COP16 AR5 Aerosols, geo-engineering, wolken-behandeling.Mr.Pachauri IPPC !

[Descartes Jr]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Another Jack

Neen, jij?

Weerkundigen versluieren vliegtuigsmog

"Kijk, dat zijn vliegtuigstrepen.
Die waren vanochtend goed te zien.
Dat leverde prachtige plaatjes op!""

[Another Jack]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Descartes Jr

Weerkundigen versluieren vliegtuigsmog

"Kijk, dat zijn vliegtuigstrepen.
Die waren vanochtend goed te zien.
Dat leverde prachtige plaatjes op!""

Ik denk niet dat de discussie over vliegtuigstrepen gaat.

[zonbron]

Spirit is een van de vele vooraanstaande bedrijven in de luchtvaartindustrie.
Spirit AeroSystems

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

Sluierbewolking als gevolg van de vliegstuigstrepen aka persisting contrails zijn uiterst 'cool' en zeker op een verjaardag.

Die idyllische 'sluierwolken' van Marjon de Hond zijn in werkelijkheid de bevroren waterdamp en andere uitlaatgassen en fijnstof (fungerend als condensatiekernen) uit de straalmotoren van vliegtuigen. Luchtvaart- of vliegtuigsmog, dus. Aangezien de meteorologie is geprivatiseerd, en commerciële weerbedrijven onderhevig zijn aan de tucht van de markt, moet het weerbericht van de publieke omroep voldoen aan de wensen van sponsors, opdrachtgevers en klanten. De belangen van de luchtvaart- en reisindustrie wegen zwaarder dan de taak van de publieke omroep om betrouwbare informatie te verschaffen. Dit gaat al vele jaren zo en iedereen weet ervan. Deze bewuste misleiding is een geaccepteerde vorm van corruptie.

Bron

[Descartes Jr]

Die rechtse streep lijkt mij die van Al Gore's jet.

O ja, nog dit : Vlaamse renner wint eiland bij de Noordpool

Hij heeft zich in de spurt gesmeten.
voor een eiland met een bergketen.
Al Gore heeft er vast
met keet en bombast
verhoogde CO2 gemeten.

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

Opmerkelijk, bovenstaande foto is een photoshop van volgend beeldmateriaal... (wie zoekt die vindt )



_{Airlines vow to halve carbon emissions by 2050
Exclusive: Industry will offer cut at climate change summit to avoid tougher action. Airlines, airports and aircraft companies to agree to cut 50% below 2005 levels by 2050. (Photograph: Corbis). The aviation industry will tomorrow make a dramatic pledge to slash carbon dioxide emissions in half by 2050 in a move that will force up air fares and spark a green technology race among aircraft manufacturers.}

Genomen uit een artikel van The Guardian :

The Guardian - Airlines vow to halve carbon emissions by 2050
21 september 2009 - Exclusive: Industry will offer cut at climate change summit to avoid tougher action

[zonbron]

FT - Tracking the aviation emissions row

1999: The IPCC report is published and finds that the effects of some types of aircraft emissions, such as carbon dioxide, are well known but other issues, such as the impact of contrails and aerosols on cirrus clouds, remain less understood.

...


March 2012: Airbus and six large European airlines urge Brussels to delay the inclusion of aviation in the scheme, claiming that China has put billions of dollars worth of aircraft orders on hold as a result of the row.

[zonbron]

Persisting contrails en sluierwolken (cirrusbewolking), satellietfoto's...












Lees ook : Nature - Atmospheric science: Seeing through contrails

[zonbron]

TalkTalk is van Carphone Warehouse.

Flight Tracker demo from The Carphone Warehouse

Volgende afbeelding werd genomen uit :
http://web.archive.org/web/201206280...alktalk.co.uk/

[Scherven A. Mok]

de deken van budyko

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Scherven A. Mok

de deken van budyko

Best mogelijk.

Check Marine Cloud Whitening.

[zonbron]

De grootse CO2-leugens nogmaals gedescrediteerd.

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Descartes Jr

Deugddoende stilte aan het front.

"A l'ouest, rien de nouveau" placht Erich Remarque te zeggen : "Messieurs, arrêtons les hostilités : la guerre climatique s'est terminée !"

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

Ze werden betrapt... opnieuw.

Daily Mail - World's top climate scientists told to 'cover up' the fact that the Earth's temperature hasn't risen for the last 15 years
19 september 2013 - A leaked copy of the United Nations report, compiled by hundreds of scientists, shows politicians in Belgium, Germany, Hungary and the United States have raised concerns about the final draft.

• Leaked United Nations report reveals the world's temperature hasn't risen for the last 15 years
• Politicians have raised concerns about the final draft
• Fears that the findings will encourage deniers of man-made climate change

The UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has changed its tune after issuing stern warnings about climate change for years

Scientists working on the most authoritative study on climate change were urged to cover up the fact that the world’s temperature hasn’t risen for the last 15 years, it is claimed.

A leaked copy of a United Nations report, compiled by hundreds of scientists, shows politicians in Belgium, Germany, Hungary and the United States raised concerns about the final draft.

Published next week, it is expected to address the fact that 1998 was the hottest year on record and world temperatures have not yet exceeded it, which scientists have so far struggled to explain.

The report is the result of six years’ work by UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which is seen as the world authority on the extent of climate change and what is causing it – on which governments including Britain’s base their green policies.

But leaked documents seen by the Associated Press, yesterday revealed deep concerns among politicians about a lack of global warming over the past few years.

Germany called for the references to the slowdown in warming to be deleted, saying looking at a time span of just 10 or 15 years was ‘misleading’ and they should focus on decades or centuries.
The UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has changed its tune after issuing stern warnings about climate change for years


Hungary worried the report would provide ammunition for deniers of man-made climate change.

Belgium objected to using 1998 as a starting year for statistics, as it was exceptionally warm and makes the graph look flat - and suggested using 1999 or 2000 instead to give a more upward-pointing curve.

The United States delegation even weighed in, urging the authors of the report to explain away the lack of warming using the ‘leading hypothesis’ among scientists that the lower warming is down to more heat being absorbed by the ocean – which has got hotter.

The last IPCC ‘assessment report’ was published in 2007 and has been the subject of huge controversy after it had to correct the embarrassing claim that the Himalayas would melt by 2035.

It was then engulfed in the ‘Climategate’ scandal surrounding leaked emails allegedly showing scientists involved in it trying to manipulate their data to make it look more convincing – although several inquiries found no wrongdoing.

The latest report, which runs to 2,000 pages, will be shown to representatives from all 195 governments next week at a meeting in Stockholm, who can discuss alterations they want to make.

But since it was issued to governments in June, they have raised hundreds of objections about the 20-page summary for policymakers, which sums up the findings of the scientists.

What it says will inform renewable energy policies and how much consumers and businesses will pay for them.

The report is expected to say the rate of warming between 1998 and 2012 was about half of the average rate since 1951 – and put this down to natural variations such as the El Nino and La Nina ocean cycles and the cooling effects of volcanoes.

A German climate scientist - Stefan Rahmstorf, who reviewed the chapter on sea levels - yesterday admitted it was possible the report’s authors were feeling under pressure to address the slowdown in warming due to the ‘public debate’ around the issue.

The draft report, which is not new research but a synthesis of all the work being done by scientists around the world, is likely to be highly disputed at the three-day meeting.

It will make the case that humans are causing global warming with carbon emissions even more strongly upgrading it from ‘very likely’ in 2007 to ‘extremely likely’ it is manmade.

But scientists are under pressure to explain why the warming has not exceeded 1998 levels although the decade 2000-2010 was the hottest on record.

Alden Meyer, of the Union of Concerned Scientists based in Washington, said yesterday: ‘I think to not address it would be a problem because then you basically have the denialists saying: ‘Look the IPCC is silent on this issue.’

Jonathan Lynn, a spokesman for the IPCC said yesterday: ‘This is the culmination of four years’ work by hundreds of scientists, where governments get a chance to ensure the summary for policymakers is clear and concise in a dialogue with the scientists who wrote it, and have the opportunity to raise any topics they think should be highlighted.’

De AGW-paniek is 100% politiek gesjoemel.

[atmosphere]

Bovenstaande artikel zegt helemaal niet dat er van global warming geen sprake is.

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door atmosphere

Bovenstaande artikel zegt helemaal niet dat er van global warming geen sprake is.

Kronkel kronkel...

Maak ervan wat U wilt.

[Descartes Jr]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door atmosphere

Bovenstaande artikel zegt helemaal niet dat er van global warming geen sprake is.

Effe aanstippen dat

- de zuidpool zich ongemeen sterk aan het uitbreiden is;
- de noordpool veel minder gesmolten is dan voorspeld, waarbij hij zich aan één zijde integendeel verder uitbreidt dan dat hij inkrimpt aan de andere zijde;
- de gemiddelde aardtemperatuur sedert 1998 (15 jaar) niet meer verder steeg;
- het er meer en meer op lijkt dat de oorzaak van de eerdere opwarming te wijten zou zijn aan aerosols in de atmosfeer, waarvan de toe- of afname sterk beïnvloed wordt door kosmische straling en derhalve ook de invloed van de zonneflux in deze of gene zin op het aardse klimaat.

Dit gezegd zijnde is er dus geen enkele reden om de CO2-sharia van de GW-alarmists (lees : kwakzalverij, verheven tot religie) verder te voeden via het VN-IPCC-AR5. Wat blijkbaar toch de rabiate bedoeling is van het gemarchandeer achter de schermen van de "politiek correcte" scientists.

Het moet immers geld opbrengen.

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Descartes Jr

Effe aanstippen dat

- de zuidpool zich ongemeen sterk aan het uitbreiden is;
- de noordpool veel minder gesmolten is dan voorspeld, waarbij hij zich aan één zijde integendeel verder uitbreidt dan dat hij inkrimpt aan de andere zijde;
- de gemiddelde aardtemperatuur sedert 1998 (15 jaar) niet meer verder steeg;
- het er meer en meer op lijkt dat de oorzaak van de eerdere opwarming te wijten zou zijn aan aerosols in de atmosfeer, waarvan de toe- of afname sterk beïnvloed wordt door kosmische straling en derhalve ook de invloed van de zonneflux in deze of gene zin op het aardse klimaat.

Dit gezegd zijnde is er dus geen enkele reden om de CO2-sharia van de GW-alarmists (lees : kwakzalverij, verheven tot religie) verder te voeden via het VN-IPCC-AR5. Wat blijkbaar toch de rabiate bedoeling is van het gemarchandeer achter de schermen van de "politiek correcte" scientists.

Het moet immers geld opbrengen.

Dank U.


edit : sommigen begrijpen mijn postings blijkbaar niet goed en stellen dan aldanniet moedwillig domme vragen... so be it.

[zonbron]

Keyword voor de toekomst :

*** A E R O S O L S ***

CO-2 vormt geen duidelijk probleem en weg met die idiote modellen en black boxes die daarop gebaseerd zijn.

G A M E O V E R

[zonbron]

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

*** DE OVERWINNING IS BINNEN ***

Ban Ki-moon heeft het begrepen!!! De luchtvaart en de sluierbewolking (persisting contrails) zijn de belangrijkste factor voor de AGW!!

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

Wel wel, wie had dit verwacht?

RTCC - Aviation central to tackling climate change, says Ban Ki-moon
26 september 2013

UN Secretary General urges states to hasten towards aviation agreements, as high level meetings commence in Montreal. “You are central to the climate change and sustainable development agenda,” Ban told the 38th ICAO Assembly in a video, in a reference to the aim of the UN to set up a package of Sustainable Development Goals to come into force in 2015, on the expiry of the Millennium Development Goals. “The benefits of air travel should be available to all, but they should be provided as efficiently and cleanly as possible.

BTW : Volgende site werd onlangs nog netjes van de server van het MIT verwijderd :

http://ksj.mit.edu/tracker/2011/03/l...ls-warm-planet
(Het artikel 'Lots of Ink: Airplanes' contrails warm the planet more than their CO2 does) van het Knight Science Journalism Fellowships[1], a program hosted at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), offers fellowships to experienced journalists who specialize in science and technology, medicine or the environment. The program also accepts journalists who wish to cover these subjects. Eligible applicants can work for print, broadcast or the Web as reporters, writers, editors or producers.

Maar, Google-cache heeft het nog :

Druk op volgende link : http://bit.ly/1h5ETBY

Kies het eerste zoekresultaat en druk op het pijltje dat naar beneden wijst, kies dan CACHED.

Dan kan U volgende lezen :

31Mar 2011
Lots of Ink: Airplanes' contrails warm the planet more than their CO2 does

aviation global warming;, Contrails global warming


About one or two percent (says Wikipedia) of fossil CO2 put into the air comes from airplanes. But new research says aviation may contribute twice that share to global warming. That's because the high altitude haze left by contrails or so-called vapor trails contributes about as much as and maybe a bit more to trapping the sun's heat than the CO2 does.

The news is in Nature Climate Change, by a team based in Germany. It received wide coverage - albeit in most cases via brief stories. That's understandable. The irony and surprise of the finding does not take long to report, and to go into the atmospheric chemistry and solar forcing mechanisms is not, for most outlets, worth the space it would take. What few stories do is put the news in context. Aviation is a measurable source of greenhouse gases. It's still fairly marginal compared to emissions from ground transportation and industry. It comes up mainly when climate contrarians accuse climate activists of hypocrisy if they took an airplane to an event to bemoan the failure of the world to reverse the rise in CO2 emissions. Doubling a small number still produces a pretty small number.

Of course, the CO2 will stay there for centuries while, if flying stops, the extra clouds will clear in almost no time. The impact on the sky was remarkable during the pause following the 9-11 attacks in the US. Not that an abandonment of the aviation industry, or of engines that leave contrails, is foreseeable.

Stories:

Reuters - Alister Doyle: Aircraft contrails stoke warming, cloud formation ; An odd and interesing idea is high in this story - that perhaps modified engines may shed much of the water from combustion as water drops, or form ice chunks, that would fall from the air. The copy I saw included a poor choice of illus. Those look like vortex condensations of vapor already in the atmosphere and momentarily generated by control surfaces, not the far more common and problematic contrails from engine exhaust.
New Scientist - Michael Marshall: Contrails warm the world more than aviation emissions;
Ars Technica via Wired News - John Timmer : Contrails Worse for Climate Change than Planes' Carbon Emissions ; Timmer or somebody found the best possible photo illus, a NASA satellite pic. Story does a commendable job distinguishing between the angle in Nature's summary for reporters, and what the paper's authors focussed on - which is the whole impact of aviation engine emissions including particulates, aerosols, oxides of nitrogen, etc.. The press release below, from the authors' home institute, has both the research paper's focus and that contrails currently have a greater warming effect than all the aviation carbon emissions built up in the atmosphere since the Wright Brothers made the first ones (hot air balloons too, I suppose).
ABC (Australia) David Mark: Contrail effect greater than CO2: study; Mark reports that aviation CO2 accounts for 3 percent of all human-caused CO2 increases, a bit higher than this post reports at its top.
LiveScience - Wynne Parry: Earth warmed by Trails of Clouds that Jets Leave Behind ; Ms. Parry or her editor are smart to link to a story on ship contrails. One wonders - if low altitude clouds cool the globe, while stratosphere ones warm it, to what extend do aviation and maritime traffics' mists cancel?

Related News:

Scripps Howard/ Chicago Sun Times (Mar 5) - Janet Zimmerman: Increased air traffic may be a factor in climate change;

Grist for the Mill: Institute for Physics (Germany) Press Release ;


Leest U ook :

http://www.dlr.de/pa/en/desktopdefau...25_read-29898/
http://www.livescience.com/13462-con...ir-travel.html
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articl...30/3177693.htm (Contrail effect greater than CO2: study)
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=4435

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/20...rails-climate/ (Contrails Worse for Climate Change Than Planes’ Carbon Emissions)
http://www.newscientist.com/article/...emissions.html (Contrails warm the world more than aviation emissions)
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...72S47O20110329 (Aircraft contrails stoke warming, cloud formation
OSLO | Tue Mar 29, 2011

(Reuters) - Aircraft condensation trails criss-crossing the sky may be warming the planet on a normal day more than the carbon dioxide emitted by all planes since the Wright Brothers' first flight in 1903, a study said on Tuesday.

[zonbron]

De oproep van Ban Ki-moon :