Politics.be Registreren kan je hier.
Problemen met registreren of reageren op de berichten?
Een verloren wachtwoord?
Gelieve een mail te zenden naar [email protected] met vermelding van je gebruikersnaam.

Ga terug   Politics.be > Algemeen > Buitenland
Registreer FAQForumreglement Ledenlijst

Buitenland Internationale onderwerpen, de politiek van de Europese lidstaten, over de werking van Europa, Europese instellingen, ... politieke en maatschappelijke discussies.

Antwoord
 
Discussietools
Oud 16 februari 2007, 13:44   #12681
exodus
Perm. Vertegenwoordiger VN
 
exodus's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 7 mei 2004
Berichten: 13.621
Standaard

De BBC gaat een reeks doen over het feit 9/11-inside job. Maar vele 9/11-sceptici die geïnterviewed zijn zeggen dat het een hit-piece gaat worden waarin 9/11-sceptici afgeschildert gaan worden als een "cult".

Ook de houding van de regisseur en de medewerkers liet geen twijfel over. Ze wilden bijvoorbeeld niet dat ze spraken over Operation Northwoods, en wanneer de opnames gedaan waren begon de regiseur te lachen zijn ongeloof te spuwen over hetgeen ze vertelden.

Maarja, de BBC is een mainstream zender, en we weten wat we meestal daar kunnen verwachten.

Citaat:


BBC 9/11 Documentary Likely Hit Piece

Obsessive focus on strawman theories say individuals interviewed for upcoming show

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Thursday, February 15, 2007
The highly anticipated BBC documentary on the 9/11 truth movement that airs this Sunday is likely to be a sophisticated hit piece, according to those who were interviewed for the program and others wary of the motives behind the creators of the show.'; digg_topic = 'politics';
This weekend's highly anticipated BBC documentary on the 9/11 truth movement is likely to be a sophisticated hit piece, according to those who were interviewed for the program and others wary of the motives behind the creators of the show.

The BBC are extensively promoting the show via commercials during peak time viewing and yesterday featured a reasonably balanced summary of the 9/11 truth movement on their website. A preview clip and an extended clip showing Alex Jones and Jim Marrs at Dealy Plaza were also released yesterday. Seemingly fair promotional material shouldn't suck anyone in to believing anything else than the fact that this is most probably going to be a severe attack on 9/11 truth.

The first program in the series that aired in December of last year focused on the questions surrounding the death of Princess Diana, an event that the overwhelming majority of the British public now believe was an assassination. According to many disgruntled viewers, the show was mostly a whitewash and toed the official line.

Other programs in the series feature investigations into the Oklahoma City Bombing and the death of Dr. David Kelly.

Many posters to the 9/11 Blogger site were skeptical of the show's balance and fear it could be one of the most sophisticated attacks on the 9/11 truth movement to date, using nebulous strawman tactics that elevate unproven theories about hologram planes, exotic weaponry and Jewish conspirators above hardcore evidence.
"Judging from my experience with (producer) Guy Smith, this will be a hit piece," stated one.

Another respondent said that Craig Bartmer, a former NYPD official who heard bombs bring down Building 7 as he ran from it, was interviewed for the show and came away with the distinct impression that its intention was to dismiss everything as a conspiracy theory, including the fact that a government cover-up was now known to have been effect in the very hours after the attack, when EPA officials told ground zero workers the toxic air was safe to breathe.
Bartmer told the BBC he thought their treatment of the subject was an insult to himself and the rest of the victims, but it's likely that the BBC will play the "insulting to the victims" card themselves, ignoring the fact that 20% of the ground zero rescue heroes are now dying as a result of an admitted government cover-up, and not due to any actions on behalf of "conspiracy theorists."

Another tactic is likely to be constant reference to NIST and the 9/11 Commission in an attempt to debunk every question raised by "conspiracy theorists," yet both have been proven to betray wild conflicts of interest along with a penchant for simply ignoring or burying information that contradicts the official story, such as the Norman Minetta testimony, 9/11 wargames and Building 7.



Alex Jones, director of Terror Storm, features heavily in show after the BBC followed him around for a week of taping.
Commenting on his radio broadcast yesterday, Jones said "They're pulling out all the stops on this one, they're going to try to mix in anti-Semitism," adding that the producer Guy Smith wouldn't allow him to talk about hardcore proven evidence on camera such as Operation Northwoods.
"They always wanted to bring up the most tenuous evidence, they always wanted to argue about that," said Jones.

Jones said that upon conclusion of filming, the producer started laughing and proclaiming his disbelief at everything Jones had stated.
"It's going to be one mega hit piece," he concluded.
Despite the BBC's best efforts to skew the investigation process into areas that can't be proven and simply discredit the 9/11 truth movement, the organs of establishment media remain oblivious to the fact that 9/11 truth has reached critical mass and the tipping point has already passed. The only ramifications of this broadcast will be to reassure the myopic sheeple that their government couldn't possibly lie to them, while provoking enough interest in those who still have the capacity to think for themselves to do their own research and find out the truth
__________________
Yesterday I was clever, so I wanted to change the world. Today I am wise, so I am changing myself. – Rumi

Laatst gewijzigd door exodus : 16 februari 2007 om 13:51.
exodus is offline   Met citaat antwoorden
Oud 16 februari 2007, 15:20   #12682
Pindar
Banneling
 
 
Pindar's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 1 juni 2005
Berichten: 8.258
Standaard

Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door exodus Bekijk bericht
Enige nuance is Parcifal blijkbaar vreemd. HEt is niet zo dat ALLE mensen of een aanzienlijk deel van die organisaties erin moeten zitten. Zolang je mensen hebt op sleutelposities waar het echt van belang is, en je de andere iets kan wijsmaken (zie bijvoorbeeld de war games op 9/11), dan is het zeker niet nodig om tot zo'n grote absurde samenzwering te komen zoals Parcifal voorstelt.

Als je door een organistaie heen ongeveer 10% hebt zitten
van je 'mensen' is dat voldoende om de zaak te 'beheersen"

Pin d'Ar
Pindar is offline   Met citaat antwoorden
Oud 16 februari 2007, 15:23   #12683
Pindar
Banneling
 
 
Pindar's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 1 juni 2005
Berichten: 8.258
Standaard

need I say more?

Citaat:
Global leaders reach deal on climate change to reduce what doesn't cause it

'A meeting in Washington of global political leaders has reached a new agreement on tackling climate change. Delegates agreed that developing countries will have to face targets for cutting greenhouse gas emissions as well as rich countries. The informal meeting also agreed that a global market should be formed to cap and trade carbon dioxide emissions'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6364663.stm

Pin d'Ar

Laatst gewijzigd door Pindar : 16 februari 2007 om 15:34.
Pindar is offline   Met citaat antwoorden
Oud 16 februari 2007, 15:23   #12684
Pindar
Banneling
 
 
Pindar's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 1 juni 2005
Berichten: 8.258
Standaard

GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

Citaat:
RFID 'Powder' - 'World's Smallest Chip Tag' (in public anyway)



'The world's smallest and thinnest RFID tags were introduced yesterday by Hitachi. Tiny miracles of miniaturization, these RFID chips (Radio Frequency IDentification chips) measure just 0.05 x 0.05 millimeters. The previous record-holder, the Hitachi mu-chip, is just 0.4 x 0.4 millimeters. Take a look at the size of the mu-chip RFID tag on a human fingertip.'
http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/Scienc...sp?NewsNum=939

Pin d'Ar

Laatst gewijzigd door Pindar : 16 februari 2007 om 15:36.
Pindar is offline   Met citaat antwoorden
Oud 16 februari 2007, 15:24   #12685
Pindar
Banneling
 
 
Pindar's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 1 juni 2005
Berichten: 8.258
Standaard

here ah ye gooo

Citaat:
The sick and vindictive get their man: Ernst Zundel sentenced to five years for thought crime

'Ernst Zundel was sentenced to five years in prison by a German court Thursday. It's the maximum sentence the activist could have received for his conviction on 14 counts of incitement. Denying the Holocaust is a crime in Germany.

The decision was cheered by Jewish groups including the Canadian Jewish Congress. "I think that they've given a strong message ... to the world, that I believe will bring a tremendous amount of comfort to Holocaust survivors," said Bernie Farber, chief executive officer of the CJC.'
http://www.citynews.ca/news/news_7873.aspx

Pin d'Ar
Pindar is offline   Met citaat antwoorden
Oud 16 februari 2007, 15:25   #12686
Pindar
Banneling
 
 
Pindar's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 1 juni 2005
Berichten: 8.258
Standaard

Citaat:
Blair ready to spam Britain on road pricing policy

'Tony Blair is planning to put even further strain on Number 10’s creaking IT infrastructure, by emailing everyone who’s signed the infamous petition against road charging. Over 1.4 million Brits have signed the online petition so far, with the servers handling the petition site buckling under the strain. Apparently there have been cabinet level mutterings suggesting whoever dreamt up the e-petition scheme was a “prat”, even as the transport secretary said, in effect, “debate is good … but we’re doing it anyway.”'
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/feb...50207Blair.htm

Pin d'Ar
Pindar is offline   Met citaat antwoorden
Oud 16 februari 2007, 15:26   #12687
Pindar
Banneling
 
 
Pindar's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 1 juni 2005
Berichten: 8.258
Standaard

ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh


Citaat:
Fake 9/11 'hero' to run for president


'Former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, acclaimed for his leadership after the September 11 attacks, confirmed he is running for U.S. president in 2008, eliminating any lingering doubt about his candidacy. "Yes, I'm running," Giuliani declared twice on Wednesday night on CNN's "Larry King Live" show.'
http://www.reuters.com/article/polit...18266220070215

Pin d'Ar
Pindar is offline   Met citaat antwoorden
Oud 16 februari 2007, 15:27   #12688
Pindar
Banneling
 
 
Pindar's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 1 juni 2005
Berichten: 8.258
Standaard

HERE IS HOW IT REALLY WORKS!!!

Citaat:
Neo-Nazi rally was organized by FBI informant

'A paid FBI informant was the man behind a neo-Nazi march through the streets of Parramore that stirred up anxiety in Orlando's black community and fears of racial unrest that triggered a major police mobilization.That revelation came Wednesday in an unrelated federal court hearing and has prompted outrage from black leaders, some of whom demanded an investigation into whether the February 2006 march was, itself, an event staged by law-enforcement agencies.'
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/feb...b_Neo-Nazi.htm


Pin d'Ar
Pindar is offline   Met citaat antwoorden
Oud 16 februari 2007, 15:31   #12689
exodus
Perm. Vertegenwoordiger VN
 
exodus's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 7 mei 2004
Berichten: 13.621
Standaard

Vandaag op het niuews hoorde ik nog zo iets grappig over de klimaatverandering. Iemand zei, "zelfs al is nog maar 10% waar van wat er in Al Gore zijn film staat, dan zitten we in de problemen."
__________________
Yesterday I was clever, so I wanted to change the world. Today I am wise, so I am changing myself. – Rumi
exodus is offline   Met citaat antwoorden
Oud 16 februari 2007, 15:31   #12690
Pindar
Banneling
 
 
Pindar's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 1 juni 2005
Berichten: 8.258
Standaard

Citaat:
IF THIS MAN TELLS YOU SOMETHING …



… IT’S NOT TRUE …


'I have been unconvinced by the official story of global warming for a long time now and the events of recent months leave me in no doubt that it’s all a scam. It’s not the warming of the planet that I challenge, but what is causing that to happen. The lie is in the why.

First of all, anything Al Gore wants you to believe comes straight from the Hidden Hand because he is a long time front man for the agenda of global control. Bush may be the current focus of hostility for those who can see the gathering Orwellian nightmare, but the Illuminati work through all sides to dictate the outcome and the ‘good guy’/‘bad guy’ approach is a common technique.



Gore has now become the face of global warming after his 2006 film, An Inconvenient Truth, which was the third most successful documentary in American box office history. His book of the same name reached number one in the New York Times bestseller list and he has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. It has all made this corrupt and deceitful man the darling of the Greens and many more besides.

Cue alarm bells, cue flashing lights, cue anything that says "CON MAN AT WORK".'

Pin d'Ar
Pindar is offline   Met citaat antwoorden
Oud 16 februari 2007, 15:33   #12691
Pindar
Banneling
 
 
Pindar's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 1 juni 2005
Berichten: 8.258
Standaard

Niets om je zorgen over te maken!!!!


Citaat:
VeriChip Admits Failure To Disclose Implant Chip Risks

'VeriChip Corporation, the much-hated purveyor of the VeriChip human ID implant, is airing its dirty laundry this week. This is not by choice, mind you, but because the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) required the company to disclose its "risk factors" prior to launching its initial public offering of stock (IPO) Friday.'
http://rense.com/general75/dane.htm


Pin d'Ar
Pindar is offline   Met citaat antwoorden
Oud 16 februari 2007, 16:16   #12692
parcifal
Banneling
 
 
parcifal's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 18 februari 2003
Berichten: 26.968
Standaard

Citaat:
A 9/11 conspiracy virus is sweeping the world, but it has no basis in fact



Loose Change is a sharp, slick film with an authoritative voiceover, but it drowns the truth in an ocean of nonsense

George Monbiot
Tuesday February 6, 2007
The Guardian

There is a virus sweeping the world. It infects opponents of the Bush government, sucks their brains out through their eyes and turns them into gibbering idiots. First cultivated in a laboratory in the US, the strain reached these shores a few months ago. In the past fortnight, it has become an epidemic. Scarcely a day now passes without someone possessed by this sickness, eyes rolling, lips flecked with foam, trying to infect me.


The disease is called Loose Change. It is a film made by three young men that airs most of the standard conspiracy theories about the attacks of September 11 2001. Unlike the other 9/11 conspiracy films, Loose Change is sharp and swift, with a thumping soundtrack, slick graphics and a calm and authoritative voiceover. Its makers claim that it has now been watched by 100 million people.
The Pentagon, the film maintains, was not hit by a commercial airliner. There was "no discernible trace" of a plane found in the wreckage, and the entrance and exit holes in the building were far too small. It was hit by a cruise missile. The twin towers were brought down by means of "a carefully planned controlled demolition". You can see the small puffs of smoke caused by explosives just below the cascading sections. All other hypotheses are implausible: the fire was not hot enough to melt steel and the towers fell too quickly. Building 7 was destroyed by the same means a few hours later.
Flight 93 did not crash, but was redirected to Cleveland airport, where the passengers were taken into a Nasa building and never seen again. Their voices had been cloned by the Los Alamos laboratories and used to make fake calls to their relatives. The footage of Osama bin Laden, claiming responsibility for the attacks, was faked. The US government carried out this great crime for four reasons: to help Larry Silverstein, who leased the towers, to collect his insurance money; to assist insider traders betting on falling airline stocks; to steal the gold in the basement; and to grant George Bush new executive powers, so that he could carry out his plans for world domination.
Even if you have seen or read no other accounts of 9/11, and your brain has not yet been liquidised, a few problems must occur to you. The first is the complete absence of scientific advice. At one point, the presenter asks: "So what brought down the twin towers? Let's ask the experts." But they don't ask the experts. The film-makers take some old quotes, edit them to remove any contradictions, then denounce all subsequent retractions as further evidence of conspiracy.
The only people they interview are a janitor, a group of firemen, and a flight instructor. They let the janitor speak at length, but cut the firemen off in mid-sentence. The flight instructor speaks in short clips, which give the impression that his pupil, the hijacker Hani Hanjour, was incapable of hitting the Pentagon. Elsewhere he has said the opposite: he had "no doubt" that Hanjour could have done it.
Where are the structural engineers, the materials scientists, the specialists in ballistics, explosives or fire? The film-makers now say that the third edition of the film will be fact-checked by an expert, but he turns out to be "a theology professor". They don't name him, but I would bet that it's David Ray Griffin, who also happens to be the high priest of the 9/11 conspiracists.
The next evident flaw is that the plot they propose must have involved tens of thousands of people. It could not have been executed without the help of demolition experts, the security firms guarding the World Trade Centre, Mayor Giuliani (who hastily disposed of the remains), much of the US air force, the Federal Aviation Administration and the North American Aerospace Defence Command, the relatives of the people "killed" in the plane crashes, the rest of the Pentagon's staff, the Los Alamos laboratories, the FBI, the CIA, and the investigators who picked through the rubble.
If there is one universal American characteristic, it is a confessional culture that permits no one with a good story to keep his mouth shut. People appear on the Jerry Springer Show to admit to carnal relations with their tractors. Yet none of the participants in this monumental crime has sought to blow the whistle - before, during or after the attacks. No one has volunteered to tell the greatest story ever told.
Read some conflicting accounts, and Loose Change's case crumbles faster than the twin towers. Hundreds of people saw a plane hit the Pentagon. Because it collided with one of the world's best-defended buildings at full speed, the plane was pulverised - even so, plane parts and body parts were in fact recovered. The wings and tail disintegrated when they hit the wall, which is why the holes weren't bigger.
The failure of the twin towers has been exhaustively documented by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Far from being impossible, the collapse turns out to have been inevitable. The planes cut some of the support columns and ignited fires sufficient to weaken (but not melt) the remaining steel structures. As the perimeter columns buckled, the weight of the collapsing top stories generated a momentum the rest of the building could not arrest. Puffs of smoke were blown out of the structure by compression as the building fell.
Counterpunch, the radical leftwing magazine, commissioned its own expert - an aerospace and mechanical engineer - to test the official findings. He shows that the institute must have been right. He also demonstrates how Building 7 collapsed. Burning debris falling from the twin towers ruptured the oil pipes feeding its emergency generators. The reduction in pressure triggered the automatic pumping system, which poured thousands of gallons of diesel on to the fire. The support trusses weakened and buckled, and the building imploded. Popular Mechanics magazine polled 300 experts and came to the same conclusions.
So the critics - even Counterpunch - are labelled co-conspirators, and the plot expands until it comes to involve a substantial part of the world's population. There is no reasoning with this madness. People believe Loose Change because it proposes a closed world: comprehensible, controllable, small. Despite the great evil that runs it, it is more companionable than the chaos that really governs our lives, a world without destination or purpose. This neat story draws campaigners away from real issues - global warming, the Iraq war, nuclear weapons, privatisation, inequality - while permanently wrecking their credibility. Bush did capitalise on the attacks, and he did follow a pre-existing agenda, spelt out, as Loose Change says, by the Project for the New American Century. But by drowning this truth in an ocean of nonsense, the conspiracists ensure that it can never again be taken seriously. The film's greatest flaw is this: the men who made it are still alive. If the US government is running an all-knowing, all-encompassing conspiracy, why did it not snuff them out long ago? There is only one possible explanation. They are in fact agents of the Bush regime, employed to distract people from its real abuses of power. This, if you are inclined to believe such stories, is surely a more plausible theory than the one proposed in Loose Change

Laatst gewijzigd door parcifal : 16 februari 2007 om 16:17.
parcifal is offline   Met citaat antwoorden
Oud 16 februari 2007, 16:19   #12693
exodus
Perm. Vertegenwoordiger VN
 
exodus's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 7 mei 2004
Berichten: 13.621
Standaard

Wat een flutartikel weeral. Het artikel neemt één klein facet uit het gehele 9/11 materiaal, in dit geval Loose Change, en gaat daarop zijn artikel bouwen ivm 9/11 inside job. Het begint afgezaagd te geraken die truuken..
__________________
Yesterday I was clever, so I wanted to change the world. Today I am wise, so I am changing myself. – Rumi

Laatst gewijzigd door exodus : 16 februari 2007 om 16:19.
exodus is offline   Met citaat antwoorden
Oud 16 februari 2007, 16:20   #12694
Pindar
Banneling
 
 
Pindar's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 1 juni 2005
Berichten: 8.258
Standaard

Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door exodus Bekijk bericht
Wat een flutartikel weeral. Het artikel neemt één klein facet uit het gehele 9/11 materiaal, in dit geval Loose Change, en gaat daarop zijn artikel bouwen ivm 9/11 inside job. Het begint afgezaagd te geraken die truuken..
idd en ik snap absoluut niet dat mensen Parcifal nog serieus nemen hier.


Pin d'Ar
Pindar is offline   Met citaat antwoorden
Oud 16 februari 2007, 16:28   #12695
puud
Parlementslid
 
Geregistreerd: 2 april 2005
Berichten: 1.545
Standaard

Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pindar Bekijk bericht
idd en ik snap absoluut niet dat mensen Parcifal nog serieus nemen hier.


Pin d'Ar
De beste mop van de maand.
Hoeveel denkt ge nemen Pindar serieus, behalve exodus natuurlijk.
__________________
"Als een menselijke maatschappij het recht van de sterkste wil uitschakelen om menselijker wetten te scheppen, dan moet ze eerst maar bewijzen dat ze daar sterk genoeg voor is."
Legh Freeman op de vooravond van de strafexpeditie naar Julesburg.
puud is offline   Met citaat antwoorden
Oud 16 februari 2007, 16:30   #12696
Pindar
Banneling
 
 
Pindar's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 1 juni 2005
Berichten: 8.258
Standaard

Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door puud Bekijk bericht
De beste mop van de maand.
Hoeveel denkt ge nemen Pindar serieus, behalve exodus natuurlijk.

ik ben bang voor jou dat het er meer zijn dan je denkt, en ik ben ook bang voor je dat het er in de toekomst nog meer gaan worden.

Nuff Said

Pin d'Ar
Pindar is offline   Met citaat antwoorden
Oud 16 februari 2007, 16:33   #12697
parcifal
Banneling
 
 
parcifal's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 18 februari 2003
Berichten: 26.968
Standaard

Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pindar Bekijk bericht
idd en ik snap absoluut niet dat mensen Parcifal nog serieus nemen hier.

Pin d'Ar
Willen we eens een poll houden?
parcifal is offline   Met citaat antwoorden
Oud 16 februari 2007, 16:35   #12698
Pindar
Banneling
 
 
Pindar's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 1 juni 2005
Berichten: 8.258
Standaard

Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door parcifal Bekijk bericht
Willen we eens een poll houden?
moet je helemaal zelf weten, ik weet wat ik moet weten.

want je weet wat Gandhi heeft gezegd he?

Citaat:
Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is the truth.

Nuff Said

Pin d'Ar
Pindar is offline   Met citaat antwoorden
Oud 16 februari 2007, 16:38   #12699
parcifal
Banneling
 
 
parcifal's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 18 februari 2003
Berichten: 26.968
Standaard

Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pindar Bekijk bericht
je weet wat Gandhi heeft gezegd he?
Grappig dat u dat zegt, want u BENT een minority of One naar mijn idee.
parcifal is offline   Met citaat antwoorden
Oud 16 februari 2007, 16:39   #12700
Pindar
Banneling
 
 
Pindar's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 1 juni 2005
Berichten: 8.258
Standaard

Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door parcifal Bekijk bericht
Grappig dat u dat zegt, want u BENT een minority of One naar mijn idee.
inderdaad!!

LOL

Volgens mij heb je de quote duidelijk niet helemaal begrepen!!!





Pin d'Ar

Laatst gewijzigd door Pindar : 16 februari 2007 om 16:39.
Pindar is offline   Met citaat antwoorden
Antwoord



Regels voor berichten
Je mag niet nieuwe discussies starten
Je mag niet reageren op berichten
Je mag niet bijlagen versturen
Je mag niet jouw berichten bewerken

vB-code is Aan
Smileys zijn Aan
[IMG]-code is Aan
HTML-code is Uit
Forumnavigatie


Alle tijden zijn GMT +1. Het is nu 14:41.


Forumsoftware: vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content copyright ©2002 - 2020, Politics.be