Stand van zaken in de raketaanvallen vanuit gaza op Israel

[Tamam]

Denken ? Jij?

[Pericles]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Tamam

Denken ? Jij?

Ja.
Precies beter dan jij want ik vind het niet nodig je te beledigen.
Je Jodenhaat is blijkbaar enorm, het vuur komt bijna uit uw neus.Zie maar dat je geen hersenbloeding krijgt.
Bij u is men al veroordeeld zonder proces.
Gelukkig zetelen er daar intelligente rechters in dat internationaal strafhof.
Maar die zijn omgekocht is het niet ?

[piazzolla]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pericles

Dat zal niet gaan.
Ze willen Israël vernietigen en de Joden uitroeien.
Ze blijven dus in hun zandbak.
Misschien nog honderden jaren , wie zal het zeggen.
Ondertussen wel flink doorkweken tot dat de ene daar op de andere zijne kop moet kakken.

honderden jaren ... meer dan waarschijnlijk niet, de oplossing zal in elk geval niet gemakkelijk zijn (tenzij je simplist bent en genocides goed zou keuren).

Wat mij betreft moet de geschiedenis zeker niet teruggedraaid worden en ligt een mogelijke oplossing in een 2 staten gebied met als grenzen, de grenzen van 1967. Beide partijen doen zeer grote toegevingen: Palestijnen verliezen hun recht op terugkeer in Israel (67 grenzen), hierbij erkennend dat ze (alle politieke partijen) geen aanspraak meer maken op israelisch grondgebied (67 grenzen) en de Israeli ontmantelen alle nederzettingen in de Palestijnse gebieden (67 grenzen) inclusief hunne muur gebouwd op Palestijns grondgebied, hierbij erkennend dat ze hun groot israel waanbeeld volledig opgeven.

U vraagt zich af hoelang men vluchteling moet blijven, ik zou in elk geval de binding van een volk met zijn grondgebied en identiteit (al zijn het maar boerkes) zeker niet te licht opnemen en ontkoppeling van het oorspronkelijk land/gebied kan vele generaties duren ... als je alleen maar kijkt hoelang hier in Belgie de francophone kolonisatiepolitiek van vlaanderen al ettelijke decennia voor 'beroering' zorgt, en dan gaat het hier niet over een vreemde invasiemacht ...
Trouwens de argumentatie in discussies met belgicisten tav vlaanderen en vlaamse identeit (regio vlaanderen? dat bestaat niet,alleen W en O Vlaanderen bestaan, vlaamse taal ? bestaat niet verzameling dialecten die niemand begrijpt, Vlaamse identiteit ? wat moet dat zijn, een hoop ongeletterde boerkes, enz .... ) gelijkt zeer goed op argumentatie die pro zionisten gebruiken tav de palestijnen hun (oorspronkelijk) gebied en hun identiteit, maar dit terzijde

[Pericles]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door piazzolla

honderden jaren ... meer dan waarschijnlijk niet, de oplossing zal in elk geval niet gemakkelijk zijn (tenzij je simplist bent en genocides goed zou keuren).

Wat mij betreft moet de geschiedenis zeker niet teruggedraaid worden en ligt een mogelijke oplossing in een 2 staten gebied met als grenzen, de grenzen van 1967. Beide partijen doen zeer grote toegevingen: Palestijnen verliezen hun recht op terugkeer in Israel (67 grenzen), hierbij erkennend dat ze (alle politieke partijen) geen aanspraak meer maken op israelisch grondgebied (67 grenzen) en de Israeli ontmantelen alle nederzettingen in de Palestijnse gebieden (67 grenzen) inclusief hunne muur gebouwd op Palestijns grondgebied, hierbij erkennend dat ze hun groot israel waanbeeld volledig opgeven.

U vraagt zich af hoelang men vluchteling moet blijven, ik zou in elk geval de binding van een volk met zijn grondgebied en identiteit (al zijn het maar boerkes) zeker niet te licht opnemen en ontkoppeling van het oorspronkelijk land/gebied kan vele generaties duren ... als je alleen maar kijkt hoelang hier in Belgie de francophone kolonisatiepolitiek van vlaanderen al ettelijke decennia voor 'beroering' zorgt, en dan gaat het hier niet over een vreemde invasiemacht ...
Trouwens de argumentatie in discussies met belgicisten tav vlaanderen en vlaamse identeit gelijkt zeer goed op argumentatie die pro zionisten gebruiken tav de palestijnen en hun identiteit, maar dit terzijde

Luister . Militair kan Hamas nooit winnen van Israël. Israël smijt heel Gaza in 2 uur zo plat als Dresden als ze dat willen.
Beste tactiek: geweld afzweren , ontwapenen en gaan voor een twee staten oplossing.
Als Israël er dan niet op ingaat raken ze internationaal volledig geïsoleerd.
Maar nee : Hamas wil per se Israël vernietigen en de Joden uitroeien.
Tja.

[piazzolla]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pericles

Luister . Militair kan Hamas nooit winnen van Israël. Israël smijt heel Gaza in 2 uur zo plat als Dresden als ze dat willen.
Beste tactiek: geweld afzweren , ontwapenen en gaan voor een twee staten oplossing.
Als Israël er dan niet op ingaat raken ze internationaal volledig geïsoleerd.
Maar nee : Hamas wil per se Israël vernietigen en de Joden uitroeien.
Tja.

Neen, zowel Hamas als het zionistisch krapuul van Netanyahu moeten uit de vergelijking verdwijnen voor een 2 staten oplossing.

[Eppes]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Tamam

Nakba ´48, 750,0000 mensen die vermoord werden of moest vluchten "at gunpoint" volgens (israelische) historci

da´s theoretisch gezien een genocide.

ontken of weerleg met feiten, ben benieuwd !

Sorry,maar die mensen moesten op commando van Jordanië,Egypte,Syrië,S.Arabië,Irak stapje opzij zetten in kampen want die landen gingen de joden in zee verdrijven .En sindsdien zijn er problemen.
En wie zijn de schuldige?Israël zeker?
Nie me maai

[Pericles]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Eppes

Sorry,maar die mensen moesten op commando van Jordanië,Egypte,Syrië,S.Arabië,Irak stapje opzij zetten in kampen want die landen gingen de joden in zee verdrijven .En sindsdien zijn er problemen.
En wie zijn de schuldige?Israël zeker?
Nie me maai

De discussie wordt hier surrealistischer met de minuut.
Nu zijn volgens Tamam de rechters van het internationaal strafhof ook al zionisten.

[1207]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Eppes

Sorry,maar die mensen moesten op commando van

zoals reeds gezegd
voor die boeren wisten wat er aan de hand was werden ze al afgeslacht,
ze hadden niets met de buurlanden te maken (net zoals een Vaming niets met Polen of grieken te maken heeft (ook al zijn het 3 katholieke landen))

[Tamam]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pericles

De discussie wordt hier surrealistischer met de minuut.
Nu zijn volgens Tamam de rechters van het internationaal strafhof ook al zionisten.

leer in godsnaam eens lezen man. waar en wanneer zei ik dit ?

[Pericles]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Tamam

leer in godsnaam eens lezen man. waar en wanneer zei ik dit ?

Het zijn volgens jou in ieder geval mensen die onder druk gezet kunnen worden om een oordeel in het voordeel van de zionisten te vellen , hetzij op de zitting, hetzij door de zaak te seponeren.

[Tamam]

wat een scheve conclusies om te trekken. dit ruikt naar jodenhaat!

[Pericles]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Tamam

wat een scheve conclusies om te trekken. dit ruikt naar jodenhaat!

Die joden toch hé.
Via de VS trekken ze nu ook al aan de touwtjes bij het Internationaal Gerechtshof.

Ik zeg het u. Het is verdorie een complot.

[Eppes]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door 1207

zoals reeds gezegd
voor die boeren wisten wat er aan de hand was werden ze al afgeslacht,
ze hadden niets met de buurlanden te maken (net zoals een Vaming niets met Polen of grieken te maken heeft (ook al zijn het 3 katholieke landen))

1948 Vluchtelingenprobleem. Door berichten in de Arabische media over wreedheden van de Joden vluchtten 600.000 Arabieren. Zeventig procent van deze Arabische vluchtelingen heeft nog nooit een Israelische soldaat gezien.

De reden van de vlucht waren oproepen van de Arabische leiders, zoals de Iraakse premier Nuri Said: “We zullen het land verpletteren met onze kanonnen en alle mogelijke schuilplaatsen van de Joden vernietigen. De Arabieren moeten hun vrouwen en kinderen daarom naar veilige gebieden brengen tot na de gevechten.”

In slechts een dorp – Lydda – werden de Arabieren door Israelische soldaten verdreven (boek ‘Palestine betrayed’ uit 2010), alle andere Arabische vluchtelingen deden dat uit eigen beweging.

De Joden probeerden juist de Arabieren te bewegen om te blijven. De Britse politiecommandant van Haifa schreef in zijn rapport: “De Joden doen er alles aan om de Arabische bevolking te overtuigen om te blijven.”

[geertvdb]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Pericles

Het zijn volgens jou in ieder geval mensen die onder druk gezet kunnen worden om een oordeel in het voordeel van de zionisten te vellen , hetzij op de zitting, hetzij door de zaak te seponeren.

De kwaliteit van uw argumenten is belabberd, en dan nog mensen woorden in de mond leggen. Als dat uw manier van argumenteren is, Proficiat!

[1207]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Eppes

De Joden probeerden juist de Arabieren te bewegen om te blijven. De Britse politiecommandant van Haifa schreef in zijn rapport: “De Joden doen er alles aan om de Arabische bevolking te overtuigen om te blijven.”

Dus de ene dag deden de joden er alles aan om de Palestijnen te doen blijven en 2 maanden later mochten de Palestijnen niet meer terug waardoor ze al 60j opgesloten zitten
zijde gij zo stom of doede gij alsof?

men heeft de aanvallen in 1948 gebruikt om het grondgebied etnisch, op basis van religie, te zuiveren. Net zoals de Nazis het in duitsland dede toen amper 5j eerder.

interessant dat ge internationaal volkeren, -burger- en mensenrecht negeert en dus ook het internationaal erkende terugkeerrecht ten tijde van vrede.

[Eppes]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door 1207

Dus de ene dag deden de joden er alles aan om de Palestijnen te doen blijven en 2 maanden later mochten de Palestijnen niet meer terug waardoor ze al 60j opgesloten zitten
zijde gij zo stom of doede gij alsof?

men heeft de aanvallen in 1948 gebruikt om het grondgebied etnisch, op basis van religie, te zuiveren. Net zoals de Nazis het in duitsland dede toen amper 5j eerder.

interessant dat ge internationaal volkeren, -burger- en mensenrecht negeert en dus ook het internationaal erkende terugkeerrecht ten tijde van vrede.

S'il vous plait,het zijn de Jordaniërs die de arabische vluchtelingen(nu Palestijnen genoemd) met duizentallen vermoord hebben en Transjordanië geannexeerd ,wat later Westbank geworden is.
Please herschrijf de geschiedenis niet!

[1207]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Eppes

S'il vous plait,

gewoon een simpele vraag

als jouw bewering klopt dat de joden er alles aan gedaan hebben om de Palestijnen te laten blijven, waarom weigeren ze dan diezelfde Palestijnen nu terug te keren?

geloof jij je eigen onzin nu echt?
indien ja ben je een debiel, indien neen ben je toch gewoon een leugenaar

[Tamam]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Eppes

S'il vous plait,het zijn de Jordaniërs die de arabische vluchtelingen(nu Palestijnen genoemd) met duizentallen vermoord hebben en Transjordanië geannexeerd ,wat later Westbank geworden is.
Please herschrijf de geschiedenis niet!

Subiet is het Kind David Hotel niet door onze vrienden van Irgun gebombardeerd maar ook door Jordaniërs

(als slachtoffers buiten de Palestijnen u misschien iets doen in die periode? want blijkbaar lukt het niet , of geeft u niet toe, dat Palestijnen systematisch vermoord of verjaagd werden bij de oprichting van Israël..niet door f*cking Jordanië)

[Eppes]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Tamam

Subiet is het Kind David Hotel niet door onze vrienden van Irgun gebombardeerd maar ook door Jordaniërs

(als slachtoffers buiten de Palestijnen u misschien iets doen in die periode? want blijkbaar lukt het niet , of geeft u niet toe, dat Palestijnen systematisch vermoord of verjaagd werden bij de oprichting van Israël..niet door f*cking Jordanië)

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black...mber_in_Jordan

Black September in Jordan
This article is about the events surrounding September 1970 in Jordan. For the organization, see Black September (group).
This page has some issues
Black September in Jordan
أيلول الأسود
Part of Cold War
Date 1970–1971
Location Jordan
Result Jordanian military victory
The Cairo Agreement
PLO driven out to Lebanon
Belligerents
PLO
Syria
Supported by:
Soviet Union Jordan
Supported by:
Pakistan
United States
Commanders and leaders
Yasser Arafat
Khalil al-Wazir
Abu Ali Iyad
George Habash
Hafez al-Assad King Hussein
Field Marshal Habis al-Majali
General Zaid ibn Shaker
Brigadier Zia-ul-Haq
Strength
30,000 - 40,000[1]
10,000[2] 74,000
Casualties and losses
3,400–20,000 Palestinians killed[3][4]
600+ Syrians killed[1] 82 killed
The term Black September (Arabic: أيلول الأسود‎; aylūl al-aswad) refers to the Jordanians Civil War that began in September 1970 and ended in July of 1971. The conflict was fought between the two major components of the Jordanian population, the Palestinians represented by the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) under the leadership of Yasser Arafat and the native Jordanians represented by the Jordanian Armed Forces under the leadership of King Hussein.[5] At its core the civil war sought to determine if Jordan would be ruled by the Palestine Liberation Organisation or the Hashemite Monarchy.[6] The war resulted in the deaths of thousands of people, the vast majority Palestinian.[3] Armed conflict ended with the expulsion of the PLO leadership and thousands of Palestinian fighters to Lebanon.

Contents
Background
Palestinians in Jordan
Battle of Karameh
Seven-point agreement
Ten-point edict
Black September 1970
Aircraft hijackings
Jordanian army attacks
Syrian intervention attempt
U.S. and U.S.S.R. involvement
Hussein-Arafat Cairo agreement
Casualties
After September 1970
Aftermath and regional consequences
See also
References
Further reading
External links
BackgroundEdit

Palestinians in Jordan
The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine in late 1947 led to civil war, the end of Mandatory Palestine, and the Israeli Declaration of Independence on 14 May 1948. With nationhood, the ongoing civil war was transformed into a state conflict between Israel and the Arab states. Egypt, Jordan and Syria, together with expeditionary forces from Iraq, invaded Palestine. They took control of the Arab areas, and immediately attacked Israeli forces and several Jewish settlements. The fighting was halted with the UN-mediated 1949 Armistice Agreements, but the remaining Palestinian territories came under the control of Egypt and Transjordan. In 1949, Transjordan officially changed its name to Jordan; in 1950, it annexed the West Bank of the Jordan River, and brought Palestinian representation into the government.

Only one third of the population consisted of native Jordanians, which meant that the Jordanians had become a ruling minority over a Palestinian majority. This proved to be a mercurial element in internal Jordanian politics, and played a critical role in the political opposition. The West Bank had become the center of the national and territorial aspects of the Palestinian problem, which was the key issue of Jordan's domestic and foreign policy. According to King Hussein, the Palestinian problem spelled "life or death" for Jordan, and would remain the country's overriding national security issue.[7]

King Hussein feared an independent West Bank under PLO administration would threaten the autonomy of his Hashemite kingdom.[8][9] The Palestinian factions were supported variously by many Arab regimes, most notably Egypt's president Gamal Abdel Nasser, who gave political support; and Saudi Arabia, which gave financial support.[citation needed] The Palestinian nationalist organization Fatah started organizing attacks against Israel in January 1965, and Israel was subject to repeated cross-border attacks by Palestinian fedayeen; these often drew reprisals.[10] The Samu Incident was one such reprisal. Jordan had long maintained secret contacts with Israel concerning peace and security along their border. However, due to internal splits within the Jordanian government and population, many of King Hussein's orders to stop these raids were not obeyed, and some Jordanian commanders along the Israeli-Jordanian border were lending passive assistance to the Palestinian raids.[11]

In June 1967, Israel captured the West Bank from Jordan during the Six-Day War.

Battle of Karameh
Main article: Battle of Karameh
On 21 March 1968, Israel Defense Forces units entered Jordan[12] and destroyed a PLO base camp in the village of Karameh. The PLO suffered some 200 killed and another 150 taken prisoner. 40 Jordanian soldiers were also killed. Israeli casualties stood at 28 killed and 69 wounded.[13] The Karameh operation highlighted the vulnerability of bases close to the Jordan River, so the PLO moved their bases farther into the mountains, which placed additional strains on their operations.[14] Further Israeli attacks targeted Palestinian militants residing among the Jordanian civilian population, giving rise to friction between Jordanians and guerrillas.[15]

Seven-point agreement
In Palestinian enclaves and refugee camps in Jordan, the Jordanian Police and army were losing their authority. Uniformed PLO militants openly carried weapons, set up checkpoints, and attempted to extort "taxes". During the November 1968 negotiations, a seven-point agreement was reached between King Hussein and Palestinian organizations:

Members of these organizations were forbidden from walking around cities armed and in uniform
They were forbidden to stop and search civilian vehicles
They were forbidden from competing with the Jordanian Army for recruits
They were required to carry Jordanian identity papers
Their vehicles were required to bear Jordanian license plates
Crimes committed by members of the Palestinian organizations would be investigated by the Jordanian authorities
Disputes between the Palestinian organizations and the government would be settled by a joint council of representatives of the king and of the PLO.
The PLO did not live up to the agreement, and instead which is why came to be seen more and more as a state within a state in Jordan. Discipline in the Palestinian militias was often poor, and there was no central power to control the different groups. Many of them were recently formed, and new groups sprang up spontaneously after the Karameh battle, or were set up by foreign governments such as Syria and Iraq. This created a bewildering scene of groups rapidly spawning, merging, and splintering, often trying to outdo each other in radicalism to attract recruits. Some left-wing Palestininan movements, such as the PFLP and the DFLP, began to openly question the legitimacy of the Jordanian monarchy and call for its overthrow, while at the same time stirring up conservative and religious feelings with provocative anti-religious statements and actions. In other cases, illustrating the lack of discipline on the fringes of the movement, fedayeen activity became a cover for gangsterism, with theft of vehicles or extortion of local merchants claimed as 'confiscation for the war effort' or 'donations to the cause'. The largest Palestinian faction, Arafat's Fatah, preached non-involvement in Jordanian affairs, but not all members lived up to this slogan. Fatah also protected smaller movements from being singled out for retaliation by the government by threatening to stand with them in any armed clashes. Palestinians claimed there were numerous agents provocateurs from Jordanian or other security services present among the fedayeen, deliberately trying to upset political relations and provoke justification for a crackdown.

Between mid-1968 and the end of 1969, no fewer than five hundred violent clashes occurred between the Palestinian guerrillas and Jordanian security forces.[citation needed] There were frequent kidnappings and acts of violence against civilians. Chief of the Jordanian Royal Court (and subsequently a Prime Minister) Zaid al-Rifai claimed that in one extreme instance, "the fedayeen killed a soldier, beheaded him, and played football with his head in the area where he used to live".[16]

Militarily, the PLO continued attacking Israel from Jordanian territory with little regard for Jordanian authority or security. Heavy Israeli reprisals resulted in both Palestinian and Jordanian casualties, and the threat of larger-scale Israeli invasion loomed large.

Ten-point edict
Play media
Newsreel about King Hussein's challenges in 1970
In February 1970, King Hussein visited Egyptian president Nasser and American president Nixon. Upon his return, he published a ten-point edict restricting activities of the Palestinian organizations. On 11 February, fighting broke out between Jordanian security forces and Palestinian groups in the streets of Amman, resulting in about 300 deaths. Hoping to prevent this violence spinning out of control, Hussein announced that "We are all fedayeen" and fired the interior minister, who was hostile toward the Palestinians.

Armed Palestinians set up a parallel system of visa controls, customs checks, and checkpoints in Jordanian cities, adding more tensions to an already polarized Jordanian society and army. Between February and June 1970, about a thousand lives were lost in Jordan due to the conflict.

In July, Egypt and Jordan accepted the U.S.-backed Rogers Plan, which called for a cease fire in the War of Attrition between Egypt and Israel, and for Israel's negotiated withdrawal from territories occupied in 1967. In accordance with United Nations Security Council Resolution 242, it called for the West Bank to come under King Hussein's authority — and that was unacceptable to the more radical organizations. The PLO, George Habash's Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), and Naif Hawatmeh's Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP) opposed the plan, and heavily criticized Nasser for agreeing to it. There were claims the plan had been a trap conceived to destroy the PLO's relations with Nasser.[17] It was never implemented.

With Nasser alienated, King Hussein began his military campaign against the PLO, while more radical Palestinian organizations became determined to undermine Hussein's pro-Western regime.

Black September 1970Edit

Aircraft hijackings
Main article: Dawson's Field hijackings
On 1 September 1970, there were several failed attempts to assassinate the king. On 7 September, in the series of Dawson's Field hijackings, three planes were hijacked by the PFLP: SwissAir and TWA jets that were landed in Jordan's Azraq area, and a Pan Am jet was flown to Cairo. On September 9, a BOAC flight from Bahrain was hijacked to Zarqa. The PFLP announced that the hijackings were intended "to bring special attention to the Palestinian problem". After all hostages were removed, the planes were dramatically blown up in front of TV cameras. Directly confronting and angering the King[citation needed], the rebels declared the Irbid area a "liberated region."[citation needed]

Jordanian army attacks
On 15 September, King Hussein appointed Field Marshal Habis al Majali commander in chief of the armed forces and declared martial law. The head of a Pakistani training mission to Jordan, Brigadier Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq (later Chief of Army Staff and President of Pakistan), played a key role in planning the offensives.[18] The next day, Jordanian tanks of the 60th Armored Brigade attacked the headquarters of Palestinian organizations in Amman; the army also attacked camps in Irbid, Salt, Sweileh, Baq'aa, Wehdat and Zarqa. However, the Jordanians could not devote all their attention to the Palestinians. The 3rd Armoured Division of the Iraqi Army had remained in Jordan after the 1967 war. The Iraqi regime sympathised with the Palestinians, and it was unclear whether the division would intervene on behalf of the Palestinians. Thus the 99th Brigade of the Jordanian 3rd Armoured Division had to be retained to watch the Iraqi division. Furthermore, the 40th Armored Brigade, 2nd infantry division, and other supporting units positioned in northern Jordan could not devote all their efforts to the PLO due to concerns of Syrian invasion.[19] Finally, political and economic pressure on Jordan by Arab leaders who sympathized with the PLO limited the success of this first offensive. Nevertheless, the Jordanian army regained control of key cities and intersections in the country before accepting the ceasefire agreement brokered by Egypt's Nasser on the 27th of September.[20] By late November, the Jordanians had regrouped and were ready to resume their campaign to expel the PLO. The King placed Brig. Gen. Zid bin Shaker in charge of the operation. Under his command, the Jordanians conducted a systematic and meticulous campaign against the PLO. First, the army regained control of all major cities with PLO presence. Second, the army forced the PLO into the mountains of Ajloun and Jarash. Finally, the army besieged the PLO in the mountains, and between fighting and surrenders the PLO was completely eradicated.[21]

Arafat later claimed that the Jordanian army killed between 10,000 and 25,000 Palestinians, although more conservative estimates put the number between 1,000 and 2,000.[22][23]

Hostage David Raab described the initial military actions in Black September this way:

"We were in the middle of the shelling since Ashrafiyeh was among the Jordanian Army's primary targets. Electricity was cut off, and again we had little food or water. Friday afternoon, we heard the metal tracks of a tank clanking on the pavement. We were quickly herded into one room, and the guerrillas threw open the doors to make the building appear abandoned so it wouldn't attract fire. Suddenly, the shelling stopped."
The armored troops were inefficient in narrow city streets and thus the Jordanian army conducted house to house sweeps for Palestinian fighters and became immersed in heavy urban warfare with the Palestinian fighters.

Amman experienced the heaviest fighting in the Black September uprising. Syrian tanks rolled across the Yarmouk River into northern Jordan and began shelling Amman and other northern urban areas. Outdated missiles fired by the PLO struck Amman for more than a week. Jordanian infantry pushed the Palestinian Fedayeen out of Amman after weeks of bitter fighting.

Syrian intervention attempt
On September 18, during the time of turmoil, Syria tried to intervene on behalf of the Palestinian guerrillas. President Hafez al-Assad told his biographer, Patrick Seale, that Syria's intervention was only to protect the Palestinians from a massacre. The Syrians sent in armored forces equivalent to a brigade, with tanks, some of them allegedly hastily rebranded from the regular Syrian army for the purpose. Other Syrian units were the 5th Infantry Division (with the 88th and 91st Tank Brigades and the 67th Mechanised Brigade with over 200 T-55 tanks) and Commandos. They were under the command of the Palestine Liberation Army's (PLA) Syrian branch, whose headquarters were located in Damascus, and which was controlled by the government. They were met by the 40th Armored Brigade of the Jordanian Army. The Syrian Air Force, under orders of Assad, never entered the battle. This has been variously attributed to power struggles within the Syrian Baathist government (pitting Assad against Salah Jadid), and to the threat of Israeli military intervention.

As King Hussein dealt with threats by both Palestinian refugees in his country and invading Syrian forces, the king asked "the United States and Great Britain to intervene in the war in Jordan, asking the United States, in fact, to attack Syria, and some transcripts of diplomatic communiques show that Hussein requested Israeli intervention against Syria." Timothy Naftali said: "Syria had invaded Jordan and the Jordanian king, facing what he felt was a military rout, said please help us in any way possible."[24]

A telegram indicates that Hussein himself called a U.S. official at 3 a.m. to ask for American or British help. "Situation deteriorating dangerously following Syrian massive invasion...", the document said. "I request immediate physical intervention both land and air... to safeguard sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence of Jordan. Immediate air strikes on invading forces from any quarter plus air cover are imperative."[24]

On 21 September the Syrian 5th Division broke through the defenses of the Jordanian 40th Armoured Brigade, and pushed it back off the ar-Ramtha crossroads. On 22 September, the Royal Jordanian Air Force began attacking Syrian forces, which were badly battered as a result. The constant airstrikes broke the will of the Syrian force, and on the late afternoon of 22 September, the 5th Division began to retreat.[25]

Whatever the case, the swift Syrian withdrawal was a severe blow to Palestinian hopes. Jordanian armored forces steadily pounded their headquarters in Amman, and threatened to break them in other regions of the kingdom as well. The Palestinians agreed to a cease-fire. Hussein and Arafat attended the meeting of leaders of Arab countries in Cairo, where Arafat won a diplomatic victory. On September 27, Hussein was forced to sign an agreement which preserved the right of the Palestinian organizations to operate in Jordan. For Jordan, it was humiliating that the agreement treated both sides to the conflict as equals.

U.S. and U.S.S.R. involvement
The U.S. Navy's 6th Fleet was positioned off the coast of Israel, near Jordan. At the beginning of September, Nixon sent an additional carrier task force and the Marine assault ship USS Guam to supplement the 6th Fleet. Two Royal Navy aircraft carriers arrived in the vicinity of Malta as well. By 19–20 September, the U.S. Navy had concentrated a powerful force in the Eastern Mediterranean. Its official mission was to protect American interests in the region and to respond to the capture of about 50 German, British, and U.S. citizens in Jordan by Palestinian forces.

The Soviets asserted that the goal of the U.S. deployment was to take control of the West Bank of the Jordan river in support of an upcoming Israel incursion into the neighboring territories of Syria, Jordan and Lebanon. To protect Soviet interests in the area and to assist Syria, the 5th Mediterranean Squadron of the Soviet Navy was increased to about twenty surface warships and six submarines. By mutual agreement with Syria, Soviet landing troops were ordered to respond to the expected U.S. landing and assist in demarcation of Syrian national boundaries with Israel.

On 19–20 September, a particularly busy time of confrontation, U.S. landing ships entered Haifa's outer harbour and prepared to disembark U.S. Marines, who stood on deck in full gear, ready to load into helicopters. However, after the Soviet landing ships ran for Tartus, preparations for disembarcation were rolled back.

The 82nd Airborne had been alerted on 15 September. On 19 September, they were loaded into C-141s. They were to drop into the Amman Airport, and secure and hold it for follow-up units. Within minutes after the first C-141s became airborne the mission was aborted and all returned to Pope AFB/Fort Bragg.

U.S. Forces remained on alert in the area throughout September and October. Tensions gradually decreased once it became clear, around 23–24 September, that the Syrian drive into Jordan had failed.[26]

Hussein-Arafat Cairo agreement

Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser brokering a ceasefire between Yasser Arafat of the PLO (left) and King Hussein of Jordan (right) at the emergency Arab League summit in Cairo on 27 September 1970.
Meanwhile, both Hussein and Arafat attended the emergency meeting of leaders of Arab countries in Cairo and on September 27, Hussein signed an agreement that treated both sides as equals and acknowledged the right of the Palestinian organizations to operate in Jordan, but which required them to leave the cities and stay in the fronts.

On September 28, Nasser died of a sudden heart attack. As a result the PLO lost its protection, and King Hussein continued the attack.

Casualties
See also: Palestinian casualties of war
Estimates of the number of the people killed in the ten days of Black September range from three thousand to more than five thousand, although exact numbers are unknown. The Palestinian death toll in 11 days of fighting was estimated by Jordan at 3,400, while Palestinian sources often cite the number 5,000, mainly civilians, killed. Arafat at some point claimed that 10,000 had been killed.[27][28] The Western reporters were concentrated at the Intercontinental Hotel, away from the action.[citation needed] Nasser's state-controlled Voice of the Arabs from Cairo reported genocide. One cameraman was shot dead in the Intercontinental Hotel, Jordanian tanks fired straight through the hotel and there was a heavy machine gun firing from the roof of the hotel.

After September 1970
On October 31, 1970, Yasser Arafat signed a five-point agreement, which was similar to that signed in November 1968, and was designed to return control of the country exclusively to King Hussein. The agreement stated that members of the Palestinian organizations were expected to honor Jordanian laws, instructed them to dismantle their bases, and forbade them to walk around armed and in uniform in the cities and villages.

Had the Palestinians honored that agreement, Hussein would have had difficulties in continuing to act against them. But the PFLP and the DFLP – the two organizations to the left of Arafat – refused to accept its conditions. They called on their members to ignore the Jordanian government, and at a meeting of the Palestinian National Council, they were responsible for prompting the acceptance of the proposal that Transjordan would be part of the Palestinian state to be established in the future.

The open defiance caused renewed conflict between the Palestinians and the Jordanian army, whose commanders were in any case eager to finish the work they had begun in September. At the beginning of November 1970, incidents of fighting erupted between members of the PFLP and DFLP and the Jordanian security forces. On November 9, Jordanian prime minister Wasfi al-Tal announced that in accordance with the agreement signed a month earlier, the authorities would no longer allow the Palestinians to walk around with weapons or to store explosives. The announcement was not honored, and the security forces received instructions to confiscate the Palestinians' weapons.

Until January 1971, the Jordanian army heightened its control in all the central cities. At the beginning of that month, the Jordanian army began an attack against the Palestinian bases along the highway between Amman and Jerash to cut them off from the other cities and to take over the roads linking their strongholds. In response to the operation, the Palestinians agreed to hand over their weapons to the Jordanians. This agreement was not honored either.

Toward the end of March, after a Palestinian arms warehouse was discovered in Irbid, the Jordanian army placed a curfew on the city, arrested some of the Palestinian activists, and expelled others. The takeover of Irbid was completed at the beginning of April. Afterward, many senior members of the Palestinian organizations, who were aware of their weakness, began to withdraw from Amman as well.

Yet, despite the series of defeats, the Palestinian organizations did not give in. On June 5, the senior Palestinian organizations, including Yasser Arafat's Fatah, came out with a declaration on Radio Baghdad in which they called for the deposition of King Hussein. The reason they gave for this was that deposing him was the only way to prevent the signing of "a peace agreement between Israel and Jordan."

In mid-June 1971, after three tense months during which the sides made efforts to fortify their positions by political means, Jordan embarked on the final campaign against the Palestinians. The Jordanian army, which for almost 10 months had been pushing the Palestinian organizations out of the major cities, used large forces to expel them from the mountainous regions of the cities of Jerash and Ajlun, in the north of the kingdom, where about 3,000 armed Palestinians were located.

The members of Fatah declared that they preferred to die in battle rather than surrender to the Jordanian dictates. After four days of battle, the Jordanian army overcame the last pockets of resistance. King Hussein held a press conference and declared that there was now "absolute quiet" in the kingdom. Seventy-two Palestinians fled to the West Bank and surrendered to IDF soldiers. The commander of Fatah's forces in northern Jordan, Abu Ali Iyad, was captured and killed by the Jordanian Army.[29]

The Palestinian rout was complete. King Hussein had removed the threat to his throne, and had strengthened his control over the kingdom.

Aftermath and regional consequencesEdit

Palestinians: The group Black September was established by Fatah members in 1971 to serve as a terrorist organization for revenge operations and international strikes after the September events. On November 28, 1971, in Cairo, four of its members assassinated Wasfi al-Tal.[30] The group would go on to perform other strikes against Jordan, and against Israeli and Western citizens and property outside of the Middle East, such as the Munich massacre in 1972. The Black September Organization was later disbanded in 1973–1974 as the PLO sought to exploit the October War of 1973 and pursue a diplomatic strategy. Fatah has always publicly denied its responsibility for Black September operations, but by the 2000s (decade), numerous high-ranking Fatah and Black September activists openly acknowledge the relationship.[citation needed] Only a few years later, in 1974, the Arab League (and then the United Nations) would recognize the PLO as the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people.

Lebanon: In the September fighting, the PLO lost its main base of operations. Fighters were driven to Southern Lebanon to regroup. The enlarged PLO presence in Lebanon and the intensification of fighting on the Israeli-Lebanese border stirred up internal unrest in Lebanon, where the PLO fighters added dramatically to the weight of the Lebanese National Movement, a coalition of Muslims, Arab nationalists and leftists who opposed the rightist, Maronite-dominated government. These developments helped precipitate the Lebanon Civil War, in which the PLO would be engrossed from 1975 until well after the mid-1980s.

Jordan: King Hussein of Jordan was maligned throughout the Arab world for having attacked the Palestinian resistance, and although he had now averted the physical threat to his throne, his legitimacy had suffered a crippling blow among Palestinian refugees and on the regional Arab scene.

Syria: The September events set alight the smouldering conflict between Hafez al-Assad and Salah Jadid in Syria. This culminated in Assad's Corrective Movement of November 1970, in which he deposed Jadid and seized power, after Jadid had tried to fire him over the Black September debacle and other issues.

Pakistan: According to Major General Aboobaker Osman Mitha, it was General Gul Hasan in 1971 who saved then Brigadier General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq from being court martialed. General Yahya Khan received a signal from Major General Nawazish, the head of the Pakistan military mission in Amman, asking that Brigadier Zia-ul-Haq be court martialled for disobeying GHQ orders by commanding a Jordanian armoured division against the Palestinians, as part of an action in which thousands were killed. Gul Hasan's intercession on Zia-ul-Haq's behalf saved the Brigadier's career, and allowed Brigadier Zia-ul-Haq to advance his own military career. This culminated in his political appointment as Chief of Staff of the Pakistan Army, and his subsequent coup against Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto.

Zia's performance as a military leader for Jordan was part of what convinced President Zulfikar Ali Bhutto to promote him to Chief of Army Staff in 1976. Haq later staged a coup d'état, executed Bhutto, and was instrumental in supporting aided by the United States; the most extremist mujahideen during the Soviet Afghan war, like Gulbuddin Hekmatyar.[31][32]

[Eppes]

Estimates of the number of the people killed in the ten days of Black September range from three thousand to more than five thousand, although exact numbers are unknown. The Palestinian death toll in 11 days of fighting was estimated by Jordan at 3,400, while Palestinian sources often cite the number 5,000, mainly civilians, killed. Arafat at some point claimed that 10,000 had been killed.[27][28