De toestand van Chavez zou kritiek zijn...

[zonbron]

[eno2]

hij overleed aan de gevolgen van een massieve hartaanval en zijn laatste woorden waren: "Ik wil niet sterven"

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door eno2

hij overleed aan de gevolgen van een massieve hartaanval en zijn laatste woorden waren: "Ik wil niet sterven"

Zo blijkt, de laatste/nieuwe infectie tijdens zijn behandeling is hem uiteindelijk fataal geworden.

[eno2]

Misschien wel de langste doodstrijd in de media, en dan nog haast zonder officiële berichtgeving

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

De laatste begroeting van van een duidelijk ontroerde Amhadinejad werd op een groots applaus onthaald.

[Boduo]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

De laatste begroeting van van een duidelijk ontroerde Amhadinejad werd op een groots applaus onthaald.

Ieder politicus, waar ook ter wereld zoekt medestanders tegen de tegenstanders.
Er zijn zelfs landen die hun tegenstanders laten vermoorden, op duizenden km. van hun eigen land.
Vb president Alliende.

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Boduo

Ieder politicus, waar ook ter wereld zoekt medestanders tegen de tegenstanders.
Er zijn zelfs landen die hun tegenstanders laten vermoorden, op duizenden km. van hun eigen land.
Vb president Alliende.

Inderdaad. Maar wanneer het over zulke zaken gaat blijkt bij velen het geheugen te falen. Vooral omdat de rol van de meest welvarende 'democratiebrenger' ter wereld in deze onmiskenbaar IS.

Daarom dat heden iedereen deze natie beschouwt als de rechtvaardige wereldwijde ordehandhaver.

[Boduo]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

Inderdaad. Maar wanneer het over zulke zaken gaat blijkt bij velen het geheugen te falen. Vooral omdat de rol van de meest welvarende 'democratiebrenger' ter wereld in deze onmiskenbaar IS.

Daarom dat heden iedereen deze natie beschouwt als de rechtvaardige wereldwijde ordehandhaver.

Iedereen: is dat sarcasme of iets anders ?

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Boduo

Iedereen: is dat sarcasme of iets anders ?

Inderdaad, daarom had ik er ook de rollende oogjes bijgeplaatst. Eigelijk is het niet enkel sarcasme, maar tevens een vorm van ongeloof.

[Boduo]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

Inderdaad, daarom had ik er ook de rollende oogjes bijgeplaatst. Eigelijk is het niet enkel sarcasme, maar tevens een vorm van ongeloof.

Sorry, ik had de smiley niet bemerkt.

[Helias]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Boduo

Ieder politicus, waar ook ter wereld zoekt medestanders tegen de tegenstanders.
Er zijn zelfs landen die hun tegenstanders laten vermoorden, op duizenden km. van hun eigen land.
Vb president Alliende.

Alliende pleegde zelfmoord.

[Boduo]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Helias

Alliende pleegde zelfmoord.

Flauw...

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Boduo

Sorry, ik had de smiley niet bemerkt.

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Helias

Alliende pleegde zelfmoord.

Ik hoop van harte dat U zich deze onzin niet zelf heeft binnengelepeld.

Uit welk boekje haalt U de regelrechte waangedachten? Ik ben benieuwd...

[Boduo]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

Ik hoop van harte dat U zich deze onzin niet zelf heeft binnengelepeld.

Uit welk boekje haalt U de regelrechte waangedachten? Ik ben benieuwd...

Die Bullshit amplifier is het beste wat we hier in het laatste jaar gezien hebben !
Gebruik hem nog maar om te antwoorden op onnozele stellingen zoals die van Helias !

[zonbron]

De resten van Chavez zullen NIET gebalsemd worden, daar is het blijkbaar te laat voor.

[Vlaanderen Boven]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Boduo

Ieder politicus, waar ook ter wereld zoekt medestanders tegen de tegenstanders.
Er zijn zelfs landen die hun tegenstanders laten vermoorden, op duizenden km. van hun eigen land.
Vb president Alliende.

Heb je er ook enig bewijs voor dat Allende vermoord werd?

[zonbron]

Hij werd afgemaakt met behulp van twee verschillende vuurwapens.

El Universal - Allende habr�*a sido asesinado, revela autopsia
31 mei 2011 - El presidente chileno recibió dos balazos de diferentes armas durante el golpe de Estado del 11 de septiembre de 1973

[zonbron]

De toestand van Washington zou kritiek zijn...

De duivel in Washington.



Van de hand van Carl Craig Roberts, de vader van Reaganomics, een prachtig stukje waarheid :

<sub>Paul Craig Roberts on Hugo Chavez


Paul Craig Roberts (United States Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy, In office 1981–1982, President Ronald Reagan)
March 13, 2013

Hugo Chavez, President of Venezuela and world leader against imperialism, died. Washington imperialists and their media and think tank whores expressed gleeful sighs of relief as did the brainwashed US population. An “enemy of America” was gone.

Chavez was not an enemy of America. He was an enemy of Washington’s hegemony over other countries, an enemy of Washington’s alliance with elite ruling cliques who steal from the people they grind down and deny sustenance. He was an enemy of Washington’s injustice, of Washington’s foreign policy based on lies and military aggression, bombs and invasions.

Washington is not America. Washington is Satan’s home town.

Chavez was a friend of truth and justice, and this made him unpopular throughout the Western World where every political leader regards truth and justice as dire threats.

Chavez was a world leader. Unlike US politicians, Chavez was respected throughout the non-western world. He was awarded honorary doctorates from China, Russia, Brazil, and other countries, but not from Harvard, Yale, Cambridge, and Oxford.

Chavez was a miracle. He was a miracle, because he did not sell out to the United States and the Venezuelan elites. Had he sold out, Chavez would have become very rich from oil revenues, like the Saudi Royal Family, and he would have been honored by the United States in the way that Washington honors all its puppets: with visits to the White House. He could have become a dictator for life as long as he served Washington.

Each of Washington’s puppets, from Asia to Europe and the Middle East, anxiously awaits the invitation that demonstrates Washington’s appreciation of his or her servitude to the global imperialist power that still occupies Japan and Germany 68 years after World War II and South Korea 60 years after the end of the Korean War and has placed troops and military bases in a large number of other “sovereign” countries.

It would have been politically easy for Chavez to sell out. All he had to do was to continue populist rhetoric, promote his allies in the army, throw more benefits to the underclass than its members had ever previously experienced, and divide the rest of the oil revenues with the corrupt Venezuelan elites.

But Chavez was a real person, like Rafael Correa, the three-term elected president of Ecuador, who stood up to the United States and granted political asylum to the persecuted Julian Assange, and Evo Morales, the first indigenous president of Bolivia since the Spanish conquest. The majority of Venezuelans understood that Chavez was a real person. They elected him to four terms as president and would have continued electing him as long as he lived. What Washington hates most is a real person who cannot be bought.

The more the corrupt western politicians and media whores demonized Chavez, the more Venezuelans loved him. They understood completely that anyone damned by Washington was God’s gift to the world.

It is costly to stand up to Washington. All who are bold enough to do so are demonized. They risk assassination and being overthrown in a CIA-organized coup, as Chavez was in 2002. When CIA-instructed Venezuelan elites sprung their coup and kidnapped Chavez, the coup was overthrown by the Venezuelan people who took to the streets and by elements of the military before Chavez could be murdered by the CIA-controlled Venezuelan elites, who escaped with their own venal lives only because, unlike them, Chavez was humanitarian. The Venezuelan people rose in instantaneous and massive public defense of Chavez and put the lie to the Bush White House claim that Chavez was a dictator.

Showing its sordid corruption, the New York Times took the side of the undemocratic coup by a handful of elitists against the democratically elected Chavez, and declared that Chavez’s removal by a small group of rich elites and CIA operatives meant that “Venezuelan democracy is no longer threatened by a would-be dictator.”

The lies and demonization continue with Chavez’s death. He will never be forgiven for standing up for justice. Neither will Correa and Morales, both of whom are no doubt on assassination lists.

CounterPunch, Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting, and other commentators have collected examples of the venom-spewing obituaries that the western presstitutes have written for Chavez, essentially celebrations that death has silenced the bravest voice on earth.http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/03/...r-hugo-chavez/
http://fair.org/take-action/media-ad...f-media-scorn/

Perhaps the most absurd of all was Associated Press business reporter Pamela Sampson’s judgment that Chavez wasted Venezuela’s oil wealth on “social programs including state-run food markets, cash benefits for poor families, free health clinics and education programs,” a poor use of money that could have been used to build sky scrappers such as “the world’s tallest building in Dubai and branches of the Louvre and Guggenheim museums in Abu Dhabi.”
http://www.fair.org/blog/2013/03/06/...c-skyscrapers/

Among the tens of millions of Washington’s victims in the world–the people of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Sudan, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, Syria, Palestine, Lebanon, Mali, with Iran, Russia, China, and South America waiting in the wings for sanctions, destabilization, conquest or reconquest, Chavez’s September 20, 2006 speech at the UN General Assembly during the George W. Bush regime will stand forever as the greatest speech of the early 21st century.

Chavez beards the lion, or rather Satan, in his own den:

“Yesterday, the devil himself stood right here, at this podium, speaking as if he owned the world. You can still smell the sulfur.”

“We should call a psychiatrist to analyze yesterday’s statement made by the president of the United States. As the spokesman of imperialism, he came to share his nostrums, to try to preserve the current pattern of domination, exploitation and pillage of the peoples of the world. An Alfred Hitchcock movie could use it as a scenario. I would even propose a title: ‘the Devil’s Recipe.’”

The UN General Assembly had never heard such words, not even in the days when the militarily powerful Soviet Union was present. Faces broke out in smiles of approval, but no one dared to clap. Too much US money for the home country was at stake.

The US and UK delegations fled the scene, like vampires confronted with garlic and the Cross or werewolves confronted with silver bullets.

Chavez spoke about the false democracy of elites that is imposed by force and on others by “weapons and bombs.” Chavez asked, “What type of democracy do you impose with Marines and bombs?”

Wherever George W. Bush looks, Chavez said, “he sees extremists. And you, my brother–he looks at your color, and he says, oh, there’s an extremist. Evo Morales, the worthy president of Bolivia, looks like an extremist to him. The imperialists see extremists everywhere. It is not that we are extremists. It is that the world is waking up. It is waking up all over and people are standing up.”

In two short sentences totaling 20 words, Chavez defined for all times early 21st century Washington: “The imperium is afraid of truth, is afraid of independent voices. It calls us extremists, but they are the extremists.”

Throughout South America and the non-western world, Chavez’s death is being blamed on Washington. South Americans are aware of the US congressional hearings in the 1970s when the Church Committee brought to light the various CIA schemes to poison Fidel Castro.

The official document presented to President John F. Kennedy by the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, known as the Northwoods Project, is known to the world and is available online. The Northwoods project consisted of a false flag attack on American citizens in order to blame Cuba and create public and world acceptance for US-imposed regime change in Cuba. President Kennedy rejected the proposal as inconsistent with morality and accountable government.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

The belief has already hardened in South America that Washington with its hideous technologies of death infected Chavez with cancer in order to remove him as an obstacle to Washington’s hegemony over South America.

This belief will never die: Chavez, the greatest South American since Simon Bolivar, was murdered by Washington. True or false, the belief is set in stone. As Washington and globalism destroy more countries, the lives of elites become more precarious.

President Franklin Delano Roosevelt understood that security for the rich required economic security for the underclasses. Roosevelt established in the US a weak form of social democracy that European politicians had already understood was necessary for social cohesion and political and economic stability.

The Clinton, Bush, and Obama regimes set about undermining the stability that Roosevelt provided, as Thatcher, Major, Blair, and the current prime minister of the UK undermined the social agreement between classes in the UK. Politicians in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand also made the mistake of handing power over to private elites at the expense of social and economic stability.

Gerald Celente predicts that the elites will not survive the hatred and anger that they are bringing upon themselves. I suspect that he is correct. The American middle class is being destroyed. The working class has become a proletariat, and the social welfare system is being destroyed in order to reduce the budget deficit caused by the loss of tax revenues to jobs offshoring and the expense of wars, overseas military bases, and financial bailouts. The American people are being compelled to suffer in order that elites can continue with their agendas.

The US elites know what is coming. That is why they created a Nazi-style Ministry of the Interior known as Homeland Security, armed with enough ammunition to kill every American five times and with tanks to neutralize the Second Amendment rights of Americans.http://www.informationclearinghouse....ticle34259.htm
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ralphben...-conversation/

Pistols and rifles are useless against tanks, as the Branch Davidians found out in Waco, Texas. The protection of a small handful of elites from the Americans they are oppressing is also the reason the police are being militarized, brought under Washington’s control and armed with drones that can assassinate the real leaders of the American people who will be, not in the legislative, executive, or judicial chambers, but in the streets. http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-mil...police/5326303

Internment camps in the US appear to be real and not a conspiracy theory.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfkZ1yri26s
http://info.publicintelligence.net/U...settlement.pdf

The threat that the US government poses to its own citizens was recognized on March 7, 2013, by two US Senators, Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Rand Paul (R-KY), who introduced a bill to prevent the US government from murdering its own citizens: “The Federal Government may not use a drone to kill a citizen of the United States who is located in the United States” unless the person “poses an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury to another individual. Nothing in this section shall be construed to suggest that the Constitution would otherwise allow the killing of a citizen of the United States in the United States without due process of law.” http://www.cruz.senate.gov/record.cfm?id=339952

The “indispensable people” with their presidents Bush and Obama have begun the 21st century with death and violence. That is their only legacy.

The death and violence that Washington has unleashed will come back to Washington and to the corrupt political elites everywhere. As Gerald Celente says, the first great war of the 21st century has begun.

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts is the father of Reaganomics and the former head of policy at the Department of Treasury. He is a columnist and was previously the editor of the Wall Street Journal. His latest book, “How the Economy Was Lost: The War of the Worlds,” details why America is disintegrating.</sub>

BRON



Wikipedia - Paul Craig Roberts

Paul Craig Roberts (born April 3, 1939) is an American economist and a columnist for Creators Syndicate. He served as an Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration earning fame as a co-founder of Reaganomics.[1] He is a former editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and Scripps Howard News Service who has testified before congressional committees on 30 occasions on issues of economic policy.

Roberts has written extensively that during the 21st century the Bush and Obama administrations have destroyed the US Constitution's protections of Americans' civil liberties, such as habeas corpus and due process in the name of "the war on terror." Roberts has been a critic of both Democratic and Republican administrations. Roberts has compared supporters of George W. Bush to "brownshirts with the same low intelligence and morals as Hitler's enthusiastic supporters." He has opposed the War on Drugs and the War on Terror stating it has "made widows and orphans of millions of Muslims". Roberts is a critic of Israel's policy toward Gaza "the world's largest concentration camp" populated by people who were "driven out of Palestine so that Israel could steal their land."[2]

...