Top-kapitalisten krijgen koekje van eigen deeg: deel 2 (>50B$)

[Nr.10]

De volgende Madoff dient zich aan ...
Activa onder beheer bedragen meer dan 50B$

Russ Dallen, who used to head the Venezuela business of Oppenheimer & Co. in Caracas, remembers clients moving money from his company to Stanford, wooed by promises for "14 percent on savings, guaranteed."

"We were just gobsmacked because guaranteeing those kinds of returns is just not possible," said Dallen.

R. Allen Stanford Under Investigation By The SEC, FINRA, FBI
Zie: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0..._n_167198.html

[Daimanta]

Waar vind je dat er meer dan 50.000.000.000 aan activa in de zaak zitten?

[Nr.10]

"Assets under management or advisement are in excess of US$50 billion."

Zie: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allen_Stanford

[Nr.10]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Daimanta

Waar vind je dat er meer dan 50.000.000.000 aan activa in de zaak zitten?

Dat bedrag beweerde ie zelf onder beheer te hebben.
In werkelijkheid zou het om 12,5B gaan.
Is vandaag in staat van beschuldiging gesteld.
Alle activa werden bevroren.

Cricket billionaire Stanford charged over $12.5bn fraud
Wednesday February 18, 2009, 7:17 am

American cricket promoter and financier Sir Allen Stanford has been charged over a $12.5 billion investment fraud.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission accuses Stanford of orchestrating a fraud involving the use of high-yielding certificates of deposit.

A US judge has frozen the Texan billionaire's assets, as well as those of three of his investment companies (...)

Zie: http://au.biz.yahoo.com/090217/31/24oa9.html

The SEC Moves Against Stanford
The firm claims to have 30,000 customers, all of them wealthy, in 130 countries, with most investors in the U.S. and Latin America.
(...)
Regulatory filings show that Stanford's brokerage arm managed about $4 billion in client money. Even adding in the $8.5 billion managed by its offshore bank, that's far less than the $50 billion that Allen Stanford claims his firm manages and advises. It appears, if the regulators are to believed, there was a lot of smoke and mirrors at Stanford Financial.

Zie: http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/...temp_top+story

[filosoof]

dubbel met post hierboven
enkel links dus:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1234...html#printMode

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7b159fda-f...nclick_check=1

ING zit er "maar" voor enkele Mio tussen:

http://www.tijd.be/nieuws/ondernemin...146032-433.art