VS: Ron Paul 2012

[the_dude]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door zonbron

Een overzicht.

meer dan dit zou een gezond denkende mens toch niet nodig hoeven te hebben om te beslissen wie interestgroups vertegenwoordigt en wie zijn kiezers?

[Wiley E Coyote]

't is natuurlijk makkelijk om categoriek neen tegen alles te zeggen... de wereld en beleid zijn echter niet zwart-wit: vaak is het immers ja, maar...

[the_dude]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Wiley E Coyote

't is natuurlijk makkelijk om categoriek neen tegen alles te zeggen... de wereld en beleid zijn echter niet zwart-wit: vaak is het immers ja, maar...

u bedoelt eigenlijk : het is duidelijk welke stappen nodig zijn naar een duurzame verdraagzame menswaardige maatschappij, ja, maar politici verdienen nu eenmaal veel meer dankzij hun special interestgroups.

[zonbron]

Ron Paul heeft de steun van minstens de helft van de afgevaardigden van Iowa en Minnesota op zak !

Policy Mic - [b]Ron Paul Won Iowa and Minnesota, In Fact



<sub>Now three people have won Iowa during this primary season. Last night, Ron Paul’s delegate finagling strategy paid off as he guaranteed himself at least half of the delegates in Iowa and Minnesota.

...</sub>

[zonbron]

Het gaat beter dan verwacht met Ron Paul...

whiteoutpress - Romney Nomination in doubt – Brokered Convention likely

<sub>April 24, 2012. Des Moines. Two networks yesterday, CNBC and MSNBC, broadcast a little known fact – Ron Paul appears to be winning the Republican nomination for President. When the popular Texas Congressman repeatedly assured supporters that the race was about delegates, not beauty contests, he apparently knew what he was talking about. Now, after three more states locked in delegates to the GOP nominating convention – CO, MN and IA – indicators point to a brokered convention with a possible, even probable, Ron Paul victory.

Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) appears to be piling up enough delegates to force a brokered convention.

Mitt Romney in a panic

...</sub>

[zonbron]

Wie & wat vertegenwoordigt een Amerikaans president vandaag de dag zoal ?

Amerikaanse presidenten, de 'Fortune 5000' & co

LAND DESTROYER - The Next US President Will Be....
April 26, 2012
....the Fortune 500. Why no matter who you vote for, nothing will ever change.
by Tony Cartalucci


<sub>April 26, 2012 - President George Bush, President Barack Obama, and presidential hopeful Mitt Romney all work for the exact same handful of corporate-financier interests. While they vary in how they dress up their methods of carrying out what is essentially a singular agenda, there is glaring continuity from one administration to the next in a process analogous to a corporate spokesman presenting the agenda of the board of directors. Changing spokesmen doesn't change the agenda of the board of directors.

While the corporate media focuses on non-issues, and political pundits accentuate petty political rivalries between the "left" and the "right," a look deeper into presidential cabinets and the authors of domestic and foreign policy reveals just how accurate this analogy is and who sits on the "board of directors."




Image: Professional spokesmen, representative not of the American people but of Fortune 500 multinational corporations and banks. Since the time of JP Morgan 100 years ago, the corporate-financier elite saw themselves as being above government, and national sovereignty as merely a regulatory obstacle they could lobby, bribe, and manipulate out of existence. In the past 100 years, the monied elite have gone from manipulating the presidency to now reducing the office to a public relations functionary of their collective interests.
....

George Bush's cabinet consisted of representatives from FedEx, Boeing, the Council on Foreign Relations, big-oil's Belfer Center at Harvard, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Circuit City, Verizon, Cerberus Capital Management, Goldman Sachs, and the RAND Corporation, among many others.





Image: The Henry Jackson Society is just one of many Neo-Conservative think-tanks, featuring many of the same people and of course, the same corporate sponsors. Each think-tank puts on a different public face and focuses on different areas of specialty despite harboring the same "experts" and corporate sponsors.
....

His foreign policy was overtly dictated by "Neo-Conservatives" including Richard Perle, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Jeane Kirkpatrick, Paul Wolfowitz, James Woolsey, Richard Armitage, Zalmay Khalilzad, Elliot Abrams, Frank Gaffney, Eliot Cohen, John Bolton, Robert Kagan, Francis Fukuyama, William Kristol, and Max Boot - all of whom hold memberships within a myriad of Fortune 500-funded think-tanks that to this day still direct US foreign policy - even under a "liberal" president. These include the Brookings Institution, the International Crisis Group, the Foreign Policy Initiative, the Henry Jackson Society, the Council on Foreign Relations, and many more.



Image: A visual representation of some of the Brookings Institution's corporate sponsors. Brookings is by no means an exception, but rather represents the incestuous relationship between US foreign and domestic policy making and the Fortune 500 found in every major "think-tank." Elected US representatives charged with legislative duties, merely rubber stamp the papers and policies drawn up in these think-tanks.
....

Obama's cabinet likewise features representatives from JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, the Council on Foreign Relations, Fortune 500 representatives Covington & Burling, Citi Group, Freedie Mac, and defense contractor Honeywell. Like Bush's cabinet, foreign policy is not penned by Obama sitting behind his desk in the Oval Office, but rather by the very same think-tanks that directed Bush's presidency including the Council on Foreign Relations, RAND Corporation, the Brookings Institute, the International Crisis Group, and the Chatham House. There are also a myriad of smaller groups consisting of many of the same members and corporate sponsors, but who specialize in certain areas of interest.



Image: A visual representation of current US President Barack Obama's cabinet's corporate-financier ties past and present. As can be plainly seen, many of the same corporate-financier interests represented in Obama's administration were also represented in Bush's administration.
....

And with Mitt Romney, the likely republican candidate running for president against Obama in 2012, we see already his foreign policy advisers, Michael Chertoff, Eliot Cohen, Paula Dobrainsky, Eric Edelman, and Robert Kagan, represent the exact same people and corporate-funded think-tanks devising strategy under both President Bush and President Obama.

While Presidents Bush and Obama attempted to portray the West's global military expansion as a series of spontaneous crises, in reality, since at least as early as 1991, the nations of Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Sudan, Somalia, and many others that previously fell under the Soviet Union's sphere of influence, were slated either for political destabilization and overthrow, or overt military intervention. While the public was fed various narratives explaining why Bush conducted two wars within the greater global "War on Terror," and why Obama eagerly expanded these wars while starting new ones in Libya and now Syria, in reality we are seeing "continuity of agenda," dictated by corporate-financier elite, rubber stamped by our elected representatives, and peddled to us by our "leaders," who in reality are nothing more than spokesmen for the collective interests of the Fortune 500.




Image: The International Crisis Group's corporate sponsors reveal a pattern of mega-multinationals intertwined with not only creating and directing US, and even European foreign policy, but in carrying it out. ICG trustee Kofi Annan is in Syria now carrying out a ploy to buy time for NATO-backed terrorists so they can be rearmed, reorganized, and redeployed against the Syrian government for another Western-backed attempt at regime change - all done under the guise of promoting "peace."
....

No matter who you vote for in 2012 - until we change the balance of power currently tipped in favor of the Fortune 500, fed daily by our money, time, energy, and attention, nothing will change but the rhetoric with which this singular agenda is sold to the public. Romney would continue exactly where Obama left off, just as Obama continued exactly where Bush left off. And even during the presidencies of Bill Clinton and Bush Sr., it was the same agenda meted out by the same corporate-financier interests that have been driving American, and increasingly Western destiny, since US Marine General Smedley Butler wrote "War is a Racket" in 1935.

A clear pattern should be apparent. The influence of corporate-financiers transcends more than presidencies, but contaminates all aspects of modern society including what is often called "non-governmental organizations" or NGOs. Modern NGOs are entirely funded and centrally directed by Fortune 500 corporations to carry their neo-imperial agenda to the four corners of the globe under the guise of the very best of intentions. The National Endowment for Democracy (NED), for instance, portends to be "supporting freedom around the world." A quick look at their board of directors reveals they are in fact drawn from big-oil, big-banking, and defense contracting boards of directors, Neo-Conservative warmongering think-tanks, corporate lobbyists, and US State Department functionaries, past and present.



Image: A visual representation of the National Endowment for Democracy's corporate-financier ties. It is not freedom they are interested in "supporting around the world," but rather the interests of the corporations and institutions their board of directors represents.
....

NED was central in funding, training, and directing mobs of protesters across the Arab World during the 2011 US-engeineered "Arab Spring," only to see US proxies put into power where these mobs successfully toppled governments or led to violence and foreign military intervention that successfully implemented regime change. Tunisia and Libya both have overt, long-time associates of the West now in power, while similar proxies are fighting to take power in Egypt as well as battling for control over Syria. It then becomes obvious that it is not "freedom" NED is supporting worldwide, but rather the corporate-financier hegemony of the Fortune 500.



Image: NED, Freedom House, and the US State Department don't just reflect the interests of the Fortune 500, they actively carry them out, many times using the resources and reach of these very interests to implement global policy. The Alliance for Youth Movements (AYM) starting in 2008 began recruiting, networking, training, funding, and equipping armies of "activists" from around the world to prepare for the "spontaneous" Arab Spring in 2011.
....

And the very shell organizations created to train NED's mobs, including the US State Department's Alliance for Youth Movements (AYM), was likewise funded by a myriad of Fortune 500 corporate-financier interests and attended and directed by representatives of these corporate interests.

The various business councils within the US Chamber of Commerce are also directed by the very same corporate interests directing both the US Presidency and carrying out their agenda through US-funded organizations like NED. The US-Qatar Business Council is one such example, whose representatives sit on the Washington D.C. based Middle East Policy Council alongside the UN's Karen Koning AbuZayd. AbuZayd was charged with compiling human rights reports in regards to Syria. Clearly she is the subject of a gross conflict of interests exposing yet again how US and even Western policy is not directed by presidents, prime ministers, or legislative branches, but rather by cadres of corporate-financiers and their representatives who have infiltrated every institution in Western society and even contrived a few of their own to perpetuate their agenda.




While there are a number of reasons to vote - including to simply write in the names of candidates to show dissatisfaction with the predetermined choices presented before us - we must recognize that voting alone will not change anything. And as the Occupy Wall Street movement has taught us, while our leaders demand nations like Libya and Syria allow their people to roam the streets armed and terrorizing the population, they have no intention of allowing even peaceful protests to take place back at home.

The solution is to identify and undermine the very source of power driving these world-spanning corporate-financier interests. One needs not travel further in search of this source of power than their own bathroom mirror. It is we the people, who on a daily basis, feed this monolithic corporate-financier machine of domination, exploitation, and destruction. And we need not do more than simply withdraw the time, money, energy, and attention we pay into this machine on a daily basis. We can begin by eliminating from our lives entirely the unnecessary amenities we purchase from this machine. This includes junk-food like that peddled by Pepsi Co., Coca-Cola, and the mega-chain restaurants, cafes, and fast food outlets spanning the world.

We can then begin devising local alternatives to replace these amenities, and eventually the necessities. We need not live a life of austerity or of want in the wake of deciding to boycott entirely the Fortune 500. We can leverage education, technology, and ingenuity to devise alternatives that not only match, but exceed the quality and comfort provided to us by these mega-multinationals.

While the system wants you to vote in their elections, you would be better served to instead vote with your wallet, time, energy, and attention. Don't be drawn into the establishment's circular debates, distractions, and especially the charade of predetermined elections. Regardless of who wins, Obama or Romney, the Fortune 500 will have a professional spokesman to present their collective agenda to the public under the guise of "democracy." America, and the West in general, is run by the Fortune 500, they were your last president or prime minister, they will be your next president or prime minister.

^{If this dissatisfies you - boycott them and put them out of business.}</sub>

Toch vergeet Tony nog een belangrijk puntje, "No Taxation Without Representation" .
(Tja, krijg je heden problemen met het IRS, kan je de V.S. niet meer verlaten. )

Verder... Gelukkigluk moeten we in "ons Europa" geen president, etc... kiezen.

[zonbron]

[Munglik]

Wat heb je toch een Joden-fixatie.

[zonbron]

Romney veliest delegates aan... Ron Paul.

Boston - State GOP’s caucus picks leave Romney slate slighted

[zonbron]

Het GOP wil Ron Paul stoppen !

policymic - Ron Paul Will Win Nevada, and the GOP Wants to Stop Him

<sub>In a shockingly brazen power trip, the national GOP has sent a threatening letter to Nevada Republicans demanding that they show support for former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney at their state convention this weekend.

The Nevada Republican Convention is the highest legislative body of the state's Republican Party and the desultory letter seeks to challenge that autonomy. In the letter, Republican National Committee Chief Counsel John R. Phillipe, Jr., introduces a new way of thinking that entitles former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney to, in essence, veto the election of delegates that he is unhappy with. The text of the letter can be read HERE (PDF).</sub>

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Munglik

Wat heb je toch een Joden-fixatie.

Nee mijn beste, ik toon gewoonweg aan dat het volgende leugens en smeercampagnes zijn.

lmgtfy

[Johnny Blaze]

Ik zie hem nog winnen, alhoewel ik hier toen nee gestemd heb. Stel u voor, mijn vertrouwen in de mensheid zou terug een beetje hersteld zijn.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=347BJLhZkE4

[Johan Bollen]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Johnny Blaze

Ik zie hem nog winnen, alhoewel ik hier toen nee gestemd heb. Stel u voor, mijn vertrouwen in de mensheid zou terug een beetje hersteld zijn.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=347BJLhZkE4

Mijn ook. Maar ik verwacht eerder dat de GOP fraude pleegt dan Ron Paul aan de macht te laten. De corporaties zwaaien de plak in de VS niet het volk.

[Johnny Blaze]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Johan Bollen

Mijn ook. Maar ik verwacht eerder dat de GOP fraude pleegt dan Ron Paul aan de macht te laten. De corporaties zwaaien de plak in de VS niet het volk.

Er zijn ondertussen al een hoop louche zaken aan het licht gekomen, zoals je ook in het filmpje wat ik heb gepost kunt zien. Nu, voor big banking is Paul een absolute ramp, dus we kunnen alleen maar hopen dat hij zijn kans krijgt. Wie weet waait er dan ook iets over naar hier.

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Johnny Blaze

Ik zie hem nog winnen, alhoewel ik hier toen nee gestemd heb. Stel u voor, mijn vertrouwen in de mensheid zou terug een beetje hersteld zijn.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=347BJLhZkE4

Mooie samenvatting.

[zonbron]

Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Johnny Blaze

Er zijn ondertussen al een hoop louche zaken aan het licht gekomen, zoals je ook in het filmpje wat ik heb gepost kunt zien. Nu, voor big banking is Paul een absolute ramp, dus we kunnen alleen maar hopen dat hij zijn kans krijgt. Wie weet waait er dan ook iets over naar hier.

Nog even geduld, het kan nog spannend worden.

Indien de GOP het toelaat, moge RP de nominatie bekomen, dan moet hij nog steeds verkozen worden.

Minder goed nieuws zou volgend addertje onder het gras zijn...

DAILYPAUL - Spanish Company Associated w/Geo. Soros Will “Count” America's Votes Overseas In November


<sub>From The Western Center for Journalism in a piece entitled, "Spanish Company Will 'Count' American Votes Overseas In November,' they state the following in this excerpt:

"When the Spanish online voting company SCYTL bought the largest vote processing corporation in the United States, it also acquired the means of manufacturing the outcome of the 2012 election. For SOE, the Tampa based corporation purchased by SCYTL in January, supplies the election software which records, counts, and reports the votes of Americans in 26 states–900 total jurisdictions–across the nation. ..." Find the rest of the article @ http://www.westernjournalism.com/spa...ny-will-count-...

And if that doesn't make you squirm, George Soros is closely associated w/one of Obama's biggest contributors who, himself, is involved with SCYTL, the company that is going to count the votes!! Keep reading.

"Those who cast the votes decide nothing. 
Those who count the votes decide everything." -- 
Joseph Stalin

...</sub>

[zonbron]

Ongezien : Het RNC blokkeert Ron Paul (delegate accion) afgevaardigden in Nevada !
Het RNC wil geen massale Ron Paul beweging in Nevada.

Video Ron Paul is winning ! RNC Preempts Ron Paul Win in Nevada, Threatens to Shut Delegates Down
Bekijk vanaf 1.40 tot 5.00

[zonbron]

Meer : Het RNC bedreigt NV GOP !

Las Vegas Sun - RNC to NV GOP: Don’t let Ron Paul delegates take over national convention slots or don’t bother coming to Tampa

[zonbron]

*** NIEUWS - UPDATE ***

Team Romney speelt een uiterst vuil spel... Ze deelden oa. valse stembiljetten uit in Nevada en Maine !!!

Romney Operatives Caught Handing Out Fake Ballots In Nevada AND Maine + VIDEO !!!
Attempts to divide and disrupt official Ron Paul delegate slates; Romney sends in lawyer that stole election for Bush in 2000

[zonbron]

De meeste mensen beseffen nog steeds niet hoe groot Ron Paul is.

Video - Fox News: Ron Paul is much bigger than people know