Trump vs Harris

[gunter5148]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door djimi

Ik vrees voor u dat DJ Trump enkel 'gefilterd' nog enigszins presentabel is: hij beledigt en schoffeert anderen om ZICHZELF een plezier te doen.

Het is wellicht een van de weinige overgebleven pretjes waar hij zich nog op aan kan trekken.


Is het u ook al opgevallen hoe zelden z'n dochter Ivanka nog naast hem op een foto/podium gaat staan?

Tijdens het interview met Joe Rogan zag je een ongefilterde Trump. Het blijft een clown, maar de filter waardoor jij kijkt was er niet.

[Voltian]

meanwhile prediction markets:

https://www.metaculus.com/questions/...ection-winner/

https://polymarket.com/event/preside...=1730637837177

https://kalshi.com/


Nadat Trump een mooie voorsprong had tot 2/3e kans, nu terug convergentie naar een pure 50-50.
Polls convergeren niet naar prediction market, maar prediction market covergeert naar polls...

interessant...

[djimi]

Het "evil empire" mag dan al onherroepelijk in verval zijn (en dat moet absoluut als iets héél positief worden gezien);

blijkbaar is het tegelijkertijd wel ontzéttend belangrijk dat een geniale oranje clown er de 47ste president van wordt en niet een idiote kakelende heks.




Ik vind dat toch een beetje een 'moeilijke' 'positie':

met de geniale oranje clown aan de macht lopen we alleszins het risico dat de onvermijdelijke doodsstrijd van het "evil empire" zowel

1) tot (véél) later wordt uitgesteld

als

2) een pak langer duurt.


Zouden 'we' daarom niet beter aandringen op de korte pijn:

de idiote kakelende heks laten winnen zodat ZIJ de boel binnen de kortste keren naar de knoppen kan helpen en WIJ er rap vanaf zijn?

[Universalia]

In extremis zou men zich kunnen afvragen:zijn de presidentsverkieaingen in de USA een strijd tussen blank en zwart???

Opgepast dan voor de blanke Amerikanen want de Kamala haar enige doel is...

Misschien zien de mensen die zo denken het wel verkeerd maar het valt toch op.

En het is daar al zo erg in de USA

p.s.

Laatst sprak ik iemand die mij zonder blozen vroeg: "Had Hitler gelijk????"

Ik kon daar echt geen gepaste antwoorden op verzinnen. op die vraagstelling naar mij toe???

Ik had kunnen zeggen: herlees de geschiedenis van het gebeurde...

[Pandareus]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Universalia

In extremis zou men zich kunnen afvragen:zijn de presidentsverkieaingen in de USA een strijd tussen blank en zwart???

Opgepast dan voor de blanke Amerikanen want de Kamala haar enige doel is...

Misschien zien de mensen die zo denken het wel verkeerd maar het valt toch op.

En het is daar al zo erg in de USA

p.s.

Laatst sprak ik iemand die mij zonder blozen vroeg: "Had Hitler gelijk????"

Ik kon daar echt geen gepaste antwoorden op verzinnen. op die vraagstelling naar mij toe???

Ik had kunnen zeggen: herlees de geschiedenis van het gebeurde...

[R. Kipling]

Opnieuw slecht nieuws voor het Kamala-kamp

Waar de Democraten jarenlang het alleenrecht hadden op de stem van de minderheden lijken die zich nu steeds meer en meer te verpsreiden over beide partijen. Zonet kwam het bericht uit Minnesota - de staat van Tampon Tim- dat de Somaliërs ook de kant van Trump kiezen: dit omwille van het feit dat de democraten na de vorige verkiezingen hen in de steek hebben gelaten. Of ze de raad van hun 'leiders' zullen volgen is maar zeer de vraag, maar als ze dat doen is dat wel een niet te onderschatten minderheid. In 2018 "spraken er al 94.000 inwoners van Minnesota Somalisch thuis"... IN 2022 leefden er zo'n 5.8M inwoners in Minnesota. Gezien we hoogstwaarschijnlijk van de veronderstelling mogen uitgaan dat hun reproductieratio op z'n minst gelijk zal zijn aan die van de andere bevolkingsgroepen, kunnen we stellen dat deze minderheid op z'n minst 1.6% van de totale bevolking uitmaakt. Het wordt daar spannend...

https://x.com/GrageDustin/status/1852757745016922615
https://x.com/covid_clarity/status/1853109633340371166
https://x.com/NeilEJohnson/status/18...999252/video/1
https://x.com/MTGrepp/status/1852780077844500872
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histor...0%93Saint_Paul

[Dadeemelee]

Iowa poll: Harris 47% Trump 44%

Trump won Iowa in 2016 en 2020

https://www.thedailybeast.com/rattle...s-trump-hater/

[Universalia]

Zoals ik al eerder schreef en er in de strijd geen andere kandidaten zijn denk ik dat Trump de beste optie is om terug POTUS te mogen spelen.

Mocht het die Kamala zijn, pas dan maar goed op Amerikanen.

[gunter5148]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Universalia

In extremis zou men zich kunnen afvragen:zijn de presidentsverkieaingen in de USA een strijd tussen blank en zwart???

Opgepast dan voor de blanke Amerikanen want de Kamala haar enige doel is...

Misschien zien de mensen die zo denken het wel verkeerd maar het valt toch op.

En het is daar al zo erg in de USA

p.s.

Laatst sprak ik iemand die mij zonder blozen vroeg: "Had Hitler gelijk????"

Ik kon daar echt geen gepaste antwoorden op verzinnen. op die vraagstelling naar mij toe???

Ik had kunnen zeggen: herlees de geschiedenis van het gebeurde...

Vraag het maar aan de blanke boeren, in Zuid-Afrika.

White-Farmer-Lives don't matter shit. Daar zijn geen marsen, rellen, celebrities of politiekers voor.

Maar, white-supremacism, dus teut houden, blanke.

[gunter5148]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Universalia

Zoals ik al eerder schreef en er in de strijd geen andere kandidaten zijn denk ik dat Trump de beste optie is om terug POTUS te mogen spelen.

Mocht het die Kamala zijn, pas dan maar goed op Amerikanen.

Pas maar goed op, Amerika, dan.
Want er zijn héél veel bewapende Amerikanen.
De totale instorting van een imperium; een burgeroorlog.

Ene grote show, en we zitten op de eerste rij. RIP aan iedereen die het leven er bij zal laten, maar zeg niet dat je het niet zag aankomen.

Of we "transen" nog wat verder,dat kan ook.

[gunter5148]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door gunter5148

Er is maar 1 manier waarop harris kan winnen, en dat is door vals te spelen.
Er is maar 1 manier waarop trump kan winnen, en dat is door absoluut niet vals te spelen.

Ik hoop dat trump begrijpt dat hij zo goed als nooit "absoluut niet valsgespeeld te hebben" zal kunnen bewijzen

Dus het eerste schot voor de boeg is gegeven;

"Trump gaat winnen, maar wij gaan hem beschuldigen van vals gespeeld te hebben"

DAT gaat de positie van de democraten zijn. Let maar op.

Pure demagogie heeft een gezicht;

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...pting-election

Dit kan het einde van de republiek zijn.

[Dadeemelee]

Het verschil met vorige keer: nu zit Biden in het White House, dus als Trump gaat proberen weer eens een staatsgreep te plegen gaan de opstandelingen wél tegenstand krijgen.

[Bach]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Universalia

Zoals ik al eerder schreef en er in de strijd geen andere kandidaten zijn denk ik dat Trump de beste optie is om terug POTUS te mogen spelen.

Mocht het die Kamala zijn, pas dan maar goed op Amerikanen.

Ik val in herhaling maar BlackRock (Fink) zegt dat het niet uitmaakt wie wint. Concreet betekent dat dat er geen echte machtsoverdracht komt. BlackRock is zonder omwegen een zionistische entiteit te noemen. En niet de minste qua macht in de VS. Als het niet uitmaakt is fraude overbodig alhoewel het lijkt alsof het huidige regime in Israël Trump verkiest. Maar ook Harris probeert op de foto te staan met die oorlogsmaniak in Tel Aviv.

[Pandareus]

Deze verkiezingen gaan niet over 'transen', over woke onzin, over deportatie fantasietjes van een dementerende autocraat, maar over burgerrechten die de conservatieve gelovige MAGA sekte wil afnemen van de burger.

A pregnant teenager died after trying to get care in three visits to Texas emergency rooms

Candace Fails screamed for someone in the Texas hospital to help her pregnant daughter. “Do something,” she pleaded, on the morning of Oct. 29, 2023.

Nevaeh Crain was crying in pain, too weak to walk, blood staining her thighs. Feverish and vomiting the day of her baby shower, the 18-year-old had gone to two different emergency rooms within 12 hours, returning home each time worse than before.
The first hospital diagnosed her with strep throat without investigating her sharp abdominal cramps. At the second, she screened positive for sepsis, a life-threatening and fast-moving reaction to an infection, medical records show. But doctors said her six-month fetus had a heartbeat and that Crain was fine to leave.
Now on Crain’s third hospital visit, an obstetrician insisted on two ultrasounds to “confirm fetal demise,” a nurse wrote, before moving her to intensive care.

By then, more than two hours after her arrival, Crain’s blood pressure had plummeted and a nurse had noted that her lips were “blue and dusky.” Her organs began failing.

Hours later, she was dead.

Fails, who would have seen her daughter turn 20 this Friday, still cannot understand why Crain’s emergency was not treated like an emergency.

But that is what many pregnant women are now facing in states with strict abortion bans, doctors and lawyers have told ProPublica.

“Pregnant women have become essentially untouchables,” said Sara Rosenbaum, a health law and policy professor emerita at George Washington University.

Texas’s abortion ban threatens prison time for interventions that end a fetal heartbeat, whether the pregnancy is wanted or not. It includes exceptions for life-threatening conditions, but still, doctors told ProPublica that confusion and fear about the potential legal repercussions are changing the way their colleagues treat pregnant patients with complications.

In states with abortion bans, such patients are sometimes bounced between hospitals like “hot potatoes,” with health care providers reluctant to participate in treatment that could attract a prosecutor, doctors told ProPublica. In some cases, medical teams are wasting precious time debating legalities and creating documentation, preparing for the possibility that they’ll need to explain their actions to a jury and judge.

Dr. Jodi Abbott, an associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Boston University School of Medicine, said patients are left wondering: “Am I being sent home because I really am OK? Or am I being sent home because they’re afraid that the solution to what’s going on with my pregnancy would be ending the pregnancy, and they’re not allowed to do that?”

There is a federal law to prevent emergency room doctors from withholding lifesaving care.

Passed nearly four decades ago, it requires emergency rooms to stabilize patients in medical crises. The Biden administration argues this mandate applies even in cases where an abortion might be necessary.

No state has done more to fight this interpretation than Texas, which has warned doctors that its abortion ban supersedes the administration’s guidance on federal law, and that they can face up to 99 years in prison for violating it.

ProPublica condensed more than 800 pages of Crain’s medical records into a four-page timeline in consultation with two maternal-fetal medicine specialists; reporters reviewed it with nine doctors, including researchers at prestigious universities, OB-GYNs who regularly handle miscarriages, and experts in emergency medicine and maternal health.
Some said the first ER missed warning signs of infection that deserved attention. All said that the doctor at the second hospital should never have sent Crain home when her signs of sepsis hadn’t improved. And when she returned for the third time, all said there was no medical reason to make her wait for two ultrasounds before taking aggressive action to save her.

“This is how these restrictions kill women,” said Dr. Dara Kass, a former regional director at the Department of Health and Human Services and an emergency room physician in New York. “It is never just one decision, it’s never just one doctor, it’s never just one nurse.”

While they were not certain from looking at the records provided that Crain’s death could have been prevented, they said it may have been possible to save both the teenager and her fetus if she had been admitted earlier for close monitoring and continuous treatment.

There was a chance Crain could have remained pregnant, they said. If she had needed an early delivery, the hospital was well-equipped to care for a baby on the edge of viability. In another scenario, if the infection had gone too far, ending the pregnancy might have been necessary to save Crain.

Doctors involved in Crain’s care did not respond to several requests for comment. The two hospitals, Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas and Christus Southeast Texas St. Elizabeth, declined to answer detailed lists of questions about her treatment.

Fails and Crain believed abortion was morally wrong. The teen could only support it in the context of rape or life-threatening illness, she used to tell her mother. They didn’t care whether the government banned it, just how their Christian faith guided their own actions.

When they discovered Crain was pregnant with a girl, the two talked endlessly about the little dresses they could buy, what kind of mother she would be. Crain landed on the name Lillian. Fails could not wait to meet her.

But when her daughter got sick, Fails expected that doctors had an obligation to do everything in their power to stave off a potentially deadly emergency, even if that meant losing Lillian. In her view, they were more concerned with checking the fetal heartbeat than attending to Crain.

“I know it sounds selfish, and God knows I would rather have both of them, but if I had to choose,” Fails said, “I would have chosen my daughter.”

‘I’m in a lot of pain’

Crain had just graduated from high school in her hometown of Vidor, Texas, in May of 2023 when she learned that she was pregnant.

She and her boyfriend of two years, Randall Broussard, were always hip to hip, wrestling over vapes or snuggling on the couch watching vampire movies. Crain was drawn to how gentle he was. He admired how easily she built friendships and how quickly she could make people laugh. Though they were young, they’d already imagined starting a family. Broussard, who has eight siblings, wanted many kids; Crain wanted a daughter and the kind of relationship she had with her mom. Earlier that year, Broussard had given Crain a small diamond ring — “a promise,” he told her, “that I will always love you.”

On the morning of their baby shower, Oct. 28, 2023, Crain woke with a headache. Her mom decorated the house with pink balloons and Crain laid out Halloween-themed platters. Soon, nausea set in. Crain started vomiting and was running a fever. When guests arrived, Broussard opened gifts — onesies and diapers and bows — while Crain kept closing her eyes.

Around 3 p.m., her family told her she needed to go to the hospital.
Broussard drove Crain to Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas. They sat in the waiting room for four hours. When Crain started vomiting, staff brought her a plastic pan. When she wasn’t retching, she lay her head in her boyfriend’s lap.

A nurse practitioner ordered a test for strep throat, which came back positive, medical records show. But in a pregnant patient, abdominal pain and vomiting should not be quickly attributed to strep, physicians told ProPublica; a doctor should have also evaluated her pregnancy.

Instead, Baptist Hospitals discharged her with a prescription for antibiotics. She was home at 9 p.m. and quickly dozed off, but within hours, she woke her mother up. “Mom, my stomach is still hurting,” she said into the dark bedroom at 3 a.m. “I’m in a lot of pain.”

Fails drove Broussard and Crain to another hospital in town, Christus Southeast Texas St. Elizabeth. Around 4:20 a.m., OB-GYN William Hawkins saw that Crain had a temperature of 102.8 and an abnormally high pulse, according to records; a nurse noted that Crain rated her abdominal pain as a seven out of 10.

Her vital signs pointed to possible sepsis, records show. It’s standard medical practice to immediately treat patients who show signs of sepsis, which can overtake and kill a person quickly, medical experts told ProPublica. These patients should be watched until their vitals improve. Through tests and scans, the goal is to find the source of the infection. If the infection was in Crain’s uterus, the fetus would likely need to be removed with a surgery.

In a room at the obstetric emergency department, a nurse wrapped a sensor belt around Crain’s belly to check the fetal heart rate. “Baby’s fine,” Broussard told Fails, who was sitting in the hallway.

After two hours of IV fluids, one dose of antibiotics, and some Tylenol, Crain’s fever didn’t go down, her pulse remained high, and the fetal heart rate was abnormally fast, medical records show. Hawkins noted that Crain had strep and a urinary tract infection, wrote up a prescription and discharged her.
Hawkins had missed infections before. Eight years earlier, the Texas Medical Board found that he had failed to diagnose appendicitis in one patient and syphilis in another. In the latter case, the board noted that his error “may have contributed to the fetal demise of one of her twins.” The board issued an order to have Hawkins’ medical practice monitored; the order was lifted two years later. (Hawkins did not respond to several attempts to reach him.)

All of the doctors who reviewed Crain’s vital signs for ProPublica said she should have been admitted. “She should have never left, never left,” said Elise Boos, an OB-GYN in Tennessee.

Kass, the New York emergency physician, put it in starker terms: When they discharged her, they were “pushing her down the path of no return.”

“It’s bullshit,” Fails said as Broussard rolled Crain out in a wheelchair; she was unable to walk on her own. Fails had expected the hospital to keep her overnight. Her daughter was breathing heavily, hunched over in pain, pale in the face. Normally talkative, the teen was quiet.
Back home, around 7 a.m., Fails tried to get her daughter comfortable as she cried and moaned. She told Fails she needed to pee, and her mother helped her into the bathroom. “Mom, come here,” she said from the toilet. Blood stained her underwear.

The blood confirmed Fails’ instinct: This was a miscarriage.

At 9 a.m, a full day after the nausea began, they were back at Christus St. Elizabeth. Crain’s lips were drained of color and she kept saying she was going to pass out. Staff started her on IV antibiotics and performed a bedside ultrasound.

Around 9:30 a.m., the OB on duty, Dr. Marcelo Totorica, couldn’t find a fetal heart rate, according to records; he told the family he was sorry for their loss.

Standard protocol when a critically ill patient experiences a miscarriage is to stabilize her and, in most cases, hurry to the operating room for delivery, medical experts said. This is especially urgent with a spreading infection. But at Christus St. Elizabeth, the OB-GYN just continued antibiotic care. A half-hour later, as nurses placed a catheter, Fails noticed her daughter’s thighs were covered in blood.
At 10 a.m., Melissa McIntosh, a labor and delivery nurse, spoke to Totorica about Crain’s condition. The teen was now having contractions. “Dr. Totorica states to not move patient,” she wrote after talking with him. “Dr. Totorica states there is a slight chance patient may need to go to ICU and he wants the bedside ultrasound to be done stat for sure before admitting to room.”

Though he had already performed an ultrasound, he was asking for a second.

The first hadn’t preserved an image of Crain’s womb in the medical record. “Bedside ultrasounds aren’t always set up to save images permanently,” said Abbott, the Boston OB-GYN.

The state’s laws banning abortion require that doctors record the absence of a fetal heartbeat before intervening with a procedure that could end a pregnancy. Exceptions for medical emergencies demand physicians document their reasoning. “Pretty consistently, people say, ‘Until we can be absolutely certain this isn’t a normal pregnancy, we can’t do anything, because it could be alleged that we were doing an abortion,’” said Dr. Tony Ogburn, an OB-GYN in San Antonio.

At 10:40 a.m, Crain’s blood pressure was dropping. Minutes later, Totorica was paging for an emergency team over the loudspeakers.

Around 11 a.m., two hours after Crain had arrived at the hospital, a second ultrasound was performed. A nurse noted: “Bedside ultrasound at this time to confirm fetal demise per Dr. Totorica’s orders.”

When doctors wheeled Crain into the ICU at 11:20 a.m., Fails stayed by her side, rubbing her head, as her daughter dipped in and out of consciousness. Crain couldn’t sign consent forms for her care because of “extreme pain,” according to the records, so Fails signed a release for “unplanned dilation and curettage” or “unplanned cesarean section.”

But the doctors quickly decided it was now too risky to operate, according to records. They suspected that she had developed a dangerous complication of sepsis known as disseminated intravascular coagulation; she was bleeding internally.

Frantic and crying, Fails locked eyes with her daughter. “You’re strong, Nevaeh,” she said. “God made us strong.”

Crain sat up in the cot. Old, black blood gushed from her nostrils and mouth.
‘The law is on their side’

Crain is one of at least two pregnant Texas women who died after doctors delayed treating miscarriages, ProPublica found.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has successfully made his state the only one in the country that isn’t required to follow the Biden administration’s efforts to ensure that emergency departments don’t turn away patients like Crain.

After the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to abortion, the administration issued guidance on how states with bans should follow the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act. The federal law requires hospitals that receive funding through Medicare — which is virtually all of them — to stabilize or transfer anyone who arrives in their emergency rooms. That goes for pregnant patients, the guidance argues, even if that means violating state law and providing an abortion.
Paxton responded by filing a lawsuit in 2022, saying the federal guidance “forces hospitals and doctors to commit crimes,” and was an “attempt to use federal law to transform every emergency room in the country into a walk-in abortion clinic.”

Part of the battle has centered on who is eligible for abortion. The federal EMTALA guidelines apply when the health of the pregnant patient is in “serious jeopardy.” That’s a wider range of circumstances than the Texas abortion restriction, which only makes exceptions for a “risk of death” or “a serious risk of substantial impairment of a major bodily function.”

The lawsuit worked its way through three layers of federal courts, and each time it was met by judges nominated by former President Donald Trump, whose court appointments were pivotal to overturning Roe v. Wade.

After U.S. District Judge James Wesley Hendrix, a Trump appointee, quickly sided with Texas, Paxton celebrated the triumph over “left-wing bureaucrats in Washington.”

“The decision last night proves what we knew all along,” Paxton added. “The law is on our side.”

This year, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit upheld the order in a ruling authored by Kurt D. Engelhardt, another judge nominated by Trump.

The Biden administration appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, urging the justices to make it clear that some emergency abortions are allowed.

Even amid news of preventable deaths related to abortion bans, the Supreme Court declined to do so last month.

Paxton called this “a major victory” for the state’s abortion ban.

He has also made clear that he will bring charges against physicians for performing abortions if he decides that the cases don’t fall within Texas’ narrow medical exceptions.

Last year, he sent a letter threatening to prosecute a doctor who had received court approval to provide an emergency abortion for a Dallas woman. He insisted that the doctor and her patient had not proven how, precisely, the patient’s condition threatened her life.

Many doctors say this kind of message has encouraged doctors to “punt” patients instead of treating them.

Since the abortion bans went into effect, an OB-GYN at a major hospital in San Antonio has seen an uptick in pregnant patients being sent to them from across Southern Texas, as they suffer from complications that could easily be treated close to home.

The well-resourced hospital is perceived to have more institutional support to provide abortions and miscarriage management, the doctor said. Other providers “are transferring those patients to our centers because, frankly, they don’t want to deal with them.”

After Crain died, Fails couldn’t stop thinking about how Christus Southeast Hospital had ignored her daughter’s condition. “She was bleeding,” she said. “Why didn’t they do anything to help it along instead of wait for another ultrasound to confirm the baby is dead?”
It was the medical examiner, not the doctors at the hospital, who removed Lillian from Crain’s womb. His autopsy didn’t resolve Fails’ lingering questions about what the hospitals missed and why. He called the death “natural” and attributed it to “complications of pregnancy.” He did note, however, that Crain was “repeatedly seeking medical care for a progressive illness” just before she died.

Last November, Fails reached out to medical malpractice lawyers to see about getting justice through the courts. A different legal barrier now stood in her way.

If Crain had experienced these same delays as an inpatient, Fails would have needed to establish that the hospital violated medical standards. That, she believed, she could do. But because the delays and discharges occurred in an area of the hospital classified as an emergency room, lawyers said that Texas law set a much higher burden of proof: “willful and wanton negligence.”

No lawyer has agreed to take the case.

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/11/03/h...ica/index.html

[Bach]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Dadeemelee

Het verschil met vorige keer: nu zit Biden in het White House, dus als Trump gaat proberen weer eens een staatsgreep te plegen gaan de opstandelingen wél tegenstand krijgen.

Staatsgreep is een groot woord voor het verzet van Trump tegen de de uitslag van vorige verkiezingen. Net zoals 'insurrectie' en 'terrorisme' iets hysterisch overdreven manipulatief hebben voor de woedende massa die het Capitool bestormde.

[Bach]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pandareus

Deze verkiezingen gaan niet over 'transen', over woke onzin, over deportatie fantasietjes van een dementerende autocraat, maar over burgerrechten die de conservatieve gelovige MAGA sekte wil afnemen van de burger.


https://edition.cnn.com/2024/11/03/h...ica/index.html

Het is niet omdat de democraten denken met abortus punten te kunnen scoren dat de kiezer op die basis gaat stemmen. Waarover deze verkiezingen gaan bepaalt de kiezer.

[Dadeemelee]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Bach

Staatsgreep is een groot woord voor het verzet van Trump tegen de de uitslag van vorige verkiezingen. Net zoals insurrectie en terrorisme iets hysterisch overdreven manipulatief hebben voor de woedende massa die het Capitool bestormde.

Ted Cruz was er wel niet gerust in, hij verstopte zich in het bezemhok.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ry-6-riot-book

[Bach]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Dadeemelee

Ted Cruz was er wel niet gerust in, hij verstopte zich in het bezemhok.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ry-6-riot-book

Oei. Het bezemhok. Wat erg. Ge zoud denken dat voor een staatsgreep wel wat meer nodig is.

[Pandareus]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Universalia

Zoals ik al eerder schreef en er in de strijd geen andere kandidaten zijn denk ik dat Trump de beste optie is om terug POTUS te mogen spelen.

Mocht het die Kamala zijn, pas dan maar goed op Amerikanen.

Denk je dat Trumpie wel antwoord kan geven op de vraag die jij naar eigen zeggen zelf niet kon beantwoorden over Hitler ? Is dat de reden ?

[R. Kipling]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Dadeemelee

Iowa poll: Harris 47% Trump 44%

Trump won Iowa in 2016 en 2020

https://www.thedailybeast.com/rattle...s-trump-hater/

Die pollster mag zich echt zorgen gaan maken... Iowa stemt traditioneel Republikeins en Emerson heeft een poll die dichter bij de realiteit lijkt aan te sluiten: Trum staat er op +10 in een poll die afgenomen werd van 28-31 oktober.

Traditioneel heeft Des moines een foutenmarge van 2.0%.. en ze hebben in de voorbije 8 jaar in 86% van de gevallen te het percentage van de Democraten overschat..

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/rc.../single-state/

Vermoedelijk zitten ze met dit soort polls na de aankomende verkiezingen op een gemiddelde foutenmarge 3-4%