Politics.be Registreren kan je hier.
Problemen met registreren of reageren op de berichten?
Een verloren wachtwoord?
Gelieve een mail te zenden naar [email protected] met vermelding van je gebruikersnaam.

Ga terug   Politics.be > Algemeen > Buitenland
Registreer FAQForumreglement Ledenlijst

Buitenland Internationale onderwerpen, de politiek van de Europese lidstaten, over de werking van Europa, Europese instellingen, ... politieke en maatschappelijke discussies.

Antwoord
 
Discussietools
Oud 23 maart 2004, 22:35   #1
filosoof
Banneling
 
 
filosoof's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 22 mei 2003
Locatie: Brussel
Berichten: 49.496
Standaard

Powell: Early Action Might Not Have Stopped 9/11
Tue Mar 23, 2004 02:51 PM ET


By Tabassum Zakaria
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Even if the United States had gone after al Qaeda before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks it might not have prevented them from taking place, Secretary of State Colin Powell told investigators on Tuesday.

In a defense of the administration's conduct before the attacks that killed 3,000 people, Powell also said top officials mistakenly believed the main danger from the militant network was against targets abroad.

Powell's comments before a national commission examining the attacks came amid a raging election-year debate over who can better protect Americans -- Republicans led by President Bush or their Democratic challengers.

He said the Bush administration determined early on to destroy al Qaeda but did not complete a strategy to carry out that decision until just days before the attacks.

"Most of us still thought that the principal threat was outside the country," Powell told the commission meeting in a hearing room at the U.S. Congress. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was to appear later in the day.

"Anything we might have done against al Qaeda in this period or against Osama bin Laden may or may not have had any influence on these people who were already in this country, already had their instructions, were already burrowed in and were getting ready to commit the crimes that we saw on 9/11," Powell said.

Separately, a commission report said the Clinton administration had four opportunities in the late 1990s to try to kill bin Laden, the al Qaeda leader, but held back -- for fear of killing innocent civilians or out of lack of confidence in the intelligence.

One CIA official told commission investigators a February 1999 sighting had presented a "lost opportunity to kill bin Laden before 9/11."

Powell's testimony followed a weekend bombshell by Richard Clarke, a former counterterrorism official for both President Bush and former President Bill Clinton, who said the Bush administration did not take the al Qaeda threat seriously before the attacks and then focused on trying to link the strikes to Iraq.

No such link has ever been made public, and many experts are skeptical that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein -- a strict secularist -- and the Islamic militants of bin Laden's al Qaeda organization would ever have worked together.

CLINTON DEFENDED

In prepared remarks, Powell's predecessor, Madeleine Albright, defended the Clinton administration's record on terrorism, and said that countering the terror threat was a top priority.

Albright said she and other members of the administration would have been prepared to kill bin Laden from the time of the 1998 U.S. Embassy bombings in Africa until the day Clinton left office.

An earlier report by commission staffers said the Bush administration had agreed on a plan one day before the attacks to combat bin Laden, which moved gradually from diplomatic pressure to military action.

The report, presented at the outset of the commission's hearings, was likely to raise more questions about Bush's election campaign assertion that he has done everything he could to protect the American people.

The report said a meeting of Bush administration officials on Sept. 10, 2001, agreed on a strategy that called first for dispatching an envoy to give the Taliban an opportunity to expel bin Laden and al Qaeda from Afghanistan.

If that failed, pressure would be applied on the Taliban through diplomacy and in the last resort the United States would seek to overthrow the Afghan rulers.

With Bush presenting himself as a "war president" for his actions against al Qaeda and his invasion of Iraq, national security has become a major issue in campaigns for the November presidential election.

Democrats say Bush gave the terrorism threat too little weight and focused too much on Iraq. Republicans say the Clinton administration did too little against the threat from al Qaeda, leaving it for Bush to deal with.

The White House has counterattacked against the allegations by Clarke and others, saying Bush recognized the al Qaeda threat and that his administration almost immediately began working on a strategy to eliminate bin Laden's network.

(Additional reporting by Saul Hudson)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

© Copyright Reuters 2004.
filosoof is offline   Met citaat antwoorden
Oud 24 maart 2004, 11:25   #2
Bakkebaard
Provinciaal Gedeputeerde
 
Bakkebaard's schermafbeelding
 
Geregistreerd: 14 december 2003
Locatie: België en niet het stomme Vlaanderen
Berichten: 845
Stuur een bericht via MSN naar Bakkebaard
Standaard

Das echt dikke zever e van Colin Powell van dat ze nog niet genoeg informatie verzamelt hadden in de vorige regering.
Bush was al een jaar aan de macht wanneer "11 september" plaatsvond.
Dus op een jaar tijd had de regering bush nog niks gedaan, ze steken het maar op Bill Clinton.
__________________
"1 op de 4 vlamingen is racist. Je mag fier zijn op uw vlaanderen"

Filip de Winter schreef :" de mensenrechten zijn valse schijnwaarden".
Er is geen enkele dictator in de wereld die dat mag zeggen. Niet in Azië,niet in Afrika,... nergens te wereld of hij zou veroordeeld worden. Hier stemt 1/4 van de mensen daarvoor, een echte schande.
Bakkebaard is offline   Met citaat antwoorden
Antwoord



Regels voor berichten
Je mag niet nieuwe discussies starten
Je mag niet reageren op berichten
Je mag niet bijlagen versturen
Je mag niet jouw berichten bewerken

vB-code is Aan
Smileys zijn Aan
[IMG]-code is Aan
HTML-code is Uit
Forumnavigatie


Alle tijden zijn GMT +1. Het is nu 13:46.


Forumsoftware: vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content copyright ©2002 - 2020, Politics.be