Historici: het 'homohuwelijk' is 600 jaar oude instelling

[C2C]

Public release date: 23-Aug-2007
[ Print Article | E-mail Article | Close Window ]

Contact: Suzanne Wu
[email protected]
773-834-0386
University of Chicago Press Journals


Are civil unions a 600-year-old tradition?

Sharing '1 bread, 1 wine, and 1 purse': The history of brotherment

A compelling new study from the September issue of the Journal of Modern History reviews historical evidence, including documents and gravesites, suggesting that homosexual civil unions may have existed six centuries ago in France. The article is the latest from the ongoing “Contemporary Issues in Historical Perspective” series, which explores the intersection between historical knowledge and current affairs.
Commonly used rationales in support of gay marriage and gay civil unions avoid historical arguments. However, as Allan A. Tulchin (Shippensburg University) reveals in his forthcoming article, a strong historical precedent exists for homosexual civil unions.
Opponents of gay marriage in the United States today have tended to assume that nuclear families have always been the standard household form. However, as Tulchin writes, “Western family structures have been much more varied than many people today seem to realize, and Western legal systems have in the past made provisions for a variety of household structures.”
For example, in late medieval France, the term affrèrement – roughly translated as brotherment – was used to refer to a certain type of legal contract, which also existed elsewhere in Mediterranean Europe. These documents provided the foundation for non-nuclear households of many types and shared many characteristics with marriage contracts, as legal writers at the time were well aware, according to Tulchin.
The new “brothers” pledged to live together sharing ‘un pain, un vin, et une bourse’ – one bread, one wine, and one purse. As Tulchin notes, “The model for these household arrangements is that of two or more brothers who have inherited the family home on an equal basis from their parents and who will continue to live together, just as they did when they were children.” But at the same time, “the affrèrement was not only for brothers,” since many other people, including relatives and non-relatives, used it.
The effects of entering into an affrèrement were profound. As Tulchin explains: “All of their goods usually became the joint property of both parties, and each commonly became the other’s legal heir. They also frequently testified that they entered into the contract because of their affection for one another. As with all contracts, affrèrements had to be sworn before a notary and required witnesses, commonly the friends of the affrèrés.”
Tulchin argues that in cases where the affrèrés were single unrelated men, these contracts provide “considerable evidence that the affrèrés were using affrèrements to formalize same-sex loving relationships. . . . I suspect that some of these relationships were sexual, while others may not have been. It is impossible to prove either way and probably also somewhat irrelevant to understanding their way of thinking. They loved each other, and the community accepted that. What followed did not produce any documents.”
He concludes: “The very existence of affrèrements shows that there was a radical shift in attitudes between the sixteenth century and the rise of modern antihomosexual legislation in the twentieth.”

###

Other articles in the “Contemporary Issues in Historical Perspective” series include explorations of fascism, genocide, and reparations.
The Journal of Modern History is recognized as the leading American journal for the study of European intellectual, social, political, and cultural history. The Journal’s geographical and temporal scope—the history of Europe since the Renaissance—makes it unique. JMH explores events and movements in specific countries, as well as broader questions that span particular times and places.
Allan Tulchin, “Same-Sex Couples Creating Households in Old Regime France: The Uses of the Affrèrement.” Journal of Modern History: September 2007.



---------------


Lijkt me toch niet onbelangrijk.

De zeden veranderen met de tijd, maar eeuwen geleden was er misschien toch meer redelijkheid dan vandaag.

Buitengewoon interessant om te zien hoe historici er in slagen clichés te doorbreken. Zo dachten sommigen dat het in de 15e eeuw technisch onmogelijk was om als 'atheist' in het leven te staan. Vandaag blijkt dat grote groepen mensen op zeer rationele basis kozen om de kerk af te vallen en niet terug naar een religie te keren. Dit alles lang vóór het tijdperk van de 'Verlichting'.

Alleszins, het homo-huwelijk is dus niks nieuws, niks revolutionairs.

[AdrianHealey]

In de 11de eeuw was er al een heel dialectische stroming die religie en filosofie scheidde.