China roept op tot een nieuwe wereldorde, de amerikanisatie loopt ten einde

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

CNN - JPMorgan sells New York building to Chinese firm for $725 million
19 oktober 2013

[zonbron]

Leest U ook :

China Wants New World Order (November 2004)


China is calling for the establishment of a new world order that will ensure a long-term stable and peaceful international environment, Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Zhang Qiyue said in Beijing on June 10, 1999.

The more than 200 countries in the world and more than six billion people should not and cannot be put under the control of one country or group, she said, emphasizing that multi-polarization has become an irreversible historical trend after the end of the Cold War.

A country's affairs should be handled by its own people and international issues should be resolved through negotiations, she said, adding that the United Nations, the organization that has the largest number of member nations and that is most representative, should play a dominant role in international affairs and that this is common sense in the international community.

The common wish is for the establishment of a just and reasonable new political and economic order in the world, she said, one that must first help create a long-term peaceful environment for the development of all countries in the world.

It must also represent the common interests of all people and embody the development and progress needs of the time, she said.

The basis of the new world order, she said, should be the five principles of peaceful coexistence and other international norms.

The five principles refer to mutual respect for each nation's sovereignty and territorial integrity, mutual non-aggression, non-interference in each other's internal affairs, equality and mutual benefits, and peaceful coexistence.

http://www.china-embassy.org/eng/zmgx/zgwjzc/t35080.htm

China Wants Its Own 'New
World Order' To Oppose US Version
By Martin Sieff
UPI Senior News Analyst
2-6-2002


MUNICH, Germany (UPI) - There was a cloud no larger than the size of a man's hand in the sky of U.S. global leadership at the annual NATO Security Conference, or Wehrkunde, in Munich, Germany, this weekend. But it will get bigger. It was the quiet emergence of China as the leader of a potentially global block dedicated to oppose the United States.

When Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Wang Yi addressed the prestigious annual forum of NATO defense ministers in this historic Bavarian city, he heralded the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, founded only last June, as the crucial "new security concept" necessary to guarantee peace and stability in Central Asia, and to lead the fight there against terrorism.

So important was this idea of a "new security concept" to Chinese policy that Wang used the phrase four times in his formal speech.

He also clearly identified what it was.

"The birth and growth of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization embodies the practice of the new security concept by China, Russia and some Central Asian countries," Wang told the conference of defense and political leaders from more than 40 countries.

The SCO was set up last June 15 at a summit in the southern Chinese city of Shanghai attended by Chinese President Jiang Zemin, Russian President Vladimir Putin and the leaders of several Central Asian nations. Its military cooperation structure was deliberately modeled in part on the old Soviet-led Warsaw Pact and it includes nations with more than a quarter of the human race with more than 2 million soldiers under arms.

Whether by fortuitous accident or deliberate design, the organization was set up the very same day President George W. Bush, speaking in the Polish capital, Warsaw, pledged to extend the NATO alliance to include all the nations of Central and Eastern Europe.

...



Readers of UPI Analysis should remember that final phrase "fair and equitable new international order" with which Wang ended his speech. It clearly indicates China finds the current world order neither capable of bringing peace and prosperity, nor maintaining either of them. Beijing, therefore, is determined to "work vigorously" toward creating such a "new international order" and is "ready to strengthen its coordination and cooperation" with any other country that feels the same way.

No major world power has used that kind of language since the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War before its last, mild spring period of détente.

Wang never raised his voice and did not bang any table like Nazis or many old Soviet leaders. And he never criticized the United States by name. As a result, no one paid any attention to what he actually said.

They should.

http://www.rense.com/general19/oppo.htm

[zonbron]

De meerderheid van de Europeanen en de Amerikanen wensen geen Chinees leiderschap van deze 'nieuwe wereldorde'.

Deutsche Welle - China urges 'de-Americanized' new world order

"The country that blocked the negotiations to reform the Security Council - to expand its membership - was China. It was not the United States," Paulo Sotero, director of the Brazil Institute at the Wilson Center, told DW.

The West turns inward

Many in Europe and the United States are skeptical of this global shift, particularly as it regards China. According to the 2013 Transatlantic Trends Survey, published by the German Marshall Fund, 47 percent of Americans and 65 percent of Europeans found the idea of Chinese leadership in the world undesirable.

"It matters if you're a democracy or not," Stephen Szabo, executive director of the Transatlantic Academy, told DW. "The fact that China is not a democracy does cause concerns in Europe and the United States."

Meanwhile, Western commitment to the transatlantic alliance remains strong. Some 55 percent of Europeans and 77 percent of Americans still view US leadership as important. Similarly, 71 percent of Europeans and 57 percent of Americans believe that strong leadership by the EU is desirable.

But with the US and EU focusing largely on domestic issues, it's unclear whether or not they have the capability to shape the increasingly multipolar world.

"As a consequence, little attention has been devoted about how to go about crafting a new rules-based order," Kupchan said.