VS: Ron Paul 2012

[Johnny Blaze]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

Busted! Ron Paul Supporter Exposes Iowa Election Fraud

frappant

[An Arkos]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

RP laat zijn campagne even voor wat het is om tegen de NDAA te strijden, hij heeft een wetsvoorstel tegen de NDAA-wetgeving ingediend !!!


Ron Paul Moves To Repeal NDAA Police State Provisions!
*** Zij die tegen Alex Jones zijn, klik AUB NIET op de video

Zijn er dan mensen buiten de VS die die gast serieus nemen?

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door An Arkos

Zijn er dan mensen buiten de VS die die gast serieus nemen?

(RP?) Mijn post aangaande Super PAC niet opgemerkt ?

Het antwoord is dus... JA.

Of refereert U naar AJ ? Blijkbaar wel, maar ik denk wel dat RP meer aanhang heeft in het buitenland dan AJ.

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Johnny Blaze

frappant

Dat was weer snel... mmm

[zonbron]

Raar maar waar, Bill Maher neemt het op voor RP !

Bill Maher Stands Up For Ron Paul & Calls His Audience Brainwashed Liberals

[AsGardSGO]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Johnny Blaze

frappant

SOPA/ProtectIP at work

[zonbron]

Wat als Ron Paul wint ?

CNN Admits What Happens WHEN Ron Paul Wins

Bekijk hoe en waarom de MSM (MudSlideMedia) en de Republikeinen RP minimaliseren, vermijden en onrecht aandoen...



▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
-END THE FED | END THE WARS | RESTORE LIBERTY | RP 2012!
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬[/quote][/quote]

[zonbron]

RP staat weer op de 1ste plaats

Election 2012: Ron Paul Wins Over Competition at Texas Straw Poll


shortnews
01/21/2012
Presidential candidate and GOP frontrunner Ron Paul has won the Saddle Up Texas Straw Poll. Paul won the text portion of the vote handily, receiving 54.4 percent of the vote. Rick Santorum took second place with 15.6 percent of the vote.

Former candidate and Texas native, Rick Perry came in 3rd with 13.3 percent. Dr. Paul also won the in-person portion of the vote with 27.9 percent. Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum were 2nd and 3rd with 23.8 percent and 21.2 percent respectively.

The latest win by Paul comes after his top-tier finishes in Iowa, New Hampshire, and polls of likely South Carolina Republican primary voters.


Drudgereport-poll

GINGRICH 32.52% (99,791 votes)

PAUL 34.35% (105,421 votes)

ROMNEY 20.04% (61,506 votes)

SANTORUM 13.08% (40,140 votes)


Total Votes: 306,858

[Kodo Kodo]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

Wat als Ron Paul wint ?



▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
-END THE FED | END THE WARS | RESTORE LIBERTY | RP 2012!
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

[/quote][/quote]

Dan vervalsen ze de verkiezingsuitslagen.

[Kodo Kodo]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

Iowa Caucus FRAUDE,

2012 GOP caucus count unresolved
MISSING DATA: 8 precincts’ numbers will never be certified

Busted! Ron Paul Supporter Exposes Iowa Election Fraud

En deze post had ik nog niet gezien.
Ik geloof nooit dat de high finance hem president laat worden. En uitslagen vervalsen is efficiënter dan vermoorden zoals ze met JFK hebben gedaan.

[Wiley E Coyote]

Ik denk dat jullie allen Ron Paul en zijn kansen overschatten... hij is vooral te vegrelijken met een zweeppartij... hij haalt ongeveer (naargelang de staat) 10 �* 25 percent binnen de GOP, maar dat laatste is zijn plafond.

Hij haalt voornamelijk zijn stemmen van bij de Republikeinen en in mindere mate bij de onafhankelijken. Slechts weinig democraten stemmen voor hem. Wat wel de GOP nog pijn zou kunnen doen is dat hij mogelijks als kandidaat van de Libertijnen nog kan opkomen en dus stemmen van de GOP gaat weghalen, wat in het voordeel van Obama zou zijn. Hij heeft dit al eens eerder in 1988 gedaan, maar toen was het libertijns gedachtengoed nog kleiner en het effect verwaarloosbaar. Nu (post Tea Party) kan dit de GOP echt pijn doen.

[AdrianHealey]

That awkward moment when someone mixes up libertarian and libertine and expects others to take him serious.

[AdrianHealey]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Wiley E Coyote

Ik denk dat jullie allen Ron Paul en zijn kansen overschatten... hij is vooral te vegrelijken met een zweeppartij... hij haalt ongeveer (naargelang de staat) 10 �* 25 percent binnen de GOP, maar dat laatste is zijn plafond.

Hij haalt voornamelijk zijn stemmen van bij de Republikeinen en in mindere mate bij de onafhankelijken. Slechts weinig democraten stemmen voor hem. Wat wel de GOP nog pijn zou kunnen doen is dat hij mogelijks als kandidaat van de Libertijnen nog kan opkomen en dus stemmen van de GOP gaat weghalen, wat in het voordeel van Obama zou zijn. Hij heeft dit al eens eerder in 1988 gedaan, maar toen was het libertijns gedachtengoed nog kleiner en het effect verwaarloosbaar. Nu (post Tea Party) kan dit de GOP echt pijn doen.

Ron Paul zit idd aan de limiet. Dat is duidelijk.

Maar dat je denkt dat hij niet populair is bij democraten zit je er los naast. ron paul is ook tweede in de democratische primary in NH.

Ron paul gaat sowieso niet als onafhankelijke runnen. Dat heeft hij meermaals gezegd. Dat de vlaamse media het tegendeel beweert is schabouwlijk slechte media. Maar mss dat de anti oorlog mensen voor Johnson stemmen. En ik weet niet of dat in het voordeel is van obama - integendeel zelfs. Hij heeft veel anti oorlogsstemmen te verliezen; de republikeinen niet.

[k9]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door AdrianHealey

Ron Paul zit idd aan de limiet. Dat is duidelijk.

Maar dat je denkt dat hij niet populair is bij democraten zit je er los naast. ron paul is ook tweede in de democratische primary in NH.

Tuurlijk met zo'n kandidaten :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vermin_Supreme

Indien je het niet beseft maar er doet niemand van belang mee bij de democraten.

Zeg ook het volledige plaatje: " Second place in the New Hampshire Democratic primary went to Ron Paul, with 3.7%, Mitt Romney was third with 2.9% of the vote, and Jon Huntsman was fourth with 2.0%. Yes, you heard me right, Ron Paul came in second in the New Hampshire Democratic primary."

En zeg dan ook de reden waaro "How can this happen? New Hampshire allows registered independents to choose which party's primary they want to vote in. The catch is that when they select a party primary to vote in, they change their registration to that party. If they want to be an independent with the option of exercising a similar choice in future primary elections, they must change their party registration back to independent. Some people forget to change their registration back to independent, and when they show up to vote find that they must vote in the primary of the party they are registered with."


Met andere woorden dit heeft geen enkel belang.

Ron paul gaat sowieso niet als onafhankelijke runnen. Dat heeft hij meermaals gezegd. Dat de vlaamse media het tegendeel beweert is schabouwlijk slechte media. Maar mss dat de anti oorlog mensen voor Johnson stemmen. En ik weet niet of dat in het voordeel is van obama - integendeel zelfs. Hij heeft veel anti oorlogsstemmen te verliezen; de republikeinen niet.

Met de praat over iran zijn de republikeinen veel anti-oorlog stemmen terug naar obama aan het duwen.

[Wiley E Coyote]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door AdrianHealey

Ron Paul zit idd aan de limiet. Dat is duidelijk.

Maar dat je denkt dat hij niet populair is bij democraten zit je er los naast. ron paul is ook tweede in de democratische primary in NH.

Niet echt een criteria aangezien daar geen enkele strijd was... en hij slechts 4 percent haalde. Romney en Huntsman haalden trouwens elk ook 3 percent bij de Democraten. Waarschijnlijk grappenmakers of vedwaalde kiezers die zich per accident als Democraat registreerden.

Ron paul gaat sowieso niet als onafhankelijke runnen. Dat heeft hij meermaals gezegd. Dat de vlaamse media het tegendeel beweert is schabouwlijk slechte media.

Hij heeft dat echter ook al eens eerder beweert (1988) maar deed het toen toch. Persoonlijk denk ik inderdaad dat hij deze keer niet als kandidaat van de Libertarian Party zal opkomen. Dat zal waarschijnlijk Gary Johnson worden

[Kodo Kodo]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door AdrianHealey

That awkward moment when someone mixes up libertarian and libertine and expects others to take him serious.

Coyote leeft buiten het Nederlandse taalgebied. We hadden wel door dat hij Libertariërs bedoelt, hoor. Had LDD dat woord maar gebruikt!

[Rr00ttt]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Wiley E Coyote

Ik denk dat jullie allen Ron Paul en zijn kansen overschatten... hij is vooral te vegrelijken met een zweeppartij... hij haalt ongeveer (naargelang de staat) 10 �* 25 percent binnen de GOP, maar dat laatste is zijn plafond.

Het enige plafond waar Paul last van heeft is een leeftijdsplafond, i.e. bij de -30 jarigen scoort hij enorm sterk tussen de 30 & 50% van alle stemmen in de primaries tot nu toe.

Zijn grote probleem ligt bij de groep 40+ en helemaal bij de groep 60+ die echter heel grote groepen kiezers vertegenwoordigen in de meeste staten.

Tegenover 2008 is zijn aanhang tot nu toe telkens ongeveer *4 gegaan en zijn aanhang zat in 2008 ook zogezegd aan zijn plafond.

Het leeftijdsplafond is dus het enige plafond dat er bestaat.

Conclusies:
1. De GOP zal imploderen door uitsterving indien ze niet in de richting van Paul evolueert.
2. In mijn ogen komt het bestaan van dat leeftijdsplafond vooral door 2 zaken. 1) veel slechter geinformeerd dan de youtube en internet generatie. 2) een nog ander beeld van wat Amerika in werkelijkheid geworden is dan de jongeren.


En mbt zijn kansen. Voor Paul is het het best dat het deelnemersveld zo snel mogelijk verder uitdunt. Ik denk dat de 40% voor Gingrich in S-Cal voor een heel groot stuk eerder een anti-Romney dan een pro-Gingrich was.

[AdrianHealey]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Kodo Kodo

Coyote leeft buiten het Nederlandse taalgebied. We hadden wel door dat hij Libertariërs bedoelt, hoor. Had LDD dat woord maar gebruikt!

Ik weet wat hij bedoelde, maar dat rechtvaardigt niet dat je niet het verschil kent tussen de twee. (En denkt dat het ene een synoniem is voor het andere.)

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Kodo Kodo

Dan vervalsen ze de verkiezingsuitslagen.

Inderdaad, yes they can !

Volgende lange C/P is een perfecte samenvatting van wat er zoals gebeurd is.

Wat denkt U ? Is de IOWA-fraude officieel ? Krijgt RP een eerlijke kans ?

EXAMINER -Iowa vote fraud official

Jeffrey Phelps, Denver Conspiracy Examiner
January 21, 2012

It’s official, or is it? Once again the establishment is showing it’s cards in an obvious attempt to defraud Ron Paul from the nomination, as Iowa GOP ‘officials’ purposely disrupt and permanently invalidate the 2012 Iowa Caucus.

The official Caucus website, in conjunction with the Des Moines Register, had to come forward Thursday to claim the official results can “never be certified” after 8 different precincts turn up invalid results due to “missing votes” and changing stories.

For the first time in history, the Iowa GOP decided to change the final vote count to a “Secret location” for what was claimed to be “security concerns.” The unprecedented change in venue came as a shock to most Iowans who are used to seeing the final results tallied at State Party Headquarters in Des Moines, in full view of the public.

Advertisement

This time, however, instead of business as usual, all of the final results were to be counted at an undisclosed location, completely hidden from public scrutiny, the seemingly ‘new’ business as usual.

What played out as a result was a mockery of democracy as Iowa election officials permanently skewed the results of the caucus, illegally miscounting and completely dismissing votes for Ron Paul, many of which were ironically from precincts that Romney lost in ’08.

Other missing or “uncounted” votes were expected to be heavy Ron Paul supporting, major populated areas and college town precincts, now leaving the true winner forever in question.

Originally, the results had Romney winning by 8 votes over Santorum with 30,015 votes. Now the establishment’s media claims new ‘official’ results show Santorum winning by 34 votes over Romney with 29,839 votes, but oddly 168 votes fewer than the ‘official’ total he was previously given, 30,007.

Additionally, Iowa’s establishment politicians now say 121,503 people voted overall, strangely down from the 122,255 it had originally reported. This could be due to new official results not including the 8 precincts that showed skewed results in the new final totals, but the truth may never be fully understood.

As if that’s not odd enough, hidden within all the commotion, even though many votes were missing, uncounted, and changed, including the official result totals for both Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum, no mention at all has been given to the new total Ron Paul should now have and if his votes were also miscounted or left out like the two ‘front-runners” votes were reported to have been. Especially considering how close Ron Paul came to winning, one would think his totals would be just as important to review as well.

The Ron Paul camp, as usual, has downplayed the situation for fear of being an easy target and giving the establishment an excuse to label him and his supporters conspiracy "theorists," a very common tactic used by the establishment and it's media throughout Paul’s career. Instead, he’s tried to remain humble and look at the bright side in saying, "a strong third is still pretty good and still sends a message to the establishment and the American people."

However, as was pointed out on CNN Thursday, even if the new results are legitimate, “It’s hard to take back that initial surge given to Romney. It’s hard to overcome the amount of hype and exposure he received as the evening progressed.” It was treated as a monumental moment as he was declared the winner, while his party and constituents celebrated in great joy…All while questionable results trickled in.

If the actual winner was to have been Ron Paul, should the votes have been counted fairly, the results would have likely been unprecedented momentum for the Ron Paul campaign, which would have likely been impossible for the other candidates to overcome, especially considering Ron Paul’s overall success, despite the constant barrage of negative and totally unfair coverage, if and when he gets coverage at all.

Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of the circumstances, when it’s all said and done, is the repeating pattern of open censorship and total demonization toward Ron Paul’s campaign by the media. He’s always referred to as “unelectable, racist, or dangerous,” or any number of attacks, while generally making a mockery of his ideals and supporters, even though his anti-war, pro-civil liberty, limited-constitutional government, and sound economic policies are all very popular in general with the American people.

What people are most impressed with, when it comes to Ron Paul, when people are actually given the chance to find who he really is and what he really stands for, are things like realizing he’s held those exact same ideals and shows a perfectly aligned voting record to go along with those ideals since he started in government over 40 years ago. Something the other candidates couldn’t even fathom with all the criminal activity and flip-flopping on the issues, many of them have done routinely, throughout their careers.

The troops feel Ron Paul is the best candidate for America, as well. For the second White House bid in a row, active military personnel give double the amount of organic campaign contributions to Ron Paul than all the other candidates combined, including Obama’s totals.

This renders the war-mongering establishment's multi-party line, that Ron Paul's foreign policy ideals are "dangerous," when even the military overwhelmingly agrees with Paul, as more examples of pro-establishment rhetoric aimed at fooling the people into thinking anti-war sentiments are irrational. The totally bias media is constantly using suggestive terms like, “he can’t win,” or, “he won’t win,” as if they are the ones who decide what the people are supposed to think about the candidates.

Frighteningly, it’s commonplace to witness the open attempt to sway public opinion in favor of the candidates with pro-war and pro-establishment views, despite the fact that Ron Paul has scored very high or first in almost every independent political poll since his second White House bid in 2007, while establishment funded polls always strangely show Paul in second, third, or even more oddly, yet just as commonly, not being included in the poll at all.

This, despite that fact that he’s always the landslide victor in almost every internet poll he’s been in, including post-debate analysis for every debate since the 2012 GOP nomination race began, both on TV and on almost all internet polling analysis.

As another perfect example, the censorship and the overall attempt to limit Ron Paul’s ability to get his message out to the American people became so bad during the SC GOP Debate Thursday night, the crowd actually began to take notice, and at one point all started demanding that he be allowed to participate, and forced CNN’s debate host to allow Ron Paul to answer the same question the other three candidates were allowed to answer. Excluding and ignoring Paul was, and has been a common theme throughout both the ’08 and the ’12 GOP nomination races, during every single debate since the very beginning.

One of the reasons for a general establishment disdain for the strict Libertarian is because he’s has always been a real thorn in the establishment’s side, going back as far as his first run for President in ’88 when he exposed CIA drug running on local Texas TV. Now he’s doing it on the national stage, and although he’s wisely being a lot more politically correct in front of a national audience, the establishment still doesn’t like him now, seemingly more than ever.

More examples of his continual fight against a totally over-reaching, big-government establishment, Paul was the only one of the remaining candidates to take a detour from the campaign trail this week to introduce legislation in the Congress to strip unconstitutional provisions from the tyrannical NDAA bill that has garnered so much attention as of late. The same bill that, pro-establishment candidate, Mitt Romney supported during a recent national debate, admitting he would have voted for it as well.

Ron Paul’s son, Tea Party favorite, US Senator from Kentucky, Rand Paul has also been instrumental in fighting for liberty against pro-establishment, pro-status quo politicians, recently vowing to block un-American additions to the internet-freedom-killing SOPA and PIPA bills that were addressed in the final SC GOP debate on Thursday evening. Freedom-killing legislation that pro-establishment candidate, Rick Santorum had trouble denouncing with the others on the same debate stage.

Coming into the Iowa Caucuses, however, most establishment pundits were so nervous over the thought of a Paul win they were rendering the Iowa caucus discredited before they even happened, some suggesting simply ignoring the results all-together. That is, until Romney or Santorum "won," and then the Iowa caucuses magically became so legitimate the establishment pundits were practically handing the nomination to Romney, even though we still had 49 states left to primary.

Bringing us to the evening of the Iowa Caucus itself, where early exit polls had Paul in first place, which included an Anderson Cooper jolting Paul win in the first couple official precincts reported.

As the evening progressed, the leaders went back and forth like a jumbo-tron race during halftime, with the first two hours of results seeing no clear leader, and a double digit amount of lead changes, despite Paul’s #1 live exit poll rankings, shown on every network.

All night long national news coverage analyzed the incoming numbers, showing Paul having a real shot, either leading or in a dead heat for much of the first part of the evening, with promising young voters and college student heavy precincts yet to be counted, something the pundits were claiming “looked very good for Paul” and had the other candidates, “very nervous,” according to live election coverage analysts.

As the night wore on, however, none of that seemed to matter. All pre-caucus polls showing Paul in first, or the live Iowa Caucus exit polls showing Paul winning, or the edge he was said to have because of the missing precincts that strangely never ended up being counted, all somehow ended up not having any effect or simply disappeared completely into a black hole.

After all this, what’s extremely frightening about the situation is that fact that neither the establishment and it’s media, nor is anyone in any policing agency doing anything about it, as if it’s no big deal that the official election results in the Iowa caucus was tampered with, rendering the results of the election forever compromised, potentially putting the future of the caucus and elections processes, this nation, and Ron Paul’s call for liberty, freedom, and the rule of law in serious jeopardy.

Just as concerning to Ron Paul supporters and supporters of freedom and fairness in general, which may or may not be a majority of the country, although we obviously can’t be sure with the current national media that's in place, is the fact that precincts around the country that aren’t still using paper ballots, are now using electronic voting machines, also said to be even easier to manipulate, admitted under oath in court by an electronic voting machine software developer. In addition to a very shady Diebold upper management history, potentially rendering the entire election system a total hoax, which exists, as Judge Napolitano recently stated, “to merely perpetuate the fake, corporate controlled, ‘two-party’ system of political slavery.”

Under the circumstances, if no one does anything about it, and the people remain largely oblivious to the actaul magnitude of the circumstances, the only way Ron Paul and his supporters have any shot at getting the nomination, and thus swinging the preverbal political pendulum back toward the direction of freedom and liberty, is via total landslide victories in many of the remaining primaries. To the point that not even pro-establishment vote counters and jimmy-rigged Diebold voting machines and their unfairly manipulated software can overcome the sheer magnitude of votes, forcing the establishment's media to take notice, forcing it into public discussion.

Sources:

Official Iowa Caucus Site showing “permanently unverifiable” results: http://caucuses.desmoinesregister.co...nt-unresolved/

Recount: Washington Times http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...iowa-caucuses/

Newser: Secret Vote Count Location: http://www.newser.com/story/136343/i...-location.html

Alex Jones: Secret Vote Count Location: http://www.infowars.com/tonights-iow...cret-location/

CNN Admits moving count site: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...rity-concerns/

Alex Jones: Media Cover-up: Ron Paul’s Standing Not Discussed in Iowa Vote Reshuffle: http://www.infowars.com/media-cover-...ote-reshuffle/

KC Star: Officials got votes wrong, won’t declare a winner: http://www.kansascity.com/2012/01/19...-official.html

7 of 8 missing precincts were Romney ’08 Losers: http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/...omney-in-2008/

Ron Paul’s 30 years of successful predictions: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ujNI...eature=related

Ron Paul receives more campaign contributions from the military than all other candidates combined: http://www.examiner.com/conspiracy-i...rting-ron-paul

Elections, straw polls, and reports proving Ron Paul is the most popular candidate in America:

CNN: Ron Paul Is Far And Away The Most Popular Candidate of ALL On Twitter: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDu31...eature=related

Ron Paul WINS GOOGLE Search POLL! (1.5million) AMAZING!!!: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJGr-Dz7q-Q

CNBC QUICKLY DELETES POLL SHOWING RON PAUL WINNING LAST NIGHT'S DEBATE: http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin...gi?read=221248

Ron Paul Wins Saddle Up Texas Straw Poll: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxs6bqw2kn4

Ron Paul Wins Values Voter Summit Straw Poll!! (Media Coverage): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIyss2K40Yc

Ron Paul Wins Illinois Straw Poll!: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0_GlYj-zvk

Ron Paul Wins Ohio Straw Poll With 53% Of The Vote!: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTHWqsH17yA

Ohio Swing State Straw Poll Results - RON PAUL WINS WITH 53.5%!: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKEDNUd0A5s

Ron Paul Wins NFRA Straw Poll With A Landslide 82%!: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAKC6jkmIxY

Ron Paul Wins California Straw Poll! CNN Puts its Typical Spin on it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mfmWG9d8cE

Ron Paul WINS Miami Straw Poll (complete ownage): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9F2fNWfuwcw

RON PAUL wins The Ohio Swing State Straw Poll - THE EVENT: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWuwOEy8wZg

Ron Paul Wins R.L.C. Straw Poll Overwhelmingly: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPZf2r4GFhw

Ron Paul Wins Republican Party of Los Angeles County Straw Poll: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8NbMffuz4E

FOX NEWS COVER UP: Ron Paul Wins FOX News Poll: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRozwnDeaTA

Ron Paul Won Straw Poll: Bachmann Bought More Than 6,000 votes!: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cuVY43rv-o

Ron Paul Wins Charleston and San Diego GOP Straw Polls: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oml9BNo5tfQ

Ron Paul Wins Person of the Year 2011 Poll - Time Magazine Makes Up Their Own Results: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djzk1wyNU-Q

Ron Paul Wins Idaho straw poll - Matt Shea speech: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Y8gCQpY-gI

Ron Paul wins Polls Across America despite what the media say: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Diyap...ABEA82823C1072

Ron Paul winning CBSNews.com After-Debate Poll - 11/14/11 - 8 Minute Time Lapse of Results: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hst8_K49r-I

CNN Makes Excuses For Ron Paul Winning CPAC Straw Poll: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8qpZ...ain&playnext=1

Who Cares That RON PAUL Wins Straw Polls? LOL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jQgGUZxADY

Ron Paul and others expose the mainstream media: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVaHF...eature=related

RON PAUL WINS CBS POST DEBATE POLL!!: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0k1QBwWiJE

RON PAUL is EXPLODING (REMASTERED) - Jon Stewart Trust Today 2012: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0mnA...eature=related

Clint Eastwood likes Ron Paul's message: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUFbv...eature=related

John Stewart Shows How Ron Paul Is Feared By media: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb5aG...eature=related

Negative/Unfair Ron Paul Coverage/Comments:

Media Scared Ron Paul is Winning: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoZbVqZGHKE

RON PAUL 2012 AND BRAINLESS CNN & FOX MEDIA (Jon Stewart) – YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSbkF...eature=related

Atlantic Wire: Anti-Ron Paul media bias confirmed in PEW Research study: http://www.theatlanticwire.com/polit...nfirmed/43747/

Ron Paul 2012 Exposed Media Censorship of Ron Paul and His Supporters: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyNsA...eature=related

CBS Omits Ron Paul From Latest New Hampshire Poll: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0qPK...eature=related

Why the Media Ignores Ron Paul: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JViVL...eature=related

Letterman On Ron Paul And His 89 Seconds At The GOP Debate: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSrF6...eature=related

FOX News: "If Ron Paul wins tomorrow it will be a black eye for Iowa" says Donald Trump.: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2k83b...eature=related

UnfairCoverage.com: Ron Paul vs. the Machine: http://www.unfaircoverage.com/archive-content.html

Huckabee claims Ron Paul “can’t win”: http://newscastmedia.com/blog/2011/1...e-too-fanatic/

RON PAUL Polls First ::: WINNING IOWA: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iu_-ByajyT8

Foxnews Cuts Off Ron Paul's Iowa Straw Poll Speech While He's Talking Patriot Act & Foreign Polic: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajoO1...eature=related

CNN’s Dana Bash receives an earful for unfair coverage of Ron Paul: http://www.infowars.com/cnns-dana-ba...e-of-ron-paul/

Pew Study confirms: mainstream media ignores Ron Paul: http://ivn.us/news/2011/10/18/pew-st...ores-ron-paul/

CNN is “WORRIED” about Ron Paul’s success: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zQKt...eature=related

CNN cuts off soldier then Ron Paul brings him on stage to let him finish talking!: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alioR...eature=related

Hillary Clinton is reminded by colleague not to encourage Ron Paul: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrAex...eature=related

Eye Witness Testimony / Vote Fraud Analysis

Illinois eye witness: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vGqM...eature=related

Local Iowa TV News covers eye witness: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIQcb...eature=related

Ron Paul's brother, Wayne Paul talks about Iowa vote fraud: http://www.prisonplanet.com/wayne-pa...d-in-iowa.html

Major Voting Fraud at Iowa Caucus Robs Ron Paul: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3Cx_...56909DF579A281

Total Blatant Criminal Voter Fraud at Iowa: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ur4ieO8M2RI

Iowa vote was a fraud Ron Paul Won that one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jB7_Q...eature=related

Ron Paul "IOWA VOTING FRAUD" "IOWA CAUCUS": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MN45r2n3d3c

Karl Rove Iowa Voter Fraud 1/05/12: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKO3I...eature=related

Karl Rove: Mitt Romney has won Iowa by 14 votes: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sD09u...eature=related

Reasons why the establishment/elite hates Ron Paul:

Ron Paul The American Power Elite He Called our Future 13 yrs ago! part 1 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=floYI...eature=related

Ron Paul The American Power Elite He Called our Future 13 yrs ago! part 2 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MautB...eature=related

Ron Paul The American Power Elite He Called our Future 13 yrs ago! part 3 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68LI8...eature=related

Ron Paul The American Power Elite He Called our Future 13 yrs ago! part 4 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ib5j7...eature=related

Ron Paul The American Power Elite He Called our Future 13 yrs ago! part 5 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIg32...eature=related

Pre-Election Analysis and Successful Predictions

How did they know the election would be stolen?: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxkkI...eature=related

Mike Rivero predicts election fraud on Iowa Caucus morning: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XW4jQ...eature=related

Diebold Electronic Voting Machine Whistle Blowers:

Vote Fraud - Diebold Whistleblower Speaks Out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_rMp...eature=related

Vote Fraud Smoking Gun Banned From CNN, FOX & NBC: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tdzln...eature=related

FOX: Diebold Electronic Vote Fraud Confirmed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4FPu...eature=related

Whistleblower Charged with Three Felonies for Exposing Diebold's Crimes: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-...t_b_16411.html

Diebold’s shady past:

Who is counting your vote? Diebold & Bush vs. the public interest: http://www.peoplesworld.org/who-is-c...blic-interest/

Exec at NH's Diebold Vote Counting Firm Convicted of Narcotics Trafficking: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5537

2 felons' roles in county elections questioned: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...elons11m0.html

Diebold Gets Free Passes In Both California And North Carolina?: http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20051201/1548203.shtml

Ohio Diebold lobbyist biz partners w. organized crime convicts: http://www.democraticunderground.com...ess=203x370287

WIRED: Con Job at Diebold Subsidiary: http://www.wired.com/politics/securi.../2003/12/61640

Diebold: How deep does the voting machine scandal go?: http://www.helium.com/items/311435-d...ine-scandal-go

Bezoek de site voor meer links/doorverwijzingen en harde feiten.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
-END THE FED | END THE WARS | RESTORE LIBERTY | RP 2012!
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

[lombas]