Dijken in New Orleans express opgeblazen?

[illwill]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Lex Blanca

Het zijn de complottards die in dit geval "kritiek" geven i.p.v. zomaar wat gevoed wordt te slikken terwijl de bewijzen in de andere richting wijzen.

Onbeantwoorde vragen wijzen in geen enkele richting kerel. Het probleem is ook hier dat mensen onbeantwoorde vragen zelf invullen om zo hun verhaal wat ze willen horen te staven, en dit zonder ook maar het kleinste feit te bewijzen.
Komt nog bij dat als men naar bewijzen vraagt men hier je huid volscheld.

[illwill]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Lex Blanca

Waarom draai je met je ogen?Saat volgens jou op die kopie iets anders dan op de originele?

Ik zeg dat het niet het originele is. En idd, er staan andere dingen op dan de originele.

[Lex Blanca]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door illwill

Dat jij een probleem hebt dat mensen dingen niet zomaar geloven tja....dat is en blijft jou probleem maar het gewoon het gebruik van gezond verstand.

Eigenlijk is "ons" probleem net het omgekeerde;nl. dat mensen juist wel zomaar geloven (bvb de officiele versie van 9/11-terwijl ongelooflijk veel ervan niet klopt en dat ondersteund wordt door ontelbare bijkomende onlogische onfrise zaakjes die in de andere richting wijzen) wat hen wordt voorgeschoteld.Jammergenoeg geloven ze wel zomaar de mainstream media (die voor geen meter te vertrouwen is en in handen van en slect clubje).

[Lex Blanca]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door illwill

Er is nog een heel groot verschil tussen "tussen de lijnen te lezen" en deze lijne zelf effe invullen en verzinnen.

Waarom reageer je op die manier op mijn post en niet op die van BigF?
Hij is degene die zegt tussen de lijnen in het rapport te lezen dat zijn frituuruitbater een nicht is en zo...
Dit is wat ik al aanhaalde....ertegenin gaan enkel omdat het van een believer komt.Beetje oneerlijk...geen goeie mentaliteit;ik denk dat je hier wel mee akkoord gaat...

[Lex Blanca]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door illwill

Ik zeg dat het niet het originele is. En idd, er staan andere dingen op dan de originele.

En dit komt van de man die claimt geen beweringen te maken.Dit is er anders wel 1 die kan tellen.Zeker als je die niet kan staven.

[MiSTa SCienTiST]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door exodus

Er de laatste week weer meer en meer aanwijzingen dat...

...

[size=3][size=2]
Als het klopt dan zou dit weer een extra aanwijzing zijn dat deze ramp opzettelijk verergerd is door FEMA en de corrupte Bush regering om Martial Law in New Orleans te rechtvaardigen. Alles wijst dit al uit, het laattijdige optreden, het blokkerern van voedsel en hulp, en nu mss het opzettelijk opblazen van de dijken...

Deze martial law in New Orleans is een "test-run" ...

De plannen zijn er van de NWO om Amerika volledig onder martial law te krijgen na een massieve terroristische aanval ...

...

Lieve help. Als er in de toekomst een stel jihadies NBC-wapens gaan gebruiken in amerikaanse steden dan gaat dat dus ook gezien worden als bewijs van "Bush en de illuminati" en het hele "NWO"-axioma (want dan zal er ook martial law komen in en rond de getroffen gebieden). Het is als een sneeuwbal.
Als "abu muhamedjihad" nu oplet, slim is en gewoon een arme, overwegend zwarte wijk opblaast met een nuke bv. dan is heel die "NWO"-cirkel weer rond en krijgt Bush de schuld van de aanval op zijn eigen land.

Met mensen met een dergelijke mind-set gaan we inderdaad nog iets mee maken.

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door exodus

Op volgende link kan er naar een interview geluisterd worden waar men op deze bovenstaande zaken ingaat:

http://theedgefiles.com/interviews/P...2009.10.05.mp3

Lieve Deugd

Deze dame, "Pam" (christelijk fundamentalistisch madammeke met waanideeën), moet een "NWO"-verband in NO zogezegd bewijzen?...

De dame beweert dertig jaar geleden te zijn gered van de "Evil illuminati", door niemand minder dan...
Jesus Christus. [/size][/size][edit]
[size=1]Edit:[/size]

[size=1]After edit by MiSTa SCienTiST on 14-09-2005 at 22:05
Reason:
--------------------------------

Lieve help. Als er in de toekomst een stel jihadies NBC-wapens gaan gebruiken in amerikaanse steden dan gaat dat dus ook gezien worden als bewijs van "Bush en de illuminati" en het hele "NWO"-axioma (want dan zal er ook martial law komen in en rond de getroffen gebieden). Het is als een sneeuwbal.
Als "abu muhamedjihad" nu oplet, slim is en gewoon een arme, overwegend zwarte wijk opblaast met een nuke bv. dan is heel die "NWO"-cirkel weer rond en krijgt Bush de schuld van de aanval op zijn eigen land.

Met mensen met een dergelijke mind-set gaan we inderdaad nog iets mee maken.

Lieve Deugd

Deze dame, "Pam" (christelijk fundamentalistisch madammeke met waanideeën), moet een "NWO"-verband in NO zogezegd bewijzen?...

De dame beweert dertig jaar geleden te zijn gered van de "Evil illuminati", door niemand minder dan...
Jesus Christus. [/size][/size][/size]

[size=1]Before any edits, post was:
--------------------------------

Lieve help. Als er in de toekomst een stel jihadies NBC-wapens gaan gebruiken in amerikaanse steden dan gaat dat dus ook gezien worden als bewijs van "Bush en de illuminati" en het hele "NWO"-axioma (want dan zal er ook martial law komen in en rond de getroffen gebieden). Het is als een sneeuwbal.
Als "abu muhamedjihad" nu oplet, slim is en gewoon een arme, overwegend zwarte wijk opblaast met een nuke bv. dan is heel die "NWO"-cirkel weer rond en krijgt Bush de schuld van de aanval op zijn eigen land.

We hebben inderdaad het ergste nog steeds niet gezien.

Lieve Deugd

Deze dame, "Pam" (christelijk fundamentalistisch madammeke met waanideeën), moet een "NWO"-verband in NO zogezegd bewijzen?...

De dame beweert dertig jaar geleden te zijn gered van de "Evil illuminati", door niemand minder dan...
Jesus Christus. [/size][/size][/size]

[/edit]

[Mephisto]

It's NOT just you..

Is dat diezelfde madam weer, die gelooft dat ze is verkracht door zowel de paus, de Rockefellers als de Bush femmili?[edit]
[size=1]Edit:[/size]

[size=1]After edit by Mephisto on 14-09-2005 at 23:28
Reason:
--------------------------------

It's NOT just you..

Is dat diezelfde madam weer, die gelooft dat ze is verkracht door zowel de paus, de Rockefellers als de Bush femmili?[/size]

[size=1]Before any edits, post was:
--------------------------------

It's NOT just you..[/size]

[/edit]

[democratsteve]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Lex Blanca

En dit komt van de man die claimt geen beweringen te maken.Dit is er anders wel 1 die kan tellen.Zeker als je die niet kan staven.

Dat heet dan, IN YOUR FACE!
. [edit]
[size=1]Edit:[/size]

[size=1]After edit by democratsteve on 15-09-2005 at 00:31
Reason:
--------------------------------

Dat heet dan, IN YOUR FACE!
. [/size]

[size=1]Before any edits, post was:
--------------------------------

Dat heet dan, IN YOUR FACE!
Een uitdrukking die hem waarschijnlijk vreemd is. [/size]

[/edit]

[Pindar]

ivm 9/11, ik heb meermaals gezegt dat ik niet weet wat er juist op 9/11 is gebeurd. Vandaar dat ik vraag aan al degene die iets beweren wat hun bewijzen ervoor zijn. Ik kan er niets aan doen dat er van alle inside job beweringen niets bewezen is en dus gewoon onzin blijven.

[size=2][/size]
[size=2]Och ja, blijf maar dromen etc.

OF

Lees eens een erg goed boek hierover, maar je moet wel durven. want je wereldbeeld zal aan gruzelementen gegooid worden. Maar..so what. The truth will set you free....But first it will make you miserable






Kijk ook effe goed naar de ondertitel ervan!

Met vriendelijke groeten

Pindar















[/size]

[Calle]

http://zapatopi.net/afdb/

[exodus]

[size=4]Mystery surrounds floodwall breaches[/size]

Times Picayune | September 14 2005

Related: VIDEO: Earwitness tells ABC explosives blew Industrial Canal levee

Related: Locals, Officials Suggest Levees were Intentionally Blown

One of the central mysteries emerging in the Hurricane Katrina disaster is why concrete floodwalls in three canals breached during the storm, causing much of the catastrophic flooding, while earthen hurricane levees surrounding the city remained intact.

It probably will take months to investigate and make a conclusive determination about what happened, according to the Army Corps of Engineers. But two Louisiana State University scientists who have examined the breaches suggest that a structural flaw in the floodwalls might be to blame.

"Why did we have no hurricane levee failures but five separate places with floodwall failures?" asked Joseph Suhayda, a retired LSU coastal engineer who examined the breaches last week. "That suggests there may be something about floodwalls that makes them more susceptible to failure. Did (the storm) exceed design conditions? What were the conditions? What about the construction?"

Ivor Van Heerden, who uses computer models to study storm-surge dynamics for the LSU Hurricane Center, has said that fragmentary initial data indicate that Katrina's storm-surge heights in Lake Pontchartrain would not have been high enough to top the canal walls and that a "catastrophic structural failure" occurred in the floodwalls.

Corps project manager Al Naomi said that the Corps' working theory is that the floodwalls were well-constructed, but once topped they gave way after water scoured their interior sides, wearing away their earth-packed bases. But he said some other problem could have caused the breaches.

"They could have been overtopped. There could have been some structural failure. They could have been impacted by some type of debris," Naomi said. "I don't think it's right to make some type of judgment now. It's like presuming the reason for a plane crash without recovering the black box."

Officials long had warned about the danger of levees being topped by high water from a storm surge. Absent topping, floodwalls are supposed to remain intact.

The floodwalls lining New Orleans canals consist of concrete sections attached to steel sheet pile drilled deep into the earth, fortified by a concrete and earthen base. The sections are joined with a flexible, waterproof substance.

Floodwalls were breached in the 17th Street Canal, at two places in the London Avenue Canal, and at two places in the Industrial Canal, Suhayda said. Naomi said last week that one of the Industrial Canal breaches likely was caused by a loose barge that broke through it.

Suhayda said that his inspection of the debris from the 17th Street Canal breach suggests the wall simply gave way. "It looks to have been laterally pushed, not scoured in back with dirt being removed in pieces," he said. "You can see levee material, some distance pushed inside the floodwall area, like a bulldozer pushed it."

He suggested that because the walls failed in a few spots, the flaw may not be in the design but in the construction or materials.

"Those sections in the rest of the wall should have been subjected to the same forces as that section that failed," he said. "Why did one side fail, not the other side?"

Drainage canals typically are lined with floodwalls instead of the wider earthen levees that protect the lakefront because of a lack of space, engineers say.

"It's a right-of-way issue," Naomi said. "Usually, there are homes right up against the canal. You have to relocate five miles of homes (to build a levee), or you can build a floodwall."

Constructing a more expensive earthen levee also would require building farther out into the canal itself, reducing the size of the canal - and the volume of water it could handle.

Naomi said that an earthen levee also could have been breached if the surge had pushed water over the top. "A levee failure might be more gradual than with a floodwall," he said. "It means you may have flooded a little slower."

The central question for engineers investigating the breaches will be whether the floodwalls were topped - and that's still unclear.

The levee system, floodwalls included, is designed to protect against an average storm surge of 11.5 feet above sea level. The Corps adds several more feet of "freeboard" to account for waves and other dynamics.

Naomi said the Industrial Canal floodwalls were topped by water coming in from the east. But scientists don't yet know exactly whether Katrina's Lake Pontchartrain surge was high enough to go over the wall in the two other canals.

Many storm surge gauges stopped functioning during the storm, LSU climatologist Barry Keim, though initial data point to a mi-lake height of eight or nine feet. Heights typically are higher at the Lakefront area because wind pushes water higher against the levees.

Suhayda said the debris line on the lakefront levee adjacent to the canal was "several feet" below the top. The levees are 17 or 18 feet high in that area. The canal levees, however, average only 14 feet. Storm surges have waves and other dynamics that push water still higher than the average height.

"There are big implications for as little as a one-foot change in elevation" of the storm surge, Suhayda said.

If the water did not top the levees, the breaches could prove more mysterious. Typically, the pounding of wave action would be the most likely way to cause a breach, scientists say. But there isn't much wave action in canals.

"Waves constantly breaking on the structure start to erode it and make it become unstable," said LSU coastal geologist Greg Stone, who studies storm-surge dynamics. "But I don't think that was a major factor in the canals. You just don't have the (open area) to allow wave growth to occur."[edit]
[size=1]Edit:[/size]

[size=1]After edit by exodus on 15-09-2005 at 12:50
Reason:
--------------------------------

[size=4]Mystery surrounds floodwall breaches[/size]

Times Picayune | September 14 2005

Related: VIDEO: Earwitness tells ABC explosives blew Industrial Canal levee

Related: Locals, Officials Suggest Levees were Intentionally Blown

One of the central mysteries emerging in the Hurricane Katrina disaster is why concrete floodwalls in three canals breached during the storm, causing much of the catastrophic flooding, while earthen hurricane levees surrounding the city remained intact.

It probably will take months to investigate and make a conclusive determination about what happened, according to the Army Corps of Engineers. But two Louisiana State University scientists who have examined the breaches suggest that a structural flaw in the floodwalls might be to blame.

"Why did we have no hurricane levee failures but five separate places with floodwall failures?" asked Joseph Suhayda, a retired LSU coastal engineer who examined the breaches last week. "That suggests there may be something about floodwalls that makes them more susceptible to failure. Did (the storm) exceed design conditions? What were the conditions? What about the construction?"

Ivor Van Heerden, who uses computer models to study storm-surge dynamics for the LSU Hurricane Center, has said that fragmentary initial data indicate that Katrina's storm-surge heights in Lake Pontchartrain would not have been high enough to top the canal walls and that a "catastrophic structural failure" occurred in the floodwalls.

Corps project manager Al Naomi said that the Corps' working theory is that the floodwalls were well-constructed, but once topped they gave way after water scoured their interior sides, wearing away their earth-packed bases. But he said some other problem could have caused the breaches.

"They could have been overtopped. There could have been some structural failure. They could have been impacted by some type of debris," Naomi said. "I don't think it's right to make some type of judgment now. It's like presuming the reason for a plane crash without recovering the black box."

Officials long had warned about the danger of levees being topped by high water from a storm surge. Absent topping, floodwalls are supposed to remain intact.

The floodwalls lining New Orleans canals consist of concrete sections attached to steel sheet pile drilled deep into the earth, fortified by a concrete and earthen base. The sections are joined with a flexible, waterproof substance.

Floodwalls were breached in the 17th Street Canal, at two places in the London Avenue Canal, and at two places in the Industrial Canal, Suhayda said. Naomi said last week that one of the Industrial Canal breaches likely was caused by a loose barge that broke through it.

Suhayda said that his inspection of the debris from the 17th Street Canal breach suggests the wall simply gave way. "It looks to have been laterally pushed, not scoured in back with dirt being removed in pieces," he said. "You can see levee material, some distance pushed inside the floodwall area, like a bulldozer pushed it."

He suggested that because the walls failed in a few spots, the flaw may not be in the design but in the construction or materials.

"Those sections in the rest of the wall should have been subjected to the same forces as that section that failed," he said. "Why did one side fail, not the other side?"

Drainage canals typically are lined with floodwalls instead of the wider earthen levees that protect the lakefront because of a lack of space, engineers say.

"It's a right-of-way issue," Naomi said. "Usually, there are homes right up against the canal. You have to relocate five miles of homes (to build a levee), or you can build a floodwall."

Constructing a more expensive earthen levee also would require building farther out into the canal itself, reducing the size of the canal - and the volume of water it could handle.

Naomi said that an earthen levee also could have been breached if the surge had pushed water over the top. "A levee failure might be more gradual than with a floodwall," he said. "It means you may have flooded a little slower."

The central question for engineers investigating the breaches will be whether the floodwalls were topped - and that's still unclear.

The levee system, floodwalls included, is designed to protect against an average storm surge of 11.5 feet above sea level. The Corps adds several more feet of "freeboard" to account for waves and other dynamics.

Naomi said the Industrial Canal floodwalls were topped by water coming in from the east. But scientists don't yet know exactly whether Katrina's Lake Pontchartrain surge was high enough to go over the wall in the two other canals.

Many storm surge gauges stopped functioning during the storm, LSU climatologist Barry Keim, though initial data point to a mi-lake height of eight or nine feet. Heights typically are higher at the Lakefront area because wind pushes water higher against the levees.

Suhayda said the debris line on the lakefront levee adjacent to the canal was "several feet" below the top. The levees are 17 or 18 feet high in that area. The canal levees, however, average only 14 feet. Storm surges have waves and other dynamics that push water still higher than the average height.

"There are big implications for as little as a one-foot change in elevation" of the storm surge, Suhayda said.

If the water did not top the levees, the breaches could prove more mysterious. Typically, the pounding of wave action would be the most likely way to cause a breach, scientists say. But there isn't much wave action in canals.

"Waves constantly breaking on the structure start to erode it and make it become unstable," said LSU coastal geologist Greg Stone, who studies storm-surge dynamics. "But I don't think that was a major factor in the canals. You just don't have the (open area) to allow wave growth to occur."[/size]

[size=1]Before any edits, post was:
--------------------------------

Mystery surrounds floodwall breaches

Times Picayune | September 14 2005

Related: VIDEO: Earwitness tells ABC explosives blew Industrial Canal levee

Related: Locals, Officials Suggest Levees were Intentionally Blown

One of the central mysteries emerging in the Hurricane Katrina disaster is why concrete floodwalls in three canals breached during the storm, causing much of the catastrophic flooding, while earthen hurricane levees surrounding the city remained intact.

It probably will take months to investigate and make a conclusive determination about what happened, according to the Army Corps of Engineers. But two Louisiana State University scientists who have examined the breaches suggest that a structural flaw in the floodwalls might be to blame.

"Why did we have no hurricane levee failures but five separate places with floodwall failures?" asked Joseph Suhayda, a retired LSU coastal engineer who examined the breaches last week. "That suggests there may be something about floodwalls that makes them more susceptible to failure. Did (the storm) exceed design conditions? What were the conditions? What about the construction?"

Ivor Van Heerden, who uses computer models to study storm-surge dynamics for the LSU Hurricane Center, has said that fragmentary initial data indicate that Katrina's storm-surge heights in Lake Pontchartrain would not have been high enough to top the canal walls and that a "catastrophic structural failure" occurred in the floodwalls.

Corps project manager Al Naomi said that the Corps' working theory is that the floodwalls were well-constructed, but once topped they gave way after water scoured their interior sides, wearing away their earth-packed bases. But he said some other problem could have caused the breaches.

"They could have been overtopped. There could have been some structural failure. They could have been impacted by some type of debris," Naomi said. "I don't think it's right to make some type of judgment now. It's like presuming the reason for a plane crash without recovering the black box."

Officials long had warned about the danger of levees being topped by high water from a storm surge. Absent topping, floodwalls are supposed to remain intact.

The floodwalls lining New Orleans canals consist of concrete sections attached to steel sheet pile drilled deep into the earth, fortified by a concrete and earthen base. The sections are joined with a flexible, waterproof substance.

Floodwalls were breached in the 17th Street Canal, at two places in the London Avenue Canal, and at two places in the Industrial Canal, Suhayda said. Naomi said last week that one of the Industrial Canal breaches likely was caused by a loose barge that broke through it.

Suhayda said that his inspection of the debris from the 17th Street Canal breach suggests the wall simply gave way. "It looks to have been laterally pushed, not scoured in back with dirt being removed in pieces," he said. "You can see levee material, some distance pushed inside the floodwall area, like a bulldozer pushed it."

He suggested that because the walls failed in a few spots, the flaw may not be in the design but in the construction or materials.

"Those sections in the rest of the wall should have been subjected to the same forces as that section that failed," he said. "Why did one side fail, not the other side?"

Drainage canals typically are lined with floodwalls instead of the wider earthen levees that protect the lakefront because of a lack of space, engineers say.

"It's a right-of-way issue," Naomi said. "Usually, there are homes right up against the canal. You have to relocate five miles of homes (to build a levee), or you can build a floodwall."

Constructing a more expensive earthen levee also would require building farther out into the canal itself, reducing the size of the canal - and the volume of water it could handle.

Naomi said that an earthen levee also could have been breached if the surge had pushed water over the top. "A levee failure might be more gradual than with a floodwall," he said. "It means you may have flooded a little slower."

The central question for engineers investigating the breaches will be whether the floodwalls were topped - and that's still unclear.

The levee system, floodwalls included, is designed to protect against an average storm surge of 11.5 feet above sea level. The Corps adds several more feet of "freeboard" to account for waves and other dynamics.

Naomi said the Industrial Canal floodwalls were topped by water coming in from the east. But scientists don't yet know exactly whether Katrina's Lake Pontchartrain surge was high enough to go over the wall in the two other canals.

Many storm surge gauges stopped functioning during the storm, LSU climatologist Barry Keim, though initial data point to a mi-lake height of eight or nine feet. Heights typically are higher at the Lakefront area because wind pushes water higher against the levees.

Suhayda said the debris line on the lakefront levee adjacent to the canal was "several feet" below the top. The levees are 17 or 18 feet high in that area. The canal levees, however, average only 14 feet. Storm surges have waves and other dynamics that push water still higher than the average height.

"There are big implications for as little as a one-foot change in elevation" of the storm surge, Suhayda said.

If the water did not top the levees, the breaches could prove more mysterious. Typically, the pounding of wave action would be the most likely way to cause a breach, scientists say. But there isn't much wave action in canals.

"Waves constantly breaking on the structure start to erode it and make it become unstable," said LSU coastal geologist Greg Stone, who studies storm-surge dynamics. "But I don't think that was a major factor in the canals. You just don't have the (open area) to allow wave growth to occur."[/size]

[/edit]

[exodus]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Mephisto

It's NOT just you..

Is dat diezelfde madam weer, die gelooft dat ze is verkracht door zowel de paus, de Rockefellers als de Bush femmili?

Nee , dat is ze niet.

[Herr Flick]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Geertje

Geloof je die onzin nu werkelijk of ben je met ons voeten aan 't spelen ????

Als Bush en zijn vrienden morgen dictatortje willen spelen, dan doen ze dat toch gewoon, ...

ne coup d' etats, en ze doen wat ze willen ....


Denkte nu echt dat ze daar zo'n constructies voor gaan opzetten. ?

[Egidius]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Antoon

Hou op , ik kan het niet meer aan. Zo'n schaterlach...

Jij hebt er dus naar geluisterd.
Wil jij ons eens vertellen wat er zo grappig aan is? Helemaal te mooi zou natuurlijk zijn als je ook nog uitlegde waarom het geen bewijs is voor Exodus' theorie.

Egidius

[illwill]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Lex Blanca

Eigenlijk is "ons" probleem net het omgekeerde;nl. dat mensen juist wel zomaar geloven (bvb de officiele versie van 9/11-terwijl ongelooflijk veel ervan niet klopt en dat ondersteund wordt door ontelbare bijkomende onlogische onfrise zaakjes die in de andere richting wijzen) wat hen wordt voorgeschoteld.Jammergenoeg geloven ze wel zomaar de mainstream media (die voor geen meter te vertrouwen is en in handen van en slect clubje).

En wat heb ik daar mee te maken?
Ik weet niet wat er precies op 9/11 gebeurt is voor de zoveelste keer.
Dat ik de inside job verhalen niet slik zonder bewijzen wil daarom niet automatisch zeggen dat ik de officiele versie wel slik é. Dat jou vrienden die de inside job verhalen als enige waarheid beschouwen mij in dat hoekje duwen is niet mijn schuld.

[illwill]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Lex Blanca

Waarom reageer je op die manier op mijn post en niet op die van BigF?
Hij is degene die zegt tussen de lijnen in het rapport te lezen dat zijn frituuruitbater een nicht is en zo...
Dit is wat ik al aanhaalde....ertegenin gaan enkel omdat het van een believer komt.Beetje oneerlijk...geen goeie mentaliteit;ik denk dat je hier wel mee akkoord gaat...

Ik wilde eigenlijk ook op die van BigF reageren maar ik was effe te lui om de zijne op te zoeken om te citeren. Sorry, was dus niet rechtstreeks naar jou gericht.[edit]
[size=1]Edit:[/size]

[size=1]After edit by illwill on 15-09-2005 at 18:02
Reason:
--------------------------------

Ik wilde eigenlijk ook op die van BigF reageren maar ik was effe te lui om de zijne op te zoeken om te citeren. Sorry, was dus niet rechtstreeks naar jou gericht.[/size]

[size=1]Before any edits, post was:
--------------------------------

Ik wilde eigenlijk ook op die van reageren maar ik was effe te lui om de zijne op te zoeken om te citeren. Sorry, was dus niet rechtstreeks naar jou gericht.[/size]

[/edit]

[illwill]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Lex Blanca

En dit komt van de man die claimt geen beweringen te maken.Dit is er anders wel 1 die kan tellen.Zeker als je die niet kan staven.

Normaal doe ik ook niet van dergelijke beweringen, enkel wanneer mensen niet willen begrijpen dat zonder bewijzen het enkel maar beweringen blijven.
Begrijp je nu wat ik wil zeggen?
Waarom zou ik die bewering moeten staven indien anderen dit niet moeten? Ik probeer enkel maar duidelijk te maken dat het makelijk is om vanalles te roepen en dat er nog een groot verschil is om dat wat je roept ook nog aan te tonen.[edit]
[size=1]Edit:[/size]

[size=1]After edit by illwill on 15-09-2005 at 18:04
Reason:
--------------------------------

Normaal doe ik ook niet van dergelijke beweringen, enkel wanneer mensen niet willen begrijpen dat zonder bewijzen het enkel maar beweringen blijven.
Begrijp je nu wat ik wil zeggen?
Waarom zou ik die bewering moeten staven indien anderen dit niet moeten? Ik probeer enkel maar duidelijk te maken dat het makelijk is om vanalles te roepen en dat er nog een groot verschil is om dat wat je roept ook nog aan te tonen.[/size]

[size=1]Before any edits, post was:
--------------------------------

Normaal doe ik ook niet van dergelijke beweringen, enkel wanneer mensen niet willen begrijpen dat zonder bewijzen het enkel maar beweringen blijven.
Begrijp je nu wat ik wil zeggen?
Waarom zou ik die bewering moeten staven indien anderen dit niet moeten?[/size]

[/edit]

[illwill]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door democratsteve

Dat heet dan, IN YOUR FACE!
.

Heb je je negeerknopje nu nog niet gevonden?

[Lex Blanca]

over Democratsteve die reageerde op post van Lex Blanca:

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door illwill

Heb je je negeerknopje nu nog niet gevonden?

Democratsteve zou jou negeren,niet mij.

[illwill]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Lex Blanca

over Democratsteve die reageerde op post van Lex Blanca:


Democratsteve zou jou negeren,niet mij.

Via jou reageren naar mij toe vind ik niet negeren.
Och ja, wat maakt het ook uit.