![]() |
Registreren kan je hier. Problemen met registreren of reageren op de berichten? Een verloren wachtwoord? Gelieve een mail te zenden naar [email protected] met vermelding van je gebruikersnaam. |
|
Registreer | FAQ | Forumreglement | Ledenlijst |
Binnenland Onderwerpen omtrent de binnenlandse politiek kunnen hier terecht. Let er wel op dat dit subforum enkel over dergelijk algemene zaken gaat die niet thuishoren in de themafora. |
![]() |
|
Discussietools |
![]() |
#161 | |
Banneling
Geregistreerd: 28 oktober 2006
Berichten: 40.545
|
![]() Citaat:
Laatst gewijzigd door system : 20 april 2007 om 18:20. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#162 | |
Banneling
Geregistreerd: 28 oktober 2006
Berichten: 40.545
|
![]() Citaat:
Alleen, de vlucht van het koningshuis naar Engeland kan ik niet zo goed plaatsen. Maar misschien heb ik iets gemist. Laatst gewijzigd door system : 20 april 2007 om 18:09. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#163 | |
Vreemdeling
Geregistreerd: 20 juli 2006
Berichten: 61
|
![]() [quote=ericferemans;2618457]
Citaat:
![]() Kom eens wat meer buiten, het zonnetje zal u goed doen. Als een bende allochtonen een blank meisje verkracht "omdat dat mag van de Koran" is dat geen racisme volgens u? Als honderden Turken een paar tiental Koerden willen te lijf gaan omdat ze terecht protesteren tegen de vernieling van hun buurthuis, hoe noem je dat? Hoe noem je de moord op drie paters in Turkije die zich bezighouden met het drukken van een Bijbel? Wat met de groepsverkrachtingen van blanke meisjes in Mälmo, Oslo, Kopenhagen, Brussel etc.? Waarom werden er enkel voertuigen van blanken in brand gestoken tijdens de opstand van islamieten in Frankrijk? Waarom verhuizen de Joden uit Frankrijk naar Amerika en Israël? Wat met de Deense 'Cartoon-rellen'? Wat met Guido Demoor, Glen Wijnants, Patrich Mombaerts etc.? En waarom al die aanvallen tegen homo's van Noorwegen tot het tipje van Italië (door islamieten)? Waarom staat er praktisch geen kerk meer recht in Kosovo? Hoe zit het met de bende-oorlogen tussen negers in London en hier bij ons? Is dat ook de schuld van Dewinter? Waarom staken onze openbare diensten om de haverklap? Omdat ze belaagd, bestolen, beschimpt en bespuwt worden door wie? Door wie word de Parijse, Londense en Brusselse metro onveilig gemaakt? Ik kan hier nog een paar uur doorgaan hoor... Maar deze feiten zijn voor u waarschijnlijk niet echt belangrijk he, belangrijker is dat Dewinter zijn politieke rechten voor 10 jaar verliest natuurlijk. PS: ik ben uw "vriendschap" of "schat" niet. Hou je manieren maar, ik weet dat het moeilijk is voor u, maar doe een poging.
__________________
Si vis pacem para bellum. La guerre juste n'existe pas et n'existera nulle part. Dans la guerre il ne s'agit pas d' avoir raison éthiquement mais physiquement. G. Faye |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#164 |
Perm. Vertegenwoordiger VN
Geregistreerd: 14 februari 2007
Berichten: 19.593
|
![]() Die lessen over de holocaust zijn een goed idee, stel je voor dat we het zouden vergeten.
Men zou het alle dagen daarover moeten hebben op televisie, radio, alle dag en weekbladen. Oh wacht... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#165 | ||||||||
Perm. Vertegenwoordiger VN
Geregistreerd: 25 april 2005
Berichten: 12.883
|
![]() Citaat:
Citaat:
![]() Citaat:
![]() Citaat:
Citaat:
![]() Citaat:
Citaat:
Citaat:
|
||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#166 |
Banneling
Geregistreerd: 28 oktober 2006
Berichten: 40.545
|
![]() Waarop moeten we dan wachten?
Laatst gewijzigd door system : 20 april 2007 om 18:52. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#167 |
Perm. Vertegenwoordiger VN
Geregistreerd: 14 februari 2007
Berichten: 19.593
|
![]() Kies maar iets, maakt niet uit.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#168 | |
Vreemdeling
Geregistreerd: 20 juli 2006
Berichten: 61
|
![]() Citaat:
__________________
Si vis pacem para bellum. La guerre juste n'existe pas et n'existera nulle part. Dans la guerre il ne s'agit pas d' avoir raison éthiquement mais physiquement. G. Faye |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#169 | |
Partijlid
Geregistreerd: 22 augustus 2005
Berichten: 250
|
![]() Citaat:
En waarom ook niet 'De brave soldaat Schweik' op het toneel voeren... of was dat in de first war? Ach, maakt allemaal niks uit, Dolf liep toen ook al rond, al was het maar als korporaal... Trouwens, ik wist niet dat de führer ook een zangcarrière gestart was. Blijkbaar is dat ook nooit echt van de grond gekomen... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMsaM...related&search= |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#170 |
Banneling
Geregistreerd: 22 mei 2003
Locatie: Brussel
Berichten: 49.496
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#171 |
Eur. Commissievoorzitter
Geregistreerd: 19 augustus 2005
Locatie: Ekeren
Berichten: 8.149
|
![]() wil dat dan zeggen dat er ook geleerd zal worden over hoe precies dolf aan de macht is gekomen?
__________________
"Het is de gelovige die, niet het geloof dat bescherming nodig heeft. Mensen hebben mensenrechten, religies, geloven en ideeën hebben die niet.'' |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#172 | |
Eur. Commissievoorzitter
Geregistreerd: 9 november 2006
Berichten: 8.593
|
![]() Citaat:
Ten gronde: lessen over WOII bestaan natuurlijk al bijzonder lang en de holocaust maakt daar deel van uit. Als men dat extra wil belichten, geen bezwaar, zeker niet wat de rol van de Belgische collaborerende overheid betreft. Persoonlijk zou ik in het lessenpakket meer aandacht besteden aan het verzet dat duizenden Joden uit de naziklauwen heeft gered. Uit die geschiedenis leer je namelijk dat individuele morele verantwoordelijkheid op het juiste moment, je niet neerleggen bij een overmacht of de bevelen van de overheid niet alleen mensenlevens kan redden maar jaren na datum ook volstrekt gelegitimeerd kan worden. Je (ook militair) tegen de overheid verzetten kan dus niet alleen correct maar ook noodzakelijk zijn. Een belangrijke les voor jonge mensen!
__________________
• نريد ثورة- • we want revolution •
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#173 |
Minister-President
Geregistreerd: 21 mei 2004
Berichten: 5.047
|
![]() Mij goed dat er lessen over WOII komen, maar lessen over de Belgische genocide in de Congo zijn nog van meer nut, daar dit enkel een Belgische aangelegenheid was. Een grondige kijk op de wandaden van de Belgische staat en koningshuis zou volgens mij van groot nut zijn voor de jeugd. De Duitsers hebben miljoenen mensen de dood ingejaagd, maar de Belgen moeten zeker niet onderdoen.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#174 | |
Secretaris-Generaal VN
Geregistreerd: 26 augustus 2004
Berichten: 47.771
|
![]() Citaat:
Zeet juist. Hoe het nu zit weet ik niet, maar toen ik nog school liep werd alles in een positief daglicht gesteld, van handen afkappen of moorden werd nooit iets gezegd. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#175 | |
Banneling
Geregistreerd: 18 februari 2006
Locatie: 2000
Berichten: 21.703
|
![]() Citaat:
Trouwens weeral een eigenaardige redenering: eindtermen die niet hard kunnen gemaakt worden (enfin, op uw school dan toch), en dan de lat nog hoger leggen. Zodat er nog meer onderdoor gelopen kan worden. Echt slim moet ge niet zijn, maar misschien was die leraar logica dezelfde als diegene die uw geschiedenis kennis op zijn geweten heeft. Laatst gewijzigd door born2bewild : 21 april 2007 om 02:18. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#176 |
Banneling
Geregistreerd: 17 april 2007
Berichten: 193
|
![]() Erg dat de jeugd het Congo verleden niet
kent maar veel volwassenen hebben nog nooit van Benjamin Freedman gehoord. Vuile was van elk land buiten hangen? Ook die van de Zionisten? http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...jamin+Freedman http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBr..._Freedman.html A Jewish Defector Warns America Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century. Mr. Freedman, born in 1890, was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City who was at one time the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States. Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times. This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley's patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense. Though in some minor ways this wide- ranging and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman's essential message to us - his warning to the West - is more urgent than ever before. - K.A.S. In 1946 he founded the League for Peace and Justice in Palestine. Arnold Forster, a high official of the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith or ADL, in his 1988 autobiography Square One, called Benjamin Freedman an affluent, apostate, self- hating Jew. The magazine Commentary (published by the American Jewish Committee) for February, 1955, referred to him as Jewish anti-Semite Benjamin Freedman. Freedman himself stated in 1954: "The word anti-Semitism is another word which should be eliminated from the English language. [The word] anti-Semitism serves only one purpose today. It is used as a smear word. When so-called or self- styled Jews feel that anyone opposes any of their objectives they discredit their victims by applying the word anti-Semite or anti-Semitic through all the channels they have at their command and under their control. I can speak with great authority on that subject. Because so-called or self-styled Jews were unable to disprove my public statements in 1946 with regard to the situation in Palestine, they spent millions of dollars to smear me as an anti-Semite hoping thereby to discredit me in the eyes of the public who were very much interested in what I had to say. Until 1946 I was a little saint to all so -called or self-styled Jews. When I disagreed with them publicly on the Zionist intentions in Palestine I became suddenly Anti-Semite No. 1." Zionists Rule the US Here in the United States, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government. For many reasons, too many and too complex to go into here at this time, the Zionists and their co-religionists rule these United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country. Now you may say that is a very broad statement, but let me show you what happened while we were all asleep. [Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents] The First World War. What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey. Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean. Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week's food supply and after that, starvation. At that time, the French army had mutinied. They had lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting, they were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed. Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, Germany was offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: "Let's call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started." England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that - seriously. They had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated. [Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents] Stalemate in 1916. Zionists Offer to get USA into the War While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and (I am going to be brief because it's a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make) they said: "Look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally." The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful. They told England: "We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war." In other words, they made this deal: "We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey." Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain, that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war.* However, they did make that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly after that (I don't know how many here remember it) the United States, which was almost totally pro-German, entered the war as Britain's ally. * Benjamin Freedman obviously did not know that the British peoples are the true Israel whose land it is. Even so, they had no right to give it to the Zionists whose land it is not, even though it was prophesied by Ezekiel that the Zionists would do this and succeed - 11:15 Son of man, thy brethren, [even] thy brethren, the men of thy kindred, and all the House of Israel wholly, [are] they unto whom the inhabitants of Jerusalem have said, Get you far from the "I AM": unto us is this land given in possession (Idumean zionists - 1948). I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews; and they, the Jews, were pro-German. They were pro-German because many of them had come from Germany, and also they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar. The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war. These German-Jew bankers, like Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: "As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!" But they poured money into Germany, they fought beside Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime. Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like a traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the newspapers had been all pro- German, where they'd been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies' hands. They were no good. Shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany. [Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents] USA Railroaded into World War I after Balfour Declaration The Zionists in London had sent cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis, saying "Go to work on President Wilson. We're getting from England what we want. Now you go to work on President Wilson and get the United States into the war." That's how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room. There was absolutely no reason for World War I to be our war. We were railroaded into (if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into) that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. That is something that the people of the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War I. After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: "Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war." They didn't know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, which was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration. The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. I don't think I could make it more emphatic than that. [Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents] Versailles That is where all the trouble started. The United States got in the war. The United States crushed Germany. You know what happened. When the war ended, and the Germans went to Paris for the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought to know. Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, said, "How about Palestine for us?" And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized, "Oh, so that was the game! That's why the United States came into the war." The Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered the terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine* and were determined to get it at any cost. * Without Adolf Hitler, who was half Jewish and his Jewish generals, there would be no Zionist State in Israel . Why was Rudolf (Walter Richard) Hess (1894- 1987), who was Adolf Hitler's second-in- command, kept incommunicado in Spandau Prison until his death in 1987, after parachuting into Scotland to seek peace in 1941? Even the prison guards were not allowed to speak to him. What did he know that had to be kept so secret and made him seem so dangerous? Was the formation of the Zionist State the REAL reason for WW2? Was that what Hess knew? [Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents] Effect on Germans when they understood Jewish Activity That brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany. You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr. Balin, [Albert Ballin-RW] who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd's and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers - the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. The Germans felt: "Well, that was quite a sellout." It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical situation: Suppose the United States was at war with the Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union: "Well, let's quit. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the whole thing." And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union. And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat.* A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man's imagination cannot encompass.! Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we had thought were loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us. How would we feel, then, in the United States against Chinese? I don't think that one of them would dare show his face on any street. There wouldn't be enough convenient lampposts to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel. * Ironically, as is prophesied to happen both by George Washington's Vision (see end of article) and the Holy Scriptures. Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. They'd been so nice to them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they had sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than the fact that they wanted Palestine* as a so- called "Jewish commonwealth." * Ezekiel 11:15 Son of man, thy brethren, [even] thy brethren, the men of thy kindred, and all the House of Israel wholly, [are] they unto whom the inhabitants of Jerusalem have said, Get you far from the "I AM": unto us is this land given in possession (Idumean zionists - 1948). Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you read about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, and 1923 wrote in all their papers (and the press was filled with their statements) that the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by Jewish intercession in bringing the United States into the war. The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling. There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious belief. It was all political. It was economic. It was anything but religious. Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said "Shema' Yisroel" or "Our Father." Nobody cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to one thing: the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat (and the reparations, which ruined and crippled Germany financially). [Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents] Freedman says World War I was started against Germany And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for which Germany was responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade. You must remember that Germany at the time of the French Revolution consisted of 300 small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth. Three hundred separate little political entities. And between that time, between the times of Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state. And within 50 years they became one of the world's great powers. Their navy was rivaling Great Britain's, they were doing business all over the world, they could undersell anybody, they could make better products. What happened as a result of that? There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to slap down Germany. There isn't one historian in the world who can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map politically. [Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents] German Camps in 1933 When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew whom Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so- called camps of political prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very fine condition. They were in excellent shape, with everybody treated well. And they were filled with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had international affiliations. [Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents] Germans fought Jewish Control Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over Bavaria for a few days. Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of other Jews took over the government for three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war he fled to Holland because he thought the Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia and that he was going to meet the same fate as the Czar. So he fled to Holland for safety, for security. After the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to get back into their former status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could without hurting a single hair on anyone's head. They fought them the same way that, in this country, the Prohibitionists fought anyone who was interested in liquor. They didn't fight one another with pistols. Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans, and there were only 460,000 Jews. About one half of one per cent of the population of Germany were Jews. And yet they controlled all the press, and they controlled most of the economy because they had come in with cheap money when the mark was devalued and bought up practically everything. The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn't want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that. The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews. They, shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could. They shunned them. The same way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat. [Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents] 1933: Jews Declare Sacred War (and Trade War) on Germany After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world attended this meeting in July 1933. And they said to Germany: "You fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist or no matter what he was. You can't treat us that way. And we, the Jews of the world, are serving an ultimatum upon you." You can imagine what the Germans told them. So what did the Jews do? In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of Jews in Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer, who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference, came to the United States and went from the steamer to the studios of the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he in effect said, "The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business." And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to starve. There was just not enough food for more than one third of the population. Now in this declaration, which I have here, and which was printed in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that "this economic boycott is our means of self- defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the National Recovery Administration," which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless he followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, and which was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of that time. Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn't find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words "made in Germany" on it. In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted if anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in Germany," they were picketed with signs saying "Hitler," "murderer," and so forth, something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South. At a store belonging to the R. H. Macy chain, which was controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews, a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked "made in Germany." Well, they were cotton stockings and they may have been there 20 years, since I've been observing women's legs for many years and it's been a long time since I've seen any cotton stockings on them. I saw Macy's boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying "murderers," "Hitlerites," and so forth. Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing. Naturally, the Germans said, "Who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and make our industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?" They naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews. Why should a German go in and give his money to a storekeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve Germany into surrendering to the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous. [Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents] Reichskristallnacht and Rearmament The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn't until 1938, when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot a German official, that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth. Now I don't like to use the word "anti- Semitism" because it's meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I'll have to use it. The only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible for World War I and for this world-wide boycott. Ultimately they were also responsible for World War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive. In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided that Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in between. And the Germans decided they were going to keep it Christian if possible. And they started to re-arm. In November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that "Our turn was going to come soon, unless we are strong." The same as we in this country are saying today, "Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong." Our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars for defense. Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other countries of the world. [Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents] 1961: Nuclear War? For Israel? For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT. Our nuclear bombs had a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT, when they were first developed. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have. What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. Why might such a war take place? It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III. The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co- religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. That is just as true as I am standing here. Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and it is known all over the world. [Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents] Secrecy (e.g. 1916 Zionist deal with USA) can happen again What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's. Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you don't know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it at that time? Not a person in the United States knew it. You weren't permitted to know it. Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other insiders knew it. Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there. I was "confidential man" to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the finance committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson's brain the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement. Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand. President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby. That is how they got us into World War I, while we all slept. They sent our boys over there to be slaughtered. For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as their "commonwealth." They've fooled you so much that you don't know whether you're coming or going. Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness who you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony." I don't know what state you come from, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness told one lie, disregard his testimony. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#177 |
Vreemdeling
Geregistreerd: 20 juli 2006
Berichten: 61
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Si vis pacem para bellum. La guerre juste n'existe pas et n'existera nulle part. Dans la guerre il ne s'agit pas d' avoir raison éthiquement mais physiquement. G. Faye |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#178 |
Banneling
Geregistreerd: 28 oktober 2006
Berichten: 40.545
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#179 |
Secretaris-Generaal VN
Geregistreerd: 27 juni 2005
Berichten: 42.814
|
![]() Er is vooral iets mis met de rol van diegenen die eender welke oorlog beginnen.
__________________
Born but to die, and reas'ning but to err. (Pope)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#180 |
Minister-President
Geregistreerd: 14 mei 2004
Locatie: 't stad
Berichten: 4.282
|
![]() Wat in die lessen dan vooral naar voren gebracht zou moeten worden, is dat het de zigeuners zijn die het meest hebben afgezien en gedood als bevolkingsgroep en niet de joden.
maar dat wordt wordt graag verzwegen. past niet in het in het slachtofferplaatje van sommigen. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |