supo

Opmerkelijk hoe je toch steeds de essentie uit een betoog weet op te pikken. En in feite een beetje griezelig hoe je dit bedenkelijk gedachtengoed dat zulke indoctrinatie in scholen aanmoedigt blijkbaar uit de wind wilt zetten. Dus nu ga je die ouder pogen in diskrediet te brengen. Opdat het marxistisch gedachtengoed zou kunnen zegevieren?

Hasta la victoria siempre, Dadee?

Als je het gedachtengoed van die ouder bedoelt dan zitten we op dezelfde frequentie.

[Elio di Supo]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Dadeemelee

Als je het gedachtengoed van die ouder bedoelt dan zitten we op dezelfde frequentie.

Wat is er juist bedenkelijk aan die zijn gedachtengoed?